Wikipedia

User talk:Northamerica1000/Archive 23

< User talk:Northamerica1000
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Northamerica1000 in topic Disambiguation link notification for December 8
Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25→Archive 30

The fish we eat

Latest comment: 9 years ago18 comments2 people in discussion

What do you think of this?

I tried finding such an article to identify some fish I bought at the market. I am sure others do this too, only to find the article doesn't exist. Surely, every country or continent has a dozen or two really common market and restaurant fish and people want to know what they are.

I found via Seafood, this ref: ftp://ftp.fao.org/FI/STAT/summary/default.htm

So, thoughts? Please weigh in at the wikiproject page if you like. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:06, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

 
Fresh seafood on sale in Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Hi A.F.: Have you seen List of types of seafood? This may provide what you're looking for. This would also benefit from descriptions being added. NorthAmerica1000 15:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Nice. I started List of the most commonly harvested fish. I'm just adding some missing items and will shorty move the page to somethign like List of most harvested aquatic species. It will include the items in the refs. Thoughts on a title? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi A.F.: Perhaps the title "List of most commonly harvested fish" (simply omitting the word "the" in the present title) would suffice. It's functional to not use the term seafood in the title, because doing so would omit freshwater fish from the list, as seafood is the term for sea life in the oceans (saltwater fish). NorthAmerica1000 15:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
But would "fish" encompass bivalves and crabs and such? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 
Geoduck is an example of a saltwater clam classified in the phylum Mollusca
A.F.: No. Bivalves are classified as phylum Mollusca, whereas fish are classified in phylum Chordate. Crustaceans, such as crab, are classified in phylum Arthropoda. Basically, shellfish, mollusks, bivalves and crustaceans are not fish. NorthAmerica1000 16:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
But in the world of fisheries, does fish mean all aquatic produce? What I am getting at, considering that the article contains crabs and mollusks etc, what should the title be? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
A.F.: "List of the most commonly harvested aquatic organisms animals" would work. NorthAmerica1000 16:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
A.F.: (Modified above: organisms would also include plantae). See also: Aquatic animal. NorthAmerica1000 16:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Now I'm starting to thing along different lines. Commonly means on many occasions. But this is not about how many times, but how much mass, right? Maybe List of commercially harvested aquatic animals by ton. Am I driving you insane? :) I think I need sleep. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:41, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
AF: To include quantification in the title, I recommend: "List of harvested aquatic animals by weight". This is in part because fish harvests are not limited to commercial endeavors. Also, tons and tonnes have varying definitions in the U.K. and the U.S., so I would use the word weight, and include information about which definition of ton/tonne is being used in the article. If you want the list limited to commercial harvests, then "List of commercially-harvested aquatic animals by weight" would work. NorthAmerica1000 16:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Okay, I've gone bonkers now and must sleep. None of these sound right. Maybe a fisheries project post is best. And I always thought it was a British spelling thing about tonne and ton. They should fix that. On this other planet, they have the "tenne"? It doesn't matter how heavy a tenne is, so long as there are ten of them. Not the brightest planet. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 
A 20,000-gallon tropical reef aquarium
AF: To add even more to the matter, there are also aquatic animals that are harvested for aquarium use. Check out this interesting 2012 article from Roger Williams University: Marine Aquarium Fish Trade Study Reveals Fewer Fish, More Species Imported. Is the list going to be limited to fish harvested for consumption only? NorthAmerica1000 17:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Sure, but because the list is about the most in terms of weight, aquarium fishes won't be on the list. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

AF: At any rate, the title "List of harvested aquatic animals by weight" would not limit the list to commercial-only, although it's likely that harvests with the highest quantities are going to be performed by commercial operations anyway. NorthAmerica1000 17:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

 
The talking geoduck thanks you...
AF: Also, thanks for creating the new article! NorthAmerica1000 17:37, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done I like your title suggestion and have moved the page. Thank you kindly for your good suggestions. Oh, and you never need to give me a talkback or whisperback. I watch your page. :) :) :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:47, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

 
v2 by AF
AF: Thanks. List of harvested aquatic animals by weight is interrelated with several topics, so it will be interesting to see how the article progresses. NorthAmerica1000 14:21, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Request for adminship

Latest comment: 9 years ago23 comments8 people in discussion
Pre-RfA discussion (extended content)

After significant consideration, I have decided to move forward with another request for adminship. Per this previous discussion on my talk page and this recent discussion, I am seeking nominators and potential co-nominators, and this area of my talk page may be used for discussion. Also, I enabled email from other users today for my account.

Some matters that I have thought over:

  • Please see this previous discussion on my talk page for extensive discussion and commentary that occurred
  • FeydHuxtable and Stalwart111 have both recommended Spartaz as a nominator, as per this discussion
  • I'm looking to commence on November 15, 2014. This will provide ample time for people to discuss here and for me to wrap up some loose ends and write answers for the first three standard questions for the candidate.
  • Due to a high number of relistings and deletion sorting I have performed for deletion discussions, standard queries using AfD Stats produces muddled results. There are also some errors occurring in the lists AfD stats generates, in which it lists my having !voted in various discussions where this did not occur. Please see User:Northamerica1000/AfD statistics for an overview regarding these matters and for custom AfD Stats queries, which produce better results.
  • Since people routinely use AfD stats when considering RfAs, background regarding AfD Stats matters and a link to my AfD statistics page (linked above) should likely be stated somewhere in the RfA, preferably in the nomination area so it is not missed.
  • It would likely be beneficial to include links within a nomination to provide an overview of deletion work I have performed, so that participants at the RfA are aware of these contributions:

Overview

A significant part of the work I have performed on Wikipedia is in areas of deletion, such as closing AfD discussions, performing speedy deletion nominations and managing the AfD logs and discussions, such as performing relistings and deletion sorting. I routinely encounter and pass over AfD discussions with clear consensuses for deletion, because I cannot delete articles. The tools would enable me to use my skills to delete articles in accordance with Wikipedia's Deletion policy, when consensus is for this to occur.

In areas of speedy deletion, my extensive experience in performing nominations has led to my acquisition of all of the procedures and policies (e.g. Criteria for speedy deletion) upon which it is based. I have the skills and abilities to accurately identify content that should be speedy deleted, which my CSD log demonstrates. Thus, acquisition of the tools would enable me to perform deletions of speedy deletion candidates.

I have the skills, ability and knowledge to use the tools properly and with precision, and look forward to the prospect of adminship to better-enable my contributions to English Wikipedia. NorthAmerica1000 12:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

  • (Per previous discussions, I have notified the following users about this discussion on their talk pages: User:Spartaz, User:FeydHuxtable, User:Stalwart111, User:RoySmith, User:Anna Frodesiak). NorthAmerica1000 12:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
I didn't get the memo, but I stalk a lot of talkpages... It's heartening to hear that you're throwing your hat into the ring again. As I recall, I ended up switching from Support to Neutral at your last RFA (which I rather regret, now), but I would be very happy to nom- or co-nominate you for another run. Whether you'd like me to do that or not, you can count on my Support !vote (and unless you do something drastic like blanking the Main Page or calling Jimbo something unmentionable, I expect to stay in that column this time). Yunshui 雲水 12:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes this is very heartening indeed, fantastic news for the encyclopedia North! The only new advise I have is to shut up shop for new noms once you have a max of 3. From past observation many voters don't like to see too many co nominators. Best of luck to you! FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
You might want to look at Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Northamerica1000 and think how you could show that concerns raised there have been dealt with. Maybe even ask some of the people who oppose then how they feel now. I reckon 3 co-noms is excessive but that's just me. Good luck anyway. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • [MOVED from Stalwart's talk page] Sorry for jumping into this discussion. I have seen the earlier discussions about RfA on your and Anna's talk page. I have few questions (I'm asking here just to keep this in one place). NA1000, have you ever been in a conflict with another editor in the past 1 year for your AfD closings? Have you ever been taken to ANI for any of your NAC closing in the last 6 months? I observed your edits of the last few weeks and I'm quite impressed. But I have seen no participation in Afd discussions in the last few weeks? You have relisted lots of Afds and have done many NAC but no involvement in the discussion (pardon me if I have missed something). I haven't seen your Afd stats (There is a technical problem) can you refer me to some of your Afds where you participated in the past few weeks? Another thing, I have seen many "no consensus" closings, have you ever considered to participate in the discussion instead closing it as no consensus? I have seen you creating lots and lots of articles or I should say lists which is good. Your CSD log, XfD and creation log is pretty impressive. I'm also willing to co-nom if you and Stalwart don't have any problem. Thanks! Jim Carter 16:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
User:Jim Cartar: There have been some disagreements about some AfD closures I have performed, which will occur from time-to-time for anyone that routinely closes discussions, but not what I would describe as conflict. Matters are typically worked out in discussion on my user talk page. See my talk page archives for examples, such as 1, 2, 3, 4. I have not been taken to ANI for anything for almost three years. Some recent AfD discussions I have contributed to include 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Regarding my AfD stats, see my AfD statistics page for an overview and a way to view them. At times I do contribute to discussions rather than closing them. NorthAmerica1000 17:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks North for answering my questions. I think you are ready for RfA. Best, Jim Carter 06:16, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Regarding the two new potential nominators above (User:Yunshui and User:Jim Cartar), I'm going to wait until everyone I have notified responds herein because some of those users have stated in the past that they would provide a nomination, and I don't want to leave anybody out. I thank you both for your support. NorthAmerica1000 18:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm still game, if slightly amused to see my value as a nom talked up so much.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spartaz (talk • contribs) 23:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • I've been an admin for about 10 years and spend most of my time on AfD. I've seen Northamerica1000 doing a lot of work there (doing non-admin closings), and for the most part, he's impressed me as somebody who knows what he's doing and has good judgement. As far as I'm concerned, that's really what this is all about. He deserves a mop. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:40, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I remain ready and willing to craft a co-nomination but I certainly wouldn't feel aggrieved if others were to put their hands up in my place. I'll remain just as supportive and my willingness to hand co-nom privileges over to others shouldn't be seen as wavering on my part. I've never nominated before; I've never even actively supported someone for adminship before. I've showed up to vote, or ask questions, or blather about something, but that's it. I suppose I thought there might be some benefit in the fact that NA1K and I have disagreed at plenty of AFDs (like this one) and he has closed plenty of discussions as "no consensus" despite my strong personal opinion one way or the other. Despite this, I actively support his being given the tools that would allow him to decide AFDs not "in my favour". In fact, his thoughtful "no consensus" close of a discussion along those lines was what prompted me to show up here and advocate for another run. But that can be explained just as comprehensively in a statement of support as in a nomination. St★lwart111 05:53, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
YGM
 
Hello, Northamerica1000. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Jim Carter 18:44, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi Stalwart111: A nomination based upon differences of opinion we have had in the past at various AfD discussions or upon closes that did not correspond with your !voting has the potential to polarize the RfA based upon sporadic examples, rather than presenting an overview of the extensive and various work I have performed in all areas of deletion on Wikipedia. Regarding my discussion closures, they're based upon overall consensuses in discussions (or lack thereof for NC closes) and input from all users. In this manner, a no consensus close for an article you have have !voted to keep or delete is not a difference of opinion, because all commentary/!votes are taken into account when closing discussions relative to Wikipedia guidelines and policies, and I never close discussions that I have !voted in. I'm also a little nervous that mine would be your first nomination, and it may be more functional for users who have more experience to nominate/co-nominate. NorthAmerica1000 02:13, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Agree 100%, on all counts! St★lwart111 00:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
User:Stalwart111: Thanks for your understanding and sincerity. NorthAmerica1000 00:39, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Nominators

Upon significant consideration, I would utmostly appreciate receiving a nomination from User:Spartaz and co-nominations from User:Yunshui and User:RoySmith. I thank all participants herein for your support, and look forward to proceeding with the RfA. NorthAmerica1000 02:13, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

User:Spartaz: Thanks so much, and take your time. I'm looking to commence with the RfA on November 15. NorthAmerica1000 07:24, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Good job, i was consumed by the paying job today. I'll try to do it this week. Spartaz Humbug! 17:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
N.b. The RfA page has been created, located at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Northamerica1000 2. NorthAmerica1000 03:55, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
I have completed the nomination statement. Please feel free to suggest amendments or additions. Good luck. You deserve the bit. Spartaz Humbug! 08:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
N.b. It's live; transcluded to WP:RFA today. NorthAmerica1000 06:16, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

RfA

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Good luck to you! I wish you a safe and speedy journey through the "meat grinder"...! :) --SCalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 19:04, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks very much. NorthAmerica1000 02:34, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 
Hello, Northamerica1000. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Jim Carter 19:14, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Re your RFA. Quick pep talk since hell week is living up to its name. I didn't expect it to be plain sailing and some people were bound to oppose based on your previous RFA history. Remember that not all opposes are equal and you are already well settled towards the lower end of the promote range. You are doing a good job by not responding to the opposes, it never ends well and has the danger of looking like badgering when you do discuss/challenge. Keep it up and you should be fine. Short of a smoking gun emerging its unlikely now the overall balance will change significantly. even if you lose a few points and slip into discretionary id not expect all the oppose votes to get full weight. Spartaz Humbug! 13:44, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Seasonal Greetings

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,
I was impressed by your Halloween greets template and then decide to go for a seasonal greetings template myself. Its from last year. A true blend of Template:Xmas2 and some other such guys. Please fix it and lets collaborate in the work. Methink, you had this in your head, but I disrupted your plan. Can you??--The Herald 12:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi User:The Herald: Very nice, with lots of detail. I have performed some minor edits to the template per your comment above. NorthAmerica1000 14:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

A Barnstar For You

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Yet another barnstar from me for the same reason: you are creating phenomenal amounts of Wikipedia's content on food. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks very much, and thanks for your extensive work too. NorthAmerica1000 11:54, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Mazagran (coffee beverage)

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that ...

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I really don't know how I blamed you for that comment when Unscintillating was the one to make it. Call it a brain freeze. Nha Trang 21:40, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply (regarding this discussion). NorthAmerica1000 01:48, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2014)

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Military aviation and missile guidance are examples of modern military technology.
Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Military technology

Previous selections: Everyday life • Pizza

Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:18, 17 November 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Tech News: 2014-47

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Software changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf8) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since November 12. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 18, and on all Wikipedias from November 19 (calendar).
  • The new search tool ("CirrusSearch") will be on the English Wikipedia from November 19. [1]

Move from Bugzilla to Phabricator

  • The tool to track bugs will change on November 21.
  • You won't be able to add or edit bugs between November 21 and November 24.
  • You can make the change easier for you by creating your account.
  • Bugzilla will be frozen after the change. You will see, edit and report bugs in Phabricator.
  • You can join two IRC chats to learn more about the change. The chats will be on Tuesday, November 18 at 16:00 (UTC) and 23:00 UTC. [2]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

18:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

ARS

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. I brought this up at the RfA but it's kind of off-topic, but I'll give you my thoughts.

I like the idea of a group that monitors AfD and looks for articles that can be "rescued" by improving them. I'd normally expect this to cover historical or foreign articles where obvious sources can't be found on the end of a vanilla google search, and keep content that really should be kept, but just can't obviously be proven to be deserving.

Where the ARS has gone wrong is I think its reputation of editors (and I don't think you're the worst offender in this group at all!) randomly turning up to !vote "keep" at any AfD without any serious and substantial, frustrating everyone else. I suspect this is because actually rescuing an article from AfD (eg: University of Michigan Men's Glee Club) can be quite hard work, whereas joining a club and writing "keep" ... isn't!

Anyway, that's sort of my views. As to whether anyone can reform ARS in that manner and transform its reputation, who knows?

PS: Sorry about voting "oppose" in the RfA. I don't like coming across as a kitten-stomping old grump, and fully appreciate it's not nice news. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Hi Ritchie: To reiterate (and provide context for other readers who may come along here), I resigned from the project over two years ago, and haven't been involved with its membership. Presently, I'm just too busy with other endeavors to begin an analysis of the project's present state. If you're interested in making changes there, I recommend posting your ideas on its talk page, where others may provide more immediate input.
Nowadays, I collaborate with editors at WikiProject Today's articles for improvement to improve articles. I noticed that you're not a member of WP:TAFI, so be sure to check it out if you're interested in collaborative article improvement. NorthAmerica1000 15:47, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I popped Jethro Tull (band) on there some time back. I tend to just fix up articles rather than deciding they need lots of collaborative work, but mileage may vary. I think US Route 66 has been banded around as a candidate. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:48, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Relisting AfD

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I saw your relisting of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of National Basketball Association career 4-point play leaders. Given that there were seven participants (including nominator) already, and ignoring for the moment the arguments made by them, it seems borderline at best for a non-admin action. This type of relist does not appear to be recommended at either Wikipedia:Deletion process or Wikipedia:Non-admin closure. I won't revert your action, but you may want to revisit it on your own. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 20:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Bagumba: Thanks for your input and I will absolutely keep this in mind. I understand that per the levels of participation, the discussion could be interpreted as having received substantive debate, and that per WP:RELIST, relisting should not be substituted for a NC closure. I relisted in hopes for a consensus to become clearer for a particular action regarding the article. NorthAmerica1000 20:24, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-48

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • The move from Bugzilla to Phabricator is done. You can now report bugs in Phabricator. [3]

Problems

  • There was a problem when editing tables in VisualEditor. VisualEditor was trying to fix bad values for the colspan or rowspan option. VisualEditor now leaves the bad values to avoid making things worse. This was fixed on November 17. [4]

Software changes this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf9) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since November 19. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 25, and on all Wikipedias from November 26 (calendar).
  • You will be able to try VisualEditor on many new wikis for the first time. After November 26, VisualEditor will become available on Wikidata, Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikinews wikis. You can find it in your Beta options. [5]
  • VisualEditor now tells you if your edit needs to be approved. [6]
  • You can now use VisualEditor's tools directly when you resume editing after closing the save window. [7]
  • VisualEditor's table editing tools now work better in right-to-left languages. [8] [9]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

19:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Egyptian Steel logo.png

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Egyptian Steel logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:16, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

N.b. Resolved. NorthAmerica1000 01:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

International Airport

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  The Good Article Barnstar
Congratulations, International airport, an article you helped in prove as an active contributor amongst the team over at the wikiproject Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement has now been recognized with Good Article status here on Wikipedia. Your contributions among the the TAFI team and Wikipedia as a whole are appreciated. David Condrey log talk 08:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2014)

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
A beach on the island of San Andrés, a tourist destination in the Caribbean
Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Tourism in the Caribbean

Previous selections: Military technology • Everyday life

Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:38, 24 November 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Are you the admin?

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

How can I open an investigation page for this user? Biruitorul. He opened a deletion page for this article. Then he came there with this user (which was blocked shortly after) E4024 to comment. Biruitorul is his sockpuppet.FromoradeaFromoradea 04:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello User:Fromoradea: I am not an administrator. Please read WP:SPI for information about opening such an investigation. NorthAmerica1000 13:38, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  small baked treats that come in a wide array of flavors, shapes, and sizes. Hafspajen (talk) 21:46, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Just to be mean

Latest comment: 9 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion

This is probably before your time being the young lad you are, but Give it to Mikey, he'll eat anything is an article begging to be created, and I just don't have the time for something this complicated by myself. It is an expressing that has fallen into common use, often parodied or satirized, and it all started with this. [10] Because it is a food related yet cultural type article, I thought you might find it interesting and worth exploring. You do very well at this kind of stuff, a talent I wish I shared, which of course is why I'm sharing this burden. You aren't obligated, of course, I just found it interesting. At the very least, expanding Life (cereal) is due, but I think that a stand alone article is possible. Dennis - 2¢ 18:57, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Dennis, was that before your time too? Because it wasn't Mickey, it was Mikey. And it turns out that Little Mikey already has an article. He was such a cultural icon that a whole separate urban legend grew up around him, or rather around the child actor who played him. Definitely a fun subject, but probably not something Northamerica needs to add to his already heaping plate. Which reminds me, watch this space for upcoming RfA! MelanieN (talk) 19:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Ah, the return of my bad speling. Fixed. Hmm, that isn't the title I would have expected, as the catch phrase didn't use "little" anywhere. I was thinking a cultural article rather than a fictional bio, but it does seem to be covered there. It could be a redirect I suppose. My thinking was that it was about food, one of his favorite topics, but I get your point. Dennis - 2¢ 21:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
(ping: Dennis, MelanieN): Dennis thinks I'm a young lad...what's all this? Ha ha. I hesitate to post my age here, but maybe someday. Mikey likes it: notable national advertising campaigns in the U.S. from the early 1970s to hawk mass-produced breakfast cereal have a place somewhere. There's presently no article for Food advertising, but some content on Wikipedia includes: Adolescents and food marketing – Food advertising, Criticism of advertising – Food advertising and Fast food advertising. From the Little Mikey article, the overall campaign appears to have had a lasting impact, likely due to it being (per the article) "one of the longest continuously running commercial campaigns ever aired." A Food advertising article would be decent place to expound on these types of topics. NorthAmerica1000 12:35, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Dennis, I agree the "Little Mikey" article doesn't do justice to the campaign. The Life Cereal article claims they later reprised the ad, same situation, same dialog, but with lumberjacks instead of little boys. I'd love to see that.
North, you're right, that topic is in need of an article. We seem to be sadly lacking in famous ads/slogans for food. Where's the article about "breakfast of champions" or "two scoops" or "good to the last drop" for instance? We do have categories worth of Fast Food Advertising and Cereal Advertising Characters. MelanieN (talk) 14:39, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Definitely fits within the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Brands (which NA1k started, of course). This is exactly the kind of "marketing" articles I like to see, where we are talking about history and popular culture, not some spamlinked new biz. I haven't looked, but Mr. Wiffle, Rosie, Speedy (Alka Seltzer) and many other long running champagnes were more than commercials, they were advertising icons in an era when even the cable companies couldn't find enough broadcasters to fill the 12 numbers on the TV dial. They were memes, many before word was coined in the 70s. With 500 channels on TV (and still nothing on) plus the internet, we see memes that spread like wildfire now, but none that have this longevity. Glad I came here, a simple article turned into a very interesting and broad cultural idea. I'm not sure if Food advertising really is the right title, that is very generic. Television advertising memes in the 20th century may seem long, but is specific in scope and time. You could drop "television", but that obligates us to search in print as well, and while they overlap, I think narrowing to TV, the new mass media tools then, makes sense. The closest thing I can think of is the article that build with Eric, 1950s American automobile culture, which was about products but more importantly the cultural impact they had. We did manage to get it to GA, my first. We took individual elements and expanded on them, as they applied to the overarching theme. Dennis - 2¢ 15:56, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
You're right, Dennis, one idea can lead to another in a very productive way. (Can we count all those "beer, breakfast of champions" t-shirts as part of a Breakfast of Champions meme?) BTW I want to apologize for my initial reaction. I had no right to stomp on your idea; I should have just pointed out the Little Mikey article and left it up to Northamerica to respond to your suggestion. In my defense, I have a very shaky Internet connection right now and I can't put as much thought into my posts as I should. MelanieN (talk),
That reminds me of a signature I use on another website, a twisting of yet another meme, the Anita Bryant orange juice commercials of the 70s, before she got homophobic. Tequila - It's not just for breakfast anymore!. It is a totally nonsensical signature line, but I've used on that website for over a decade. Never apologize for correcting me for spelling something wrong. NE Ent has built a career out of it. Dennis - 2¢ 10:34, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Food marketing

(ping: Dennis, MelanieN) Just a brief follow-up; there is an article for food marketing, where information about food and beverage advertising campaigns could be added to. NorthAmerica1000 21:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations, you are now an administrator

Latest comment: 9 years ago41 comments37 people in discussion
 
You are discouraged from dying this t-shirt with any colors, with one exception, of course.

I'm happy to inform you that, due to your successful request for adminship, you have now been promoted to an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or stop by the administrators' noticeboard. Congrats! Andrevan@ 07:46, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

With all sincerity, congratulations in getting the mop and I really hope this is a positive result. Well done. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:54, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
– Thanks to everyone here and participants at the RfA, including neutral and oppose !voters who provided constructive criticism. NorthAmerica1000 18:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
@AmaryllisGardener: Okay; didn't catch that! -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 19:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Yikes, sorry, clumsy edit. Jusdafax 22:03, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Concern that your RfA closer was involved

Latest comment: 9 years ago8 comments7 people in discussion

Are you following this? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:59, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Wow. How petty. —Cryptic 00:39, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Congrats for passing your RfA a second time! Chillum 01:41, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

A Turkey for you!

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Happy Thanksgiving for you - what, are you an admin? Congrats North! Hafspajen (talk) 10:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi North, can you help me to change the link on this article infobox from Moro attacks on Sabah → Moro attacks on Malaysia, as normal user cannot edit this page at the moment . ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 07:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

  Not done: Hello Muffin Wizard: Despite the second link in your post above presently redirecting to the third within the Royal Malaysian Air Force article's infobox, it may be more accurate to keep the wording in the infobox in place as "Moro attacks on Sabah". If the air force engaged in Sabah only for this specific engagement, it would be incorrect to imply in the infobox that it acted in all of East Malaysia (which would include Sarawak) or Malaysia proper. I recommend discussing the matter on the Royal Malaysian Air Force talk page and obtaining input from other users regarding this matter. This type of change is best made only after research has been performed to ensure factual accuracy. NorthAmerica1000 09:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

PROD type deletions

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Northamerica1000,

I am one of the small number of wp:inclusionists left on Wikipedia. I am not currently involved in efforts to change the wp:deletionist mindset, or to try and change the system. However I just noticed this: User:Cyde/List of current proposed deletions but I am really not inclined to try and figure out why some of these articles are already on the chopping block after getting their PROD notice earlier today- so I thought of you just in case you aren interested. BTW congratulations! Ottawahitech (talk) 16:52, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Ottawahitech: In case you aren't aware of it, check out Category:All articles proposed for deletion, which lists all present PROD candidates. NorthAmerica1000 18:07, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fried rice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

  Fixed. NorthAmerica1000 17:32, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Echo

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your archiving method sends Echo notifications. See User talk:Equazcion/OneClickArchiver#Echo. Is there something which you can do differently? --Stefan2 (talk) 18:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Stefan2: A fix would be to de-link user names prior to archiving using the script, but this is forbidden per WP:TPO, section Signature cleanup. So, we'll see if a fix can be determined per the thread you started at User talk:Equazcion/OneClickArchiver. NorthAmerica1000 18:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Jamie Harney - An apology

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Northamerica1000, I forgot to notify you earlier that I recreated Jamie Harney after you deleted it at AfD as a few minutes after you deleted the article, he made his debut and passed WP:NFOOTBALL. I apologise for not contacting you at the time and congratulations on your recent Admin success :) JMHamo (talk) 23:32, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi JMHamo: Thanks for the notification, and no need to apologize. I saw the discussion at Requests for undeletion. Quite a unique situation how the subject qualified for an article per NFOOTY shortly after the AfD discussion, per his having debuted playing in a fully professional league on 29 November 2014. NorthAmerica1000 16:49, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2014)

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
The Mexico–United States border spans six Mexican states and four U.S. states, with a total length of 3,145 km (1,954 mi).
Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Mexico–United States border

Previous selections: Tourism in the Caribbean • Military technology

Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Northamerica1000/Archive_23&oldid=1146336195"