User talk:MrX/Archive/April-June 2013

Mannequins

I created a new article called 'store mannequins' and you redirected it to a new page. Can you tell me why?Arielnorton (talk) 15:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Because we already have a Mannequins article about store mannequins and because you created the new article as COATRACK for spam, just as you did with Powerful Women's Vitamins. - MrX 15:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

I did not create the article WP:COATRACK. I did not create these for SPAM I created them because they contain notable information. Can you please reinstate these articles and I will make necessary changes. Arielnorton (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

I can not recreate deleted articles. Please read the helpful links in the welcome message on your talk page. - MrX 15:18, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	Thanks for reviewing my pages! Julius Know (talk) 01:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you Julius, for the barnstar and for all of the interesting articles that you have created. It was my pleasure to review them. - MrX 01:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	I've been meaning to give you one of these for some time now. I'm consistently impressed with the way you manage to stay civil, even during the most heated disputes. I know you already have one, but this civility barnstar is well deserved. Kudos to you for taking the high road. ~Adjwilley (talk) 04:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I know it's a pile on, but that's not the way I meant it...I really have been meaning to do this for a couple of weeks, and I was thinking about it just now so I did it. (Otherwise I probably would have forgotten for a couple more weeks.) ~Adjwilley (talk) 04:29, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Adjwilley, I really appreciate the recognition. One can never have too many civility barnstars! Cheers - MrX 12:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Howdy

Howdy, I am fairly new at editing and creating. I read your list of interests and I figure we have some common ground. I have some questions regarding new pages and disambiguation pages. Let me know when you have time and we can set up a chat or however you do it here. Thank you for your time. Best, Sean Postcolumbian (talk) 20:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Sean. Sure, I'm happy to answer any questions and help in any way that I can. Feel free to post your questions here, or on your own talk page. Cheers - MrX 21:08, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambuguation

Cool. I recently created a page for a place that no longer exists but is historically significant (the Atomic Cafe). I know there is a film of the same name. Should I create a disambiguation page or just edit the film page to include "may refer to" type language? That is my main question. Thanks again for your time. (You may get tired of me saying this but I mean it.)--Postcolumbian (talk) 21:21, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The rule of thumb, when there are two ambiguous titles, is to place a disambiguation hatnote on the article that is considered the primary topic. See WP:DABLINKS for the relevant guideline.

I have made the edit to the film article by inserting this code: {{about|a film|For the Punk diner|Atomic Cafe (diner)}} at the top of the article. It's also possible to place a similar hatnote on the secondary article (in this case, Atomic Cafe (diner)), but it's not necessary. It's really a judgement call. - MrX 21:50, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Awesome! I saw it and I agree the diner does not to revert back to the other page. The code is simple and neat. Thanks very much I really appreciate it. I'll be contributing some more articles soon. I am writing them now. If you don't mind I would like to ask you to review my articles when I am ready to upload. Thanks again! --Postcolumbian (talk) 01:18, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome! I look forward to reading your upcoming articles. - MrX 01:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Hategroup SPLC

What is your problem? The SPLC is an openly partisan hategroup. It belongs on that list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.36.157.32 (talk) 16:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

What reviewed article?

Hi MrX. I saw your note on my talk page, but I'm confused. I don't have permission to review on Wikipedia- all I did was saw a French Language article from Special:NewPages and slapped a {{NotEnglish}} on it. I'm not entirely sure what I did wrong, but whatever it was, would you be kind enough to explain it to me, since I don't have a clue :) Thanks! Humblesnore (talk) 00:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

You didn't do anything wrong. I assume that you are using WP:TWINKLE when adding tags to articles. When you tag an unreviewed article, it is marked as reviewed by Twinkle, by default. I don't necessarily agree that is should work that way, but it does by default. You have the ability to turn the "Mark pages as patrolled when tagging (if possible)" feature off in your Twinkle settings here, if you prefer. - MrX 00:29, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Done, and disabled. Thank you for that, when I saw your message about something being unreviewed I got confused. I know there's a reviewers user right on here, which is attached to pending changes. That's why I mentioned about me not having permission to review! Humblesnore (talk) 00:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, there are two types of reviewers: pending changes, which requires a special user right and page curation/new article review which anyone can do by going to Special:NewPagesFeed. If you are curating new articles, I recommend that you manually review any that clearly meet our minimum inclusion standards, after adding any appropriate cleanup tags. - MrX 00:39, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Kirlian photography

Dyemets (talk) 04:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)I noticed you listed Yakov Narkevich-Iodko as Russian. Various sources do indeed seem to source him as Russian and even Polish but I am sure that you will find upon a simple Yandex search online will show that he is largely noted to be Belarusian.

Here is a link of the search and you can flip through the first few results as most of them state he is Belarusian: http://yandex.ru/yandsearch?lr=103261&text=%D0%AF%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2+%D0%9E%D1%82%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87+%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87-%D0%98%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BA%D0%BE

Wikipedia has no article on him in English but there is a credible article on him in Russian: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87-%D0%98%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BA%D0%BE,_%D0%AF%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2_%D0%9E%D1%82%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87

I don't dispute the possibility that he could be Russian or Polish but the general consensus that I see in many articles is that he was Belarusian.

Dyemets (talk) 04:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

The only source currently in the article and the ru.wiki article both support that he was Russian. As far as I know, Belarus was not a recognized sovereign country at the time of his birth (see Belarus#Before the First World War). Interestingly, the Yandex search reveals that several web sources have copied the ru.wiki article but revised it to state that he was Belarusian. This is why we need reliable sources, such as published books, journals and newspapers. Unfortunately, we can't follow consensus outside of en.wiki. - MrX 13:07, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

User page draft will be deleted

Per the discussion [1] it was determined that the efforts that you participated in at User:TheRedPenOfDoom/sandbox/heterophobia had lead to the conclusion that there was not enough content to overcome WP:DICDEF and so instead of an article, the term will be a redirect to Wiktionary.

I will be requesting a deletion of the sandbox draft that you contributed to. Please feel free to contact an admin to have it restored and moved to your user space if you wish to continue working. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:53, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I'm happy to see it go. - MrX 20:31, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar from Julius Know ‎

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paul Bedson/Archive. Paul Bedson is an obsessive puppetmaster who promises to keep socking until we unblock him. Dougweller (talk) 09:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. - MrX 11:58, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BDD

Nicely done.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:04, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

He's back - again

User:Chechyna Freedom! and a sleeper Adrianomperiniera. One hoax and a battle. And a kitten for Basalisk! Peridon (talk) 22:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

That's fantastic. I will keep my eyes open for any new battle-socks. - MrX 23:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I apologize

I apologize for editing without using the items you mentioned. From now on I will not edit in the manner which brought this to your attention.

Fillin Preacher (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Welcome to Wikipedia! - MrX 20:59, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I'm a new user...

Hello! I am a bit of a newbie to wikipedia - but keen to contribute and find out more - I'm not sure exactly what content I'd most like to work on - but have considered geographic topics, social innovation and cultural phenomena - are you still taking on mentees?!

Caseybain (talk) 14:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Caseybain. Welcome to Wikipedia! I would be happy to take on a mentee, however I do have somewhat limited time right now because of real life demands. I can at least answer your questions and steer you in the right direction.

There are an unbelievably diverse number of ways to contribute to the project. Do you have experience editing articles? If not, that's a good place to start. I sometimes find an article that I'm interested in and then follow Wikilinks or category links to related articles. Almost every article on Wikipedia can benefit from copy editing. There's even a GUILD for that!

You may also benefit from joining Wikiprojects in your areas of interest. For example, Wikiproject GEOGRAPHY. In any case, if you can help me narrow down how you would like to start contributing, I will help get you started and also monitor your contributions so that I can provide you with guidance. - MrX 21:19, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion.

I am fixed this, please confirm. Ramayana Water Park — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chronograph (talk • contribs) 11:50, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

You did remove some of the advertising verbiage, but not all of it. You should not remove the speedy deletion template from the page (as it states on the template itself). Also, the article has no sources with which to establish notability and the article may violate WP:CRYSTAL. If these are not addressed, the article may be deleted. Please read WP:FIRST for tips on how to properly create an article. Best wishes - MrX 12:15, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Every time I turn around on New Page Patrol, you've beat me to doing whatever it is I'm looking at. Damn, you're good - keep it up! TKK bark ! 13:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar. I do what I can... - MrX 14:55, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Same-sex marriage article edit

Hi. I got your message regarding my edit on the same-sex marriage article. What I did is I updated the population of countries and jurisdictions where same-sex marriage has been legalized since the information in the article was out of date. Could this be a valid source? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_marriage-equality_laws.svgThevastdarkness (talk) 22:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately, no. The map graphic is intended to illustrate data in an article, but it can not be used as a source for the content that you added: "As of May 4, 2013, 402,242,098 people (5.7% of the world population) lived in areas that recognize and perform same-sex marriages." I assume that you calculated that percentage? If so, that would be original research which our policies do not permit. Perhaps you could find a recent magazine or newspaper article with an updated statistic. I'm sure that there must be a reliable source that has compiled such a statistic.

The message that I left on your talk page was because you removed three countries from the Countries that disallow homosexuals from serving in the military list in the Sexual orientation and military service article. You didn't state in the edit summary why you removed them and you did not provide a source. - MrX 23:10, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Ah, ok I see. Yes, I did do the calculations myself. I'll try to see if I can find an article that contains more recent statistics. Also, I created a new section on the talk page of the Sexual orientation and military service article over my previous edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thevastdarkness (talk • contribs) 01:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Is it ok if I go ahead with my previous edit on the Sexual orientation and military service by the information that I provided on Talk:Sexual_orientation_and_military_service? Also, this isn't a relevant question, but no has given me an answer yet as to how I can add individual states to world maps. I would like to know so that I can update this map: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_homosexuality_laws.svg Thevastdarkness (talk) 06:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

I have commented on the article talk page. Generally, if you have newer sources that refute older ones, then you can remove those countries from the list. I recommend that you include a notation in your edit summaries referring to the talk page discussion. - MrX 11:17, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Adoption?

Hi, I have a few edits and new here, and am quite interested in being adopted. --Ugog Nizdast (talk) 18:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Sure. I will respond in more detail on your talk page. - MrX 21:19, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Same

I actually think theres a roughly 90% chance that Acoma Magoc and Keted6 are the same person. Maybe we should link the two together? Pass a Method talk 09:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

I would agree based on the subjects that they edit and the edit summaries. However, Keted6's editing times are a little different from Acoma Magic's and his socks such as this one and this one.

