#REDIRECT [[User talk:Arfæst Ealdwrítere]] {{R from move}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJAMP4444 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

@Huon,@Jpgordon, @Peridon, and@Delta Quad: I think I have found the real talk page of my main account which was obscured by a redirect. I find myself able to edit. I hereby appeal for an unblock based on the reasons stipulated on User talk: Dmcl404. Now that I am able to edit on this account I promise I shan't use the other one again. DJAMP4444 (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline per User talk:Arfæst Ealdwrítere. Huon (talk) 23:32, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's still a checkuser block. You'll have to wait for one of them. Peridon (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have commented out the redirect so the unblock request is visible, but to me this looks like some relic, not your User talk:Arfæst Ealdwrítere account. It was renamed and afterwards recreated, possibly by accident. Huon (talk) 23:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
I just realized you saw that, too. I've declined this request since it's a useless duplicate and left the other one for someone else to decide. Huon (talk) 23:32, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply