This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Madden NFL. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ArcAngel (talk) ) 11:39, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Welcome
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Welcome!
Hello, Phanuruch8555, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Jamietw (talk) 19:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
June 2011
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Formula One worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 13:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Talk:Pet Society, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 14:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.Bretonbanquet (talk) 11:29, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, if you read WP:3RR, it will explain to you what it is. Basically, you're not allowed to keep changing an article to your preferred version more than 3 times in a 24 hour period. You keep deleting the photo of Vettel every time someone puts it back. You need to discuss why you want the photo removed, instead of deleting it all the time. Maybe you can start a dicussion here: Talk:Sebastian Vettel. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 11:59, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi again - I've just read your user page, and I see that you seem quite happy to continue edit warring over the Vettel photo and your "secret reason". If you start warring again, then 3RR or not, you're gone - finished. I won't be able to help you, and I won't even try after the first time. So the choice is yours. Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Phanuruch8555,
This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the Edit warring policy at the Administrators' noticeboard.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them.
~ NekoBot (MeowTalk) 15:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC) (False positive? Report it!)
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A tag has been placed on File:Pirate Ahoy Offline.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 02:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
PF
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hello. I reverted your redirect of PF to Playfish. PF means many different things in many different fields, and the disambiguation page allows us to list all of the meanings, to help readers in navigation. I added Playfish to that page as one of the possible meanings. If you feel strongly that this should redirect to Playfish, please start a thread at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. Thanks. Jokestress (talk) 15:57, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at PF. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jokestress (talk) 15:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
The same applies to your redirect of ESC. If you redirect a disambiguation page like that again you may be blocked. Please don't do it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 13:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Re: Formula One Redirects
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. It is WP:F1 policy that future races are not given full articles, unless they are the next race (eg 2011 German Grand Prix), or have something notable to be written about them (eg 2010 British Grand Prix). The remaining races of 2011 do not meet either of these criteria, and therefore do not merit articles of their own, but a redirect to the 2011 Formula One season page is better than any potential red links. WilliamF1two (talk) 19:15, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming or deletion at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature. Grutness...wha? 01:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
WikiProject Eurovision is currently suffering from inactivity, despite having a large number of active users as project members. It is recommended that you add the project talk page to your watchlist if you have not already done so, since there are a number of proposals on this talk page which will significantly impact on the project that should be of interest to you.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision, please remove your username from this page.
Users are always welcome to help us with this newsletter. If you are interested, please leave a message on an existing editor's talkpage or sign up on the "Contributors" list of the central newsletter page, and we will tell you everything you need to know and answer your questions.
The 2011 British Grand Prix was a Formula One motor race, held on 10 July 2011, at the Silverstone Circuit in Northamptonshire and Buckinghamshire, England, and won by Fernando Alonso. Changes to the circuit mean that the race was previously classified as being in Northamptonshire, but the movement of the start-finish line means that the race is now officially classed as being in Buckinghamshire. It was the ninth race of the 2011 season, and saw the introduction of a ban on off-throttle blown diffusers, the practice of forcing the engine to continue to produce exhaust gasses to generate downforce when drivers are not using the throttle.
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there.
I'm writing to clarify my reasons for reverting your edit and changing the Eurovision redirect to point back to Eurovision Song Contest. It is based on the guidelines found on Wikipedia:Primary topic: "A topic is primary for an ambiguous term if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other, and more likely than all the others combined—to be the subject being sought when a reader enters that ambiguous term in the Search box." The Eurovision redirect page has been that way since roughly 2008, where the primary topic for the search term "Eurovision" was the song contest, and thus Eurovision redirects to Eurovision Song Contest.
I find your reasons for pointing the redirect to Eurovision (network), such as "the network made the contest, not contest make a network", highly irrelevant. Again, per the rules of Wikipedia:Primary topic, it is mainly based on what topic is much more likely to be searched for by users. It is not based on which topic was established first. Nor is it is based on which organization or body founded the other.
Therefore, unless you provide evidence that it is the network that is much more likely to be searched the most, the only compromise I will make is moving Eurovision (disambiguation) to Eurovision – in other words, there will be NO primary topic and "Eurovision" will be the disambiguation page, much like what the Georgia page is now.
Regards. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Eurovision stubs
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Decline reason: Markschmitz was using the same computer and IP as you. Now why would that be? I'm leaving this autoblock in place- do not create other accounts to vandalize. TNXMan 13:25, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
but I'm getting affected by him/her right now:
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Accept reason: It does look like someone jumped on your computer to trouble you. Don't let it happen again. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:15, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Markschmitz doesn't make more vandalisation, I check his contribution that he doesn't do anything. I'm affected by him again.
Markschmitz's contribution
12:58, 12 August 2011 (diff | hist) User:Phanuruch8555 (←Replaced content with 'YuGiYuGiYuGiYuGiYuGiYuGi Yoh!!!!') (Tag: speedy deletion template removed)
12:54, 12 August 2011 (diff | hist) EA Sports FIFA Superstars
12:52, 12 August 2011 (diff | hist) User:Markschmitz
12:43, 12 August 2011 (diff | hist) Jérôme d'Ambrosio
12:41, 12 August 2011 (diff | hist) EA Sports FIFA Superstars (Undid revision 444431272 by ClueBot NG (talk)) (Tag: reverting anti-vandal bot)
12:33, 12 August 2011 (diff | hist) N User:Markschmitz (←Created page with 'Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to EA Spo...')
12:31, 12 August 2011 (diff | hist) EA Sports FIFA Superstars (Reverted to)
12:29, 12 August 2011 (diff | hist) VEVO
This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Accept reason: I have given you IP block exemption, which I will remove when the autoblock has expired. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:33, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Cut and paste moves
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. CT Cooper ·talk 11:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
You are clearly trying to make a complex set of page moves which will require administrator assistance to complete, and should not take place without prior discussion. I would recommend raising the proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision first to see what editors think. You could also mention it on relevant talk pages such as Talk:Eurovision Song Contest. CT Cooper ·talk 11:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:SANDY, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:ScreenshotFIFASuperstars.png
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:ScreenshotFIFASuperstars.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Eurovision
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
You cannot fool me with such bogus edit summaries. A real page move would show up on Special:Log/move and the page histories of both Eurovision and Eurovision (network) would reflect that. Your cut and paste move has been reverted again.
This is another in a long line of disruptive conduct, including your "I hate disambiguation" actions last month, and other stuff you proudly display on your user page. If you proceed any further, I might recommend a block on you. Please defer to consensus instead. Regards. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:00, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes, it was obviously a cut and paste move. And I noticed you continue to go against consensus. [1] Therefore, I am going to seek other admins on whether it warrants a block on your disruptive behaviour. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eurovision. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges.
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The problems with your editing have been described on this page and at the administrators' noticeboard, so it is not necessary to repeat all the details, but I will also mention your creation of various pointless redirects, such as Spaim. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, which works by cooperation, not by individual editors insisting on doing what they prefer, even when there is consensus against them. Like everyone else you are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but if you can't or won't fit in to the way things are done here then it will be better for you to find another activity to work on. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:53, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
An article that you have been involved in editing, YouTube , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. JC Rules! (talk) 03:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Suite PreCure
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello. I moved the Suite PreCure♪ article back to Suite PreCure as per the Wikipedia policy on article names. Specifically this section which states "Do not use symbols: Symbols such as "♥", as sometimes found in advertisements or logos, should never be used in titles. This includes non-Latin punctuation such as the characters in Unicode's CJK Symbols and Punctuation block." The musical note is just such a symbol that shouldn't be used in the title of an article. If you disagree with my interpretation of policy please discuss it on the talk page. Thanks. SQGibbon (talk) 20:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I reverted your attempt to re-direct Talk:Eurovision, as it wiped a discussion that needs to be kept on record for future editors. I noted this clearly in the edit summary. You then came along and reverted without providing any reason at all, which demonstrates a lack of courtesy and is disruptive. It clearly states in the window when you undo an edit, "If you are undoing an edit that is not vandalism, explain the reason in the edit summary. Do not use the default message only." Did you read the thread at WP:ANI about you? Have you taken any of it on board? You have already been warned for edit warring. I am happy to discuss this with you if you like, but if you are just going to silently revert, then I or other editors are likely to go straight back to WP:ANI, and you will soon or later be blocked. I am awaiting a justification from you here for you original edit and the revert. CT Cooper ·talk 13:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
The discussion has been restored by another editor, do not attempt to remove it again. CT Cooper ·talk 10:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Epic World Cup 2011
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello you nominated Epic World Cup 2011 for deletion with the G4 tag. This is only for articles or pages that had an AFD (or xFD0 discussion that resulted in a consensus to delete. In this case you should have just used the A7 speedy delete tag again as it still made no claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
{{WikiProject Eurovision}} now accepts importance ratings as well as quality ratings, and the project now has a formal assessment department which gives details on how to assess articles, and provides a place for contributors to request re-assessment. Feel free to add the {{WikiProject Eurovision}} template to the talk page of any new Eurovision articles you create.
The Eurovision Song Contest now has its own stub template at {{Eurovision-stub}}. Please only use this on Eurovision Song Contest stubs, with {{Music-stub}} and {{Dance-stub}} being the appropriate template for other Eruovision contests.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hello. Please note that these images, being non-free, need to pass all ten criteria of our non-free policy WP:NFCC. When I previously removed the images I noted in the edit summaries why they failed this policy. This was usually because they were either unhelpful to the reader in showing the image, or because the text was already sufficient to describe the design. Unless you can explain how the images pass all the criteria of NFCC, please do not re-insert them. Doing so may be seen as disruptive. Black Kite (t)(c) 11:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Nothing to do with the rationale. They simply fail the criteria. Unless the use of image significantly increases the reader's understanding of the subject (which these don't, especially as some of them don't even show images which correspond with the text), they can't be used. Black Kite (t)(c) 13:31, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ESCPostcard2011.png
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:ESCPostcard2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:39, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ESCPostcard2010.png
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:ESCPostcard2010.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:40, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Postcards in Eurovision articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Please let me make it very clear. If you edit-war an image that fails our non-free image policies back into one of these articles again, you will be blocked. Black Kite (t)(c) 01:04, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Phanuruch8555, this is now the second time since the WP:ANI discussion that you have resorted to silent reverts in response to objections to your actions, and you have been already been warned once above that this is not acceptable behaviour. If I see any more of this, I will file another report at WP:ANI, and your changes of being blocked will be greatly elevated. CT Cooper ·talk 11:16, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
This hasn't gone unnoticed either. CT Cooper ·talk 11:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ESCPostcard2011.png
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:ESCPostcard2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
D'Ambrosio
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Stop changing the photo. You've been told by more than one editor that the original photo is a better photo, and it makes no difference that the photo is a year or two old if the one you're trying to add doesn't even show his face properly. You have a very poor history of changing photos, and I will report you if you continue to edit war over this photo. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ESCPostcard2009.png
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:ESCPostcard2009.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ESCPostcard2007.png
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:ESCPostcard2007.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ESCPostcard2008.png
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:ESCPostcard2008.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:08, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This is a long-standing re-direct which has been in place since 2006 as an abbreviation for "Eurovision", and as a result changing where it points to will result in a number of links pointing to the wrong place. If you think there is a case for change, you are free to raise it at WT:EURO and WT:EUROPE. Do not attempt to change it again without discussion, and bear in mind my comments in the section above still stand. CT Cooper ·talk 11:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Disruptive editing
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On this page we have numerous messages from various editors about a number of issues where your editing has been disruptive, including edit-warring, non-free image problems, changing long-standing redirects without discussion and other issues. You cannot continue to cause problems for other editors like this, especially after you have been warned what the problems are. A certain amount of collegial editing and basic competence is required to contribute here. Please take note that further issues of this type may lead to increasing blocks. Black Kite (t)(c) 11:29, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
WPF1 Newsletter (August)
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Users are always welcome to help us with this newsletter. If you are interested, please leave a message on an existing editor's talkpage or sign up on the "Contributors" list of the central newsletter page, and we will tell you everything you need to know and answer your questions.
The 2011 Belgian Grand Prix, formally the 2011 Formula 1 Shell Belgian Grand Prix, was a Formula One motor race that was held on 28 August 2011, at Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps in Spa, Belgium. It was the twelfth round of the 2011 Formula One season, and the 67th Belgian Grand Prix to be held. The race, contested over 44 laps, was won by Red Bull's Sebastian Vettel, the drivers' championship leader, after starting from pole position. Vettel's team-mate Mark Webber finished in second place, and Jenson Button completed the podium in third position for McLaren.
As a consequence of the race, Vettel extended his lead in the World Drivers' Championship to 92 points over Webber. Fernando Alonso, fourth in the race, moved into third place in the championship, ten points behind Webber in third, and eight ahead of Button. In the World Constructors' Championship, Red Bull extended their championship lead to 131 points over McLaren, with Ferrari a further 64 points behind in third position.
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Help:Wiki.png, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Help:Wiki.png and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Help:Wiki.png during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -Porch corpter(contribs) 09:53, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
