User talk:Praxidicae/Archive 23

Archive 20

Archive 21

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

→

Archive 29

Article: Ranveer Allahbadia

Greetings. I see that you nominated the page mentioned above for speedy deletion, however this should not be the case as there are plenty of relevant references that allow for notability. The individual is a famous youtuber, AND has the number 1 podcast in Spotify India.... Number 1. According to you, if this doesn't warrant an article, what does? Kindly remove the nomination for deletion as it is very clearly out of order. Best regards.

No, I won't be removing it. TAXIDICAE💰 19:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Why? The references are quite relevant, and so is the article. This is disruptive editing on your behalf.

The references are, for lack of a better word, garbage. They are not independent or in depth coverage. This isn't disruptive editing. This is a normal Wikipedia process. It was deleted after a discussion and it's a raging advertisement. TAXIDICAE💰 19:24, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

According to you the following are "Garbage": -Forbes India -The Times of India -Hindustan Times -Republic World I did not create a previous version of the article, but if this gets deleted I will be truly shocked.--The inquisitive reader (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Forbes is a contributor piece, RW is deprecated per WP:RSP, The TOI article is garbage and vanity spam, and TOI is not considered to be truly reliable and HT is a piece written by him. Next. TAXIDICAE💰 19:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Brexit Edits

Hi Praxidicae, I noticed you removed our edits to the Brexit site concerning potential Russian interference for being "not remotely neutral." Could you please explain your reasoning? I would argue that CSIS is a reputable source. Any insight would be much appreciated!

Thanks, McAdamsFanClub (talk) 18:34, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

AD Maddox

Hello, I am not a paid contributor to AD Maddox (A.D. Maddox). Yodielay (talk) 18:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Flat Earth

Hello, Praxidicae,

When you are correcting a bad move or vandalism, could you please leave a redirect? When the bad move happens, the bots change all of the redirects to point to the wrong page. If you leave a redirect when you correct the move, then the bots can change back all of the redirects back to the correct location. Without a redirect, then all of the changes have to be reverted manually (see User:AnomieBOT III/Broken redirects). If one of our patrolling editors doesn't correct the redirects listed on the broken redirect page, then AnomieBOT III will just delete them. Leaving a redirect after a bad move is really only essential for popular articles where there might be dozens of redirects directed to them. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Moved SuperRare back to draft.

Hey the article for SuperRare has sources from Forbes, Time Magazine, Fortune Magazine, Yahoo Finance, and HypeBeast. I am working on adding more sources right now but I just figured I would let you know why I do believe it meets the Wiki criteria for being an article and that is the only reason I moved it. I will keep updating it and once I reach 8-11 sources I will update you and see if you think it is ready for review. Thank you for the update. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mildlycake (talk • contribs) 16:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Forbes is a contributor piece and Yahoo is a press release, the rest aren't in depth coverage. TAXIDICAE💰 16:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

After reviewing the guidelines and updating the article I believe it is ready for review. However, you stated that the rest are not "in-depth" coverage leading me to believe you did not read them but the Wiki guidlines institute that, "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." I also reviewed Wiki Reliable sources page and it mentioned nothing about contributor sources being unreliable. Therefore, I do not believe the fact that the Forbes article being written by a contributor matters in terms of creditability because a FORBES editor still has to approve the article before it is published on their site. Please review the draft again and if you still believe it is not credible then I suggest you read the wiki guidelines and provide me with an in depth review as to what issues you have found. Keep in mind that the guidelines also state, "There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected." Mildlycake (talk) 18:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Please read WP:FORBESCON. There is no evidence that the writer is an SME. TAXIDICAE💰 18:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Stop with your childish Editing Warring

Or you will be reported. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cambridge2354 (talk • contribs)

Please do feel free to report me, it'll get you blocked even faster since you're doing nothing but vandalizing while evading an active block for edit warring on hte exact article you're disrupting. TAXIDICAE💰 18:18, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

AKL

Dear praxidicae and BawinV,

While reverting back edits made by the unknown IP addr in the AKL, it is seen that the older version of the page is being restored and real updates made by BawinV, and me ( Added new ref, updates for OMP and Loner Music videos ) are lost in the process. Can both of you please review the version made @ 00:25 on May 1. If found to be satisfactory, can we please get back those changes. Appreciate your help.

Thank you so much Adapongaiya (talk) 16:07, 1 May 2021 (UTC).

Roe v Wade release year

• Citation 1: Quote: "After years of controversy and strife on set, Roe v. Wade is finally headed for release Friday, April 2" (meaning 2021)
• Citations 2 and 3: Quote: "Loeb, 45, said in a statement that 'the judge was clearly influenced by Hollywood, which is a pattern I expose in my upcoming film Roe v. Wade on April 2." (meaning 2021)

I can cite other sources:

• Salt Lake City Weekly: https://www.cityweekly.net/BuzzBlog/archives/2021/04/01/movie-reviews-new-releases-for-march-31-april-2
• South Florida Sun-Sentinel: https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/fl-ne-roe-v-wade-movie-south-florida-ties-20210402-u5hthvu2vrcivmwtxliqc2eafm-story.html
• Catholic News Service: https://catholicphilly.com/2021/03/culture/the-arduous-birth-pangs-of-roe-v-wade/

So, there. I have reliable sources that say April 2, 2021. I have the filmmaker saying April 2, 2021. What do YOU have that says the film year is 2020? I have reliable sources. You don't. Put it back. -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 16:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

It was released at the VIFF. Go discuss it on the article talk page and get consensus, not mine. TAXIDICAE💰 16:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Citation or it didn't happen. It was screened there. Not released. Got a reliable source saying otherwise? -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 16:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

ShinmaWa, this isn't going to continue to be discussed here. You've been reverted by two different editors. Go take it to the talk page where I've already opened a discussion. TAXIDICAE💰 16:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

You reverted multiple reliable sources to hold up something that doesn't have any sources at all. I'm quite comfortable talking to you directly about that. -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 16:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Shinmawa I will ask you one more time - this is not the place to discuss a content dispute. Go discuss it on the talk page. TAXIDICAE💰 16:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Email, talk page, whatever

Figured if any tps were around they could also look. There is something odd about the prose in Draft:Eric Dubois; it feels like a machine translation or something but I cannot put my finger on it. Refs are all in French but I haven't gone through and translated any myself yet (too tired). Primefac (talk) 01:08, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

About Deletion of page CONSEQUENCE KARMA

Please let me know how can I make a page with no objections and consequently deletion... Because I tried to make the page as un-biased as possible...

The guidelines provided by Wikipedia are so complexly written that a simple person like me is unable to follow them I guess... Because I made the page by checking out some other pages of similar topics and wrote the things as much similar to them as possible. Still it was deleted.

Please give me an example, and I'll follow that to the point to make the article Wikipedia would allow to put on.

Thanks & regards

Please see our general notability guideline and on promotion. Judging from the speedy deletion message it looks like you came here simply to promote whichever business or service you're hawking, which is not what Wikipedia is for. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:08, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Tigray Defence Forces

I have worked on the Draft:Tigray Defence Forces. Would you see it and possibly lift out of "draft" status? Rastakwere (talk) 10:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hi @Rastakwere: - You're probably want to put this draft through WP:AFC - look at the section "Submitting for review". Looking at your specific article, I think it would be better worked into Tigray War as a section rather than being a discrete article. -- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 11:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

both odisha fc and delhi dynamos fc are different clubs. so fixing this. making sure both clubs have separate pages. past as delhi and present as odisha

both odisha fc and delhi dynamos fc are different clubs. so fixing this. making sure both clubs have separate pages. past as delhi and present as odisha Imsamrat392 (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Stop, all you're doing is making a mess. Grogudicae👽 16:28, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Move reverted

Sorry for the move of that page; took WP:BOLD too far, it's reverted now at Doping in Russia. --Chelston-temp-1 (talk) 15:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Please undo the rest as well, you mass moved 40+ pages with no clear consensus and many are just ridiculously long and unnecessary moves. YODADICAE👽 15:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Still going? At least one copy and paste move in there as well. Does BOLD even apply to page moves? Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 15:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Moving Truck it in back to Articlespace

An article you recently moved to draftspace, Truck it in, is very suitable to be in Articlespace, though we can categorized it as WP:STUB. It's having citations from reliable, independent sources. I'm moving Truck it in back to Truck it in as all referenced sources are reliable & independent. And Article is fully compliant with general notability guideline. If you still have any problem, please discuss before moving Article to draftspace. Thank you... HelloPak (talk) 16:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

"2007 Trolley Square shooting, Salt Lake City" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2007 Trolley Square shooting, Salt Lake City. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 6#2007 Trolley Square shooting, Salt Lake City until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Guidance on AfD and related content

Apologies for moving Gagandeep Reehal article back to mainspace. I was relatively new to Wikipedia so wasn't aware of AfD policies. Kindly guide me on what all can be improved on that article. Mrexcoder (talk) 17:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Would you tutor me?

Hello Praxidicae, would like to know if you would consider tutoring me by any chance? So i don't commit the sames mistakes and previously warned by you before. I love editing and contributing, hopefully i can do better!

Thanks in advance, Best Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdmBrasil (talk • contribs) 21:13, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Re:May2021

Hi Praxidicae, I guess you're referring to Mohammed Orfli's page, which as you correctly stated I was asked to write by someone working for Mr Orfli (and I'm already regretting this as they, very unprofessionally, stated he is a famous person in Saudi Arabia, but now I see that they can provide only a few references and hence infer he is actually not and this will result in me appearing in a bad light). I shouldn't have published his page before getting the full set of references I was promised (I was urged to publish it before Monday, I guess they needed it for some reason) and, looking at its current state, it can be deleted with no doubt if he actually does not meet notability standards. Regarding the conflict of interest, I was not aware of the policy you mentioned (not an excuse, I know and I'm sorry for not having read it earlier) and of course I'm willing to fully comply with Wikipedia's rules. For full disclosure, this is the second time I write on commission: the first one was years ago for Investors Mutual Limited. Can you please help me sort this out? Thanks in advance!--Aethelfirth (talk) 09:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Do NOT let that person drive you away

For one thing, I want to see what June's signature is. For another, they can usually be safely ignored unless they are talking about categories. They're too well liked for their category work to do anything about their incessant rudeness, but ignoring works really well. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:13, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Normally I would just ignore her and move on but someone being allowed to run amok and denigrate editors with long established history (not just myself!) as trolls and intentionally disruptive is just too far for me to deal with and is a point I've made elsewhere. Do categories really need that much work that we're willing to let something of this nature slide? Wasting editor time to attempt to enforce some antiquated non-policy that doesn't actual exist is infuriating, more so when this is part of a pattern of truly chronic incivility. Not to mention the fact that some of the most respected editors including arbcom members, crats and the like are effectively being called trolls, WP:NOTHERE, etc...because of course, everyone else is wrong and has been for years. YODADICAE👽 16:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

I've been a target before; my desire to have redlinked categories on my userpage was clear evidence I was part of the large group of people who don't give a shit about Wikipedia. Because I've been a previous target, I would be too involved to block her from that page for personal attacks. Either too involved, or too chickenshit to deal with the AN/ANI thread that would follow. But if it helps, you are certainly in the right and they are certainly in the wrong, at least as far as this Floquentroll is concerned. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Here's a preview of my June signature: Plain old Praxidicae, whimsy free, lest ye be yeeted into the sun by the fun police or does that not count since that's not my username? 🤔 YODADICAE👽 16:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Aw, not solidicae/solstidicae? --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

(Talk page enjoyer) I personally know people they've driven away from the project over one of their previous cleanup projects (remember portalistas?) Some people take this site too seriously, and not in a good way. Elli (talk | contribs) 10:51, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

My apologies for dragging you into this. I found it too hard to talk about people's suggested rules without more concrete examples. —Kusma (Кузьма · कुस्मा · 𐌺) 08:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

I am increasingly infuriated by their uncivil, unrealistic, out of control and gaslighting attitude. They're not an admin but seem to act like one. I hope reason breaks out of all this because consensus seems to be against their demands that the entirely of Wikipedia must respect their expectations. I refuse to communicate with them. doktorb _words^deeds 09:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

A year and a half ago this behaviour reached Arbcom: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals. —Kusma (Кузьма · कुस्मा · 𐌺) 10:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

@Doktorbuk: admins shouldn't act like that either - they were desysopped by arbcom for cause. Elli (talk | contribs) 00:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

• The real dilemma of Praxidicae taking a break is the global impact it has on enabling spamming and undisclosed paid editing. I think we can safely say there would always be the “unblockables” no matter how egregious their actions. Again, Indicative of the cracks in the “wall” that needs fixing. Celestina007 (talk) 16:46, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Draft

Can you please move my article to a draftspace until I am done with it? I know you moved my page Girl in the Basement to a draftspace, can you please do the same with Roblox Piggy until I am done with it? Thanks. PedigreeWWEFigz87V2 (talk) 12:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) PedigreeWWEFigz87V2,  Done by Bbb23. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 16:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Malerooster (talk) 15:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

GIADA (brand) edit reversions

You continue to revert edits to this page and your last summary says that you have "explained extensively why this silly pr campaign doesn't belong", but you haven't explained. I posted on the page's talk page in an effort to understand why edits about the brand's history, ie - photographers worked with, iconic brand designs and new business ventures with good sourcing are considered spam, other similar pages have this type of content. You have not engaged there, you just revert the edits. Instead of calling these edits spam, please let me know how I can add content to this page. Thank you! Ecity97 (talk) 19:26, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

This is your dear friend checking in

Dearest Praxie <3,

I wanted to check in things are good with you, family, friends (including Drmies, TonyBallioni (T.Baloney), GeneralNotability).

Your biggest fan, --Ι2.Ι5.7.76 (talk) 20:07, 4 June 2021 (UTC) (Arturo)

How was your second shot? <3 BEACHIDICAE🌊 20:07, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

2nd shot was fantastic! I feel like air travel again for summer holiday! Glad to hear your voice dear friend! ❤ --Ι2.Ι5.7.76 (talk) 20:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I'm so glad. Stay safe and enjoy returning to "normal", my dear friend. <3 BEACHIDICAE🌊 20:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Hmm you're already traveling, no? Drmies (talk) 20:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Rajasthan United FC page deletion review request

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae&oldid=1012967141#Deletion_of_Rajasthan_United_FC

hey this was the talk we held to review the deletion request, but that was turned down.

As this club now has well established presence, i managed to get some reference links if you look these and review your decision. links are as follows: 1. https://footballindia.co.in/jecrc-fc-rebrands-to-rajasthan-united-fc/ 2. https://footballindia.co.in/rajasthan-united-fc-set-up-residential-academy/ 3. http://www.arunfoot.com/rajasthan-united-fc-launch-their-residential-academy/ 4. https://www.falconebiz.com/company/RUFC-SPORTS-PRIVATE-LIMITED-U92410RJ2021PTC073870

hope you will look into this and review your actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vplpoonia (talk • contribs) 13:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Nijat Rahimov (actor)

Hello, if you could copy the article to the draft page, I would make new sources and additions. The person is one of the famous actors of Azerbaijan.

https://www.kinopoisk.ru/name/4030527/ https://kino.fm/ru/name/nijat-rahimov https://www.kinofilms.ua/star/2543735/ https://ru.kinorium.com/name/3560857/ The link here has the main roles in 5 films. I think if we correctly indicate each source on the article page, we can improve it even more. If it is restored i can start working on the draft page.--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 11:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Munawar Faruqui for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Munawar Faruqui is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munawar Faruqui (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Thryduulf (talk) 20:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Cangan Stele Speedy Deletion

I was unable to contest the speedy deletion of Cangan Stele as I was asleep at the time. I do not understand what was the issue for the content. What portion of the article allegedly came from that source? They are in different languages so that does lend some confusion, I would like to remake that article but don't want the same problem to happen again. SiliconProphet (talk) 20:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

It was a word for word machine translated copy of the article. BEACHIDICAE🌊 20:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Can you check this article? https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%81%B8%E7%9C%9E%E5%AF%BA%E8%A8%98 and can you give suggestions on this draft? Draft:Cangnan_Stele Did the block quote of the stele contents perhaps trigger an automatic system?

Contributed to the written record of Shilang Jiande, Kong Kebiao, who was born in Jinshi Dunwu school lieutenant Wenzhou Road Pingyang Prefecture judge Yanjing Sun Zhuan'e

Seventy li south of Pingyang Guo, there are mountains called Pengshan, Zeng Luan, long back hug, rivers, forests and magnificent forests, the Peng family lived there forever. More than three hundred steps from the Northwest Road, where the Peng family lived, there is a palace in the first district. The list is called "Xuanxu Temple", which was built by the predecessor of the Soviet neighboring countries and the Peng family. Therefore, the system is simple, people or conspicuous. Peng Jun, like the mountain, said: "Temple, the creation of my ancestors. It is not enough to show the integrity of Fuhong. I am fortunate not to follow the legacy of the ancestors. I will make you like each other. My ancestors have the knowledge, and will not mourn his ambitions to be inherited underground." Deyu responded: "Promise! Dare to live together." I denounced the old site, to the woods. Stone, gather the group art to attack it. In the Hall of Chongfo, there are three gates, and the columns are left and right. All establishments, Xianchang bottom method. Nothing, Deyu Ji shishi, Jun Yiyan. Then he said: "My wife is dead, how can I do everything?" Then he worked with materials and used money to perfection. There is a hall for performances, a house for apprentices, a room for food and a living room, and even a kitchen, well, library, etc., which are all genitals. The houses are like dry trees, and they are wide and open, depending on the beginning of the year. He then said: "Hey! The creation of the army, I am afraid of the Fuke of the first aspiration, not benefiting Fukuda's interests. I am fortunate to have succeeded, but the spirit of the ancestors is not good enough! "So the east of the temple was used as a shrine to worship the gods; and the land was cut like dry acres, and the gold was given to sacrifices, and the other people who entrusted it to win and fill the temple cost Yan. Those who follow the virtues of the jade and are the same as those of success, the king's Sun Wenfu, Wenming, Wending, Wen Chong, Wen Zhenye. In the spring of this year, civilization came to Taoism to build temples, and solicited essays. Alas! The world is like a grandchild, and it is difficult to keep the grandfather's deeds! It can be polished and magnificent, and it can be achieved by a thousand and a hundred and one or two. Can you do your best to build and broadcast more than anything? Jin Guanjun was in the battle of building the temple, and if the first aspirations of Shaoyang were to do this, then the prosperity of his career can be known. It enjoys longevity, it is good! Yu Jiaqi's filial piety is not forgotten, so it is the achievement of Ji Jiansi, and the beauty of the king won the book because of the link. The monarch's name Renweng is like a mountain with its own words. This year is actually eleven years old, and it will be recorded on February 15th.

Deleting Draft Changes

Can you stop deleting my draft edits? You can literally do anything once I publish it for review, stop touching it when I'm writing. You literally have some problem with me contributing on Wikipedia.

Also, I need your response on the MARMO's Talk Page, have you researched about it yet? Or get another mods who are aware of the topic to review it if you can't. You are not allowed to delete that page with your own opinion.

You're clearly not having a fair environment with editors. Review the both pages (Guz Hardy & J Like and MARMO (musician) as soon as possible. D3FAULTX8 (talk) 07:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

I already reviewed it and that is why it’s at AFD. PRAXIDICAE🌈 10:34, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

sorry

Sorry Sir I don't know about chandan madan banned article his is my mistake I very sorry please sir forgive me Drewdramfir (talk) 11:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

• I think I managed to clean most of this mess up; let me know if I missed anything.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:59, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

"NO"

"NO" is a perfectly valid reason for editors like you. You can't continue to revert editors without a valid reason or you might be blocked. ภץאคгöร 20:14, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Ironic coming from someone who has been engaging in a slow burning edit war on a highly controversial article for 3 days. Feel free to report me if you think I've edit warred. BEACHIDICAE🌊 20:15, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Also based on your block log and comments in edit summaries and here, you should rethink your approach before you wind up indefinitely blocked for chronic incivility and your strange battleground behavior. BEACHIDICAE🌊 20:18, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Incivility? I definitely presented a more formal writing and a valid reason than your edit summary. Where did that "incivility" come from? Are you going to prolong your false accusations by telling me about a block from 2 years ago? Everyone is free to report anything, you know. Stay within your limits. It looks like I've more knowledge on the topic unlike you as I can understand the language and I've read the source. You shouldn't disrupt the article without even reading it first. And "no", it was on 6 June only, and was a different topic. Your comments make you look suspicious in addition to your incivil edit summary. I'm not the one who brushed somebody off, and that's why I'm not going to contact you again. ภץאคгöร 20:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Any further accusations about my behavior should be backed up with a diff at WP:ANI. Otherwise, goodbye. BEACHIDICAE🌊 20:44, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Do you think people like this (not this one specific case; this approach is not rare) honestly believe they are clearly 100% in the right, and you are clearly 100% in the wrong? And that any dispassionate observer would immediately agree? Or are they generally just playing a "best defense is an over-the-top offense" game, and figure it's worth a shot? The way they're playing it, even if they'd been right, they'd have been wrong, if you know what I mean. Puzzling. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

He who shouts the loudest gets heard? Primefac (talk) 14:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

I think maybe they've seen aggressive approaches work, and think that's how it's done? —valereee (talk) 22:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Pride-idicae?

) Love the new signature! Bkissin (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Same :) Looks good Praxidicae. doktorb _words^deeds 21:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep them coming! Pawnkingthree (talk) 21:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

+1 —valereee (talk) 22:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

+ another 1. Your creativity reminds me of a page-a-day calendar - or in your case page-a-week :-) I look forward to the next one and enjoy being able to flip back to previous delights. Thanks Praxidicae. MarnetteD|Talk 22:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

how can i fix this article

I see this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Izzat_Dajani how I can fix this draft to be accepted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kouider bounama (talk • contribs) 09:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Matthew Gordon-Banks

I just want to say, a big Thank YOU for dealing with (yet another) "psycho-warrior" on 1st June trying to change my bio.

I have already had to endure changes from the likes of Moist Towlett, NomedA etc whom are part of the UK security services and have long deleted the major parts of my career.

These people now make up stories of a very nasty nature pure and simple because I support in a quiet way better dialogue between UK/Russia and US/Russia.

Thank you again for stopping further serious defamation. MGB 2A00:23A8:983:6D01:7909:63A8:F375:7FCF (talk) 02:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Request

If you have time can you look into the editing of Special:Contributions/Kendalandrew? Something about it worries me. What I can make out is that the account's focus seems to be to write extensive prose, often via original research and dubious sources, on Russian involvement in British politics, including their page creations (see first revisions of them before my/others' removals, example). That alone is concerning but since it's BLP territory I think it needs a closer look from someone experienced. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Unresolved issues at ANI

Hi. Please see this thread at ANI that you have been involved in. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Mrs Hinch - you tagged for speedy deletion

Could you explain what aspect of the Mrs Hinch page you perceive as "clearly promotional"? To me it simply reads as a summary of the available facts, and I've meticulously referenced everything listed on the page. I found a draft and made it live, adding to it, because I looked for information about her on Wikipedia and was shocked that such a major figure had no article. The idea that I'm somehow interested in promoting her is quite bizarre to me because the whole thing arose simply because I knew nothing about her and was surprised I could find no information on Wikipedia.

To be honest I think this reeks of the elitist attitude of many Wikipedia editors and their belief that some subjects are inherently more valid than others. You seem to think a page about a social media influencer is too low brow to merit inclusion on Wikipedia, despite her being a major public figure and author of bestselling books. I'm not sure why you think this is not a valid subject for a Wikipedia article. Suttonpubcrawl (talk) 13:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Are you not going to address this or provide any explanation for your edits? They seem to me to border on Wikipedia vandalism. They are certainly intensely America centric. Suttonpubcrawl (talk) 16:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Accusing someone of vandalism is a personal attack. I explained clearly in my edit summaries which you've reverted while logged out and in violation of the giant notice that says you may not remove the tag. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Accusing me of editing while logged out is also a personal attack, as well as being false. You provided absolutely no explanation of how the page could be considered purely promotional, and obviously you couldn't provide such an explanation, because it wasn't. I don't even understand how you could have reached that utterly bizarre conclusion in the first place. Fortunately someone else with some sense has now confirmed that you were wrong. Suttonpubcrawl (talk) 06:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The No Spam Barnstar
	For your works against spam and being a source of inspiration to me. Thanks Praxi. It’s an honor to watch you edit. Celestina007 (talk) 17:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

You are involved in a recently-filed amendment request

You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Arbitration motion regarding Ritchie333 and Praxidicae and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 11:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

A motion has been proposed which relates to you

Hello. A motion has been posted for voting by the arbitrators at the clarification request, Amendment request: Arbitration motion regarding Ritchie333 and Praxidicae, you are a party to. You may view the motion through this wikilink. Comments on the motion are welcome in the section for your statement. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 08:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Motion enacted and amendment request closed

The motion at the Amendment request: Arbitration motion regarding Ritchie333 and Praxidicae has been enacted after it reached majority support and the amendment has been subsequently closed. The enacted motion is as follows:

In the interest of furthering discussion around the UCOC, admin sanctions, and other such reforms, the interaction ban between Praxidicae and Ritchie333 is amended after the last sentence to add Parties may discuss the existence of the ban, and examine its implications, but remain forbidden from discussing each other and interacting with each other.

You may view a permalink of the now closed amendment request here. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:06, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Praxidicae:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1100 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Mail Notice

Hello, Praxidicae. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Celestina007 (talk) 17:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Alila Hotels and Resorts

Hi Praxidicae, I would like to clarify about my edits for the article Alila Hotels and Resorts, which you have reverted and marked as Spam. I am an editor primarily interested in the topic of hotels and hospitality. As such, I have elected in good faith to improve the aforementioned article by expanding its content and written in depth on the company's history, removed content that were blatant advertisements (there were several) added numerous new citations, and, took the time to fix existing citations (that were poorly listed and cited). I trust that the articles was vastly improved from the its previously very short, and poorly cited incarnation. As such, I believe that the reversion is objectively an improvement from the existing article, and does not fall under Spam or G11. I shall add an entry to the article's talk page for a more thorough explanation on the changes.

I also noticed that you have specifically removed the properties list from the previously unedited article, and I shall remove that from my update as well.

Okadiputera (talk) 02:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC) Okadiputera (talk)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Okadiputera (talk) 18:52, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

User conduct

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Okadiputera (talk) 03:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

You've invented a new space!

You just moved an article into "Draft:Draft:" space, it appears. Did you really mean to do that? --Nat Gertler (talk) 19:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

I've actually been working on a draft of a draft myself, so I'm grateful to know there's a place to house it. It's not quite ready for Draft:Draft: space though... Firefangledfeathers (talk) 19:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Aw, it looks like Liz has gone ahead and moved it. (But as it turns out, it looks like there are still about 9 pages in the Draft:Draft: space, so it isn't gone after all!) --Nat Gertler (talk) 00:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Meta-Wiki message 22 July 2021

Hello, Praxidicae/Archive 23. You have new messages at meta:User talk:Praxidicae.
Message added — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 19:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Interwiki talkback}} or {{Itb}} template.

— Relisted. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 06:08, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  Resolved. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 08:32, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Global sysop

Hi! Can I pick your brains on the limits of global sysop? I know GSs can't perform actions on wikis which have opted out of the global sysops' remit, but can a GS see deleted articles/images/revisions on opted-out wikis or is that also limited? Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 10:53, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

(not talk page stalker but still saw this message) @Cabayi: Per Special:GlobalGroupPermissions/global-sysop, the whole list of granted user rights is only enabled on wikis that are not opted out of GS. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Reza Goodary

Dear Praxidicae, Reza Goodary's article has credible sources approved by WP:News sources. Please kindly and check again.

(1), (2), (3), (4). IRIB, IRNA, ILNA are in the list. Also IPNA is Iran Pro Sport News Agency (5) and BORNA News Agency (Reputable news agency affiliated with the Ministry of Sports of Iran) (6). Also It is news from official website of Ministry of Sport Iran (7) (Link open Only in Iran).

The Reza Goodary (رضا گودری) article already approved on The Persian Wikipedia.

Sincerely. MMA Kid (talk) 14:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, but no. Half of the sources are blatantly unreliable spam and blackhat SEO. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Dear Praxidicae, Thank you for your response. I want to know where you think the article is wrong, then I delete it. Please tell me their so that I can delete it and submit again. Regards. MMA Kid (talk) 15:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Dear Praxidicae, I modified the text as you requested and replaced the sources correctly. I hope you accept, because Reza Goodary is currently in the headlines of Iranian news. Sincerely. MMA Kid (talk) 15:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Page moves

Thejenkins44 recently moved George II Frederic to George II which you moved back but this person has moved a lot of pages. Some have been reverted but at least two are still standing.

• Robert Henry Clarence to Robert ll
• William Henry Clarence to Jonathan l

And now he has authored George ll to duplicate George II Frederic. I have tagged the latter but I don't know how to move the other two back to their proper names. Notfrompedro (talk) 16:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your Signature 👍

Hello, I have to tell you, that I like the style of your signature very much! I just copied the code to my sandbox, looks even good with my name! But don't worry, I won't use it here on enwiki! Greetings! --Maresa63 ^Talk 17:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

No worries, you're welcome to use it wherever! PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Soletair Power

I was starting to write an AFD nomination when you nominated it for G11. I can see the judgment of an admin going either way as to whether the article is purely advertising. I wouldn't have nominated it for G11; after all, I was already planning to nominate it for a deletion discussion. I am ready to start the AFD discussion if the G11 is declined. (If the author is familiar with the ways of Wikipedia, and the article is deleted, the author will appeal to DRV, and the DRV will send it to AFD. I don't think that the author is that familiar with Wikipedia anyway.)

So we will see what an admin does with the article, and I have completed an analysis of the sources for an AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

The article was deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:13, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

And I have rejected the draft, which was the same as the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

WUKF

Dear Praxidicae, I'm sure you work to improve the quality of Wikipedia. I also do my best to raise the level of sports. This article is valuable. Please review and revise further. Sincerely. MMA Kid (talk) 02:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello Praxidicae,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

paged deleted

I need that information written over the subject 6ackend RicobrooksCMR (talk) 19:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Chandrachur Singh

Stop cutting the amount of search I have done on Chnadrachur's page. You are cutting it please don’t I have given my time to edit that page. Inda19712003 (talk) 04:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Based on the edit history of the page, you are copying directly from other sources, which is not allowed. I have not looked at the content to see whether it is appropriate or not, but if you do not write the content in your own words it will always be reverted. Primefac (talk) 11:22, 2 October 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

A barnstar for you!

The No Spam Barnstar

For your beyond perfect work at detecting and obliterating spam. A Barnstar doesn’t even do justice to the incredible work you do here. Thanks for everything, words aren’t enough to describe your works here. Your name has been written in gold, your legacy is eternal and posterity would never forget the splendid job you carried out here. They say no one is indispensable, to be honest you are an exception. Celestina007 (talk) 18:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Rashpal Singh Dhaliwal

Dear user, I think Rashpal Singh Dhaliwal does have independent notability so I put it in draft version. So kindly give me some time. I will put some references for him.--Jhanjeriboy (talk) 05:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Noting for the record it's been moved to Draft:Rashpal Singh Dhaliwal. Nothing wrong with continued improvements, though I would suggest submitting it for review via WP:AFC (see the "Submitting for review" section) when you are ready to go. Primefac (talk) 06:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

I accidentally created a page that I later realized was also a draft that you rejected

Hi,

I translated the page The Chestnut Man from Danish, but then when I was in the process of linking it to other articles, I found that Draft:The Chestnut Man already existed, and that you had rejected the draft. I was unaware of this beforehand, and wanted to apologize for this.

That being said, the draft page is currently in review, so what is the procedure in situations like this, so that the duplication can be resolved? DraconicDark (talk) 17:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

For what it's worth, the duplication has been resolved. I'm too tired to tease out why a histmerge was done, but done it was, so now only the draft remains. Primefac (talk) 21:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Added newspaper reference & created newspaper article.

Hi Praxidicae added newspaper references in Draft:Smit Shetye & created newspaper article Draft:Cyber Genius. Rockstar250802 (talk) 21:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) @Rockstar250802, This draft article appears to have been outrightly rejected so messaging Praxidicae is only to bother her. Then this appears to have been recently declined by someone who isn’t Praxidicae so messaging her about that is also moot, you can talk to the latest editor who declined the submission or go the AFC Help Desk for help. Celestina007 (talk) 14:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Okay thanks! Rockstar250802 (talk) 17:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dj K.O

Can you please elaborate on why you deemed the page for speedy deletion. Nothing that was written was false nor promotional. Only information on a musical artist and his completed works. Dannyk7000 (talk) 18:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker), @Dannyk7000, you may choose to read WP:NOT and G11, in your spare time. Celestina007 (talk) 23:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Reason behind the revert

Hello, I saw you reverted one edit here, can you let me know why do you think this should not be in the article? And in this revert, it seems that you reverted as the information was part of the "trial" (correct me if I am wrong). If this is the case, can you mention the relevant policy? Thanks. — Ankan (talk) 06:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker), @ANKAN, please Praxidicae implies here that they have indicated the reasons for the revert in the past. Please note that everything, or, every information is not required in an article thus when something is referred to as “trivial” it means what was added to the article has/had no real encyclopedic value. Celestina007 (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Recheck the article

Hello Praxidicae. Could you please recheck Reza Goodary's article? It's WP:N as WP:NKICK (Fighting for WBC and WMC world title). Also references full covered WP:NWSRC. This article seems to deserve a move to WP:Mainspace. Thank you. AriaTess (talk) 15:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

AriaTess, generally speaking reviewers don't like to do reviews "on demand" (and in particular, I know Prax doesn't). That being said, if you feel that it is ready for mainspace, there is no reason you cannot move it yourself (AFC is not strictly a requirement). However, short-cutting the review process could result in the page being taken to AFD, so do give it the proper consideration. Otherwise, the page has been submitted, and someone will review it in due course. Primefac (talk) 15:45, 27 October 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Thank you for share your knowledge and expriance. AriaTess (talk) 17:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not avoid deletion conversations by using redirects over content

I was quite curious when I noticed a stub I had created on the semiconductor industry had turned into a redirect to an article about plastic orthodontia. Normally if this had been a PROD or CSD, the involved editors and other interested parties would be informed and have a chance to comment. By simply removing the content in this fashion you are failing to inform them of these changes.

According to your edit history, it appears you use this sort of edit a fair amount. Even on the first page of contribs, I found a number of cases where you redired articles that clearly fail any CSD or AFD criterion. I also found any number of perfectly valid CSDs, but I am concerned that the ones that appear to be on the way to failing CSD are instead redired without comment.

If you wish to have certain articles removed, by all means, AfD away, but I strongly recommend against the sort of "silent deletion" you are performing.

Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:32, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

"Blank and redirect" is a perfectly valid BOLD move to take by any editor. If, as in this case, the redirect is reverted, then more bureaucratic actions such as AfD or similar can be undertaken. There is nothing procedurally wrong with Praxidicae's edits, and she is under no obligation to notify anyone of her edits. Primefac (talk) 12:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

When the articles in question would obviously fail AfD, and B&D is being used to, as you say, avoid "more bureaucratic actions", then all that is being accomplished is upsetting users (see my talk page) and making work for other admins. A one-off example would not be cause for note, but in this case, the editor is using this widely and I believe that is a concern. YMMV.Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:17, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

With all due respect, WP:ATD-R is policy and ATD is almost universally preferred to deletion, especially as a one-off bold move. Doing too many only indicates that the editor's area of work is patrolling poor articles. You would have to show they are making too many mistakes for that to actually be a cause for concern. From the way you called ATD-R pejoratively, a "silent deletion ", it is clear that you were not aware of that policy. I would suggest the starting point should be for you to acknowledge that. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:24, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

@Usedtobecool: The very first statement of the policy is (bolding added) "A page can be blanked and redirected if there is a suitable page to redirect to, and if the resulting redirect is not inappropriate." The redirect in question pointed a page on semiconductor manufacturing to a page on orthodontics. Please explain how you believe this meets the policy? Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:22, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Based on what you have said here and elsewhere, I think you may have a misunderstanding of what redirects are for. Regardless of that, Praxidicae simply restored the redirect that was there before. By your logic, Störm could ask you how you could expand a redirect that was created to point to an orthodontic implement into an article about semiconductor chips without notifying them. Of course, you were perfectly within your rights to change the topic without asking anyone. As was Prax. If you think the article should be restored, you simply revert them and they will decide whether to leave it alone or pursue deletion processes. If you think the redirect is pointing to the wrong target, either change it, or better yet, create a disambiguation page so everyone can find the article they want. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:37, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

@Usedtobecool: You formerly claimed that I did not understand the policy, and I asked you to explain how that was. You have failed to do so, instead, you have now stated that I don't understand "what redirects are for". I am confused by these shifting sands, perhaps you can simply answer the question asked? Maury Markowitz (talk) 16:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) My guess would be that Praxidicae based her redirect on the title of the page and not the content, since the former is related to the target page and the latter is/was not. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 16:09, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

@Giraffer, Praxidicae restored the redirect that was there before expansion. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

My apologies! A suitable page is any page which contains information the reader would be looking for when they type in the keyword. In this case, readers looking for the orthodontic topic will find the information they are looking for, so it is appropriate to redirect there. As I said before, if you think there will be readers looking for other topics also searching the same term, you should create a disambiguation page or hatnotes to direct all such readers to the exact articles they are looking for. A redirect is not inappropriate if the title of the redirect is not offensive or gibberish, and if in your opinion, the subjective reasons given at WP:R#DELETE do not apply so as to necessitate immediately tagging it for speedy deletion or starting a deletion discussion. As the title aligner is quite benign and there is an article which has information at least some of the readers typing in that keyword are likely to be searching for, the redirection was within policy. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:12, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Just as a related story, I recently answered a help ticket for Filkers, which (ostensibly) redirects to Filk music, but was expanded to be about a company named Filkers before those changes were reverted. Sure, someone looking for the company would potentially be confused by the end result, but it's a perfectly valid redirect because "filkers" does relate to the end target. As usedtobecool states, this is the same situation here (and honestly, if I searched "aligners" I would not be at all surprised to end up at the orthodontic device). Primefac (talk) 16:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Anil Deshmukh

Hi, May I ask whether the deletion tag on the article, Anil Deshmukh is valid? The IP who put the tag has only been active for the last few days. I also could not find it on the AFD list. Anil Deshmukh is currently facing criminal charges but he has held public office including senior ministerial portfolios for more than twenty-five years in the state of Maharashtra in India. Even the high profile charges makes him quite notable so please investigate. I am not fully acquainted with the deletion policies but this article and its subject does not meet deletion criteria. thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 20:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

It's a fully formed AFD, whether it gets kept or not, I can't say. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

As per wp:civ, tone down the sarcasm in AfDs.

Reading the discussion, you've been unduly hostile to the people in favor of keeping RainFurrest, even directly refusing a polite request to keep it civil. I understand seeing poor notability and coverage can be frustrating, but nothing gets done by "kthx"ing people who try to talk about it. Hyperwave11 (talk) 05:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Redirect

Hi there. I see that you edited this page Mohammed Maigari Dingyadi because it named the perwson Jeff Selingo. I work for Jeff and I notice that when I google Mohammed Maigari Dingyadi, his wiki page comes up with Jeff's name as the title. How can I fix this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jengh (talk • contribs) 16:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Jengh (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Jengh, we have zero control over what shows up in a Google search. I highly suggest you contact them if there is incorrect information showing up on their Knowledge Graph. Primefac (talk) 10:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Joyous Season

I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday! Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Hogmanay, Festivus or your hemisphere's Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:53, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.

Vyacheslav Kim

Hello, Praxidicae! I just wanted to let you know about the suspicious activity in the article in question:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vyacheslav_Kim

I checked the history of the page and found out that it was moved to the mainspace by the blocked sockpuppet ‎ Wodasweten and then another blocked sockpuppet Siberosan removed the "paid editing" tag. I believe this is still a very raw and promotional article. Also, the first editor Deviloper, who created the draft for Vyacheslav Kim, also tried to create a page for his business partner Mikhail Lomtadze, which makes me think it is a collaborative job of paid editors or people with clear conflict of interest:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Deviloper

P/S: Wodasweten and Siberisan are both sockpuppets of Bodiadub, banned globally by Wikimedia Foundation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bodiadub

• Furthermore, the most recent editor MRSEN2B2 removed the tags without solving the tags' issues.

--2601:1C0:CB01:2660:B433:771F:24C2:833C (talk) 06:49, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Removal

I have removed the speedy deletion tag from the page Kollision. If you feel this page should still be deleted please consider WP:AfD. --Tautomers_{(T C)} 23:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

I have since put the page in question up for AfD partly on your behalf, and it can be found here if you'd like to vote/comment on the discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kollision (2nd nomination) --Tautomers_{(T C)} 23:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your revert of Nicholas Alahverdian article

It is unclear why you reverted the inclusion of a death date in the Nicholas Alahverdian article. Though the date is unconfirmed, it is given and properly cited in the article, and the infobox clearly stated that it was unconfirmed. The infobox simply restarted what is in the body text of the article; it did not state an incorrect death date. In the interest of providing information to Wikipedia users, would you please reconsider your revert. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 04:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Nicholas Alahverdian (Proivdence Journal).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nicholas Alahverdian (Proivdence Journal).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 22:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

My bad!

Good revert. I was focused on that section and hadn't seen any previous mention of Ireland, but I see now there's mention in the previous section of him possibly being there. --BDD (talk) 20:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

No worries, I was surprised to read it myself but he specifically told authorities that he chose Ireland initially (and there's unreported information that supports this but I know we can't include it yet) because they wouldn't extradite to the US. SANTADICAE🎅 21:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

ANI, re: Alpha Psi Lambda

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jax MN (talk • contribs) 04:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicholas Alahverdian (Proivdence Journal).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nicholas Alahverdian (Proivdence Journal).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Article l

Hello, you said some things about the article I submitted that seem untrue. How does this seem like an advertisement? How are my citations not reliable they are 3rd and second party articles and news articles. As a person with a learning disability and autism. I would like to know why you said these things I believe to be untrue. Madhat1988 (talk) 12:46, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

• (talk page watcher), @Madhat1988, see WP:PROMO, WP:RS, WP:V, & WP:CITING SOURCES which I believe expressly answers your question(questions?) and to be honest If you hadn’t read the aforementioned prior referring to Praxidicae's edits as untrue, then you owe them an apology, but oh well. Celestina007 (talk) 01:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Because it is untrue and I don't owe them an apology. It's not an advertisement. Honestly, I feel like they said that because they don't like the artist for reasons mentioned in the "DRAFT" PAGE. yes, the draft might not be ready but it's not a promo and it's not an advertisement. That is untrue. Madhat1988 (talk) 22:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Also if it was an advertisement. It would be like this ( The Band just came out with a new hit record in stores now ) it does not do this at all. Madhat1988 (talk) 22:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Helen Kaminski

HI Praxidicae,

Recently you made some suggested edits about my page Helen Kaminski. I was wondering if you could give me some more specifics about which section needed more independent sources to be viable for the mainspace? Thanks.Zoe Blue98 (talk) 22:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker), Please see WP:RS to see the standard(s) we expect from you (or any editor for that matter when sourcing in an article) I also note you make mention of Independent sources in that case see WP:IS to understand what an independent source is. Celestina007 (talk) 23:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Viral B Shah

Not sure, why this article on Viral_B._Shah was marked for speedy deletion. The article didnot violate any copyright material (the references do not work or fail). Happy to help you understand, if there are concerns. @yarapavan 08:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by YPavan (talk • contribs)

• (talk page stalker) YPavan, I’m not sure why you are mentioning or bringing up the issue of a copyright violation to Praxidicae's TP. They tagged your article with a G4. I believe you should ask Adem20 that question as it was they who mentioned a copyvio & not Praxidicae. Celestina007 (talk) 23:58, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

How to move a page in official wiki webpage?

Hello! Sorry for disturbing, but i guess you can help me in this stupid situation... About 6 month a con not move a title from Draft, i literally have no idea, how to do or what is going wrong. Can you tell me, please, where to find some info to fix this trouble....?

Thank you and have a nice day, MorozovOpera — Preceding unsigned comment added by MorozovOpera (talk • contribs) 10:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

MorozovOpera, WP:MOVE describes how to move pages. Primefac (talk) 15:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Hello

Hope all is well. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Jake Strain

Hello @Praxidicae: may i know if this article was reviewed by a new page reviewer then why this page was moved to draft and this page have enough independent sources may i know the reason.

The reason is it's straight up vanity spam sourced to paid for fake news sites. CUPIDICAE💕 19:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

@Praxidicae::Remove all the fake and paid links from the article after that may b i can add some more references for these article

He isn't notable. That's why someone had to pay them to write about him on those sites and presumably you for doing so here. CUPIDICAE💕 19:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

@Praxidicae::please take a look about Jashmir — Preceding unsigned comment added by NabéTrath (talk • contribs) 20:12, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Calendar

It's February - isn't it time for Cupidicae to come out and play? Or Aphrodidicae? Girth Summit _(blether) 19:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

I just changed it a few hours ago actually :P CUPIDICAE💕 19:38, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Great minds think alike? Girth Summit _(blether) 20:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Curtis Sparrer

Curtis Sparrer is one of several gay married people I am researching for a series of articles in publications and blogs on notable members of the LGBTQI+ community. The Wikipedia article I wrote that has been deleted follows Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Each sentence is factual and is supported by independent and reliable secondary sources. It is an encyclopedic expression of a notable public relations person with no intention of advertising nor promotion; no adjectives not adverbs are used. Please move the article into livestream so that it can be read by all, particularly members of the LGBTQI+ community. I was not given sufficient time to contest the deletion so I am appealing to you. I know you cannot undelete it but you can point me in the right direction to the administrator that can. FuBiuC (talk) 20:07, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Recent changes to Photolith film

Hi - Praxidicae. I am a recent arrival on Wikipedia as far as editing is concerned. I believe you a reversed a name change (move) I made. And reverted the article to an earlier version which had errors and no citations. Please help me understand what/why you did that. You said we attempt consensus... sounds good. But how do you do that? DerekAP (talk) 14:56, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Recent changes to Draft:EMnify

Did you even read my page? You mentioned that I should avoid self published content and press releases in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:EMnify. Please indicate where you see press releases. The article is sufficiently sourced. I want better explanations why you deleted this page. Reply to User:Guilho.

Yes, that's why I said waht I said. It's not well sourced. 1 is their own website, not an independenet rs, not coverage of them [1] is a press release/funding announcement - utterly meaningless and not independent reliable coverage, is yet another funding announcement, akin to a press release, not independent coverage, it's WP:MILL, this is a single paragraph, not in depth coverage and is a self provided (from the company) about us section. CUPIDICAE💕 15:46, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Request on 18:58:50, 16 February 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by NabéTrath

• NabéTrath (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jake Strain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Wikimedians i want to request a user please view Draft:Jake Strain as this draft was live in article mainspace for more than ten days an was reviewed by a new page reviwer and this draft have enough sources for mainspace article so please view in this matter NabéTrath (talk) 18:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Contesting Speedy

Hey CUPIDICAE💕, I noticed you placed a CSD tag on the article I created. I would request you to please check this link here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Companies/Assessment#Quality_scale . On the quality scale, if you click on show on the more detailed criteria on the start type of articles, you can see that it clearly says "No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted". And as the page I created has been rated on its talk page, I would request you to withdraw the CSD. Enormous Efreet (talk) 20:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

No. And perhaps next time, try being a little less obvious when you create a sock account, Enormous Efreet. CUPIDICAE💕 20:43, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Sock account was on purpose since I do believe I'm in the right. And Atleast tell me what I'm doing wrong, I'm only referring to what was written there on the policies of WikiProject companies. Enormous Efreet (talk) 20:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Glad you admitted to socking, makes things a lot easier. CUPIDICAE💕 20:47, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Banish Verefied Handles

Wow, you caught a lot of those. Feel free to add your thoughts to this ANI report. From looking at a couple of the ranges I blocked, it appears this isn't the first time someone's done a similar bot attack, presumably using a residential proxy network. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Ohnoitsjamie It's apparently a botnet, don't want to go further into it but there's been some mitigation (feel free to email for details.) CUPIDICAE💕 01:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Bensci54. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Jacknjellify, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bensci54 (talk) 18:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

What is the logic behind this while it's at AFD, Bensci54? Especially considering the draft is by the same user and no better than the current article? CUPIDICAE💕 18:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Oh, I added the histmerge tag with Page Curation and had forgotten to uncheck the "mark as reviewed" box, so I thought I was who marked it as reviewed. I hadn't realized that someone else already had. I have no objections to re-marking it as reviewed. Bensci54 (talk) 18:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

And if you are asking about why I added the histmerge: it is more difficult to delete a draft than a full article. If they get merged, then AfD will take out both. If it survives AfD, then the histmerge would need to be done anyhow. That was my thinking anyways.Bensci54 (talk) 18:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker), Bensci54, Whilst I think i understand what you may be trying to say, when this action was done, the npr right Praxidicae wields caused the article to be automatically marked as reviewed & this is normal for all (700+)?? editors with the reviewer right as I presume you already know. However, unmarking as “reviewed” any article sent to AFD by a new page reviewer is probably not a good idea. Celestina007 (talk) 21:28, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Kruti Mahesh (choreographer)

You added tag (undisclosed payment) to this article. I did not create this article for any kind of payment. Please remove this tag from the article. IndaneLove (talk) 20:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

I have a question and I ask you to help me

Hello, dear inspector. I have made a draft entitled Draft:Seyyed Mahmoud Razavi and you rejected it due to invalid sources. I checked all articles similar to my draft. An article like Mohsen Chegini is in the field of my draft, but this article has been approved by 3 sources, but my article is rejected by 17 sources, some of which are the best and most famous sources in Iran. Can you help me why Mohsen Chegini's article has been approved with 3 sources, but my draft, which I modified and expanded the number of sources, will be rejected again ?? I'm sorry, the text of my question was a bit long.Ahmad1387 (talk) 22:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)