Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 May 4

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< May 3 May 5 >

May 4 edit

League of Legends roster templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, already subst. into articles. Pbrks (talk) 21:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I see little reason to use these restrictive templates when we can more easily edit the {{Esports roster header}} in each article. Also, some of these are outdated. Rekkles does not play for Fnatic. Anarchyte (talk • work) 09:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - unneeded, overly specific templates. Agreed with above comment. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:20, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — The last four templates are for discussions only and aren't referred from any article. They are useless and pollute template namespace. --AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 15:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis3555 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by {{16TeamBracket|compact=y|sets=3/5/5/5}} Frietjes (talk) 20:32, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds-Byes-2Reseeds edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by {{16TeamBracket|compact=y|seeds=n|byes=2|RD1-RD2-path=0}} Frietjes (talk) 20:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-Finals3reseed edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by {{16TeamBracket|RD2-RD3-path=0|legs=1/1/1/3}} Frietjes (talk) 20:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-FinalsReseed edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by {{16TeamBracket|RD2-RD3-path=0|seeds=y}} Frietjes (talk) 20:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:X mark big edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Xmark. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{X mark big}} is the same as {{Xmark}}, just with a default value of 23px rather than 20px and less options.. It should be substituted and then redirected to {{Xmark}} / deleted. Most of its transclusions come from {{Done/See also}}. Terasail[✉] 17:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - used regularly in some places, as noted in nomination, and incapable of confusing readers or editors. Useful to have multiple sizes depending on context. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:22, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect - Even though it's virtually everywhere I think it should be redirected to a smaller {{Xmark}}. --AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 15:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comparison for reference:  N N The difference is tiny and I wouldn't be able to identify which one is which without the comparison. Might as well redirect imo. --Trialpears (talk) 19:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    It also looks like the line spacing gets slightly larger with the bigger version which is undesirable. --Trialpears (talk) 19:41, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect. These are almost exactly the same, with this being overall worse per Trialpears. As a personal note, which should be disregarded as it's entirely WP:IDONTLIKEIT and yet, still worth mentioning, editors should really stop creating the same exact icon templates, because the current ones aren't their exact flavor. There are 10 "x" templates just in the /doc of this one, and I'm pretty sure there are even more undocumented. Wikipedia isn't a blog or a personal website and editors should work with what is already present (and hopefully complies with accessibility guidelines, which some of these obviously do not). --Gonnym (talk) 12:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per Trialpears, given the spacing quirks noted by them in their statement. Hog Farm Talk 23:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • redirect, minor difference in size. Frietjes (talk) 17:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:ProcessArgs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previously used by Module:Delimited tag, has become unused after that module's deletion. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Designer labels edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:11, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The scope of this template is too broad, better served by a cat or list, fails WP:NAVBOX. Störm (talk) 02:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Motorways and Trunk Roads in England edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 May 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_May_4&oldid=1023706684"