User talk:Philroc/Archive 4

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results

The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:

• First Place - Adityavagarwal (submissions)
• Second Place - Vanamonde (submissions)
• Third Place - Cas Liber (submissions)

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

• Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
• Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
• Featured List – Bloom6132 (submissions) and 1989 (submissions) both produced 2 FLs in R2
• Featured Pictures – SounderBruce (submissions) improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
• Featured Topic – MPJ-DK (submissions) has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
• Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
• Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
• In The News – MBlaze Lightning (submissions) had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
• Good Article Review – Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (submissions) completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - @Adityavagarwal, Vanamonde93, Casliber, Bloom6132, 1989, and SounderBruce: please send Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018

So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Philroc. I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 10:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

I notice that you have the "administrator someday" userbox. Reviewing new pages is one of the best ways to develop experience needed to successfully wield the mop. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 10:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Alex Shih (talk) 16:59, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

List of Metro Systems

Hi Philroc, I just read your message on my talk page about List of metro systems: you did the right thing reverting my last edit, since the gargantuan removal of content wasn't actually neither a desired action nor some sort of experiment. I was merely editing a record (São Paulo Metro, as my edit summary points out) in the list section, but something went wrong while the "save changes" operation was under way, due a sudden restart of my browser, and therefore things turn out completely screwed up. Again, thanks a lot for your help! 93.57.255.93 (talk) 19:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

The image was already on Wikipedia.

The image was already on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.238.132.9 (talk) 01:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Philroc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Philroc|<font color="#009933">Phil</font>]][[User talk:Philroc|<font color="#9A0002">roc</font>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Philroc|''My contribs'']]</sup> : Philroc^{My contribs}

to

[[User:Philroc|<span style="color: #009933;">Phil</span>]][[User talk:Philroc|<span style="color: #9A0002">roc</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Philroc|''My contribs'']]</sup> : Philroc^{My contribs}

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 21:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

How is this libel?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pete_Hoekstra

It's national news here in the netherlands https://nos.nl/artikel/2211303-vs-ambassadeur-weigert-uitleg-over-bewering-in-brand-gestoken-politici.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.179.8.145 (talk) 14:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@143.179.8.145: Your edit to the linked article made it appear that Hoekstra was lying in an interview. Wikipedia maintains a neutral point of view on political issues such as this and does not attempt to accuse certain politicians of lying. Philroc^{My contribs} 14:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Libel in Pete Hoekstra wiki?!

https://nos.nl/artikel/2211303-vs-ambassadeur-weigert-uitleg-over-bewering-in-brand-gestoken-politici.html

It's in the Dutch National News. See the video. He's refusing to answer questions about his 'inaccurate statement'. How is this libel? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.179.8.145 (talk) 14:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:

• Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
• FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
• Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
• Ceranthor, Numerounovedant, Carbrera, Farang Rak Tham and Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

VA SR 666

You can delete it if you want to, but I'll just end up recreating it in a few months when I get to the 661-670 group of SR. FYI. Famartin (talk) 19:43, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Removing Riiconnect24

If you search up riiconnect24 mentions on wikipedia, you will enumerate 3 of them, and most of them are written by members of that home-brew application. I'm proceeding to delete mentions of that, and I wonder if I should warn the people who added that mention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abequinn14 (talk • contribs) 02:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 May newsletter

The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:

• Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
• Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
• Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
• SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
• Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
• Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
• Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

I-95

The NJ portion, which is the focus of that article, has been completely resigned as I-295. Famartin (talk) 16:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

@Famartin: Source? All major mapping services still show I-95 as being in New Jersey, and there are no news articles which talk about the supposed completion. Philroc^{My contribs} 16:55, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/commuter/roads/I95-295/ The project schedule had it being complete in NJ by the end of April. I can tell you that the signing has been completed via personal verification on the ground, though I know that doesn't really count for Wikipedia unless I take pictures of everything and upload to commons (and even that is shaky for verification but I've seen others use it before). Famartin (talk) 17:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Actually, this shows what is done: http://i95link.com/schedule/ Famartin (talk) 17:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Ace as a member of Gorillaz.

Hi Philroc,

I've reverted your edit on Gorillaz, as you provided no explanation for your revert.

No verifiably accurate sources have covered Ace and his relationship with Gorillaz; speculation regarding his relationship with the band falls under WP:CRYSTALBALL, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Please wait until a reliable source covers any future lineup changes before making edits to the virtual members list. FlotillaFlotsam (talk) 17:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Humility (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Now Now

Hello! Your submission of The Now Now at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SounderBruce 00:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Gorillaz Humility thumbnail.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for The Now Now

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Gorillaz - The Now Now.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:04, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Action Comics 1000

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Re: GRTC PROD

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Quidster4040 (talk) 04:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

@Quidster4040: None of the station pages that I nominated for deletion have any sources other than an official map of the system, which is not reliable. Therefore, they fail the notablility guidelines and should be deleted. Also, an AfD discussion in 2014 decided that the articles be deleted, meaning that they shouldn't still be up anyway. Philroc (c) 12:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Just an FYI, you cannot re add a prod tag after its been removed. I wouldve been fine with redirecting to the main article until the stations are operational, which will be in only a few days. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 23:13, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Sega Technical Institute

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 23:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Happy Birthday

Hey, Philroc. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Kpgjhpjm 07:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:The Now Now singles cover.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Now Now singles cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HQ app logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HQ app logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Time zones

Sorry, but there is no guideline or rule on Wikipedia that says we have to wait until it is 12:00 AM UTC on Fridays when music is released before updating information regarding their release. As soon as the album has been released anywhere in the world (for instance, even if the album were released in a country like Japan several days before the rest of the world, which does happen), we can update the information. It had already been released in New Zealand, Australia and some of Asia by the time you reverted me. In future, please don't revert users over this because as I said, there is literally no rule regarding this on Wikipedia. Wikipedia does not say "wait until it's UTC before updating the release of anything". Thank you. Ss112 05:05, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 July newsletter

The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
• Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
• SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Felix Agnus

Hello! Your submission of Felix Agnus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:49, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 22:56, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pulte Group logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pulte Group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Now Now

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Now Now you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lazz R -- Lazz R (talk) 12:21, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Now Now

The article The Now Now you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Now Now for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lazz R -- Lazz R (talk) 12:21, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 September newsletter

The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:

• Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
• Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
• Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
• Other contestants who qualified for the final round were Nova Crystallis, Iazyges, SounderBruce, Kosack and Ceranthor.

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Felix Agnus

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MainStay Investments Logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MainStay Investments Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

2018 Atlantic hurricane season

Any explanation for the unwarranted nuking of Gordon and Florence's sections on the article? ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 18:03, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

@Cyclonebiskit: Having duplicate information in the hurricane season article and the main article is redundant and unnecessary. Philroc (c) 18:12, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Summaries of the additional content are required by WP:SUMMARY and WP:SPLIT to sufficiently cover the overall topic of a hurricane season. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 18:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Post-nominals/ISL

Template:Post-nominals/ISL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DrKay (talk) 18:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:STiki!

Hello, Philroc, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 10:50, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

I didn't vandalise anything. I wrote the truth. As Wikipedia evolves with time and the present becomes history you will see that what I wrote is in fact more accurate than the current article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Errumm (talk • contribs) 22:47, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

@Errumm: You are allowed to have your own personal opinion, but on Wikipedia we have a rule that states that all articles must cover their subjects fairly and not favor one view over the other. In fact, this idea of neutrality is so important that it is one of Wikipedia's five main tenets. What you did on the article for Brexit was give your own biased commentary on the matter and make the article unpartisan; therefore you were reverted. Hoping you understand - Philroc (c) 23:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

HAL 9000 (origin of name)

It is unclear to me why my post was marked as disruptive. I was simple adding information, not elsewhere in the article about an issue that frequently comes up in this discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OldJoe555 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

@OldJoe555: The inital action of you adding the information was not disruptive in of itself; however, readding it after being told not to multiple times due to it being completely unsourced is. Find some sources that back up your information and add them to the article. Thanks - Philroc (c) 19:20, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

I did add the reference - HAL Communications own web site http://www.halcomm.com/about/history/ , yet it was removed again. I also have another reference form the founder of HAL Communications but was reluctant to add it since I keep getting deleted. ( https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/history-of-hal-devices-and-hal-communications-corp.431281/ )

@OldJoe555: The information you keep trying to add to the article is original research, where an editor assembles their own ideas related to a subject from previous sources and information and adds them to an article without any reliable sources to back them up. Are you able to find any sources that talk about the connection you mention between HAL 9000 and H.A.L the company? Philroc (c) 19:46, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

That is aht I have done. The point I have been trying to add is reguarding the naming of the HAL 9000 in 2001: A Space Odyssey. There is speculation that the name came form the HAL Communications corp in Urbana, IL. due to the fact that this name (HAL labs) and location is referenced in the movie - and the fact that HAL Communications was located in Urbana IL (ref 1 http://www.halcomm.com/about/history/ ), however the relocation to Urbana was post the production of the movie (ref 2 https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/history-of-hal-devices-and-hal-communications-corp.431281/). There has been confusion about the relationship of the company and the naming of HAL in the movie and my addition is simply an attempt to help clarify this point. This is not my original information - I have obtained it from outside sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OldJoe555 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

@OldJoe555: What you are doing is a prime example of original research; you are taking two sources and combining them to say something stated by neither. Either find a source that explictly refers to the connection or don't add the information. Philroc (c) 20:06, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

.."you are taking two sources and combining them to say something stated by neither" This is not correct. I have found an outside source that explicitly makes the point I am trying to post. It is the former president of HAL Communications himself (from my reference #2 ( https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/history-of-hal-devices-and-hal-communications-corp.431281/ ) : "HAL Devices - HAL Communications Corp. By Bill Henry, President HAL Communications - Retired. " "There was not and never has been any connection to "Hal", Arthur Clarke's intelligent computer in the screen play "2001" - later published as a book. We were very surprised when the movie hit the Coed Theatre on campus and discovered that the movie's computer had our name. We never had any problems with that similarity - "Hal" for the movie and "HAL" (all caps) for our small company. But, from time-to-time, we did have issues with others trying to use "HAL". That resulted in us paying lawyers. The offenders folded or eventually went out of business. " — Preceding unsigned comment added by OldJoe555 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

@OldJoe555: Thank you. You can use the source you linked to back up your information and add it to the article, as it is now no longer original research. Philroc (c) 21:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks - I should have pointed out quotes from the sources more clearly earlier. I ddn't mean to drag you into a protracted debate - but thanks for sticking with me! — Preceding unsigned comment added by OldJoe555 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

My post was t6aken down again - by GorillaWarfare. I'm at a loss to understand. OldJoe555 (talk) 22:30, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Wow! That document was a very good find! I think it would be worth adding the quote from the former president of HAL since that would really settle the debate - but I don't want to take credit for your research (and I'm afraid of GorillaWarfare - I think she's going to chop off my head if I make another improper post). If you don't feel like doing it I will (is there a way to give you credit?). BTW I'm impressed with how seriously you Wiki editors take things. I figured my post was just so minor - but I do appreciate that if everything was just let go then the whole project would be a mess. OldJoe555 (talk) 00:29, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

@OldJoe555:  Done Philroc (c) 00:45, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Nice! OldJoe555 (talk) 03:53, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Gorillaz Hollywood sign.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:31, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations from WP:STiki!

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Philroc! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Orphan Wiki 08:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphan Wiki 08:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

About the edit on the page on Nora Fatehi

Hello Philroc! I'm writing this in order to know why you have reverted my edit on the page on Nora Fatehi. Please, if you can, do explain what wrong have I done. As I am new to Wikipedia editing I would be glad if an experienced person like you explained the reason in detail. Thanking you, Ninette Ninette Catherine (talk) 11:44, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ninette Catherine: I apologize for reverting your edit. After taking a more thorough look at what you were attemping to add, I now see that it is a song name and not the random gibberish I assumed it to be at first. You are free to readd it if you prefer. Philroc (c) 11:53, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your Page on Mormons and Mormonism is wrong

Hello,

Your opinion on "Mormons" and "Mormonism" is incorrect. The words Mormon and Mormonism are slang words. It is not proper terminology. There is no such religion as Mormonism or followers known as Mormons. The religion is Christianity. The church is called The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Members of the church read from the Book of Mormon, Another Testament of Jesus Christ. (Which you leave the entire title off your page). Mormon is a prophet in The Book of Mormon, Another Testament of Jesus Christ.The slang term "Mormon" was taken from the title because people did not take the time to say the full name "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints". Jesus Christ was a prophet and written in about in the New Testament, not the actual bible. The bible is a combination of the Old Testamemt and New Testament. People who read the prophecies of Jesus Christ do not call their religion Jesus Christs therefore it makes no sense why members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints would name their religion after the prophet Mormon. There is no where in the Book of Mormon, Another Testamant of Jesus Christ where it says the religion is called Mormonism or people called Mormons. President Nelson did correct everyone from using the term Mormon and Mormonism at the 2018 general conference because it was incorrect. Your page should be corrected and updated since you will not allow others to contribute and change the correct terms to the truth. You are giving incorrect information even after the president made an announcement that society was calling the church/religion by the incorrect name. Also I'd like to point out that you made a point that all members practiced polygamy, but what about every other culture and religion of the time? And how do you know all members practiced Pologamy? It is not true because my ancestors were members of the church and only had one wife. Your stero-typing the religion and opionion vs. fact. It is not known they practiced pologamy, but by you writing it, it is making it known to readers. I know many people that didn't know some people practiced pologamy. So your information is incorrect saying "Mormons" are known for Pologamy". They are known for many other things and not Pologamy. If some people in society do a certain thing it doesn't mean all of them did. And you didn't write the fact why Pologamy was practiced by Joseph Smith. It was practiced because the only way a family can be sealed together is through marriage. If a woman was unmarried she could not be sealed in the temple for eternity. The women would never be able to go to the Celestial Kingdom. The only way Joseph Smith could help the unwed women was to marry them,therefore, they could be sealed as a family for eternity. The way it you wrote it makes it look as he married multiple woman and actually practiced marital relationships with each one. If you do not know the meaning and purpose behind something you should not be writing about it. Half of your sources are from authors with opinions just like yourself. Please correct the informarion and don't stero-type The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints aka Christians!Im not trying to debate I just want to get the correct terms online.

@Official Latter-day Saint: Please see your talk page; Gerda Arendt has posted a message there that should clear things up. If you are still confused, I will be glad to explain further. Philroc (c) 19:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Now Now logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Now Now logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:

1. Courcelles (submissions)
2. Kosack (submissions)
3. Kees08 (submissions)
4. SounderBruce (submissions)
5. Cas Liber (submissions)
6. Nova Crystallis (submissions)
7. Iazyges (submissions)
8. Ceranthor (submissions)

All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:

• Cas Liber (submissions) wins the FA prize, for three featured articles in round 2.
• Courcelles (submissions) wins the GA prize, for 92 good articles in round 3.
• Kosack (submissions) wins the FL prize, for five featured lists overall.
• Cartoon network freak (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 30 articles in good topics overall.
• Usernameunique (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 24 did you know articles in round 3.
• Zanhe (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 17 in the news articles overall.
• Aoba47 (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 43 good article reviews in round 1.

Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email) and Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email).

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Philroc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!

Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Gorillaz in Tranz.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Human After All

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Human After All you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BeatlesLedTV -- BeatlesLedTV (talk) 00:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Human After All

The article Human After All you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Human After All for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BeatlesLedTV -- BeatlesLedTV (talk) 01:40, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Human After All

The article Human After All you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Human After All for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BeatlesLedTV -- BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:21, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ETF Securities logo new version.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ETF Securities logo new version.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

• L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
• Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
• MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
• Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
• Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
• Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

File:Short Pump Town Center Logo.svg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Please participate to the talk pages consultation

Hello

Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.

We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.

We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.

Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update

The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.

The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.

Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Apple Inc.

Hello Philroc,

You've been identified either as a previous member of the project, an active editor on Apple related pages, a bearer of Apple related userboxes, or just a hoopy frood.

WikiProject Apple Inc. has unexpectedly quit, because an error type "unknown" occured. Editors must restart it! If you are interested, read the project page and sign up as a member. There's something for everyone to do, such as welcoming, sourcing, writing, copy editing, gnoming, proofreading, or feedback — but no pressure. Do what you do, but let's coordinate and stay in touch.

See the full welcome message on the talk page, or join the new IRC channel on irc.freenode.net named #wikipedia-en-appleinc ^connect. Please join, speak, and idle, and someone will read and reply.

Please spread the word, and join or unsubscribe at the subscription page.

RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} and Smuckola on behalf of WikiProject Apple Inc. - Delivered 15:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 May newsletter

The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

• Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
• Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
• Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
• Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

Other notable performances were put in by Barkeep49 with six GAs, Ceranthor, Lee Vilenski, and Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)