You may want to check with Reaper Eternal and see what he thinks about the new socks under AM. You can also post a request on WT:SPI. - MrX 11:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks and getting started

Hi - just to say thanks for taking the time to reply to me. I'm finding my way around a bit before I start asking questions ;) and also taking your advice around thinking which areas I'd most like to work on first. I'll be in touch when I get going and get to grips with the new environment!Caseybain (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. Just let me know when you need help. - MrX 15:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Not Spam

I'm the administrator of the Theosophical Wikipedia (tswiki.net) that the Theosophical Society in America (theosophical.org) is developing. The wikipedia article mentioned the Theosophical concept of Aura and we are providing a link to a Theosophical resource for those who want to know more about this particular subject. The same with the others. I'm only adding a link to genuine and related sources of information so that people may access them. I do not see why this is not appropriate, when there are other external links not directly related to the subject? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theosophical Wiki (talk • contribs) 4:14 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Your link additions were inappropriate and seem to have been placed with the objective of promoting your web site. Our policies do not permit the addition of promotional links or links to non-authoritative websites. We don't want to send our readers to other wikis. However, feel free to add verifiable content to the Wikipedia articles, with reliable sources. The welcome message on your talk page contains links to articles that will help you contribute to Wikipedia. Best wishes - MrX 20:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

To anyone who knows about Theosophy, the TSWiki cannot be regarded "non-authoritative", since it only offers primary sources and not the opinion of uninformed people. But it is a repeated experience in trying to work in Wikipedia that I encounter people who do not know how to share and collaborate. This is why there was a need to create a Theosophical wiki. If the benefit of those whose are researching is not the main concern of those involved in a project, the result is tribal attitudes that make valuable contributors simply leave. So be it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theosophical Wiki (talk • contribs) 21:21, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

I think that's an unfortunate and unfair characterization of Wikipedia. Anyone is welcome to create and edit articles, and advance the goals of the project in numerous other ways. All that is required is that the content emanates from reliable sources and is presented in a neutral fashion. Why not stick around and use your knowledge and resources to help improve the Theosophy articles on Wikipedia? It seems like that could only benefit the goal of collaborating and sharing information about the subject. There are community established policies that sometimes seem onerous to new contributors, but really this is a pretty great place to build an encyclopedia in spite of our many flaws. - MrX 22:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Oops!

I accidentally used the rollback tool to revert you on Chick-Fil-A. You did not edit the page out of bad faith in any way shape or form and I regretted using that tool instead of "undo" immediately. Please do forgive me. Red Slash 18:47, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

That's OK. It's not a problem. - MrX 18:49, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Wiki-labs

I just realized I never told you about my first labs-tool. common-interests is in the gate. Unfortunately there is no database yet, so it doesn't do much other than return generated editor names. Once the database is online (7-10 days I'm told) you can dump in several articles and get a list of editors who have edited every one of those articles. Good for finding socks or even your Doppelgänger. I'll let you know when it goes live.  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer  21:39, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I look forward to trying it out. - MrX 00:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Adopt Me

Dear MrX,

Would you be able to adopt me? Regards, Anjumodgil (talk) 03:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Possibly. I will discuss it with you on your talk page. - MrX 14:17, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Dispute

I'm not trying to be a pain, but I've looked for sourcing from reputable sites like the BBC but can't find anything. When it's released it'll probably be referenced in news reports about the film but for now there's nothing (at least that I can find). The relevance to the film hasn't been justified either and a section on the page seems like undue weight. Whatly (talk) 22:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

I disagree and I believe the sources support inclusion of the material. Let's discuss this on the article talk page though so other's can participate. - MrX 23:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

And they ask me why I drink.

Out of curiosity I did a wiki blame to see how that unsourced bit got added. [2]. Yes, it's from two years ago. But it is still dissapointing.  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer  04:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

I assume that was added in good faith and I suspect the content as it was written could be verified in one or more sources. - MrX 20:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Best case scenario is that she didn't read the source. However recent history shows this infidelity continues. BTW, who is your money on being the sockmaster? I'm going AM  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer  02:26, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Sigh. Of course it's AM. Ample ROPE is being dispensed as we speak. - MrX 02:35, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Is he following you or the other way around? I noticed the flap over at Ender's Game.  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer  02:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

I checked some of his contributions once I realized who it was. I tried to address some of the more troublesome edits, but since he's so fond of edit warring, I will just wait until the sock is put back in the drawer and simply revert all of his edits under WP:EVADE. - MrX 03:05, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

We are trying to had a reference

we are tryign to had a reference now if you can give us a couple of minutes prior to create the page, many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trmanagement (talk • contribs) 15:48, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Could you provide some context please? I don't know what you're referring to. - MrX 15:58, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks to reverting my change

I accidentally nominated an article for deletion and you caught it right away. Thanks so much!

Sure. I think our edits were nearly concurrent. - MrX 15:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Westboro Baptist Church

Please use caution in your comments regarding living persons. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:34, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Alloy metal

Per WP:CHEAP, I think the page could simply be redirected to Alloy. But I left the speedy tag on it; you (or a passing admin) can decide. Cheers, Ignatzmice•talk 12:52, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I guess a redirect may be appropriate. I agree that an admin can make that call. - MrX 13:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Polar Bear Cub

I created an article called Polar Bear Cub. I will add some more information about them and I am working on it. Seals1534 (talk) 12:54, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution. We already have an article about Polar bears, which is where you should add content about Polar bear cubs, since cubs are just the children of the adult polar bears. You can imaging that, if we created articles for the young of every animal, this place might start looking like a zoo! - MrX 13:11, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Polar Bear Cub

Hello MrX. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Polar Bear Cub, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: the page was intended as a redirect, rather than a summative duplicate of existing topic. . Thank you. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 14:51, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi MrX! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 14:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi MrX! I'm so happy to see you signed up to join the project - welcome. You can dive into our to-do lists here. Be sure to watchlist your favorite to-do lists, as they will continue to grow as new content gets added to the WDL website. Also, you can always search the WDL website for something that you're interested in. And be sure to share your outcomes here. If I can help with anything just ask and welcome aboard! SarahStierch (talk) 14:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Sarah. I look forward to working on the project. - MrX 21:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Lil Wyte-No Filter

Hello, I'm the person who created the No Filter article. I noticed it has been included into the deletable articles. I would like to give a few reasons why my article shouldn't be deleted.

First of all, the information is reliable since they are facts that were confirmed by the artists like the date of release, the first single, that it is a collaboration album etc.

Second, the reason I consider this album notable is because it is an album by an artist who is relatively famous: Lil Wyte. Third the guests and producers are also notable since Three 6 Mafia member DJ Paul who was confirmed as a producer on the album has his own article as well as guest rappers Twiztid.

Finally, I would like to add that the album isn't released yet (July 16 is the release date), so I consider it early to call the article unimportant since the tracklist, other guests and producers, album length are all unknown currently and there aren't any reviews either due to the fact that it's an upcoming rap album and not a released one. Abgrenv (talk) 14:01, 28 May 2013

Unfortunately, while the artist is notable, the album is not. Notability is not inherited. Notable means that reliable sources (magazines, newspapers, books, news web sites) have taken notice and written about the subject (the album, not the artist). Since the album does not exist yet, it stands to reason that it would not be notable. Please read WP:NALBUM to better understand what would be required to establish notability for this album. - MrX 21:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

So if the album will be reviewed after released and if there will be interviews about the album, then it means it is notable and the article can stay? Abgrenv (talk) 13:58, 05 June 2013

No. Please see WP:CRYSTAL. - MrX 12:34, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Daydreamin' (Ariana Grande album)

Hello MrX. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Daydreamin' (Ariana Grande album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article is not substantially the same as the deleted version. A new deletion discussion is required. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

OK, but I think the article is is not substantially the same because I made it into a redirect before I realized that there had been a previous AfD. I think leaving the redirect is fine though. - MrX 11:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For helping stop a likely sock puppet. Way2veers 21:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! Hopefully we stopped them...for now anyway. - MrX 22:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Reporting in.

Thought I'd better to post on your talk page rather than mine since I have only 20 items on my watchlist. Would you kindly inspect my recent contributions regarding local places and BLPs and point out what you feel about it and about the editing manner in which I've proceeded. Thanks. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Overall, I think your edits looks good. I tweaked the grammar a little on Natural gas. You removed a bad redirect at Humour in Australia, but you didn't put another in it's place. I'm not sure if you thought it better to leave a blank page than have a bad redirect. Someone fixed it though be inserting the correct redirect page.

Your edits on Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health were WP:BOLD and they seem reasonable. Your removed quite a lot of sourced content (albeit possibly poorly sourced). It's fine that you did that, but be prepared for another editor to revert you if they disagree. If they do, be sure to discuss the edits on the talk page rather than reverting the other editor. See WP:BRD for the prevailing wisdom on this.

This edit gave me some pause. Your edit summary was "Removed material without proper sources", but you removed most of the article's content and 20 sources. Is it your view that all twenty sources that you removed are unreliable? Are you prepared to defend that if challenged? When I make bold and substantial deletions like this, I usually try to make a case on the talk page to try to preemptively address any objections. Again, if you are reverted, please consider the BRD cycle.

You're making good contributions and you seem to be learning quickly! Please let me know if your run into any issues. - MrX 01:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, also I just realised a BLP for a politician is notable just by holding even a district/province office(didn't know that better reconsider some of my edits). Sorry about that blank page, I just came across that probably vandalised redirect, did a quick brush up on redirects and did that edit. Didn't think about what I left behind but good someone saw that. I've probably made some more grammatical mistakes here and there since this isn't my plus point, better check up. Sometimes some users who are good at that have improved my edits.

Most of the articles related to that are founded on sources which are not exactly third party. Moreover, I'm at a loss since there mostly isn't much nationwide news coverage over those topics, and that is why I done mostly removing and especially changing the tone in which they have been in.

Regarding that article, most of these citations were based on just 3 sources in the end. From that all three are restricted to that region and are local, again no national coverage here. Since it was also in a biased tone, I removed most of it. But after you have said that, I have fetched some of that information and summarised it more properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ugog Nizdast (talk • contribs) 07:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

I've read about image use policy and about images having some rights or in public domain etc. It's really confusing for me, and for example I've been trying to find a suitable Indian air force Mig-21 image for this section since in the talk page also, some one mentioned it. I tried searching for public domain images using google but got nothing.(In fact everything found was from wikimedia commons). Any tips? I'm getting really confused about this copyright thing and whats allowed, I've tried to read about it though. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:04, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Ugog Nizdast. Many times, it is simply not possible to find a free image. Generally, free image are those that have been donated to Creative Commons or public domain by the photographer or artist. In the US, images produced before 1923 are automatically in the public domain. Then it becomes complicated, and it is best to assume that any images created after 1923 are under the copyright of the creator unless otherwise noted (by the creator) [In the US]. Certain historical images may be used under the Fair use doctrine. Many counties have similar copyright laws as the US, and many are signatories to the Berne convention. Anyway, it's a complex subject, and Wikipedia err's on the side of caution, so our policies are somewhat stricter that allowed by law. I assume you have already read WP:IUP.

We have a listing of free images sources here: WP:PDI. That may or may not help you with your specific quest. If you can find a suitable image on the internet, I can help you determine if it can be used, and also how to upload it with the appropriate licensing and/or fair use information. Sometimes you can contact the artist and ask them to donate the image to Creative Commons. Please let me know if you have any questions that I haven't answered. - MrX 19:37, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I think I got a clue about this by reading all that. WP:PDI, I checked before, useful no doubt but certainly not for my current quest. I've found this [image], It is most probably not suitable but I would like to know exactly why, maybe that may clear up my doubts. This site claims that all images are used in the 'fair use' policy and their original owners may or may not have it in public domain, so do I have to trace the image's source and find out? Am I right? for example say I want to consider uploading this, how should I proceed? -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Oh and thanks a lot for that help, especially the cleanup part. :) -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 18:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

According to this, that photo is owned by the Indian Air Force. My interpretation of Copyright law of India is that the photo is not public domain (or creative commons), unlike in the US where most government photos are automatically public domain. Yes, you would need to trace the image source back to the original copyright holder. A blog's claim that their use of the photo is fair use unfortunately carries no weight on Wikipedia. - MrX 18:24, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

I didn't know that, so technically any picture by the US army is in public domain? That must be pretty useful for us. I tried Flickr too, again dead end. I think I better stop this quest, since everything belongs to the IAF in that case. But one thing I noticed, most images which are from Flichr over here are NOT necessarily public domain, and have 'some rights reserved' with attribution to the owner. That works out fine too? I thought everything needed to be public domain and this was supposed to be very rare? -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

"...so technically any picture by the US army is in public domain?" - I'm sure there are exceptions, but that's the general rule. It's true, many if not most photos on Flickr have at least some rights reserved. Photos that require attribution, without any other restrictions, can be used. Here is an example of such a photo that I uploaded from Flickr: Paul_Liebrandt.jpg. Some editors contact Flickr users requesting them to release specific photos to Creative Commons. In fact, you can approach any copyright holder and ask them to do this, but your results will vary. I once contacted the British Museum requesting that they donate this image for use in the Adam and Eve cylinder seal article. They pretty much flatly refused. - MrX 20:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Small question

Hi mrX, it's me again. Would kindly take a look at this edit and tell me if this citation is fine and in order? Also tell me how did you check it and what was wrong with it. I'm bit not sure about citing urls especially books with identification numbers. Thanks. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

First (and only somewhat related) you can use this tool to fix bare URL references. I did this, however it does not address your question.

I don't think the citation as it was written was complete, although it's better than no citation. The DOI is useful, but it is best to include the publication name, title, author(s), volume, issue, page number(s), publication date, access date and the DOI as further described here WP:DOI. I used this tool to generate a correct citation from the DOI.

Unfortunately, there is no universally agreed-upon citation format on Wikipedia. Generally, articles should retain a consistent format throughout, to the extent possible, and the format should arise from consensus. - MrX 15:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot MrX! Pretty nice tools I'll make sure to try them out next time. I always wonder how cleaning and maintaining citations must be really tedious job. Another small question: the 'quote' option while citing anything? Is it important to fill it? I just realised that when you move your cursor over the in-line citation, it promptly shows the exact quote which is used for reference. Won't this be invaluable to users (especially those besides the user who put the citation) who try to maintain or rectify the sources? I haven't filled that option so far... -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome, Ugog Nizdast. I find the quote field to be useful for the reason that you mentioned, but I wouldn't use it unless the quote is needed to add clarity to the cited content. It can be useful when there is potential doubt as to what is written in the source. We also have to be cautious about copyright, and using the quote field is fair use, but overusing it could theoretically encroach on copyright. - MrX 18:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

New article

Hi again, I have managed to write an article on Tarn Adams, which is currently a redirect. I have looked at it having this kind of notability and by my judgement it seems it deserves an article. Its still in a draft stage and is here, please briefly skim through it and tell me what do you think. I used various tools like peer reviewer and dab link solver, which mentioned I should make my lead section more lengthier and I use a lot of redundant words which was quite interesting. So I did this test and realised how bad I was. I shall make the necessary changes later but first please check it especially for copyvio or something. And I've come across some articles where I cannot verify the matter since the source can only be accessed by registering or buying a book, I've read that this is allowed but then how do we go about verifying this? won't it be misused since only people who own the said material can refer or check it? -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I think it looks good, and probably meets our notability guidelines. Portions of the 12th paragraph seem to closely paraphrase the source, so you may want to tweak it a bit to make sure that you stay clear of any copyvio concerns. There are portions that may be need to be trimmed a little to remove some excess detail. You should also consider adding a person infobox as well as persondata and a DEFAULTSORT key ( {{DEFAULTSORT: Adams, Tarn}} ).

I think you can publish it to the article mainspace any time. When you do, you can copy-paste the article from your user space to the redirect page, or you can have the redirect page deleted (via WP:CSD#G6) and then move the page to the article space, which has the added benefit of moving the edit history and giving you credit for creating the article. - MrX 21:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

All right, I'll make sure to trim down,put defaultsort and remove trivia. The infobox I thought of adding and I'll have to ask people for a picture of him, when I put up the article.

