Welcome! edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 02:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

MroWikipedian, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi MroWikipedian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi MroWikipedia, I was wondering why you added the extra image on the article, there is Commons:Category:Jimmie Åkesson for that. I will go an revert it. Thank you for your time; Lotje (talk) 12:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Officials implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China (2017–2022) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Officials implicated by the anti-corruption campaign in China (2017–2022), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 08:11, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (2018 Russian pension protests) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating 2018 Russian pension protests, MroWikipedian!

Wikipedia editor K.e.coffman just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for improving the coverage of current global events.

To reply, leave a comment on K.e.coffman's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

K.e.coffman (talk) 09:16, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

You inserted a table showing how much each party got. However, the table you added used 2016 data, not 2018 data. Since it was clearly wrong (it showed the Republicans winning), I fixed what I could and commented the rest out. If you have 2018 data, you can change the numbers and uncomment it. HotdogPi 14:30, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, MroWikipedian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deleting and not responding to constructive criticism on this page, and still not providing edit summaries edit

I can see from this page history that you have deleted several users' suggestions and warnings. Despite two recent requests that you provide edit summaries for your edits, these requests seem to have been removed and ignored. Your current stats show:
Major edits with summaries · 103 (11.1%)
No summary · 826 (88.9%)
I am now issuing you with a friendly warning as I do not wish to escalate this unnecessarily, but please review WP:HOW and WP:EDIT and try to stick to the guidelines. It would also be helpful to write something on your user page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:01, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry edit