User talk:Piguy101/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Page Ong Kean Swan and its creator, Garydog Comment

I have reported both the page and its creator to administrators. They have removed about 8 templates (about 4 of them after a final warning. There's no point in battling him since both he and the page will be gone soon. DJAMP4444 (talk) 15:21, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Good. I was just about to do the same. Piguy101 (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

I am sorry

Hello Piguy101 I did not know about the guidelines sorry. I deleted The Super Sleuths now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darby-Sleuth (talk • contribs) 21:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

No hard feelings. Ask if you have any questions. Piguy101 (talk) 21:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

I don't understand.Darby (talk) 21:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello Pigguy101 You just wrote to me saying to post this (Darby (talk) 21:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)); I don't understand what that means.

I am not sure what you mean. If you are talking about the blue rectangle, it is simply a message I left, informing you that I replied to a message by you on this page. My reply is above this section. If you are talking about the four tildes (~~~~), you do this after leaving messages on talk pages, so other editors can easily tell who is posting what message. I am ending this message with four tildes, which will say that I wrote this message and it will also show the time I wrote this message. Here: Piguy101 (talk) 21:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Re: Thanks for cleaning my mess

Re: your message: No problem. =) That's what the mop is for. I've done the same thing with copying and pasting. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:56, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Morang Model College

Hello Piguy101. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Morang Model College, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 15:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

When I tagged it, the article was blank. Now it is good. I guess that I should not be so hasty when tagging. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 15:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for patrolling new pages. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 15:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

I am Sorry, I am the new users.

Hi, Piguy101. It is my first time to write in Wiki which I 'm not familiarized with its templates, requirement. I apologize about breaking the rule in wiki. Please keep it. I will continue to provide more sufficient information and reference for the copyright status in this few days. Thank you for all your advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garydog (talk • contribs) 16:07, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

No hard feelings. Remember next time, if you create an article and it is tagged for speedy deletion, do not simply remove the template; click "contest this speedy deletion" and give your case there. This way, editing can be more civil and no blocks will result. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 16:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

But even if I click "contest this speedy deletion" next time, the article will also eventually be deleted if ambiguous advertising?Garydog — Preceding undated comment added 16:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Correct. If the article is tagged for unambiguous advertising, you need to demonstrate why the article is not unambiguous advertising under "contest this speedy deletion." Alternatively, you can edit the article, without removing the speedy deletion template, to make the article less promotional and not an advertisement. Ask if you have any questions. Piguy101 (talk) 17:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 85.210.177.155 (talk) 16:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Report retracted and 85.210.177.155 temporarily blocked. Piguy101 (talk) 16:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Dolescum. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Gomerblog, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Dolescum (talk) 03:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

What does this mean? I requested speedy deletion of the page; I did not review it. Could you please explain? Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 03:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I think you've spotted based on what you put on my talk, but to ensure I'm clear on this, the author removed the speedy tag, but A3 no longer applied as they've added some content, nor A7 (there's a claim of notability in the article) and it's probably not promotional enough for G11. Problem is, the fact the article has been previously speedied leaves the article marked as reviewed, looking like it passed (green tick on curation taskbar and new articles). Not sure it passes GNG myself, but I've spent enough time at AFD recently. ;) Dolescum (talk) 03:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

My speedy tag was applicable when I tagged it, but is certainly not now. It should probably be tagged for GNG as it doesn't indicate its importance. I wonder why requesting speedy deletion reviews the article. Maybe it is some Twinkle setting. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 03:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Is this the same as marking pages as patrolled? Piguy101 (talk) 03:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Apparently so. Dolescum (talk) 04:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

I think I may change my Twinkle settings then to not automatically mark these pages are reviewed. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 13:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Can a newbie do this?

Hi Pigguy <3

Thanks for your comment. I want to learn how to be a part of Wikipedia and started a page.

I know a bit about Internet communities but I instantly feel like I'm in waaaay over my head.

I don't even know how to DM you... looks like this is public.

KC — Preceding unsigned comment added by KC RyourPANTSdown (talk • contribs) 18:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

I am not really sure what you are asking. Wikipedia is rather confusing for new users. To help, please read the guidelines posted on your talkpage. The red speedy deletion template on Hiddencash was in fact added by you when you copied the contents and recreated the article. Do not remove the template yourself since it is already there; wait for an administrator or other user to do so. Hiddencash has already been deleted once today for the reason "A1: Not enough context to identify article's subject." Ask if you have any questions. Piguy101 (talk) 18:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Message from Theabyssinian

I have no right to remove an entry I made? What the fuck?

You actually don't. See WP:OWN. Since other editors have made contributions to Ohimai Godwin Amaize, you cannot request speedy deletion. If you would like the article deleted, tag it for proposed deletion or nominate it for a deletion disucussion in which other editors will decide whether or not to keep it. Ask if you have any questions. Piguy101 (talk) 20:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Page Manggahan High School deletion

I'll be posting {{db-g7}} {{{delete| I am the article creator and I want to delete it (as said in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_delete_a_page ). The main reason is to edit it first in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Neilvin_John_Aventurado/Manggahan_High_School an if I already put a strong article, that's the time I'll post. I'll be assigning also [[User:StarOThisCentury]] in administrating this page. ~~~~ }} in my creted page Manggahan High School. Please delete the page as you are deleting administrator, so I can first put a strong article before posting it to this free encyclopedia. I also assigned one of the contributors, User:Starofthiscentury in administrate the page, not only that he is one of the contributor, but because I know this user personally. That's all for now. Thanks.

Regards, Neilvin John Aventurado (talk) 18:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

I am truly not sure what is going on to the page and what you are asking. Thus, I have reported the situation to an administrator, who can (hopefully) handle the issue. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 18:50, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

I did just said that please erase the page Manggahan High School (I've put the deletion request there) so I can develop first strong article by User:Neilvin John Aventurado/Manggahan High School then I'll post it after that (Either me or User:Starofthiscentury). That's the point I want to say. Neilvin John Aventurado (talk) 18:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I am not an administrator, which means that I am unable to delete pages. Hopefully, an administrator can come in and close this issue. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Meaning, it's possible to decline a deletion request but cannot delete article, so if it's like that, if you know a deleting administrator, please send me to him or to her. Thanks.

Neilvin John Aventurado (talk) 19:12, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

That is correct. I left a message at User_talk:Mike_V#Requested_deletion_on_Manggahan_High_School. Piguy101 (talk) 19:14, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Neilvin John Aventurado (talk) 19:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Nicholas McDonald

What I wrote was true — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.83.253.150 (talk) 23:43, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Find a source to keep it. See WP:BURDEN Piguy101 (talk) 23:45, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Erik Berglöf

In response to your comment regarding deletion of Wikipedia:Erik Berglöf - yes please delete the page, I am not sure how to do it. Many thanks. (Engstroa (talk) 09:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC))

I actually don't have the ability to delete pages as I am not an administrator, but I am requesting deletion on Wikipedia:Erik Berglöf for the reason that you requested deletion here. An administrator should delete the page in less than a day. Keep in mind that the actual page will remain, but simply a redirect to it well be deleted. Thanks. Piguy101 (talk) 13:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Justin K. Thannhauser

I have declined your CSD nomination of this subject. You should always try and search for sources before doing such nominations, and it was not hard for me to find that this person has a dedicated art exhibition at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, which easily elevates them above the necessary criteria. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:10, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

That's good advice. I was too hasty when tagging this. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 16:12, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

No problem. For future reference, don't tag something less than a minute after creation unless it is one of the more "urgent" criteria such as blatant vandalism (G3), an attack page (G10) or a copyright violation (G12). If you drop a person's name into Google, in about 99% of genuine CSD A7s, the first search result will be one of Facebook, LinkedIn or YouTube. You may be interested in an old project, WP:NEWT, which dealt with NPP problems when they were more widespread than today. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. That page is pretty interesting. Too bad I wasn't around when the study occurred! Piguy101 (talk) 16:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Message from Soupman11

I don't know how to message other users but the pages I've created for the 16 sociotype are valid concepts, the original research is in russian, I'm about to post the references to them like this for example http://socionics.ru/types/2009-01-09-00-35-45

I don't want to seem like a troll or anything, I'm doing this in good faith and I've read most of the rules on how to use wikipedia

I believe that your creations are in good faith; however, you may have made the articles too fast without adding any information on each page. Please edit each one to fix this. I cannot help you on content because I have no clue about the topic, but I can help with layout and Wikipedia formatting. Ask for any questions. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 01:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6