I was planning to just copy paste on to the redirect page and now that you've said this, I feel this other way is kind of..you know. I have mostly till now refurnished stagnant articles which was as good as creating a new one. Tell me what would you do if you were in my place; place in redirect or start a new one?

If you aren't too busy, you haven't answered my previous doubt about verifying inaccessible sources... -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 05:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed this question: "And I've come across some articles where I cannot verify the matter since the source can only be accessed by registering or buying a book, I've read that this is allowed but then how do we go about verifying this?"

You can't. There's no expectation that any particular editor can verify every source. This principle is summarized here WP:SOURCEACCESS.

As to how I would publish an article if faced with an existing redirect page: I would usually just copy-paste because it's easier. - MrX 03:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For your comment in the Kiefer Wolfowitz blocking discussion; it drills down to the heart of the matter - that editors need to be evaluated not only in terms of what they contribute, but what they stop others from contributing. Ironholds (talk) 03:25, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you Ironholds. Your recognition means a lot to me. - MrX 03:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Help requested

Hello MrX. I wanted to ask you for your review of the article I posted today Anna Ayala. This person has been in recent news but I see that perhaps Wikipedia does not want this article at this time. If that is the case I just want to understand why and I don't know how or who to ask. Thank you. DeeplyInspired52 (talk) 17:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi DeeplyInspired52. A large part of the article was copied from here. However, I have removed the speedy deletion nomination because the source text is available under a compatible use/share license. - MrX 18:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Fred Phelps

It's been reported that Phelps had a gay experience. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/15/lauren-drain-westboro-baptist-church-fred-phelps-gay-experience_n_2877987.html (one example). How should I go about adding this to his page? Wiltthoulearn (talk) 15:48, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

The article is about the speculation of a former employee and that employee has a well-known bias against the subject. Unless Fred himself publicly declares that he is gay, we can not include it in the encyclopedia. Please see our policy WP:BLP for more information. - MrX 15:52, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

You did not answer my question. Wiltthoulearn (talk) 19:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought I did. You should not add this content to the article, per the policies and reasons that I mentioned above. - MrX 12:11, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

I would think if it was not speculation, hearsay, or rumor, but an incident that has been documented, could it be added?

Tier-3

Several external reference sources have now been added to this entry - including analyst research (Bloor and Gartner) and press coverage/reviews. before this gets deleted - how many independent sources do you need and what level (beyong say a full product review or the Gartner magic quadrant, do you expect to see? Only1weasel (talk) 20:39, 6 June 2013 (UTC) only1weasel

I'm going to retract the AfD nomination based on the ZDNet article. Thanks for adding the additional sources. - MrX 20:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

hello

i saw that u edit the page mira bhayandar. u removed the external links and info about health fitness and malls. so i want to ask u that what types of links should be provided and is it wrong to provide info abt health services and malls.Arja36 (talk) 11:59, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Arja. The types of links that would be appropriate would be local government web sites, scholarly historical research, and a (non-commercial) visitor's bureau, if such exists. As I mentioned in response to your comment on Ugog Nizdast's talk page, I think it would be useful to collaborate on the article talk page so that we can get input from other editors interested in this topic. - MrX 12:09, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

i know all that what u posted on ugog talk page. i know that my experience and research can not be used on wikipedia articles. but since he asked for help,i responded to him. u interpreted my response to him a little bit wrong. but thanks for above advice. tell me whether it is wrong to provide info abt important places,health services and malls of a region? please ans for my this doubt. do not refer some help page, those are too lengthy to read, please ans me in ur words. Arja36 (talk) 12:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Short lists of important features are OK, but you still need reliable sources that have made the determination about which are important (or notable). You can not create such lists based on your own experience. - MrX 13:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

although i am not raising ques on ur edit of mira bhayandar page, but i will say that if shortlist of imp feature is ok, then i think u may not have deleted info abt health services from there. it was not any essay written there but it was a brief idea, so it may exist there. its my suggestion to you, do not mind it. Arja36 (talk) 13:28, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Re Noël Juchereau edit

Hi, re Noël Juchereau my edits removed |author= from the two cites as |first= and |last= were both specified as well. My edit therefore didn't affect the rendered citation and no authors were lost. So I think you're the one who got it wrong. Would you rather that I keep |author= and remove |first= and |last=? Thanks Rjwilmsi 17:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

You're right. I'm used to seeing 'first' and 'last' near the end of the citation, so I completely missed it. Thanks for catching it and I'm sorry to have been a bother. - MrX 18:17, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Mohamad Mousavi

Hello MrX. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mohamad Mousavi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 11:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

The article has subsequently been deleted as a hoax - presumably someone checked the relevant websites and found that there was no such player in that league. But please remember that an assertion of importance does not need to be sourced to be credible - there will be people who play at national level for Iranian teams. ϢereSpielChequers 17:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

To clarify, and as I mentioned in the AfD, I did not find the claims to be credible. I did not nominate the article for speedy deletion because of the self-published source, or for lack of sources. - MrX 18:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Deletion Policy Question

Hi,

You recently un-reviewed a page I reviewed. During my review I labelled the article for speedy deletion. Is it Wikipedia policy to un-review pages that are marked for deletion? I usually do leave them un-reviewed but to be honest I'm not familiar with the actual policy.

Thanks,

Josh1024 (talk) 12:56, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

I don't think there is a policy, nor consensus, about whether or not an article nominated for speedy deletion should be marked as reviewed. In practice however, I (and other editors) find it more useful for those articles to remain unreviewed so that other editors can see them in the new page queue. That way, if the CSD is declined, the article can still get attention so that it is either deleted thorough the AfD or PROD process, or improved so that it doesn't need to be deleted. - MrX 13:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Can you help me?

There's a discussion of whether or not this source would be considered reliable to support the statement "Her parents are of Egyptian Jewish descent." on this article. The source was removed by another editor who believed it to be unreliable. Please see this entry by the source's author on the talk page. I'm not sure where to go on this. Thanks. Teammm ^talk
_email 06:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Teammm. I think the interfaithfamily.com source, which is corroborated by the other cited source, is sufficient for the statement. I also found this, although I think the examiner.com is largely considered unreliable around here.

We have no way of knowing if editor Natebloom (talk · contribs) is actually the author of the source article, so his talk page claims carry little weight in that regard. - MrX 13:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot MrX. I just needed validation, not just myself. Teammm ^talk
_email 19:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

You're very welcome Teammm. - MrX 20:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Órbita Bicycles

Hello MrX,

I request your help; I can and will provide any reference sources for my deleted article, Such as I will like to have help to write/maintain a proper article about Órbita Bicycles, 42 year old European/Portuguese reliable item that needs to have it's info included in the wikipedia db...

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamNos (talk • contribs) 09:04, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

If you can find some reliable sources that cover the subject in depth as required by WP:ORGDEPTH then I would be happy to take a look at them and give you my opinion as to whether a stand alone article should be include in Wikipedia. Best wishes - MrX 14:02, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

WTF is wiki used for if you cant let your own article be on there?

Hi MrX but before anyone can see my creation stupid esanchez deletes everything. If he doesn't want anyone doing that to him he shouldn't do it to others. What is wiki for then? If you cant let your own article be? Answer those questions please!

-peacock560 ;( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peacock560 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Peacock560. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your message. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of knowledge. Content in the encyclopedia has to be notable, as demonstrated by reliable sources. Did you happen to read the notice at the top of the edit window when you created your article?

Here is a good place for you to start to learn more about how to contribute to Wikipedia: New contributors' help page. Please let me know if you have any specific questions. - MrX 14:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Mohr Publicity

Hello MrX. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mohr Publicity, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:28, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Steve Fitzgerald

Hi there, I replied to your tagging on the talk page, lets work on resolving your concerns. JmdTmp (talk) 20:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

OK - MrX 21:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Stop taking off the stuff that is being edited in

You say you want the free flow of information? Then stop undoing things that public users edit into pages, especially when other things are on the very same page that has no sources or references at all. The stuff i edit into any page on Wikipedia, will have what the public deems as credible information which links to sites talking about such subject matter. If i am not allowed to post about something and link to sites talking about said something, then there should be no other information on the wikipedia page in question, that has no references or source material. Bottom line, if you take my edits down, edits that have references, then you must also take down information that doesn't include any references at all. Otherwise, i will continue re-editing and re-posting my tid bit of information.

So knock it off with your bs buddy, because if you really are for the free flow of information upon this site, yet you take down information that OBVIOUSLY has a right to be here, then you are no better than the tyrannical system we are trying to surpass. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.47.83.49 (talk) 03:13, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

I never said that I want the free flow of information. Perhaps that's something you read on another web site, such as erowid.com? I have strived to remove most of the the unsourced or poorly sourced content from the article, explaining the removal on the article talk page. Is there other unsourced content that you think should be removed? I've also explained why I removed your additions on the article talk page as well as your user talk page. I've also provided links to Wikipedia policies to support my position.

Not all information belongs in the encyclopedia, particularly the personal testimony and how-to information that you continue adding to Dimethyltryptamine. If you insist on forcing your will against our established (by community consensus) policy, then there's a very good chance that you will be blocked from editing. Instead, How about joining the article talk page discussion that I started? That way you can present your policy-based arguments for including the content that you feel so strongly about. Best wishes. - MrX 03:31, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

My bad, it was "I am a Wikipedia editor whose simple goal is to help expand this global repository of free information" that i saw, and btw i think Erowid blows. Anyways, how is what i edited in, and put links referring to, in any way unsourced or poorly sourced content? What i wrote, was merely a summary, one which correctly details existing knowledge circulating around the DMT community. If you "create and edit articles of which I have some subject matter interest, or that I believe could benefit from my help", then SURELY if you're managing the Dimethyltryptamine article then you are or should be aware that what i am simply trying to edit into the article is very well true. If you believe it's not true, then prove me wrong (when there is undeniably proof to back up a smokable herb containing DMT to be smoked instead of vaporized, that is either smoked on it's own or mixed with an MAO-A containing herb.

The reason i include what references i do, is because it's not like Changa/Enhanced herb has a lot of reference points and studies done on it like with Ayahuasca or pure DMT, but just because it has no scientifically based paperwork, doesn't mean it's not an actual thing. If you're a reasonable guy, then surely, you know what i'm saying is true. If there was a part of an Encyclopedia for DMT, then surely one would include the fact that while it can be extracted into crystal form, it doesn't necessarily have to be smoked in crystal form and can be put onto herbs for smoking in a regular pipe. From there, if one mixes in Harmala alkaloids, it is referred to as Changa, however if it contains no Harmala alkaloids, it is simply called Enhanced Leaf. Everyone who has a particular interest in DMT, after looking into it, would def. agree with what i just said.

And when i say there are other things on the page that contain no references, i am specifically referring to anything that says "Citation Needed" or "Clarification Needed" beside it. If something says that yet is allowed onto the page (or any of the many other pages that also have that), then a simple summary of smoked herbal DMT can be put onto the page. If you don't like how i'm wording something, then by all means, word it how you like. But we are talking facts here, so please help share the facts, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.47.83.49 (talk) 04:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Oh and also, THIS IS INCORRECT!!!! Which is WHY i keep removing it. "Use of DMT was first encountered in the United States in the 1960s, when it was known as a “businessman's lunch” because of the rapid onset of action when smoked (2 to 5 minutes) and short duration of action (20 minutes to 1 hour)". DMT when smoked most CERTAINLY does not last 20 minutes, not even 10, it lasts about 7 minutes (or so most say). However, when it is mixed with Harmala alkaloids, like i have been trying to edit into the article from the get go, that the Harmala alkaloids potentiate and extend the DMT, and one can stretch the DMT duration out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.47.83.49 (talk) 04:24, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

I see that you have posted these same comments on the article talk page, so I will respond there. - MrX 12:27, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

What seems to be the problem, Mrx?

Why does one feel the need to censor the global repository of free information between human beings? Why do you undermine the significant importance of individual beings on Earth? How is this is called an Encyclopedia, when it is one of limited information and of limited censored subjects? Does wikipedia not support the freedom of information, press, or of knowledge? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chicagomoon (talk • contribs) 21:25, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia Chicagomoon! There's no problem at all. Although anyone can edit Wikipedia, we (the community of editors here) have adopted inclusion standards for articles, because not everything belongs in an encyclopedia. This is not censorship by any definition that I'm aware of; it's editorial discretion. In the case of the article that you created, Jared Deinlein, there is simply nothing to indicate that Mr. Deinlein is sufficiently notable for an encyclopedia article. If he is, perhaps you can find some sources (books, newspapers, magazines, journals, major news websites) that have taken notice of him and written about him in some depth. If so, the article may be retained. I would also mention that, when you created the article, there were warnings right above the edit box. Did you happen to read them, or follow any of the links that provide help for creating new articles?

Don't be discouraged if the article that you created is deleted. If you are here to help us build an encyclopedia, you should be able to overcome the learning curve pretty quickly. Feel free to ask me, or any other experienced editor for help. Best wishes - MrX 21:40, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

St. Johns County

Good afternoon MrX,

I am a Communications Specialist writing on behalf of the St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners. As the local government body serving St. Johns County, our organization has a vested interest in the content written on the Wikipedia page designated for our region. In our efforts to provide residents, visitors, and external viewers with the most up-to-date and factual information regarding St. Johns County, we recently established a Wikipedia account to offer edits and improvements to the page. Out of respect and consideration for the rules and guidelines detailed by Wikipedia, we have made consistent efforts to offer content which we feel supports Wikipedia’s goals of sharing unbiased, community based, and reference backed information. Though we are extremely proud of St. Johns County and would love to fill the Wikipedia page with endless accolades, we recognize our responsibility to offer site visitors neutral information. We welcome any feedback on how best to balance these efforts. As an example, we would like to share the fact that St. Johns County has been recognized as having the number one school district in the state. There are numerous references explaining this recognition, how it was established, and what it means for our residents and the future of St. Johns County. With your help, we hope to share this type of County fact on Wikipedia in an appropriate fashion. Thank you in advance for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceilingtile1234 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Ceilingtile1234 and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm sure that your contributions will benefit the St. Johns County article and Wikipedia as a whole. I will keep an eye on the page and help where I can. Feel free to ask for help if you need any. - MrX 01:55, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Whoops! It looks like I spoke to soon. An admin has blocked your account for being a shared account, against our policies. Hopefully, by now, you know that you can only edit on your own behalf. Also, we do not permit promotion, although I did not assume that you intended to promote St. Johns County. You may want to clarify this if you decide to request being unblocked. - MrX 02:11, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Binders full of women

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binders full of women (3rd nomination) Trackinfo (talk) 07:46, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	I, SarahStierch, hereby award you, MrX, the World Digital Library Barnstar for your fabulous contributions to the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. I do hope you will continue to contribute, and thank you for all you do to expand on Wikimedia's mission of sharing free knowledge! SarahStierch (talk) 16:16, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Sarah. Much appreciated. I enjoyed working on this project and I may have even learned something. Thanks for your leadership and effort! - MrX 17:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership Newsletter

Expand Wikipedia's free knowledge with WDL resources!

Hi MrX! Thanks for participating in the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. Your contributions are important to improving Wikipedia! I wanted to share a few updates with you:

• We have an easy way to now cite WDL resources. You can learn more about it on our news page, here.
• Our to-do list is being expanded and features newly digitized and created resources from libraries and archives around the world, including content from Sweden, Qatar, the Library of Congress, and more! You can discover new content for dissemination here.
• WDL project has new userbox for you to post on your userpage and celebrate your involvement. Soffredo created it, so please be sure to thank them on their talk page. You can find the userbox and add it to your page here.
• Our first batch of WDL barnstars have been awarded! Congratulations to our first recipients: ProtoplasmaKid, ChrisGualtieri, TenthEagle, Rhyswynne, Luwii, Sosthenes12, Djembayz, Parkwells, Carl Francis, Yunshui, MrX, Pharaoh of the Wizards, and the prolific Yster76!! Thank you for your contributions and keep up the great work. Be sure to share your article expansions and successes here.

Keep up the great work, and please contact me if you need anything! Thank you for all you do for free knowledge! EdwardsBot (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)