Mlgeorge925
Welcome! edit
Hello, Mlgeorge925, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 01:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello! edit
Hi, Mlgeorge925 -- welcome to Wikipedia! As Ian mentioned, the Teahouse is a great resource for new editors. But did you know that Wikipedia also has an extensive help library for common questions? Of course, if you run into a question or problem, you're always welcome to get in touch with me either by email or on my talk page. Happy editing! Fraudoktorkatie (talk) 14:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review edit
I think your article is structured very well. It puts together great organization of information. I think one thing that stood out to me was the amount of information and detail in your washout section. That was a very informative procedure of what occurs. I think you could expand on why it's called washout. I think you could go explain what happens after storage. It wasn't abundantly clear of how this procedure after death will preserve the memories and personalities; where will that tissue go? It may be already in the article, but I think if it is not, it would be worth on expanding the 'post-storage procedure" to better connect the idea of tissue preservation can be linked to memories and personality preservation. I think you have a great rough draft, very interesting subject. ETB44 (talk) 18:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review edit
I like your first draft. You have a very well, thought out idea in place. I like how you had many sections discussing your topic. I enjoyed the ethical considerations section you incorporated into the article. I would perhaps suggest adding a little bit more information to the sections on the process and popular culture. If at all possible to find more sources and information on those sections, I think they could help to better the article. Within the popular culture section, more information could potentially help change the tone of the topic a little bit. Just a thought however. The storage section seems to be to the point and simple, but also adding more information to it would help the credibility of the section and overall article. However, I believe you wrote a very good article draft and had a lot of good information in your draft. Kwilcox25 (talk) 02:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)