Mohammedbhaq
Mohammedbhaq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #26025 was submitted on Jul 20, 2019 21:56:17. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 21:56, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have restored your talk page access for you to make an appeal. Courtesy ping to Bbb23 to make him aware. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Unblock Appeal
edit
Mohammedbhaq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I should be unblocked because I have waited 6 months, I have made contributions on other wikis and I apologise for my vandalism, I understand that what I did was against Wikipedia’s editing policies. I will avoid making the same mistake again by making better edits on the regular English Wikipedia. I will do this by correcting grammar mistakes.
Decline reason:
Rohaanhaqaccount and BonkerBoy123 were both used to make edits in June. Your ability to count to six appears to be questionable. Yunshui 雲水 09:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Please disclose all the other accounts you've operated.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:28, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Other accounts to help with the block appeal: User:Mohammed Haq, User:Rohaanhaq123, User:BonkerBoy123, User:Rohaanhaq12, User:Rohaanhaqaccount
- First, those aren't all of your socks (you have much older accounts than this one). Second, one of them demonstrates that you have not waited six months as the block occurred at the end of June 2019. Your unblock request is absurd.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:54, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note. Rohaanhaq12 and Rohaanhaqaccount were added after I responded above. Still doesn't include all of the accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Your new unblock request
editCreate a new unblock request by adding a new {{unblock}} template at the bottom of the page, rather than by editing the old one and removing the "reviewed" status. The old, declined request needs to stay on the page until the account is unblocked. --bonadea contributions talk 15:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Unblock request
edit Mohammedbhaq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I should be unblocked because I have waited 6 months, I have made contributions on other wikis and I apologise for my vandalism, I understand that what I did was against Wikipedia’s editing policies and I should not use multiple accounts to edit Wikipedia when I am blocked. I will avoid making the same mistake again by making better edits on the regular English Wikipedia. I will do this by correcting grammar mistakes.Mohammedbhaq (talk) 15:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You clearly lack sufficient competence to edit here, given that you have repeatedly demonstrated you cannot accurately determine when six months has passed. I suggest waiting no less than six months from today before making your next unblock request. Note that you will be judged on your competence at that time. If you are not able to determine six months from today's date, expect that request to be declined as well. Yamla (talk) 15:38, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock request
edit{{unblock|I should be unblocked from editing on Wikipedia because I believe that I have learnt my lesson properly. Since I was blocked, I familiarised myself with the Wikipedia policies and I don’t think that this block is no longer necessary for me. If I do get unblocked, I will avoid the behaviour and damage that I have caused to get my account and IP blocked. I now know what are the wrong things to edit, what I should try to edit instead and I understand fully why I was blocked for. It would be a shame to lose the opportunity forever because I am very trustworthy and would not like to be seen like this in front of other editors. Again, I apologise the inconvenience I have caused you previously and I did not know that I caused trouble at the time. (If you are still not happy, please tell me what I should add in this appeal as I think that it is good enough.) [[User:Mohammedbhaq|Mohammedbhaq]] ([[User talk:Mohammedbhaq#top|talk]]) 16:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)}}
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Try again, waiting no less than six months from today's date. You will need to use WP:UTRS to request access to your talk page when you do that. That will probably be your final chance, so please make absolutely sure you have waited six months from today's date. --Yamla (talk) 16:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)