Welcome! edit

Hello, Petr73, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

December 2017 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Hive frame has been reverted.
Your edit here to Hive frame was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/ApiculturaBulgaria/photos/rpp.246191622227873/674530796060618/?type=3&theater) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the help! OK! --> --Petr73 (talk)--Petr73 (talk) 18:52, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kostal-Gruppe edit

Hello Petr73,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kostal-Gruppe for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 19:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

)--Petr73 (talk) 20
12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ARIETE Group edit

Hello Petr73,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ARIETE Group for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 20:32, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Links to user pages and sandboxes edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Feeder (beekeeping). Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 18:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Beekeeping, you may be blocked from editing.
You were clearly told not to add links to user pages, above, but continued to do so - Arjayay (talk) 09:34, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Beekeeping, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Anfisa Letyago edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anfisa Letyago, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – NJD-DE (talk) 19:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wait! The copyright will be corrected, but the page must be preserved!--Petr73 (talk) 20:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Anfisa Letyago edit

I've deleted the article (again) and salted it. If you try again to recreate it, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

I do not understand why you are so strict, when you could only make corrections to the article? Do you feel any personal hatred or because the original article was bad and that's why you were so angry? Petr73 (talk) 22:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

--Petr73 (talk) 22:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Petar Petrakov edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Petar Petrakov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:12, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:12, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, this page was created by this person, but there is no self-promotion in the page and it is good to stay on wikipedia.Thanks for your attention!Petr73 (talk) 20:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 20:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello! I had a good look at the rules and realized that my humble article that I wrote about myself was not good enough because I need to have more followers. Also, it should be written by another person, I guess the owner of this encyclopedia. I understand the rules here and if you unblock me I will have to follow them better by not allowing myself to create new pages, just some syntax and slight additions to the other articles.Petr73 (talk) 20:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Petr73 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Petr73 (talk) 20:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.