Muteelation

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beequeen (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beequeen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Beequeen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 23:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Muteelation! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 23:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Beequeen

Hi Muteelation,

I have done a bit of formatting to the Beequeen draft. Take a look and see what you think. Pretty much all I've done for now is add an infobox, create some sections from what you had already written, and move some of the text around. I also removed the external links in the lead paragraph (not allowed) and added a reference for the name coming from Joseph Beuys.

The thing to do now is take the reviews you have found and create a chronological history of the band, summarising what they say. The Herbal International and I Heart Noise reviews should be avoided as they are blogs, but the rest look good. The collection of reviews from their own website can be used if you can find the original publication details and cite them to where they are from rather than to the band's own website.

I'm not going to do any more work on it today but will take another look tomorrow. There's no question that they are notable, so we will get this article live! Cheers, Turner Street (talk) 20:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

@Turner Street: Wow, you made great progress with this, your experience with editing Wiki's really shows! I went through and pulled out quotes from the reviews at the bottom and incorporated them throughout the article. I avoided the 2 blogs. I hope this is what you were thinking. I researched how to handle quotes in Wikipedia and hope I did this in an acceptable manner. I highly appreciate the work you did, and if you have time to ensure that I 'told the story' as you requested in the proper manner.

Since it sounds like you enjoy obscure music, I recommend a quick listen to the first track from The Bodyshop https://beequeen.bandcamp.com/album/the-bodyshop and just for fun, The Maypole Song from Sandancing https://beequeen.bandcamp.com/album/sandancing - I think of this more as a Brunnen song as it shows the fun side that Freek brings to the band with the lyrics.

With my sincere thanks - Muteelation (talk) 3:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry I haven't been back to do any more work on the draft since Thursday - I will get back to it over the next few days. The stuff you have done is exactly what is needed - feel free to create more sections or change the headings if you like! Thanks Turner Street (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Muteelation! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Established band, has reviews - rejected for Notability, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beequeen has been accepted

Beequeen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 00:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC)