PapasGrandes
Sockpuppet investigation
edit
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BeloyiseBurron, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
July 2014
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC) |
PapasGrandes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I never made edits~
Decline reason:
Technical and behavioural evidence both indicate convincingly that you are the same user as User:IHR.HIASO. Yunshui 雲水 14:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
i dont understand why someone asking questions about citations gets blocked when I haven't made any edits to the page. I thought the Wikipedia community allowed helpful pieces. There has been no help but instead just banishment when I haven't done anything to warrant. If it was sockpupperty, wouldn't the point be to make the company look good? or is it sockpupperty to make the company look bad? either way, how does asking questions allow for such a response? (PapasGrandes (talk) 13:09, 31 July 2014 (UTC))