Njoy deep

Easylife

A tag has been placed on Easylife, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DarkSaber2k 10:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Njoy deep, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on [[User talk:|my talk page]], or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Addbot (talk) 00:39, 4 April 2012 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Rangilo Gujarati (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Draft:.OOO concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:.OOO, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Indus-University

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Indus-University, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: IndusUniversity. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of IndiaBizforSale

Hello Njoy deep,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged IndiaBizforSale for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Josu4u (talk) 10:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stand-Up Comedian India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Stand-Up Comedian India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kostas20142 (talk) 14:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hardik Patel.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hardik Patel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Hardik Patel.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Uri: The Surgical Strike. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [1] Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia. It's not our job to describe someone's actions as "brilliant". That is an opinion being presented as a fact, which is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Asian Granito India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Asian Granito India, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.moneycontrol.com/company-facts/asiangranitoindia/history/AGI04. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Copyright infringement

Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Montu Ni Bittu. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:54, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Vijay Nehra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vijay Nehra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Nehra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 06:03, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:Elisabeth-Anderson-Sierra.jpg

The page File:Elisabeth-Anderson-Sierra.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at 48 hours. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of hospitals in India for coronavirus treatment

The article List of hospitals in India for coronavirus treatment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Enlisting the hospitals that treat coronavirus pandemic is not possible since all hospitals might as well treat the disease.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Netha (talk) 21:06, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Well, this page is about "Corona test centers" in India, I guess this page should change treatment to "test centers"

Okay. That sounds reasonable. Please change the title of the page and develop the content accordingly. Cheers! --Netha (talk) 14:28, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barnacle SEO

The article Barnacle SEO has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

SEO buzzword; non notable neologism.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 00:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucky tea stall and restaurant

The article Lucky tea stall and restaurant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

indistinguishable from an advertisement

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 18:05, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dev Information Technology

The article Dev Information Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

August 2022

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that in this edit to Darshan Ashwin Trivedi, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr.weedle (talk) 06:18, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Mr.weedle ! I had changed the Early life details with proper citation and re-write that section with the citation. that's why I have remove that mark. Kindly have a look and restore the things. I am going to add Career details soon and a few more details found so other details too. Njoy deep (talk) 09:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Hyperlactation syndrome

Hi, @Njoy deep! A few days ago, I translated your article Hyperlactation syndrome into Catalan and proposed it for the Translation of the week project on Meta-Wiki. Thus, I would really appreciate it if you could vote here for the proposal to succeed so that other Wikipedias are encouraged to translate it as well. --Brunnaiz (talk) 23:24, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Udgam School For Children, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBSE. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for a note.

will solve that ASAP. Njoy deep (talk) 06:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Elisabeth Anderson Sierra

@Njoy deep: Hi! Your article has been nominated for DYK. Thanks RV (talk) 02:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks @RAJIVVASUDEV, I am honoured Njoy deep (talk) 05:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Elisabeth Anderson Sierra

On 9 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elisabeth Anderson Sierra, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Elisabeth Anderson Sierra, nicknamed the "milk goddess", holds the Guinness World Record for the largest individual donation of breast milk? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elisabeth Anderson Sierra. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Elisabeth Anderson Sierra), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC) 00:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 19,051 views (793.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Njoy deep (talk) 13:32, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zerodha (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zerodha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:47, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Njoy deep! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:47, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahmedabad, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Australian and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Stadium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Taneira

Hello Njoy deep,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Taneira for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Maliner (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

I'd like to advocate for the retention of the Taneira Wikipedia page based on several compelling reasons. First, the Notability of Taneira is established as it is a subsidiary of the well-known Titan Company (Tata Group) and has garnered significant media attention. Second, the page meets Wikipedia's Verifiability standards, being well-cited with reliable sources. Third, Taneira holds Cultural Significance as it contributes to the revival of traditional Indian crafts. Fourth, its ambitious expansion plans indicate a strong Business Impact. Fifth, the page maintains a Neutral Tone, adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines. Sixth, the brand's plans for global expansion add to its Global Relevance. Seventh, the brand has received public endorsements and participated in public events, indicating a high level of Public Interest. Eighth, the page is Complete and provides a comprehensive overview of the brand. Lastly, Taneira is a brand in Ongoing Development, and the Wikipedia page can be updated to reflect these changes. I believe these points make a strong case for the page's retention. Njoy deep (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Foxconn in India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Foxconn in India, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 16:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023 - Paid editing concerns

Hello Njoy deep. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Njoy deep. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Njoy deep|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 18:15, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello @ONUnicorn, You're welcome for your concern. I can confirm that I am not receiving any paid assignments, nor am I affiliated with this company in any commercial capacity. I have been contributing to Wikipedia for a long time, albeit not very actively, but consistently. I make an effort to stay updated with current news and information and check if it's available on Wikipedia. If I find that certain information is missing, I attempt to add it. I engage in this purely out of passion and to acquire new knowledge and skills. I firmly believe in the concept of "givers gain" and the theory of Karma. I love to understand if I made any mistake while contributing, that will help me to learn new things. 122.170.39.10 (talk) 09:11, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your response (although I note you were logged out when you responded). I will point out that you have had a lot of your articles/drafts either deleted or at least nominated for deletion under G11, which allows for the deletion of "Unambiguous advertising or promotion" on sight. These seem to go back to your earliest contributions here in 2007 all the way to your current contributions.

I want to help you understand why this keeps happening, what it is about your articles that triggers people's spam detectors, so that you can write better articles that are less likely to be deleted.

• First, realize that G11 is not about the topic of the article, it's about the writing style. It's also a little inherently subjective.
  • One of the things that alerts makes articles seem like ads is the presence of "puffery" - language that creates the effect of making something sound good or important. Phrases like "highly-acclaimed", "award-winning", "famous", etc. Avoid that.
    • For example, in the I deleted (Taneira), included language like, "The brand has ambitious plans..."
  • Another problem that makes articles seem like ads is an excessive reliance on non-independent sources, like a company's website, press releases, and sponsored content.
  • Also, when a company writes about itself it tends to use a lot of generic, impressive-sounding phrases, like "ethnic wear brand" instead of "clothing company". It tends to talk about lofty ideals like "aims to modernize ethnic wear while preserving traditional hand-weaving techniques" and "vision of modernizing the ethnic wear market in India." Phrases like that are PR-speak that has almost no place in a Wikipedia article, and in as much as there is a place in a Wikipedia article for discussion of a company's mission and vision, it needs to be an attributed quote, not in Wikivoice.

I hope this helps. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 14:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the very detailed explanation. I appreciate your guidance. Now, I understand the mistakes I was making. With your insights, I am confident that I will improve my contributions. When I started in 2007, I was a novice, but I am maturing day by day, thanks to self-learning and support from editors like you. Thanks again. Njoy deep (talk) 11:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Madhavpur beach

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Madhavpur beach, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 14:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Hello, Njoy deep. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. A page you created  User:Mermaidgirlpro/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and on IRC chat Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

This would be more suited for Wikiyoyage. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

I haven't made any page on Wikiyoyage, do you think the same content will work? and Thanks for the suggestion. Njoy deep (talk) 13:26, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alcohol laws of India, you may be blocked from editing. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for starting this page on Operation Shikkar, an important part of the struggle against poaching in India. Klbrain (talk) 16:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for appreciation Njoy deep (talk) 09:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Road to Heaven, Kutch. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 15:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello There,

There is nothing promotional there, It's just a road. I am not sure which part of the content looks promotional, Can you help to me to navigate that? Njoy deep (talk) 06:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello Njoy deep. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Gopal Snacks, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Njoy deep. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Njoy deep|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Charlie (talk) 05:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

The only connection I have with this brand is I own couple of stocks, there is nothing paid activity is done. I know the Wikipedia policy and do respect that. Check my edits I had done contribution on various topics.

How responding the discussion make you think this? The creator is always have an idea why it's a meaningful for the Wikipedia and the world. Njoy deep (talk) 06:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Gopal Snacks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gopal Snacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gopal Snacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Charlie (talk) 07:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

This is a company which is listed on Indian stock market. The Indian stock market is worlds 3rd larger stock market in the world and it requires a lot of compliance to get there. All the details are varified and the citation are from the leading media company from India and global media too. Njoy deep (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Savji Dholakia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Gujarat Ambuja Exports moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gujarat Ambuja Exports. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Please see WP:NCORP before submitting the article for review. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Hey @Jeraxmoira Thanks for your note and moving this to draft. The company is listed in Indian stock market and I have cited links from Bloomberg, Yahoo, NDTV and many other known references. Can you help me to suggest, what specific more information I should add? Njoy deep (talk) 08:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Business directory listings are useless, please see WP:CORPDEPTH. A company is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. You need to find sources that fulfill WP:MULTSOURCES. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Hello Njoy deep. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Mold-Tek Packaging, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Njoy deep. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Njoy deep|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Charlie (talk) 03:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello Charlie,

Thank you for bringing this concern to my attention. I want to clarify that I have no financial affiliation with the company in question. As an Indian individual with an interest in the stock market, I frequently conduct research on companies listed on the Indian Stock Market (NSE). When I encounter companies that lack representation on Wikipedia but possess substantial coverage from reputable primary and secondary sources, I endeavor to create pages for them to enhance Wikipedia's coverage.

My motivation stems from a desire to contribute valuable information to Wikipedia and to ensure that notable entities are adequately represented. For instance, I often refer to the NIFTY 500 list, which comprises the top 500 companies in the Indian stock market. I've noticed that many of these companies lack Wikipedia pages despite having significant online presence and coverage. Therefore, I randomly select companies from this list and conduct thorough research to determine if there's sufficient information available to warrant a Wikipedia page.

I am currently focusing on creating pages for wildlife sanctuaries, Padma Shri Awardees, and Indian stock market companies that are not yet represented on Wikipedia. I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies while contributing to the platform.

As a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject India (you are), I would appreciate any guidance or assistance you can provide in my efforts to contribute effectively. I am eager to learn and improve my contributions to Wikipedia, and I believe mentorship from experienced editors like yourself would greatly benefit me in this journey.

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to your guidance. Njoy deep (talk) 09:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your courteous and detailed message. I appreciate your transparency regarding your motivations and intentions for contributing to Wikipedia. However, I kindly ask that you abstain from making any further edits to the page until it has been reviewed. Charlie (talk) 23:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Roger that @CharlieMehta Njoy deep (talk) 11:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sano Vamuzo (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sano Vamuzo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurella Vittalacharya (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kurella Vittalacharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 13:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing my submission and providing valuable feedback. I appreciate your guidance on maintaining a formal and neutral tone expected of an encyclopedia article. I will revise the entry to remove peacock terms and ensure it adheres to Wikipedia's encyclopedic standards. I plan to rewrite and resubmit it soon. Thank you once again for your assistance. Njoy deep (talk) 13:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Please have a read of WP:PEACOCK which explains the terms to avoid using @Njoy deep. Qcne (talk) 13:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

I had rewritten the text and keep in mind about Wikipedia:PEACOCK terms as well. Have a look and suggest me feedback (if any) Njoy deep (talk) 09:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Njoy deep, not there with the tone yet. Sentences like "He overcame financial hardships in his youth" and "he was able to continue his education thanks to the support of his community. This experience fostered a deep appreciation for books and literature" etc.

You need to write completely dispassionately: you should only be paraphrasing or summarising in a neutral way what other sources state about Kurella. Qcne (talk) 09:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Noted. Let me try one more time. Njoy deep (talk) 09:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)