You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:39, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Mmahajneh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm interested in logistics specially in non resident importer, Importer of Record and Exporter of Record using companies' contents and my own content to let people know more about this service as well as differentiate it from IOR in Oil Industry where many people mix about it, so Ideally we should put refernce, also not all compnaies write about the missing pieces that I covered and find good content for GCE, aslo I was planning to add more content for Flash Global and Tecex companies that focus on the same as I can see
Decline reason:
We aren't interested in having you link to gcelogistic.com, or anything else for which you have a conflict of interest. To understand why, see WP:COI, WP:SPAM, WP:EL, WP:PAID. Yamla (talk) 12:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mmahajneh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
remove anything related to GCE logistic if thats the issue, I told you my intetion is to keep the source of reference dear, and don't consider everyone is spamming, I added new content that was not here at that page, so if you see an issue in technical part we can discuss futher and for links you can remove all links you want and maintain the info part. ok?
Decline reason:
Putting aside the external link issue, I believe you have not demonstrated the level of competency in written English necessary for contributing constructively in this appeal. MER-C 12:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mmahajneh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
So we started with spam and now level of english, what else I should expect? and for level of english, you can read the original edits submitted for audience before judgment and if you can add/modify something of it please feel free , also there are many articles at wikipedia need loads of english improvment and we all know that, so let's put politics aside which I can see you are doing to support the first one blocked me thinking that I'm spamming, and to be honest I see what you are doing here doesn't make any sense and should have another way to judge my edits so how we can escalte this and reach to a common ground so my edits to be published? and if you want we can have a phone call to discuss but not to be blocked subjectivly guys. sorry but I'm not convinced
Decline reason:
Maybe not everyone is spamming; you clearly were. I reviewed the content you added, and it's off-topic and not an improvement to the encyclopedia, even if it were not just a hook to hang some spam links on. There's also a comma error right in the first sentence of the content you added (and no, that is not the reason for your block, but it's symptomatic). Your edits should not be published. If you don't see the problems with your conduct, it's better for the project to keep you blocked. Huon (talk) 19:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mmahajneh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I think this last one with 14 years of joining have issues of seeing her perfect and FYI number of years for some peopleus just a number, first of all we are talking business so no need to move things to be personal and subjective, second point I'm not spamming and my morals and conduct have high caliber that you won't reach with such childesh respones, as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for all not for you, so for the success of the project only professional people should be like admins, those who should help new people to become good in adding and enriching Wikipedia, not just block and that's it, if I recieved that I have issue in what I added I will fix accordingly. Also I bet that you are not aware about what I have added to the topic and its value to importer of record topic. So don't act as the exprt. It is good to be specialized in some topics but not in all and no one can master all topics as you, also you failed once you mixed two topics (Spam part + English part) to support the block from your colleagues. And I will tell you that having poisonous people like you is the real success to this project according to your conduct. And a communication course needed here of how to help new comers and another course related to being polite in conversation as I can reply to you 10X same way but fortunately I have high level of business morals. At the end I will deeply ask you not to unblock me at all please and will keep it to you to keep your subjective judgement. it was my first and last experience with this encyclopedia.bye bye
Decline reason:
Editor states they do not want to be unblocked. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.