User talk:Pbsouthwood/Archive 29
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | ← | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 |
Administrators' newsletter – February 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.
Technical news
- Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)
Arbitration
- Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
- Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2024 Steward elections will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
- Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
- The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Disambiguation link notification for February 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diving bell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bellman.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
"Conservatism (diving)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Conservatism (diving) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § Conservatism (diving) until a consensus is reached. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Question from Sarah kapopo on PayPal (11:45, 7 February 2024)
Hi how are you --Sarah kapopo (talk) 11:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- I am fine, is there a question relevant to Wikipedia that I can help you with? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 12:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Question from BANEN24 (14:12, 7 February 2024)
Hello, please review a bit to all of my contributions. --BANEN24 (talk) 14:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi BANEN24, I took a brief look at the pages you have created, but I am unable to read most of your references. It would appear that various others have already tagged the pages for some problems, and it would be good for you to concentrate your efforts on resolving those issues. After that, it would be good to expand the pages as they provide very little information on their topics. We are sure to have other editors more capable of reviewing your articles by virtue of being able to read the sources. Perhaps a visit to the WP:Teahouse will find someone, or QEDK may have some suggestions. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 15:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
IAbot
Hi, I saw you use the IAbot interface and are an admin, so I hope you can help. The domain http://www.iranica.com/ is tagged in IAbot as permalive (for reasons I don't fully understand), although it is dead and usurpated. Could you please change it to permadead? I tried to do so but I lack admin permissions. Broc (talk) 09:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Broc, I agree that the domain ha been usurped, but I do not do that kind of work. I suggest you ask at WP:Village pump (technical), Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 14:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Question from Techlover1593 (17:16, 11 February 2024)
Subject: Request for Guidance on Enhancing Notability References for Thomas Truong's Wikipedia Submission
Dear Mentor,
I hope this message finds you well. I am seeking your expertise and advice regarding a Wikipedia submission I have prepared on Thomas Truong, a French engineer and entrepreneur notable for his contributions to AI and accessibility, particularly through the development of VocalSign. Despite providing references to his recognition as an MIT Innovator Under 35 and a televised interview on BFM Business, the submission was declined due to insufficient demonstration of notability through significant coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources.
Given your experience, could you kindly guide me on how to better identify and incorporate additional references that meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for individuals? Specifically, any advice on sourcing and documenting significant coverage beyond brief mentions would be invaluable. My aim is to ensure that the submission accurately reflects Thomas Truong's contributions and adheres to Wikipedia's standards.
Thank you for considering my request. I look forward to your guidance.
Best regards, X --Techlover1593 (talk) 17:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- When requesting comment on a specific article, it is necessary to provide a link to the article so that it can be opened and read. In this case the point is moot, as contributions by people blocked as sockpuppets tend to be deleted on principle. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 05:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- You should read the instructions for WP:Notability, WP:Biographies of living persons, and WP:Conflict of interest. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 06:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Admin request
Hi would you be able offer some advice on how to proceed on this talk page comment? Almost 6 months ago I engaged with the issue on whether to describe David Lammy as British, English or both. Made several attempts to explain and engage, disagreements continued so I disengaged and came back. The disagreements continue with the same users and despite providing 18 (I believe) sources to help, I am met with comments that imply I am motivated by discrimination. My offer of compromise has been rejected and personal attacks are starting. I would very much appreciate advice on what I can do, is there a way you can have a look? I started a dispute resolution but unfortunately there is no engagement with the substance of the sources and argument. I am lost. Erzan (talk) 10:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
About the FA nomination of cataract surgery
Hello! Thank you for letting me know about this, I'm glad of your achievement! : ) Oltrepier (talk) 11:08, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oltrepier You may find it interesting to take part in the FA discussions if you have not been involved in one before, or at least observe the process. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 11:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Pbsouthwood I'll definitely try to do it if I'll have enough time, thank you! Oltrepier (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Question from Quintus rex on User:Diablo666Daemon666 (04:38, 17 February 2024)
Would Jehovah’s witnesses be christian? --Quintus rex (talk) 04:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Try reading the article Jehovah's Witnesses, the information should be there. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 08:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Index of underwater divers for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of underwater divers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hypericum × inodorum on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tropical Storm Dolores (2021) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mount Edziza on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
March 2024 GAN backlog drive
| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive |  |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
Hello and good day. What is the proper method to correct transposed words on the format? --R.Nico528 (talk) 21:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- R.Nico528 I need more information to be sure I understand your question. Perhaps you could give an example of the specific problem?
- If it is a small number, it may be easiest to simply manually edit. If there are many, a find and replace may be the way to go. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 03:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Modafinil on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lecideaceae on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination, and at Talk:Appalachian temperate rainforest on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Silver Hill Mine on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Question from Miklusha Quoffie (22:13, 24 February 2024)
Hello! I wish to create my biography --Miklusha Quoffie (talk) 22:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Miklusha Quoffie, Please read Wikipedia:Autobiography. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 18:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Question from Kikidoll13 (21:19, 26 February 2024)
How do we report an editor for misconduct? --Kikidoll13 (talk) 21:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Kikidoll13, It would depend to some extent on the type of misconduct. The information page Wikipedia:Noticeboards explains some of the recommended venues. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 04:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ballast Island (Japan) on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Early glassmaking in the United States on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Interstate 55 in Tennessee on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Texas City refinery explosion on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hackaball on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Phase I of the 2024 RfA review is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the requests for adminship process.
- Following an RfC, the inactivity requirement for the removal of the interface administrator right increased from 6 months to 12 months.
Technical news
- The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)
Miscellaneous
- The 2024 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Doǵu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, MdsShakil, Minorax, Nehaoua, Renvoy and RoySmith as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
- Following the 2024 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Ajraddatz, Albertoleoncio, EPIC, JJMC89, Johannnes89, Melos and Yahya.
Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Snowy albatross on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dissoderma odoratum on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gustaf Einar Du Rietz on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2002 Van Wert–Roselms tornado on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Confluentic acid on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cookie stuffing on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Question from Emmanuele Béthery EN (18:59, 3 March 2024)
Hello Pbsouthwood, I drafted a new artcile that was rejected early February. I edited the drafted following the feedback, and now would like to re-submit. I can not find how to re-submit. Where can I do that? Thank you. --Emmanuele Béthery EN (talk) 18:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Emmanuele Béthery EN, If you are referring to Maurice Pellosh, it has already been moved to main space, and a notice to this effect is on your talk page. If you are referring to another draft, please link to it so I know what you are talking about. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 07:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Question from Bigjoe Rio (19:57, 7 March 2024)
Just to say hello, bud. --Bigjoe Rio (talk) 19:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Bigjoe Rio, Welcome to Wikipedia. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 01:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Missing edit summaries
I see that you mostly dont use edit summaries- but you should ! Wuerzele (talk) 17:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Wuerzele, Last time I looked, edit summaries were not compulsory except for a few special circumstances where they are necessary for attribution. I am very careful to ensure that I use the required edit summaries in those cases. When I make any edit that seems likely to be confusing or controversial, I try to ensure that I leave an edit summary to explain my actions. When it will be obvious to the reader by simply examining the edit, I often do not bother, as my time can be better spent on more edits. When I can't remember all that I have done in an edit I prefer to not mislead anyone by making a misleading summary, which in my opinion is far worse than none at all. You are free to entertain different opinions, and you are free to request an explanation from me for any edit which you do not understand. If I consider the request reasonable I will try to explain sufficiently for the needs of a reasonable person. Like almost everyone else here, I am a volunteer, and I use my time how it seems worthwhile to me. Trivial edit summaries do not make the cut. Is there any specific circumstance in which you claim my lack of edit summary has caused a problem? Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 17:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- In these 50 edits over 3 days for example. Like almost everyone else here, I too am a volunteer and I dont have time to look up each edit but if I see red and red I wonder what did you do? I too use my time how it seems worthwhile to me and I find not using edit summaries makes review difficult- it doesnt enable it. I think you should provide an edit summary.--Wuerzele (talk) 20:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Wuerzele, I do not understand your reference to seeing red, so may be missing something of importance in your argument. If you don't have time to look up each edit, how do you know what the edit was? There is no way that I am aware of to know whether the edit summary was accurate without inspecting the edit. I have seen many inaccurate edit summaries, so do not assume they are accurate unless I am familiar with the editor's work and trust them, at which point the edit summary is usually redundant.
Do you have objective evidence that the time you would save by me making edit summaries would improve the encyclopedia more than the time I save not making edit summaries and therefore spend on improving the encyclopedia? I am unaware of any study which claims that conclusion, but would be interested to see one.
Your example is a case of where I would consider it fairly obvious from inspection what I was doing. I was expanding/updating a list. I do not know what further information you would find necessary or desirable in the 46 edit summaries that would have covered those edits.
At this point I am seeing a claim that you think your work and time is more important than mine, but no evidence to support that claim. Why should I take it seriously? I think I should provide edit summaries when it seems a worthwhile investment of my time, which includes those cases where it is specifically required, and where it will make it clear why I am making a specific edit where it might me considered controversial, as in removal of content without an obvious reason, or reverting someone else's edit. I will also usually mention when copy editing or clarifying a point.
If you want everyone to provide an edit summary with every edit, your recourse is to get policy changed by running a site-wide RfC, but I think that has been tried before without success. I think it would be a huge waste of everyone's time, but it is the only way to make it obligatory. If you try that, I recommend first collecting some convincing evidence that it would be a net gain.
If you just want to get people to make edit summaries without making them compulsory, try providing convincing objective third party evidence that it is worth their trouble. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 03:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)- Red is deleting, and as for the rest of your verbose above: I merely repeated your wording. (Now you see what it sounds like) Interesting, that you think I insinuate my time is more worthwhile. Then you d have to interpret the same in to the sentence you wrote to me.
- Wuerzele, Thank you for clarifying. Yes, to me my time is more important, and it would be entirely reasonable for you to consider your time more important to you, but I am not telling you what you should do with your time, except in the context of you attempting to persuade me to do a thing I am not required to do, where I am suggesting that you do not waste it. Cheers · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 18:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide edit summaries.
Edit summaries are a collaboration tool, and Wikipedia is a collaborative environment where we all work together. It helps the team (all of us) understand what each other are doing, which facilitates better and faster quality control, and serves as an educational tool for experienced editors to train new editors which helps overcome the problems caused by Wikipedia's high editor turnover rate. Thus, edit summaries leverage the team's time.
Use of edit summaries also helps increase transparency, which builds trust, not just of individual editors, but of the entire project.
Due to its role in working with others, using edit summaries is a show of respect for them – from a sociological standpoint, that may be the most compelling reason of all to provide them.
Personally, I find edit summaries invaluable for 2 reasons: 1) they provide a shield from knee-jerk reversion by justifying edits, and 2) for reviewing my own work, to aid memory of what I did years ago, relieving me of having to go in deeper to figure it out.
Weighing the costs and benefits, while skipping the provision of edit summaries may seem to save time on the individual level, their value lies in the aggregate -- the more editors who summarize their edits, the more useful they become: swaths of edits with blank edit summaries have become a red flag that assist experienced editors in homing in on problems and problem editors. When competent editors don't use them, it creates an ambiguity that makes the work of Wikipedia's watchdogs more difficult. We truly appreciate when editors summarize their work.
One way to reduce the tedium of providing an edit summary for each and every edit during an edit session on an article, is to write an opening edit summary for the session ("begin general edit session") and then at the end of the edit session, provide a summary of what you tried to accomplish during the session.
Edit summaries get easier the more practice you get. Once they become habit, they don't feel like a burden at all.
I hope these observations and tips help change your mind about providing edit summaries.
Cheers, — The Transhumanist 01:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)- The Transhumanist, I will think about your suggestions. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 17:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide edit summaries.
- Wuerzele, Thank you for clarifying. Yes, to me my time is more important, and it would be entirely reasonable for you to consider your time more important to you, but I am not telling you what you should do with your time, except in the context of you attempting to persuade me to do a thing I am not required to do, where I am suggesting that you do not waste it. Cheers · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 18:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Red is deleting, and as for the rest of your verbose above: I merely repeated your wording. (Now you see what it sounds like) Interesting, that you think I insinuate my time is more worthwhile. Then you d have to interpret the same in to the sentence you wrote to me.
- Hi Wuerzele, I do not understand your reference to seeing red, so may be missing something of importance in your argument. If you don't have time to look up each edit, how do you know what the edit was? There is no way that I am aware of to know whether the edit summary was accurate without inspecting the edit. I have seen many inaccurate edit summaries, so do not assume they are accurate unless I am familiar with the editor's work and trust them, at which point the edit summary is usually redundant.
- In these 50 edits over 3 days for example. Like almost everyone else here, I too am a volunteer and I dont have time to look up each edit but if I see red and red I wonder what did you do? I too use my time how it seems worthwhile to me and I find not using edit summaries makes review difficult- it doesnt enable it. I think you should provide an edit summary.--Wuerzele (talk) 20:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Question from Mw6630! on Talk:Technical Service Bulletin (11:56, 29 March 2024)
Good morning, I'm marcus, I'm having issue with my 2016 587 peterbilt truck abs system...I've replace the abs sensor multiple times ,went to many shops, but issue persist..it's giving fault code 22 an flashing my service light, every now an then I could do an key switch clear code an I'm fine for the day, but once I crank up again the problems back.. --Mw6630! (talk) 11:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Mw6630!, Sorry, this is Wikipedia, an encyclopedia, not a service manual, and I am not a truck technician, so cannot help you. I suggest you contact your local agent or the manufacturer. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 12:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Question from RJClark1447 (12:12, 29 March 2024)
I have created an article in my sandbox and now want to submit it for review. How do I do that? --RJClark1447 (talk) 12:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi RJClatk1447, the page User:RJClark1447/sandbox, to which I assume you refer, needs references to show that it is a notable topic, and references to allow verification of the content by the reviewer and any other reader before it should be submitted for review. In its present state it is nor ready for Wikipedia article space. I recommend that you read Help:Your first article, Wikipedia:Notability, and Wikipedia:Verifiability to get a better idea of how things are done here, and revise your draft accordingly. When you are confident that the draft complies with Wikipedia's requirements, you can add the template {{AfC submission}} to the draft, which will tag it as ready for review, and one of the new page reviewers will review it, possibly leave comments on required or recommended improvements, accept or reject the submission, and leave you a message. Hope this helps, Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 12:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.
Technical news
- The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)
Arbitration
- An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".
Miscellaneous
- Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Organism on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello Pbsouthwood,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)