March 2015 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oldjoe2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I lost my password to mirrortoamermaid, and so created the oldjoe2 account to use instead. I have now found my password to the mirrortoamermaid account. I used mirrortoamermaid, stopped using it as I lost the password, then created the oldjoe2 account. At no point was I using both the oldjoe2 account and the mirrortoamermaid account at the same time.

Decline reason:

You appear to have used these accounts to vote twice in an AFD and have never linked them. Can you show me where you indicated that the accounts were the same person? Kuru (talk) 13:19, 21 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • I have revoked Talk page access here, not for abuse, but purely to keep things in one place. The individual admits to using both accounts and has found the password to the master account. Therefore, he can use that account to discuss the blocks rather than this one. I will comment at the other Talk page.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Alan Taylor (circuit judge) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Taylor (circuit judge) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Taylor (circuit judge) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uhooep (talk) 10:51, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply