Paulgrra

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Guerra (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul Guerra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:54, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Paul Guerra

Hello, Paulgrra. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Paul Guerra".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 08:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Unblock Request to Bbb23

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paulgrra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Bbb23 I am sorry about all these, now with some research done I totally get it's my bad. I am new to the Wikipedia community (joined on 2015 but I never contributed an article) and didn't know I was doing something against its policy. Time ago, I found that my page was put on by someone, but then some months after I've realized it disappeared, so I put it again myself thinking I could do that. Then, when Smartse put it down the first time, I thought it was because I put it myself, so I asked my publicist to put it back again through her office, and I just found out it was taken down again twice through her users. Today, I've just read Smartse's response to the question I made him on his talk page about why my article was taken down the first time, and he said that I do fulfill Wikipedia's notability requirements to be on the site, but that I need to let it grow organically. On May 18th, he put it up again in a shorter version waiting to let it grow organically (thing I didn't know). I assume after that was when my publicist tried to post it again and it caused this misunderstanding. I'm willing to make this right. I am an artist with an extensive work portfolio which can be proved with all the press articles, footage, interviews, awards, videos, etc. that I have garnered through all these years of trajectory. Please let me show those proofs to you by email or here if you unblock me to write you on your talk page. All the best, Paul GuerraPaulgrra (talk) 22:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Since your only goal here is to edit an article about yourself, I'm declining this request. Editing about yourself is against our WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIO policies. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:19, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paulgrra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia community and Vanjagenije: Hope all is well. I'm writing again because I probably didn't explain myself in the right way. My previous request was just trying to make a point that when Smartse replied to me on his talk page, he said I as an artist have all the requirements to have a page here, but it needed to be made by someone who's not me or relative to me and also by their own will and organically. Said that, I understand I can't make an article about myself, I learned my lesson and I won't do it. Said that, I'm just trying to get unblocked in order to contribute lots of content that I feel would help Wikipedia and everyone in this community. When I wrote the page for myself I didn't know about rules and the policy here, but in the process of writing and putting references, I liked the activity and I know I can put up some nice articles about other productions and movies and plays of the entertainment world that aren't here yet. That's it, thanks again for your time.Paulgrra (talk) 23:55, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As a starting point, you need to address the evidence of your sock puppetry at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HemantDas34/Archive. Just Chilling (talk) 17:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paulgrra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Regarding Just Chilling response that I should address my sock puppetry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/HemantDas34/Archive, I already said that these mistakes were committed in good faith and I have a very strong argument to prove it. First of all, I had a page created by some Wikipedia editor last year and it was put down after some months of being online. When I saw that, for obvious reasons I was concerned since due to my profession lots of people and casting directors rely on google searches to find my IMDb page and any other prestigious source that shows my previous work and experience, and Wikipedia was one of those. Therefore, I tried to fix that because I thought there was some mistake about it. Honestly, I didn't know the reason that made my page being put down (since I wasn't and never been an active member on the Wikipedia community), so I proceeded myself to try to put it back again without being aware that was against WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIO policies. Therefore, when it was taken down this time I created it, I assumed there was something wrong with it so I looked on the eliminated page link and it appeared that User:Smartse deleted it. So, I proceeded to write on his talk page and let him know what happened, but since I hadn't activated email notifications on my settings nor I wasn't checking my user page frequently, I didn't realize he responded me (I just looked on my name to see if the page was put up again and it wasn't). Secondly, after all this happened, I asked a friend of mine with his user Futstore to fix it and edit my page again (I repeat, without knowing this was my mistake). When I got worried because I thought Smartse never replied to me, I checked on his talk page and he actually responded to me on May 18th and said "Rather strangely just after you left this note, someone recreated the article about you. It does appear that you meet our notability requirements for actors meaning that we should have an article about you. I have added some references present in the article I deleted which demonstrate this. I will not be restoring the full version however and request that you leave the article as it is and let if grow organically if someone is interested to write more about you. Thanks SmartSE (talk)". Once I saw that I obviously meet the notability requirements, I thought everything was ok with my page and that it was to be online for good and I was going to follow his instruction to let it grow organically. Unfortunately, since it was already recreated by my friend, it was taken down again. I thought this happened because the recreation came from a friend of mine through the same IP address it was created by my username. Third; after all these incidents, I thought my publicist was going to be the only person who could put it back online, so I asked her to fix it for me. Under HermantDas34's investigation that event appears as a possilikely socket puppetry performed by me, but I insist, these all came from a good place and never was meant to harm or try to fool Wikipedia's policies and their very dedicated and respectful community of editors and contributors. I just wanted let my page be online since I really have the notability to be on this website, nothing else. I know now, once it's online I have to let it as is and to grow organically. Also. I'm not trying to get unblocked to create an article about myself, I know now after all these events that that's against Wikipedia's policy. I just want to have a valid username to be able to contribute to the community with articles and content that I realized on this time that could be beneficial for the community and especially the Theatre Community, where major artists and plays don't have a reference page, and I would love to have the chance to create them on my free time. At this point, I have really explained in detail everything that happened in the last month and I really apologize for my mistakes and I appeal to your understanding on this case.Paulgrra (talk) 08:25, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks and no admin has decided to weigh in. You are welcome to request another unblock, but if you do so, please rewrite your request. Yamla (talk) 01:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Bbb23 I'd be willing to undo this given the explanation above - however as this is tagged as a checkuser block I can't. Can you give your opinion please? GoldenRing (talk) 15:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Paul, did you and Futstore edit Wikipedia from the same computer? I'd also like to get Smartse's input.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Bbb23 Yes, as I explained in my request, I asked a friend of mine to do it for me, since at the time my ignorance about all these was huge, I just thought the recreation needed to come from someone else, so my friend did it through his user Futstore, but yes, in the same computer and same IP address I'm sure. (Paulgrra (talk) 18:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)).

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paulgrra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

In response to Yamla[1] procedural decline, I'm sending again my request as she told me since my request has been unanswered for more than two weeks by any administrator who could weigh in this case. therefore, I'd like to repeat and expose in detail why I consider my request has strong arguments and makes a point: Regarding Just Chilling response that I should address my sock puppetry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/HemantDas34/Archive, I already said that these mistakes were committed in good faith and I have a very strong argument to prove it. First of all, I had a page created by some Wikipedia editor last year and it was put down after some months of being online. When I saw that, for obvious reasons I was concerned since due to my profession lots of people and casting directors rely on google searches to find my IMDb page and any other prestigious source that shows my previous work and experience, and Wikipedia was one of those. Therefore, I tried to fix that because I thought there was some mistake about it. Honestly, I didn't know the reason that made my page being put down (since I wasn't and never been an active member on the Wikipedia community), so I proceeded myself to try to put it back again without being aware that was against WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIO policies. Therefore, when it was taken down this time I created it, I assumed there was something wrong with it so I looked on the eliminated page link and it appeared that User:Smartse deleted it. So, I proceeded to write on his talk page and let him know what happened, but since I hadn't activated email notifications on my settings nor I wasn't checking my user page frequently, I didn't realize he responded me (I just looked on my name to see if the page was put up again and it wasn't). Secondly, after all this happened, I asked a friend of mine with his user Futstore to fix it and edit my page again (I repeat, without knowing this was my mistake). When I got worried because I thought Smartse never replied to me, I checked on his talk page and he actually responded to me on May 18th and said "Rather strangely just after you left this note, someone recreated the article about you. It does appear that you meet our notability requirements for actors meaning that we should have an article about you. I have added some references present in the article I deleted which demonstrate this. I will not be restoring the full version however and request that you leave the article as it is and let if grow organically if someone is interested to write more about you. Thanks SmartSE (talk)". Once I saw that I obviously meet the notability requirements, I thought everything was ok with my page and that it was to be online for good and I was going to follow his instruction to let it grow organically. Unfortunately, since it was already recreated by my friend, it was taken down again. I thought this happened because the recreation came from a friend of mine through the same IP address it was created by my username. Third; after all these incidents, I thought my publicist was going to be the only person who could put it back online, so I asked her to fix it for me. Under HermantDas34's investigation that event appears as a possilikely socket puppetry performed by me, but I insist, these all came from a good place and never was meant to harm or try to fool Wikipedia's policies and their very dedicated and respectful community of editors and contributors. I just wanted let my page be online since I really have the notability to be on this website, nothing else. I know now, once it's online I have to let it as is and to grow organically. Also. I'm not trying to get unblocked to create an article about myself, I know now after all these events that that's against Wikipedia's policy. I just want to have a valid username to be able to contribute to the community with articles and content that I realized on this time that could be beneficial for the community and especially the Theatre Community, where major artists and plays don't have a reference page, and I would love to have the chance to create them on my free time. At this point, I have really explained in detail everything that happened in the last month and I really apologize for my mistakes and I appeal to your understanding on this case. Paulgrra (talk) 04:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request is essentially identical to the previous one which had remained open since June. Given that, there's no reason to believe simply reposting it will convince any admin to weigh in. You are welcome to request another unblock, but must substantially rewrite your request so as to be more convincing. Yamla (talk) 11:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I asked you to rewrite your unblock request. You didn't. You should expect this unblock request to remain ignored indefinitely, just as your previous one was. --Yamla (talk) 12:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)