EverQuest

Greetings ;)

I found your user page at Special:Whatlinkshere/User:Scepia/EverQuest, and was wondering if you'd be willing to do some editing for another wiki. I started a family of wikis - called The KnowledgePit; it's intended to (eventually) be an encyclopedic reference for anything video game-related. MMORPGs get their own nodes (EQ KnowledgePit, WoW KnowledgePit, etc); at this time, the EQ node is the only one I've really done any work maturing. I've done a little work with the others, the node for console games more than the rest, but mostly it's the EQ one, which I've written a whole bunch of extension code for; the others are really just there as placeholders currently.

Anyway, this whole long thing is basically to ask if you'd be willing to do some editing on the EQ node, since you're a player ;) any time you'd be willing to contribute would be greatly appreciated. I threw together a little database hack so that if you sign up for one, the login info will work on all of the.m

Thanks ;)
~Floppie(talkcontribs) 22:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)


Bob Ferguson (baseball)

I'm reviewing the GA and currently have it on hold, as I have some stuff for you to fix. Wizardman 17:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

    • good, any suggestions will be glady received. Neonblak (talk) 20:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Wild Bill Donovan

Hello.

I noticed that you switched the target of this redirect from William Joseph Donovan, the intelligence agent, to William Edward Donovan, the baseball player. They're both pretty famous and they're both nicknamed Wild Bill Donovan so the disambiguation around their names has been pretty bleary in the past. However, comparing these two Google searches ([1] and [2]) it seems to me that William Joseph is the more famous of the two, which is why I changed the redirect earlier today to point to his article. I then went to that page and wrote at the top

"Wild Bill Donovan" redirects here. For the baseball pitcher and manager see William Edward Donovan.

Anyway, this is a long-winded way of saying that I'm inclined to have the redirect point to William Joseph. It's pretty trivial so I doubt you particularly care. If you do have objections, let me know. Otherwise, I'll switch it back at some point in the next day or so. Canderson7 (talk) 00:12, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Looks good. Thanks for changing it back. Canderson7 (talk) 15:21, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Bug Holliday

  On 30 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bug Holliday, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Commons

Since you seem to have moved some photos of umpires to Wikipedia Commons, I'll suggest here that you add the photo of John Gaffney as well. MisfitToys (talk) 23:45, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

it appears the photo has already been moved. I moved only the Bob Ferguson photo, as I was trying to figure out how it was done, and I don't know if it was correctly moved or not.Neonblak (talk) 11:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Operation COOKIE MONSTER

 
In support of Operation COOKIE MONSTER (OCM) I'm presenting WikiCookies in appreciation for military service to the United States. Happy Independence Day! Ndunruh (talk) 04:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Misc Did you know

  On 19 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charlie Morton, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo (t)(c) • 17:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

  On 8 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Matt Kilroy, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 16:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

  On 11 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Buttercup Dickerson, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--DarkFalls talk 07:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

  On 15 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eddie Kolb, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Fascinating story, thanks for sharing it! --Royalbroil 14:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

  On 16 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cub Stricker, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bookworm857158367 (talk) 03:29, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

  On 4 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Herm Doscher, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bobet 13:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

  On 11 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dory Dean, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--DaughterofSun (talk) 10:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

  On April 16, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hugh Daily, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid (talk) 18:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

  On 18 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ed Walsh (Jr.), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 04:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

  On 28 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Bechtel, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford 19:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

  On 24 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dan Brouthers, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

  On 30 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bug Holliday, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Baseball Newsletter

--  jj137 (talk) 03:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Henry Porter

Hello. I've reverted your changes on this disambiguation page, but if you feel I'm wrong, please let me know. I'm unsure what grounds they've been changed on. 'Harry' has only become a separate name from Henry very recently and is usually the shortened form of 'Henry', therefore many people would try 'Henry Porter' when looking for 'Harry' as article titles are usually in someone's formal name. If it's something people may look for, I feel it should be there, even if it is not his full name (the article is very short and doesn't say if it is or isn't). As for the date of birth and further short description of 'Henry Porter (journalist)', I feel this is also necessary; it is useful on a disambiguation page to have the dates (especially to ensure the people are listed in the correct order) and the description of him as a fiction writer makes it clear to people who may think the person they are looking for is not listed as they do not know him as 'journalist'. Thanks Boleyn (talk) 17:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

A trick that some disambig pages use to seperate like names or variations is to include a small heading above each differential, in this case a description of why Harry = Henry I feel would be necessary. I know I have never related the name Henry with Harry, and I would suspect that many people would be understandably confused for the same reason. This, of coarse, does not mean that the names are unrelated.Neonblak (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Assistance at John McGraw

Thanks for what you've done so far, and regarding your last post at the talkpage, any assistance you can offer with regards to statboxes, et al would be great. Hell, I don't even know what "meta data" is! :) S. Dean Jameson 18:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I will do what I can, it may be sporatic, but nothing seems to move very fast on wikipedia anyways :) Neonblak (talk) 19:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Invite

Congratulations for Dan Brouthers, a Good Article

After reviewing your changes, I have listed Dan Brouthers, an article which you've significantly improved, in the list of Wikipedia's Good Articles. Congratulations! And keep up your great work improving baseball content. —Wknight94 (talk) 10:52, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your assistance in getting this ready up to snuff for the upgrade to GA level, hope to work with you again on other articles of this type.Neonblak (talk) 17:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO

According to my records, you have nominated at least one article (Bob Ferguson (baseball)) that includes a category at WP:CHIBOTCATS and that has been promoted to WP:FA, WP:FL or WP:GA. You are not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Bill Lange

Hi there, just gave a couple of suggestions at the peer review and had a little idea - how about creating a couple of Baseball stubs for Henry Harris (baseball), Ren Kelly and California State League? Even a short descriptive stub is better than nothing. In fact Encyclopaedia Brittanica contains mostly stubs: they're all useful! I'm watching the Bill Lange peer review and article for changes. Also - any idea about the IPA pronunciation? For example I'm not sure if it sounds like "Langer" or "Lanj" or neither! Cheers. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 22:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the useful suggestions, I am not sure if there is too much information available for the State League since its lifespan was very short, and I could look into Harris and Ren. As far as pronunciation of Lange, I couldn't find one, but then again, I didn't look specifically for one.Neonblak (talk) 04:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK

  On 15 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bill Lange, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 04:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Brown Stockings or Ruby Legs?

Heya Neonblak!

I need an education.

I saw your recent edit over at List of Major League Baseball triples records. I understand that the article that was being linked to calls the team Worcester Ruby Legs. I also noted and checked a few references that call them as such. Major League Baseball calls them the Brown Stockings (search for "Stovey"). Is there one name more "authoritative" over the other? I know that back in the day, team names were far more a big deal than they are today, and they could change more or less at the drop of a hat. It would seem to me that MLB would be the "proper" source, unless there is clearly something that the baseball historians know that MLB won't admit to or is purposely stearing away from.

Respond here or on my talk page ... I am genuinely curious about this. Take care! LonelyBeacon (talk) 15:31, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for asking, what I did was make the Worcester team uniform, there was an individual over a year ago re-direct the Ruby Legs to Worcester Worcesters, without much of an explanation. So, I changed it back and made all the links back to the Ruby Legs. Most of them were anyway, but quite a few were to the Worcesters, and only a couple were directed from Brown Stockings. The two most often cited sources for baseball stats, etc, on Wikipedia are Baseball-Reference and retrosheet. Here is each of them: Retrosheet and Baseball-reference. Also, the category for their players is named Worcester Ruby Legs players. I don't doubt MLB.com as a reliable reference, it is just my judgement that the preponderence of the evidence suggests Ruby Legs as the uniform name. Don't hesitate to ask me anything else or expand on this, we could take to WikiProject Baseball and see what the community thinks.Neonblak (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
I appreciate the education. I am personally not interested in it being one vs the other, and having it as the Ruby Legs is fine by me. Having seen more than a few nineteenth century teams go be several names, I was just wondering if there was some source out there that gave some bite to one name over the other.
If I do have any more questions, I will come knocking again. Have a great day! LonelyBeacon (talk) 01:32, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

welcome

 

Welcome to WikiProject Oregon! If you'd like, you can add the WP Oregon userbox to your user page using this code: {{User WikiProject Oregon}}. Check out the ongoing and archived discussions at WT:ORE and be sure to add the page to your Watchlist. If you are new to Wikipedia, it's a good idea to browse through the core principles of Wikipedia as well. The project home page at WP:ORE has many useful links to get you started. The recent changes and recent discussions links will display recent edits on articles within the project's scope. Welcome!

EncMstr (talk) 16:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Red red links make me feel so fine...

Greetings WikiProject Oregon editors. It's time for another edition of the COTW. Thank you to those who helped improve Ken Kesey and the Nike, Inc. last week. This week, by request we have the Northwest Forest Plan and then a Red Link Elimination Drive. For the red links, pick any one you want from any article, the list provided is just to help make it easier. And if you get a good article started, don’t forget to nominate it for a DYK. Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 20:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Jimmy Wood

I changed some dates in the infobox & cats which didn't agree with others in the article text - I only checked one reference, so if these variant dates reflected some disagreement in sources, then that would need to go back in. Since you seem the main contributor for this one, thought I should let you know. Dsp13 (talk) 23:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Good catch, I caught one other persondata I did the same thing to, thank you for changing it to it's correct information.Neonblak (talk) 00:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Dodgers

Thanks Neonblak. There is a bot running right now which is tagging talk pages with the |dodgers=yes parameter, so hopefully all the players you were talking about get tagged. The project has only just been created, so hopefully it kicks off during the off-season ;) —Borgardetalk 04:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

October Baseball WP Newsletter

Very Special COTW, act now!

Greetings WikiProject Oregon peoples. It is once again time for another edition of the COTW. Thank you to those who helped eliminate some red links the last few weeks (the NWFP received little attention). This week, we have the stub High Desert Museum and then in honor of losing airline service again, McNary Field. Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

XXX<-COTW->XXX

Howdy WikiProject Oregon humans. Time for another edition of the C to the O to the T to the W. Thanks to those who help out on McNary Field and Bend’s High Desert Museum. For this week, we shall tackle Bridges on US 101 and then with the last few days of decent weather, The Semi-Annual Picture Drive. Plenty of red links on the bridge list, or improve a stub! Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Elect the Best Financed, Least Offensive Person For the Job (aka Oregon COTW)

Hello fellow WikiProject Oregon folks, it’s time for another COTW. But first, just remember that those other guys only want to raise your taxes, but I won’t. A big thank you to those who helped make improvements to Bridges on US 101 and participating in The Semi-Annual Picture Drive. And unlike the other guys, I won’t ship your jobs overseas! This week, we have Mr. Bipartisan Wayne Morse who went from being a Republican to an Independent and finally to a Democrat. Then, let’s see if we can finish up creating articles for members of the Oregon House before their January inauguration. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. I’m Aboutmovies, and I approve this message. Paid for the committee to elect Aboutmovies. Aboutmovies (talk) 19:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Capitoline Grounds

  On 17 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Capitoline Grounds, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 08:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Harvest Time @ COTW

Greetings WikiProject Oregon folks, it’s time for another edition of the fabled COTW. Thank you to all who helped make improvements to Wayne Morse and creating some members of the Oregon House. This week, we have by request Upper Klamath Lake which think made the news lately with a salmon plan. Then, in honor of the end of the harvest time, we will go farming with Fort Stevens. There is a beautiful link farm in the article that is ripe for harvesting into citations. It should provide for a bountiful feast, or alternatively you can take your hoe to it and weed some out. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. WARNING: COTW is not approved for children under 3 and may contain choking hazards for small children. DO NOT leave your child unattended with COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:49, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikiproject San Francisco 49ers

  Hello fellow Wikipedian! I just wanted to let you know that WikiProject San Francisco 49ers is looking for participants who are interested in improving the quality of the articles on the San Francisco 49ers! If you want to help, you can add your name to our list of participants, check out our to-do list, and most importantly, improve the articles!

--pbroks13talk? 23:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Zero Down, Zero Interest at the Oregon COTW

Hello to all the WikiProject Oregon folks, time once again for yet another bone chilling edition of the Collaboration Of The Week. I thank yee who helped make improvements to Fort Stevens and Upper Klamath Lake. For this first week of December, we have by request Mike Bellotti and his archrival Mike Riley, both in honor of that great tradition we call the Civil War (AKA the battle for the platypus). As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. This message is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents is strictly prohibited. Aboutmovies (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Very cold, must type about the Oregon COTW to stay warm

Hello again from WikiProject Oregon’s Collaboration of the Week HQ. Since there was no notice last time, thanks to those who helped improve Mike Riley and Mike Bellotti at the begging of the month and to those who helped create Oregon Department of Justice and Lindsay Applegate last week. Those last two were the red links with lots of links to them from other articles (DOJ was #1). For this week, in honor of Arctic Blast/Winter Storm/Damn its Freakin’ Cold Outside 2008/Storm of the Century/Is there ANYTHING else on going on in the world?/We Might Actually Have a White Christmas, we have Snow Bunny. Then as part of the Stub elimination drive, we have state senator Margaret Carter, which could easily be turned into a nice DYK entry once expanded 5X. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Have a Holly Jolly Christmas/Hanukah/ Kwanzaa/Winter Solstice. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

The Infobox MLB retired template

I noticed that you're still using this template when creating new baseball player articles. This template is no longer in use and has been deleted. The page is simply a redirect to the new-and-improved (heh) Infobox MLB player template. Could you please use this on all future pages? Thanks! -Dewelar (talk) 02:31, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

It has been noted.Neonblak talk - 03:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New COTW

Greetings from WikiProject Oregon’s Collaboration of the Week. First off, thank you to everyone who has done work the last few weeks on the last two COTWs. This week we have by request Oregon and California Railroad, part of the lands involved in the Oregon Land Fraud Scandal. Then as part of the Stub elimination drive, we have longtime politician Grattan Kerans, which hopefully can be turned into a nice DYK entry. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Roster flags

Just to let you know, Spanneraol has been removing flags on a bunch of roster pages. I believe this discussion is what he is using as justification. It doesn't matter to me either way, but just a heads-up in case he challenges you on your edit to 1884 Brooklyn Atlantics season. -Dewelar (talk) 06:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, interesting. Guess I had better revert, WP:FLAG seems pretty clear on this. Damn, I thought it was a cool thing to put in there, as I have seen them around, but yet another WikiRoadBlock.Neonblak talk - 06:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
I actually agree that it's a cool thing, and I'd been adding them pretty much whenever I edited a team-season page, because every other pre-2009 page I'd seen had them. Ah, well. -Dewelar (talk) 06:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Museums & Prisons COTW

Howdy to all those in WikiProject Oregon land! To start, thanks to those who helped improve Grattan Kerans and Oregon and California Railroad as part of the Collaboration of the Week. This week we’ll try and start some new articles with a red link elimination drive on a couple of Oregon lists. So, you have your pick of prisons, or museums. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Mount Bailey lakeview.JPG

File:Mount Bailey lakeview.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Mount Bailey lakeview.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Mount Bailey lakeview.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

B-day for Oregon

Hello to WikiProject Oregon peoples! Thank you to those who helped start some new articles on prisons and museums. This week, in honor of Oregon’s 150th b-day, we have the slightly older Oregon Constitution and the first state governor John Whiteaker. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 01:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

NABBP

Hi, At Cincinnati Red Stockings, I put Darryl Brock in a footnote and soon found myself ensnared. Probably I massaged the article for more than an hour. Maybe Brock should be in a popular culture section as some cities have for their appearances in Hollywood movies.

More important, I spent 2/3 of a long weekend looking over the NABBP articles. I couldn't resist revising content of some articles and prefaces of some categories but the main efforts were

  • categorizing player pages in players/members by team
  • reporting on coverage of players and clubs.

To see the reporting please visit Category talk:National Association of Base Ball Players teams for clubs and Category talk:National Association of Base Ball Players members by team as the point of entry for players. The latter is more important. Subcategory Category talk pages for particular teams hold the reports that function something like all-time rosters (now mainly covering 1869-1870 for major teams).

Probably I put 50 players into teams subcategories 100 times in all. Probably I will extend that back before 1869 for players with pages, without extending the team rosters.

Feel free to revert category prefaces, of course. Maybe I should have resisted temptation and preserved more of the two days simply to cat as many players as possible.

Now time is short again. --P64 (talk) 21:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

There seems to be little work on baseball before 1871(?) during the last two years. Now I am here rather than at your WikiProject (a) because your name is on many of the articles and categories, (b) because you seem to be watching the Cincinnati Red Stockings. --P64 (talk) 21:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
I am relieved that there is another person who is interested in improving these early baseball articles, I welcome any effort you put forth. I threw in the Brock novel due to the orphan tag that was placed on it, and since I had read it, I connected it to the Red Stockings in some fashion, not worrying so much about refs. I watch almost exclusively pre-1900 baseball articles, so I try to stay up on all the changes.

There are some pre-1869 players in the NABBP cats, but finding full rosters is not so easy... I have books with full team photos, but either there is no listing of the names, or they are so small and pixelated to read.Neonblak talk - 00:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Which books with team photos?
Are you using for one reference Marshall Wright, NABBP 1857-1870 (no photos)?
A club doesn't merit a players category until there are a few player pages to categorize there, imo. Do you know of any early baseball player who is not in any baseball player category? Or who is in one of the NAPBBP categories for convenience although he didn't play in the second NA? --P64 (talk) 02:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Me and and another user only just started creating these a month ago or so, so I am sure there are plenty of players not rightfully connected to there NABBP teams.
One book (because it just happens to be on my computer desk) that has nice old team photos, with many that don't list the players is "Baseball: More Than 150 Years" by David Nemec and Saul Wisnia, Publications International, Ltd. For example, a team photo of the New York Actives (bet. 1856 and 1863), 1864 Brooklyn Base Ball Club, 1865 Brooklyn Atlantics, the 1864 New York Mutuals (readable but with last names only)... the 19th century is only covered for one chapter, then the 1900's, 1910's, and so... good book though. As far as I can remember, I haven't used the Wright book, but I would if I had it.
I agree with you about team categories only being created if there are multiple players that can be filed in there, and the NABBP had a long list of teams under that umbrella.Neonblak talk - 06:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Probably I will wait for more than two player pages.
Visit User:P64/roster where I have presented some roster data for the Unions of Morrisania and the Forest Citys of Rockford. Wright provides some player data for the Unions 1857 to 1870 and for the FC 1868 to 1870. My presentations all fall short of his rosters by limiting the players who are listed and for the Unions my tables begin only in 1863 and 1862. Some of the data on fielding positions and regular status is from other sources; a few player-team listings may be from other sources. For now I am playing with what can be displayed compactly without too much clutter. --P64 (talk) 20:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Xenophopia does not involve a Xylophone: Another WPORE COTW

Greetings to WikiProject Oregon members. A big thank you to everyone who helped last week with the Oregon Constitution and John Whiteaker. This week, we have by request Clyde Drexler and a newer article in Religion in Oregon (I thought surveys said we didn’t have religion in Oregon). Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Ellard on Charlie Gould

These notes from Baseball in Cincinnati rely on the index to the McFarland reprint. These represent about half of the index entries; the others seem insignificant today. Every note begins with the page number(s). Generally this is my account of what Ellard says with quotation marks for his words and parentheses for my asides.

18-19. The Cincinnati Buckeye Townball Club, apparently Cin's first ballclub, reorganized fall 1866 as the Buckeye Baseball Club. Charley Gould played firstbase on the nine that fall and in 1867.

36-37. At the Great Baseball Tournament of September 1867 (local), he won the prizes for "farthest throw" 302'3 and "best second base"(!).

60. The Cincinnati Base Ball Club Song (evidently 1868) celebrated his reliability. "In many a game that we have played, We've needed a First Base, But now our opponents will find The 'basket' in its place. And if you think he 'muffs' the balls, Sent into him red hot, You'll soon be fooled by 'Charlie Gould', and find he 'muffs' them not."

94-95. For 1869 Gould (a member since 1868) was the only "Cincinnatian" on the Red Stockings team. For eight months, Mar 15 to Nov 15, he was paid $800 the base rate earned by five of the first nine.

99. "He was one of the best humored men on the field, always working with a will, and always to be found at his post." --every game in 1868, all but one 1869 ... "was familiarly known as 'the bushel-basket'" ... "the largest man on the team" Against the Mutuals in New York he put out 12 at firstbase without error, with "one or two surprising catches". He was praised in the New York press.

139. After more than a year the Red Stockings were defeated 8-7 on a 3-run rally by the Atlantics in the bottom of the 11th. With a tie score and one on base, "Zettlein went to bat, and, hitting a hot liner to Gould, he made his first base, as Gould found the ball too hot and too far out of reach to capture it, but he stopped its force and sent it toward Sweasy. He, however, did not pick it up cleanly, and, in fact, by a bad muff, he not only let Ferguson to get his third, but allowed him to steal home, thereby giving victory to the Atlantics."

178. 1896 Apr 13, many cities observed Harry Wright Day to raise money for the Harry Wright Memorial Fund. In Cincinnati the 1896 Reds defeated the 1882 Reds, 7-3. Gould played rf and 1b for the 1882 Reds (altho he last played in 1877)

A new Cin club joined the National League for its inaugural 1876 season with Charlie Gould as captain/manager but Ellard doesn't cover that or any season after 1870 in any depth.

I hope this helps you do what you must. It isn't possible or reasonable to provide references for all facts. --P64 (talk) 19:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the pages, I will incorporate that within the article. I know it is not always possible to reference all facts, but if the article were trying for promotion, all facts would have to be, and all not referenced would have to be deleted. I just noticed that you had used two books for reference in the article, and was curious as to what material belonged to which reference. This will help me greatly, but I am not sure I am going to find enough to get this to GA.Neonblak talk - 21:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Every ballplayer page is full of facts that without references, sometimes hundred of quantitative facts, plus at least a team and fielding position for every season. That status may be inappropriate for ballplayer articles but I don't have enough experience to know what they are really seeking in biographical articles. For example, how many references for birthdate, birthplace, cause of death, deathdate, deathplace, burial place?
Do you know the biographical collections by SABR, Nineteenth Century Stars (1989) and Baseball's First Stars (1996)? They cover about 150 baseball people each, generally a little more prominent than Gould and Sweasy, such as Leonard. Commonly the shorter ones are about five times longer than I wrote here for Gould. I have a list somewhere. When it finds me I will post it so you can see the coverage, although you should simply buy either one if you find it on the web for $10. --P64 (talk) 21:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

careers of NABBP players

My User page now begins with a big wikitable, providing some background data for 20-odd clubs and navigating the information on NABBP teams and player careers that I have recently provided behind the scenes.

  • rosters that feature important teams (commonly the 1869 and 1870 professional teams of the club)
  • "members by team" Categories of wikipedia player pages
  • reports on major leaguers (who has a page, who played for the team when)

The latter are versions of reports I provided first at Category talk pages; probably I will maintain these versions in my User space.

Team roster data is unwieldy, relative to its importance. For now I am not willing to work at making tabular rosters part of the encyclopedia; there would need to be some agreement that a particular format works well, and I doubt that that is true. Most of the rosters I have presented for "featured teams" are unwieldy or close to the maximum wield although they feature only one or two seasons and they list five-game players only. --P64 (talk) 21:36, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

I was not aware of the books noted in the previous section above, but I will search for them. I am certain that any table, roster, charts can be explained narratively for the articles, if I am understanding you correctly.Neonblak talk - 21:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Killer Oregon COTW, its Totally Rad

Greetings WikiProject Oregon peoples. It is once again time for another edition of the World Famous Collaboration Of The Week. Thank you to those who worked on Clyde and [the lack of] Religion in Oregon. This week (as many have noticed), we have the “it was a red link” and by request Eugene Station and Heceta Head in honor of the work that’s been going on at Oregon Coast. Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. On a side note, does the recent news of Portland being the unhappiest place in all the land make people there more unhappy? Aboutmovies (talk) 06:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Bob Ferguson (baseball) Spoken article

Check the talk page for the referenced article, I read the article and posted a link to the file. There are a couple of notes there, also.

Also, and this is pretty important, if you click the leave new message widget on the top of your talk page, it leave's a message on Loganberry's.....

Nevermind, I think I fixed it for you

Vulture19 (talk) 20:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Bubmcatee.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bubmcatee.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

V is for Victory at the COTW: Brought to you by the Letter W (naming rights still available)

Hear ye, hear ye WikiProject Oregon villagers. Tis time for another edition of ye ol’ Collaboration Of Thine Week. Thank you to those who worked on Eugene Station and Heceta Head the last few weeks, may the Black Death spare ye family. This time we have a we little stub in the John Ross Tower and by request Bill Walton in honor of a pretty good chance at making the playoffs for the Blazers (sorry can’t think of a good Old English type language for that one, but if we go with Olde English 800, then the Jail Blazers could come into play). Anyway, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Zeus is a really cool dude and he thinks these WP:ORE articles are cool too

Greetings WikiProject Oregon guys and gals. Once again it is time for another edition of the our niche market Collaboration Of The Week. As always, thank you to those who worked on the Ross Tower and Walton. For this week we have the Calapooya Mountains and by request (and in honor of the opening) the venerable Portland Saturday Market. Just remember, if you are feeling blue, try breathing (rimshot please). Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

U too can help Oregon

Howdy WikiProject Oregon folks. It is time again it is time for another round of the Collaboration Of The Week. A big thank you to those who worked on Calapooya Mountains and Portland Saturday Market, both saw some great improvements. For this week we have two great opportunities for DYKs with Brian McMenamin and Algoma, Oregon. Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:42, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

  The COTW award from WPOR.
Thanks for leading the way in last week's Collaboration of the Week!
Great job on PSM! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

DRV for Category:Knuckleball pitchers

The close of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 April 17#Category:Knuckleball pitchers, in which you participated, is now under discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009 April 28#Category:Knuckleball pitchers. Alansohn (talk) 04:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Bring on the COTW

Good afternoon WikiProject Oregon peoples. It is time again it is time for another round of the Collaboration Of The Week, Volume 82. Thank you to those who worked on Algoma, Oregon‎ and Brian McMenamin, both saw some great improvements and are up for DYks. This week we have Mary Alice Ford and by request Waterfront Blues Festival. Once again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Live long and phosphorous. Aboutmovies (talk) 23:29, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

East End Park (Cincinnati) vs. Pendleton Park

The researcher there has me pretty well convinced that the focus of the information should be at East End Park rather than at Pendleton Park, with Pendleton Park (and several others) merely redirecting. One thing I find quite interesting is that there is still a diamond on the location, albeit a softball diamond. Some of the surrounding houses are still there too. I think the one article should cover the whole history (such as it is) of that site. Any objections to focusing the article on East End Park (Cincinnati)? P.S. I added a needed disambiguation to East End Park, an existing venue in the U.K., I think. That precedent is fine. It's kind of like the now-defunct Tiger Stadium (Detroit) vs. the still-in-use Tiger Stadium, the home of LSU football. P.P.S. I have a hunch the real problem with "Reds" was not the other team in Cincinnati, but the other team in the American Association, namely the pennant-winning Boston Reds, who of course also stole their nickname from a cross-town rival. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 08:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I discussed this issue with the main contributor to the East End Park article. He seems to have access to a great many newspaper articles from the era, and has done quite a bit of research, convincing me that Pendleton Park should redirect there, but I left it up to him to do what was necessary, as well as possible changes to Kelly's Killers (Reds) and King Kelly (Mike Kelly).Neonblak talk - 12:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
OK, so it's probably just him and me working on it at the talk page, and I think we can get it worked out there. Thanks for your help on this item. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 14:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

XOXOXO - Oregon loves you, now love Oregon back!

Greetings to WikiProject Oregon folks. It is time again it is time for another round of the Collaboration Of The Week. A big thank you to those who worked on Mary Alice Ford ‎ and the Waterfront Blues Festival, both saw some great improvements. In honor of the great weather, we have our Semi-annual Great Oregon Picture Drive for this week’s collaboration. You can go out and take a picture, or search for a free one on the Internet, or in some cases remove an old request. See the bottom of this page for some links to a variety of free sources. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:59, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Blah blah blah, Oregon COTW

Hello to members of the WikiProject o' Oregon. Once again it is time for the Collaboration Of The Week. A thank you to everyone who participated in the Semi-annual Great Oregon Picture Drive, we added a lot of pictures. For this edition we have by request Mr. Maurice Lucas of the Blazers, and a maintenance type project with the Dab Patrol. For the later, pick any Oregon disambiguation page (mainly common city names) and use the "What links here" feature to find any stray incoming links and direct them to the correct article. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Peace out! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

King Kelly

I'd love to take old Kelly on as a project. I was hoping some of the many stories about him were in Rob Neyer's Big Book of Baseball Legends which I own, but sadly not. Regardless I've got his contemporary biography Slide, Kelly, Slide by Appel and his appearances in the New Bill James Historical Abstract for some starting source material. Any help you can provide would be excellent. As for his name, I really do think King fits better. As mentioned on his talk page, that is the name he is listed as on Baseball-Reference, Fangraphs, etc, etc. Cy Young, Babe Ruth, Whitey Ford, Catfish Hunter, plenty of players grow to be known by nicknames more than their real name. Staxringold talkcontribs 03:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

  • As per Jimmy McAleer and other FAs, isn't the common reference practice to have a "Notes" section for the individual refs and a "References" section for books cited multiple times? Staxringold talkcontribs 05:07, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
I have seen multiple ways of doing this, so I have gone with what I believe to be the easiest for the reader to understand. To me, it seems easier that the book reference be above the "notes". WP:LAYOUT is pretty vague on this, it likes either references or notes, and the way I use references, was the preferred method by a GA reviewer, and it stuck with me; see Bill Lange. However, I am very receptive to others' views on these matters.Neonblak talk - 05:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Nah, this really does look more logical, I just don't want to hit a hiccup in the process down the line for formatting reasons. Staxringold talkcontribs 06:09, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Sorry I haven't done much since that first night of intro fixing. Started an LSAT prep course and my parents have been on vacation so between getting used to coursework and keeping the house in order haven't had much freetime. Hopefully after this Saturday I can get back into the swing of fixing up ol' Kel's article! Staxringold talkcontribs 16:48, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
I have been pretty busy myself, but it will get done sooner or later, just like my Providence Grays all-time roster update still hanging in my sandbox.Neonblak talk - 04:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Kite Man Says beware of powerlines

Hello to those who participate in WikiProject Oregon. Once again it is time for the Collaboration Of The Week. A thank you to everyone who participated in the Dab Patrol and improvements to Maurice Lucas. For this week we have Oregon company FLIR Systems, and a maintenance type project with the FA Update Drive. For the later, pick any Oregon FA class article and read through it to make sure it is still up-to-date. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. I like frogs. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:42, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Boz rates the day a Perfect Ten

Greetings and salutations to members of WikiProject Oregon. We hear bye announce another Collaboration Of The Week. Thanks to anyone who participated in updating any FA articles and for the improvements on FLIR Systems. This week we have two requests: former Blazer Sidney Wicks, and a key historical event with Oregon land fraud scandal. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Acquisto1976.jpg

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Acquisto1976.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 13:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Hot outside, so stay inside working on the Oregon COTW!

Hello to WikiProject Oregon folks, and get ready for another Collaboration Of The Week. Thank you to those who worked on the land fraud scandal and Mr. Wicks. This week we have one by request, Central Oregon, and a gnomish task, the Great Infobox Drive of '09. For the infobox drive, just find some articles without infoboxes and add one. People and companies are two prime areas as many do not have infoboxes, yet infoboxes exist for those areas. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back, welcome back, welcome back, Mr. COTW

Howdy after a long message absence to those of WikiProject Oregon. To answer a common question, no you did not get removed from the COTW notification list, I was just too busy to send out the notification for the last change. So, thank you to all those who helped improve Central Oregon and Mount Jefferson, as well as those who added infoboxes and adopted a governor. For this edition of the COTW, we have partly by request and in honor of the return of college football, Duck football and Beaver football. If you are a fan of neither, maybe go back and work on a governor or add infoboxes this time around. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Insert profound knowledge and wisdom here with wacky side effects

Greetings from WikiProject Oregon. First, thank you to all those who helped improve the Ducks and Beavers football teams. Second, now on with the countdown. For this edition of the COTW, we have by request Portland Hempstalk Festival and Munson Valley Historic District. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Goodbye summer, hello Dolly!

Hello WikiProject Oregon member, it is time for another Collaboration of the Week. First, thanks to those who helped out the last few weeks improving the Portland Hempstalk Festival and the Munson Valley Historic District articles. This week we have by request Rasheed Wallace and the Oregon Zoo. The later should have lots of recent news with the new/old exhibit opening. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Mert hackett.jpg

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mert hackett.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Merry Columbus Day 2 all and 2 all a goodnite, beware of large windstorms bearing gifts

Greetings fellow WikiProject Oregon member, time to uncork a fine wine as it is once again time for the Collaboration of the Week. As always, thank you to those who helped out the last few weeks improving the Oregon Zoo, the Rasheed Wallace, Willamette Bridges, and the Vanport articles. This week we have by request Jim Paxson and Films shot in Oregon. The later can easily be improved just by adding some sources. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. And with Halloween fast approaching, remember that pennies really suck as a “treat” and you can expect toilet paper and or eggs on your residence for your “trick”. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Tax revolt in critical care at a hospital near you

Hello fellow WikiProject Oregon member, once again time for the Collaboration of the Week in the land of Oregon. As always, thank you to those who helped out the last few weeks improving List of films shot in Oregon and Jim Paxson. This week we have by request Oregon tax revolt and not by request, the annual Hospital creation drive. For the later, I have laid out some sources here, and the remaining red links are all over the state, so you can find one near you! As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. May the wind always be beneath your wings. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:26, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK for List of New York Metropolitans managers

  On November 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of New York Metropolitans managers, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BencherliteTalk 20:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

It's sunny out, quick take a picture!

Greetings to WikiProject Oregon folks. It is time again for another installment of as the Collaboration Of The Week Turns. A big thank you to last time’s guest stars who worked on Oregon tax revolt‎ and creating hospital articles, we had 3 DYKs off the hospital articles createdd. This week is the star-studded affair of the Semi-annual Great Oregon Picture Drive, starring Neonblak. You can go out and take a picture, browse through Commons for an existing one, or search for a free one on the Internet, and in some cases remove an old request (or even add a request to an article that has no images). See the bottom of this page for some links to a variety of free sources. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 23:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Honor Rolls of Baseball

  Hello! Your submission of Honor Rolls of Baseball at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Providence Grays all-time roster

  Hello! Your submission of Providence Grays all-time roster at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Harrias (talk) 09:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Providence Grays all-time roster

  On December 8, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Providence Grays all-time roster, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wiki rules! Thanks Victuallers (talk) 12:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Hartford Dark Blues all-time roster

  On December 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hartford Dark Blues all-time roster, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Dick Padden

I've nom'd it for a 5x expansion over at DYK. Staxringold talkcontribs 22:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you.Neonblak talk - 22:15, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Dick Padden

  On December 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dick Padden, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

PayLess at Sprouse-Reitz for your G.I. Joe's, brought to you by Troutman's Emporium and Frederick & Nelson

Hello WikiProject Oregon member, and seasons greetings. Here at Collaboration Of The Week we thank you for your efforts making Oregon better, at least on Wikipedia, and hope you are doing better than Joe's. Or, in the eloquent words of some marketing manager for another now defunct Oregon chain, Merry Christmas from PayLess... Merry Chriiiistmaaaasssss!!!

Now that pleasantries have been exchanged, thank you to those who worked on the last two collaborations, the Semi-annual Great Oregon Picture Drive, and Oregon Country Fair and Geoff Petrie. For this edition of the COTW we have Gambling in Oregon and NRHP in Washington County. The hope for the later is to fill in the last few images (5) and then see if we can make it the first NRHP list in Oregon with an article for every entry (need 27). As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

WikiProjectBannerShell

It's a great idea to add {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} to an article talk page and tidy up the project banners, but not such a good idea to break the project banners whilst doing so. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: column breaks

I think I figured it out; instead of using the "valign" stuff and the like, it'd be better to use divs on the whole column. Most of the current all-time rosters use it currently if you're looking for an example. Wizardman Help review good articles 21:11, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

One last time for 2009

Happy New Year to you, you WikiProject Oregon member! Tis the season for one last Collaboration Of The Week to get started this year. Thank you to those who worked on Gambling in Oregon and NRHP in Washington County the last few weeks. For the final COTW of 2009, we have Archiving Article Talk Pages and Mr. Standard TV & Appliance, Bill Schonely. For the archiving, we have a lot of old, stale comments on article talk pages from before 2009 that should be archived away, so that new comments are not added to things that either were addressed or not worth addressing. Personally, I archive anything older than a year. Anyway, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Adios. Aboutmovies (talk) 22:34, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Dick Padden GA

Just to let you know that I passed the article. Well done. It's very good and as a non-baseball person, I really enjoyed it. I'm interested the cricket equivalent of this type of player and this period!--Sarastro1 (talk) 16:02, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Wow, congrats man! I had this watched from when we DYKed it and I just saw the GA update! That article is really what Wikipedia is all about, great job! Staxringold talkcontribs 18:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you both ! This one was a group effort, starting with the, seemingly, off-handed link on the baseball project talk page in reply to a cricket editor interesting in doing baseball articles. I enjoyed helping with this article.Neonblak talk - 18:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Stan Benjamin

  On January 8, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stan Benjamin, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Oregon COTW v 3.0.2010ish

Greetings WikiProject Oregon team member. Time for the first new Collaboration Of The Week in 2010. Thank you to those who worked on Bill Schonely and archiving talk pages. For this week, we have Concordia University and the Berry Botanic Garden. Hopefully we can mine the garden’s website before it closes down. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Cheers and stuff. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Just Out, COTW does well in new decade

Howdy WikiProject Oregon folks, time again for the latest installment of As the Collaboration Of The Week Turns. Last week was one of the more successful COTWs in recent memory as we really worked hard as a community to improve Concordia University and Berry Botanic Garden. Both are now at least C class articles and nicely illustrated (thanks to Tedder, Finetooth, and Ipoellet). Plus it really was a group effort as we had five different WPORE editors work on the garden and ditto with the school, with some overlap between the two.

Anyway, this week, we have by request the completely unrelated Just Out and Terrell Brandon. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. This message paid for by Fooians against COTW killing taxes. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:31, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bill Clymer

 

A tag has been placed on Bill Clymer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Marine79 (talk) 05:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Bill Clymer

Hello Neonblak, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Bill Clymer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Any player for a "major league" franchise who played at the top professional level of their sport is considered notable, therefore deserves an article. This is well established policy see WP:ATH for the guidlines. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 05:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for contesting it, I actually put the tag back on after I deleted it by mistake, the user above is actually the proposer.Neonblak talk - 05:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation. I have notified User:Marine79 that I removed the speedy. -- Eastmain (talkcontribs) 05:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your help.Neonblak talk - 05:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Ganguly

Thanks for your review :) —Aaroncrick (talk) 07:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem, the reason I reviewed this so quickly was that I thought this was an interesting cricketer, although I know very little about the sport (I'm in the US, where they don't show the sport on TV). I left a comment on the GA nom page about an issue raised by another user, in respect to Ganguly's coaching legacy, I think that an explanation of the good and bad would be great for comprehensiveness, and would not fall into in a cruft stage. Although I think that the one sentence covering his two years in county were awfully short, I wouldn't hold back the GA on that alone.Neonblak talk - 07:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
YM knows more about his conflict with the coach more than me or Legolas. Well, I know very little about baseball, though, it is shown on tv. —Aaroncrick (talk) 01:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Neonblak, I added the material as pointed out by YM and my own research from bios and scholar analysis to the article to balance out the legacy section. It presents the positive as well as the negative aspects too. Could you take a look please? --Legolas (talk2me) 09:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Surely.Neonblak talk - 12:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied and I don't want to get deeper into a Chappell-Ganguly style dispute on the GA. YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars photo poll) 04:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Autoreviewer

Hi Neonblak, I just came across one of your articles at newpage patrol, and was surprised to see that an editor who has been contributing referenced articles since 2006 hadn't already been approved as an wp:Autoreviewer. So I've taken the liberty of rectifying that. ϢereSpielChequers 16:55, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you :) Neonblak talk - 17:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Philadelphia Athletics (1890–1891) all-time roster

  On February 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Philadelphia Athletics (1890–1891) all-time roster, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi, are you keeping track of this FLC? Dabomb87 (talk) 14:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, but I have been extremely busy. I will time for the next few days to address changes with this list, however few. I should have left a note to explain that, but simply wasn't able to.Neonblak talk - 04:32, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Oregon COTW and randomness

Greetings fellow WikiProject Oregon member, it is once again time for the Collaboration of the Week (yes, I know they are not actually every week anymore). Thank you to those who helped out the last few weeks improving Terrell Brandon, Just Out, 75th Oregon Legislative Assembly, and all the unreferenced BLPs. This week we have by request Oregon Coast Aquarium and Arvydas Sabonis (maybe the Blazers can sign him as I think he's healthy). Both need more sourcing. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. And remember folks, the only thing we have to fear is death and taxes, unless of course the dingo ate your baby, at which point you may feel the need, the for speed to get away from said dingos, which in turn can lead to a failure to communicate due to the dynamics of sound waves, though at some point hopefully we can all just get along. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Hugh Daily

I cannot find a reference that states Daily was born in Maryland, only references that state Ireland. Are you aware of a Baltimore, MD reference? If none can be found, maybe it should be changed. Flibirigit (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

It looks like one of the sources I used has corrected his birthplace, I am going to check the book reference to verify that it did not claim his birthplace as Baltimore. Once I am done with that, I will re-work the article.Neonblak talk - 15:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
There were alot of birthplace changes that were inputted into baseball reference recently. The folks at SABR are keeping busy. Flibirigit (talk) 15:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Napoleonic Triple Crown

 
Well done for hitting a home run on so many olde baseball articles to WP:DYK, WP:GA, and WP:FC, with a well-deserved Imperial Napoleonic Triple Crown upon Neonblak. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:23, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Visual edition of the Oregon COTW featuring the Glass Palace

 

Hello WikiProject Oregon member, time for a new edition of the Collaboration of the Week. Thank you to those who helped out the last few weeks improving Oregon Coast Aquarium and Arvydas Sabonis. Also thank you to those few of you helped with the attempt to celebrate Women's History Month with Barbara Roberts and Ursula K. Le Guin.

This week we have by request the Memorial Coliseum that has been in the news a lot lately, and then one of the more important political figures in our state's history, Douglas McKay. The MC needs some ref work and EL work, and McKay really needs a lot more sourcing. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

It Takes a Rim Village - Oregon COTW

Greetings WikiProject Oregon member, time for the next edition of the Collaboration of the Week. Thanks to those who assisted in improving a few articles over the last month. For May Day edition of the COTW (in Wikipedia time its May already), we have by request Rim Village Historic District and the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry (AKA OMSI). Rim Village just needs some refinement to get to GA, while OMSI needs a lot of work in general. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Adios (on May 5th that is). Aboutmovies (talk) 04:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Portland Parks Photo Blitz!

  <font=3> Want something to do this weekend? I propose a WikiProject Oregon weekend photo blitz! Let's try to fill up the List of parks in Portland, Oregon as much as possible by getting out and taking our own pictures or finding ones online that can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. The pictures uploaded will not only benefit the aforementioned list, but they will be used for future articles about specific parks and will fill up the Parks in Portland category over at Commons. Get your cameras ready!

--Another Believer (Talk) 21:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

 

DYK nomination for Kansas City Cowboys (AA) all-time roster

Hello, your nomination of Kansas City Cowboys (AA) all-time roster at DYK was reviewed and comments provided. --NortyNort (Holla) 04:28, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Kansas City Cowboys (AA) all-time roster

RlevseTalk 18:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

 
Hello, Neonblak. You have new messages at Killervogel5's talk page.
Message added 12:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AfD of Major League Baseball team captains

Hello, you recently !voted to delete Major League Baseball team captains at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major League Baseball team captains. Another editor has substantially edited the article and added references, and I have withdrawn my nomination and endorsed a move to Captain (baseball). I would like you to take another look and re-evaluate your !vote in light of the recent changes. Thanks! —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:15, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Your valued picture nomination was promoted

 
Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Thomas Lynch01.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Spongie555 (talk) 04:26, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

image

I saw your interested i'n baseball. Could you help find a better image of Pete Gray. His article really needs a better image atleast a VP worthy one. If your not interested it's ok. Spongie555 (talk) 05:19, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Certainly, I will look for a better one. Might be tough to find a good, free use photo of him, but I will try.Neonblak talk - 05:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Jim Devlin

I wanted to ask you about this pair of edits. According to the change you made, the Devlin in the image would be just seven years of age (the picture was taken in 1873 and Jim Devlin (pitcher) was born in 1866). Plain old Jim Devlin would be 24 in 1873, old enough to be playing in MLB. — KV5Talk • 19:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

I believe the date of picture to be incorrect, I uploaded to commons this picture of the 1887 Philadelphia Quakers, and the Devlin shown on the team appears to be the same guy, complete with cutoff sleeves.Neonblak talk - 20:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Find a Grave

 
Hello, Neonblak. You have new messages at Kumioko's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Valued Picture nomination of File:Chaplin The Kid.jpg

 
Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Chaplin The Kid.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Acather96 (talk) 17:30, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Johnkerins.jpg

 

Thank you for uploading File:Johnkerins.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Barkleycard.jpg

 

Thank you for uploading File:Barkleycard.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)