Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 January 26

< January 25	January 27 >

January 26 edit

Template:Nuneaton Town F.C. squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:08, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nuneaton Town F.C. squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No wikilinks, so does not aid navigation. JMHamo (talk) 22:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No prejudice toward it being restored if it becomes populated with wikilinks. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Delete as not a navbox. Fenix down (talk) 09:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 18:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 18:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:400 Test wickets club edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:400 Test wickets club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is completely redundant in that it is a subset of Template:Bowlers who have taken 300 or more wickets in Test cricket. The benchmark achievement is indeed 300 wickets, as our article List of bowlers who have taken 300 or more wickets in Test cricket (a featured list) clearly demonstrates. St Anselm (talk) 19:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Entirely doubles up on subject matter. Cavalryman V31 (talk) 20:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Harrias ^talk 09:55, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. GreenCricket^TALK 07:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Article Feedback Tool templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 6. Primefac (talk) 04:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Leave feedback (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Feedback editintro (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Feedback preload (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Feedback page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Has feedback page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

See Wikipedia:Article Feedback Tool: "AFT5 was removed from all Wikimedia wikis on March 3, 2014." Therefore, no need for these templates to be left on pages. See Category:Wikipedia feedback pages for pages that use it and see wasted posts made there in the last 30 days. Anything related to AFT is wasting time of any newbie who thinks it is still used. There are probably more useless pages related to AFT if anyone wants to weed them out. Rgrds. --64.85.216.192 (talk) 15:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Czech Republic winners in the Grand Slam pageants edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 6. Primefac (talk) 04:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miss Czech Republic winners in the Grand Slam pageants (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Miss Colombia winners in the Grand Slam pageants (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Miss Dominican Republic winners in the Grand Slam pageants (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Miss Ecuador winners in the Grand Slam pageants (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Miss Panamá winners in the Grand Slam pageants (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. This template, and four others to be bundled with this discussion, link a total of two articles. Suggest delete and propose later recreation when more can be done here. C 679 13:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not needed clutter. Legacypac (talk) 09:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bassets edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 6. Primefac (talk) 04:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bassets (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All dogs covered in this template are already covered in Template:Hounds, Template:Pastoral dogs or Template:Terriers along with their national breed templates (Template:British dogs, Template:French dogs and Template:German dogs etc). Cavalryman V31 (talk) 10:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bradford City W.F.C. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 6. Primefac (talk) 04:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bradford City W.F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in the main article in a bunch of drafts for the seasons. Nothing but red links here. If there's a belief that the drafts are notable enough to mainspace then this could be useful. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:58, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No useful purpose. Can be recreated if required in the future. JMHamo (talk) 17:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).