Mushh94
Welcome!
editHello, Mushh94, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mike Cavanaugh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SL93 (talk) 10:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Mushh94, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Mushh94! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hey, I see you do most of the writing for the 2014 Boston College Eagles football team article; I do most of the writing for the corresponding Penn State article. I generally do a lot of work on bowl articles, and was wondering if you would be interested in collaborating on the 2014 Pinstripe Bowl article ... I generally like to follow the structure I used in these good articles: 2012 New Mexico Bowl 2012 Hawaii Bowl 2013 Cotton Bowl Classic. Feel free to help out if you'd like! Thanks. Go Phightins! 00:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Adding content
editThanks for your contributions to wikipedia like the Jets–Patriots rivalry. Please try and make sure everything you add is sourced though. Enough RS papers and websites cover the games, it shouldn't be a problem finding sources to put up with the game's stats. Nothing should ever be added to wikipedia without an RS used as a ref - Galatz (talk) 22:38, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Please make sure you source your content. You just added more content to the article, put it before the reference that was there, yet it is not found in that source. Please fix - Galatz (talk) 04:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- I also suggest you take a look at WP:OR and WP:OLINK. As I mentioned all information must be sourced. A lot of information you added was your personal view of it, but it shouldn't include your original research, it must be sourced from an RS. Additionally an an internal link is only used the first time its mentioned. There is no need to link Rex Ryan in the article as that already has been linked. - Galatz (talk) 04:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Ryan Fitzgerald (ice hockey) for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Fitzgerald (ice hockey) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Fitzgerald (ice hockey) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 23:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
editHi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
editYou are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Mushh94. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Concerning the Milo Yiannopoulos WP article
editHello, Mushh94! There is once again a discussion concerning Mr. Milo Yiannopoulos background. Could you help out? Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos. Thank you! Regards, RudiLefkowitz (talk) 14:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Mushh94. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Mushh94. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editUMASS
editBro the game is over. UMASS is up 5-0. There is absolutely no way in hell they are choking this game. Just give it up. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 01:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed. But wiki etiquette is to not make the edit until the result is official. Mushh94 (talk) 01:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:16TeamBracket-FinalsReseed
editTemplate:16TeamBracket-FinalsReseed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Frietjes: If there is a simpler version, then please feel free to delete it. Mushh94 (talk) 20:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Stanley Cup playoffs 2021
editThat’s technically true, but the Jets scored 3 goals in a 3 minute span, 10 minutes later. You might want to clarify that Mastergerwe97 (talk) 06:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Mastergerwe97: You're perfectly welcome to add that information if you feel so inclined. I just reverted the change that was incorrect. Mushh94 (talk) 06:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, I also have a problem with Deadman. I do not get along with him at all. I’m always arguing with him, he thinks I know nothing about editing, and he’s a huge jerk. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 06:34, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Mastergerwe97: I can see that you have had issues with many users concerning your editing practices. I would suggest that if you have a disagreement with someone, start a new section in the talk page and discuss it there, rather than continually engaging in edit wars (where you revert each other back and forth). Also, read up on the site rules and Wiki etiquette. As I told you in April during the NCAA tournament, there are standards which dictate how the encyclopedia is run. Also, I see that you were temporarily banned for personal attacks, I wouldn't keep that up if you want to continue to edit. You don't have to agree with other users, but insulting them is not necessary at all, or acceptable. Mushh94 (talk) 07:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editPre-NCAA Tournament Timeline
editThere is no one source. I've had to check and cross-reference everything pre-1947 on my own. I used the school yearbook and newspaper archives. If you follow the same route I took, it will probably take you a while to finish. Fortunately, Springfield College makes everything available online so you would at least be able to find it if you're so inclined.PensRule11385 (talk) 05:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oh well, I was hoping it wouldn't have to go deep diving into record books but if I every get the motivation at some point at least I know its out there. Thanks for the reply! Mushh94 (talk) 08:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Charlie Holt Team Sportsmanship Award moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Charlie Holt Team Sportsmanship Award, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Very well, I added the same archived and dead link the other Hockey East Awards articles reference, such as Hockey East Scoring Champion and Bob Kullen Coach of the Year Award. I didn't realize the official source - let alone the one and only working link - wouldn't be sufficient. If that doesn't make it meet WP:GNG, then none of the others do, either. Mushh94 (talk) 04:21, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Holt Team Sportsmanship Award (March 31)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Holt Team Sportsmanship Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- I've resubmitted the draft with articles mentioning a team winning that year's award. But just FYI, there are no secondary sources that compile a list of award winners.
- The citations I initially added are consistent with the other Hockey East Awards articles that exist, such as Hockey East Player of the Year, Bob Kullen Coach of the Year Award, Len Ceglarski Award, Hockey East Three-Stars Award, and Hockey East Scoring Champion. All of these articles only cite the primary source and archived or dead links to secondary sources.
- If such standards exist for the creation of Charlie Holt article, then the rest of the league's award articles are not reliably sourced either. Mushh94 (talk) 04:27, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Holt Team Sportsmanship Award (June 2)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Holt Team Sportsmanship Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Charlie Holt Team Sportsmanship Award
editHello, Mushh94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charlie Holt Team Sportsmanship Award".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 10:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)