Prehistoricplanes
Welcome edit
|
Regarding your plesiosaur collage, we at Paleoart review are wondering where exactly you got those images from to ensure they’re all in the public domain User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 17:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Machairodus kabir edit
Excuse me, but where did you get your evidence that determined that Amphimachairodus kabir was a species belonging to the genus Machairodus? You left no sources or explanations as to why the species was reclassified. It's important to cite sources if you make such a change to an article.Saberrex-Strongheart (talk) 21:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- It now belongs to the genus Adeilosmilus Patachonica. (talk) 19:26, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Machairodus and Machairodontini edit
After researching your edits to Machairodus, Amphimachairodus and Machairodontini, I was forced to undo your revisions or place them in proper articles. Amphimachairodus and Machairodus are distinct from one another, and your switching of species between the two genera was inaccurate and was lacking any credible evidence. Furthermore, your edit saying Machairodus survived until the Pleistocene Epoch was inaccurate and had no basis in fact. It should also be noted that Amphimachairodus is a member of Homotherini, and not Machairodontini. Please cite sources that are more accurate and up-to-date for future reference.Saberrex-Strongheart (talk) 10:50, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Oudated sources edit
Please cease modifying the pages regarding Machairodus and Machairodontini with outdated information. The references you keep citing have been disproven by more recent discoveries and remain woefully outdated. Furthermore, there is no evidence present to suggest machairodontini and especially Machairodus have been found in Pleistocene deposits. Your sources date back to 2005 and are inaccurate in light of new discoveries, which prove "M. kabir" is a member of the genus Amphimachairodus, specifically the book Sabertooth by paleoartist Mauricio Anton, with whom I further confirmed the reclassification via personal conversation alongside artist and paleontologist Velizar Simeonovski.Saberrex-Strongheart (talk) 16:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
December 2019 edit
Please refrain from making major edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Amphibian, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a major change. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Picture of amphibia edit
Hello I would like to know why you remove my image which was filled with many species of amphibians while your classic image puts a reptiliomorphic amphibian
Changes to taxonomy templates edit
Please don't make changes to taxonomy templates like Template:Taxonomy/Saurischia without first seeking consensus at the appropriate WikiProject (in this case WT:WikiProject Dinosaurs) and also supplying a reference. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- There is a discussion regarding your recent (disruptive) activities with changing taxoboxes going on here. Be aware that continuing such actions without garnering or blatantly ignoring community consensus could result in a temporary ban. User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 03:35, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- You are still doing it. Discuss here first please! Changing taxonomy templates high in the classification hierarchy affects many articles and requires consensus. WP:BRD applies: you were bold, you were reverted, now you must discuss. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:07, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 14:36, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Why you change rang classifiction edit
Why for the Therapsida taxon you go from order to clade? -Prehistoricplanes
- If you want to say something about your edits, say it here User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 21:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
December 2019 edit
Hello, I'm Anaxial. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Template:Taxonomy/Eupelycosauria have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Please obtain consensus before making changes to templates that affect multiple pages. Anaxial (talk) 15:14, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Chordata. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 22:19, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Prehistoricplanes: Serious questions regarding your edits have been raised at the administrators' noticeboard here. It is essential that you respond there to explain how you will avoid problems in the future. Please do that before continuing with other edits because an indefinite block is being considered. Johnuniq (talk) 08:42, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Inostrancevia, you may be blocked from editing. Anaxial (talk) 21:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 01:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Prehistoricplanes: I explained at 08:42, 26 December 2019 just above that you needed to respond to explain how the problems described at ANI would be avoided in the future. Yet at 20:23, 27 December 2019 you made a similar edit to change the taxobox at Inostrancevia. That is clearly against the consensus of editors shown at WT:WikiProject Dinosaurs#New editor changing ranks in taxonomy templates (permalink)—that is the first link in the ANI report. A diff at ANI shows "that Prehistoricplanes is not able to communicate effectively in English" and repeatedly making contentious edits that are not discussed is disruptive and cannot be continued. The ANI report is here (permalink). Johnuniq (talk) 01:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Unblocking request edit
Prehistoricplanes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Get banned just because I have some that were left in other page and those by other user is the definition of hypocrisy ... But in short I understood in relation to the taxa Therapsida and Saurichia in as a clade because it brings together the current descendants (Mammalia and Aves). Can I get my unlock if I stop controversial type changes?
Decline reason:
No, it is not sufficient just to agree to stop making controversial type changes. You need to demonstrate why these were problematic, and you need to explain how you'll resolve disputes in the future. You'll also need to explain how WP:RS and WP:CITE apply. Yamla (talk) 13:10, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Prehistoricplanes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Basically, I was banned from Wikipedia in English because I made page modifications called "inacepptable" for taxonomic classifications. (ex: class Synapsida or Order Saurichia or Therapsida) So I would like to answer a question: We agree that the Batracomorpha and the Reptilimorpha are tetrapods supposed not to belong to the biological class of Amphibia. So how is it that when I search on Wikipedia in English the page concerning these Oh! Seymouria, a reptiliomorph! So for me here is the phylogenetic classification that I have to see in Wikipedia in English:
- Superclass : Tetrapoda
- Class : Amphibia
- Clade : Batrachomorpha
- Various extinct clade
- Order : † Temnospondyli (paraphyletic)
- Subclass : Lissamphibia
- Subclass : †Reptiliomorpha (paraphyletic)
- infraclass : † Lepospondyli
- Super-order/Clade :Anthracosauria (paraphyletic)
- Clade: Amniota
- Class/Clade : Sauropsida
- Class/Clade : Synapsida
- Class : Amphibia
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:06, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is not an unblock request. Please reread WP:GAB. I very, very strongly suggest you remove the above request, as you are in danger of having your talk page access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 13:50, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Prehistoricplanes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello again, here are my reasons for why I should be unlocked: *1) I was blocked after tens of adding images that I created (see the montages on the pages Chordata, Vertebrata, Gnathostomata, Condrichthyes, Osteichthyes, Sarcopterygii, Stegocephalia, Amniota, Synapsida, Eupelycosauria, Sphenacodontoidea, Therapsida, Machairodontinae) specially for certain articles and again I plan to do several later if I have time. *2) I was also blocked because I moved taxonomic ranks on Wiki in English (for example by moving Therapsida as an Order and not as a clade because when we hear the word therapid we have the famous mammalian reptiles ) *3) I have been passionate about paleontology, cinema and aeronautics for a long time and it is a shame that you banish because of a conflict of ideas (which I finally accept under certain conditions).
Decline reason:
Decline request as stale. As you have lost access to this page, you will need to use WP:UTRS for further appeals. 331dot (talk) 11:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I explained the reason for the block at "01:18, 28 December 2019" above (diff). Johnuniq (talk) 08:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Declined unblock requests edit
You are not permitted to remove or edit declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Please do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 20:59, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Request for changes for certain pages edit
For non-mammalian representatives, all the synapsids group Caseasauria and Eupelycosauria need this classification
|rank=clade
|link=Eupelycosauria
|parent=Synapsida/Class
|extinct=
|always_display=yes
Talk page reinstated edit
This user's talk page access has been reinstated as they plan to make an unblock request. They know not to modify or remove declined unblock requests and they know their unblock request must address the problems that lead to their original block and must list all accounts they have used to evade their block. If they use the talk page for anything else, if they modify or remove a declined unblock request, or if they fail to list all accounts they have used, their talk page access will be revoked immediately. -- Yamla (talk) 10:29, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- User should also address their attempt to evade their block just last month, over at User talk:Amirani1746. They were already well aware that asking others to edit for them wasn't allowed. --Yamla (talk) 10:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC)