Poofdragon
May 2016 edit
Hello, I'm CorbieVreccan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jim Morrison, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:IRS for how to identify reliable sources that are suitable for this. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 15:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
CorbieVreccan. I did provide a reliable source on Mary Werbelow. It was not discussed prior altho it was just deleted by you and I undid: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jim_Morrison&diff=next&oldid=721009584
It is fact that she was a serious girlfriend and a simple search of Mary Werbelow and Jim Morrision will show this information exists in over 8 books.
https://madameask.com/2014/10/06/interview-with-paul-ferrara-doors-photographer/ Poofdragon (talk) 05:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jim Morrison, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Bare urls to fanzines are insufficient. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 22:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jim Morrison. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Take. It. To. The. Talk. Page. And seek consensus. Stop edit warring. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 22:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Edit-Warrior at Jim Morrison regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Poofdragon reported by User:CorbieVreccan (Result: ). Thank you. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 23:08, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
CorbieVreccan. I did provide a reliable source on Mary Werbelow. It was not discussed prior altho it was just deleted by you and I undid: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jim_Morrison&diff=next&oldid=721009584
It is fact that she was a serious girlfriend and a simple search of Mary Werbelow and Jim Morrision will show this information exists in over 8 books.
https://madameask.com/2014/10/06/interview-with-paul-ferrara-doors-photographer/
Poofdragon (talk) 05:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 20 May edit
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Jim Morrison page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
{PoofDragon|reason= I don't have multiple accounts. This is my only active account and I am hardly active here. Why is my account blocked? Someone reverted all my sourced edits. Poofdragon (talk) 02:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)}.
June 2018 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Poofdragon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is my only account. What is the real issue? Poofdragon (talk) 15:21, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Poofdragon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is my only account and this is it. Your confirmation is incorrect. How do I prove this? Can I appeal this further? Poofdragon
Decline reason:
Obvious sock is obvious, even without two checkuser confirmations (now three). Revoking talk page access. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- If not you, who is Paltryforhire (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)? —DoRD (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Ask them. Again, this is my only account. What did I do wrong? How do I appeal this? Poofdragon (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)