User talk:Mitchazenia/Archive22

Latest comment: 14 years ago by GTBacchus in topic "Trolling" in RFAs

WikiCup newsletter XVII.V edit

This is just a quick reminder that the round ends this Friday, May 29, 2009. I wanted to let you guys know the current standings. If you are very close, but not close enough, work as hard as possible these next two days. Pool leaders are listed as usual, and under the 10 wildcards, are competitors that are still fighting for a spot. Also, if you currently have any un-reviewed GAN's up and you'd like them to be reviewed and counted for this round, you must place them on the appropriate thread of the WikiCup talk page.

Pool A
  1.   Shoemaker's Holiday (647)
Pool B
  1.   ThinkBlue (247)
Pool C
  1.   Theleftorium (455)
Pool D
  1.   Candlewicke (539)
Pool E
  1.   Durova (479)
Pool F
  1.   Sasata (961)
Current Wildcards
  1.   Useight (393)
  2.   Scorpion0422 (372)
  3.   Rlevse (329)
  4.   Wrestlinglover (307)
  5.   Paxse (285)
  6.   Ottava Rima (248)
  7.   Mitchazenia (226)
  8.   Juliancolton (181)
  9.   the_ed17 (179)
  10.   J Milburn (168)
  11.   Bedford (156)
  12.   Gary King (147)
  13.   97198 (142)
  14.   Ceranthor (111)
  15.   Tinucherian (106)
  16.   Matthewedwards (98)

 GARDEN ,  iMatthew :  Chat  , and The Helpful One The Helpful Bot 00:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

You're invited... edit

 

You're invited to the
Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
June 14, 2009

Time: 3pm
Location: Drexel University

RSVP

In the afternoon, we will hold a session at Drexel dedicated to discussing Wikimedia Pennsylvania activity and cooperation with the regional Wikimedia New York City chapter.

Are events like a Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia in our future?

In the evening, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local sports bar.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XVIII edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 14:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.Reply

Capital District compilation image edit

You input would be appreciated. wadester16 04:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Pennsylvania Route 171 edit

  On June 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pennsylvania Route 171, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Giants27 15:49, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar! edit

  The Original Barnstar
For getting so many great articles to GA status. Keep up the good work! :) TheLeftorium 19:55, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 6 - June 2009
edit

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 23:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #26 edit

The 26th issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Maryland Route 537 edit

 
Terrific, short and sweet.

The article you nominated to become a good article has passed the criteria necessary to accomplish the said feat. It has become the 334th good "road infrastructure" article, as seen on the good article page listed above. Great work! Hello32020 (talk) 21:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XIX and XX edit

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 21:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.Reply

Re:1 week warning... edit

Thanks for the heads up, but it's alright, I redid the code to handle articles being in up to 4 topics when we first discussed this waaaaaay back in time. Glad to see you're fulfilling the plans though! :) rst20xx (talk) 23:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh bloody hell. I don't think the system can take any more. Well it could but the code would just be horrifically long and also beyond 4 I think there will be a bit of a debate as to whether this is right or not. I think we need to work together to work out a solution to this - rst20xx (talk) 11:39, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia talk:Featured topic criteria#Maximum number of articles a topic can be in - rst20xx (talk) 12:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

  The Utah State Highways Barnstar
This is for your marvelous improvements to SR-103 that bring it up to the caliber of NYSR articles; I appreciate the time you've taken away from New York to help us out here on this article. Thanks again - CL — 17:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re:A few important NJ routes still need help edit

It won't hurt for me to do some more help for New Jersey. At the current time, GAN has a long backlog and I have nothing to really rush for with the County Challenge, as no one else seems to really be participating. Dough4872 (talk) 00:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for giving me the list of articles that need to be worked on. Dough4872 (talk) 17:45, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Pennsylvania Route 963 edit

  On June 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pennsylvania Route 963, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Mifter (talk) 20:35, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Next FPOC promotion edit

I have 3 midterm exams in the upcoming week so I will be busy in life. OhanaUnitedTalk page 23:37, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:NYSR inactivity check edit

Hello, Mitchazenia. You are receiving this message because you are listed on the participant list of WP:NYSR. I am conducting an inactivity check on behalf of the project to see if the project still has an active editor base. The status column on the participant list will be cleared today, and to remain a listed member of the project, you must update your status on the participant list (preferably using the terms "Active", "Semi-active", or "Inactive") which is located here. Those who do not update their status after one week (by the night of June 25) and those who put inactive as their status will be removed from the list. If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page or at the "A smorgasbord of topics" section on WT:NYSR. Thank you for your understanding and your time. – TMF 12:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

County Route 236 (Onondaga County, New York) edit

County Route 236 (Onondaga County, New York) has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County Route 236 (Onondaga County, New York). Cunard (talk) 17:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of County Route 35 (Warren County, New York) edit

I have nominated County Route 35 (Warren County, New York), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County Route 35 (Warren County, New York). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 19:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

cookie edit

NY 28A ref markers edit

Hmm. I seem to recall from my trips up there that it uses standard NYSDOT reference markers. Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXI edit

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 22:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.Reply

Sure, but... edit

I'll agree to him reviewing your GA's, however myself of another judge will go through to see if the review was accurate, and everything checks out. As long as they are "good" reviews, I don't see a problem with it, being that nobody else will review them. – (iMatthew • talk) at 18:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

It'd be better if you did, IMO. Just let him know that he can review these again, but I'll be checking his reviews. – (iMatthew • talk) at 18:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re:WikiCup edit

Thanks for letting me know that. I had really wanted to review your GAN's to clear the almost two-month-long backlog for transport articles. I will make sure to look at every aspect clearly and not just push them through. However, I cannot review some of them I have made major contributions to, such as Maryland Route 284 and Pennsylvania Route 737 (I actually created 737 a long time ago as a stub). By the way, I have been working on improving NJ articles. Dough4872 (talk) 18:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Book for NJ Highways edit

We can continue to work on making the book for NJ highways. However, I am not sure if its going to be possible to get every route's article to GA-class. There are some very short routes such as New Jersey Route 59 that seem impossible to expand to get to GA. I will try my best though to get as many articles as I can to GA. Dough4872 (talk) 22:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I see you have been working on improving a few NJ articles too. Are you going to nominate them for GA? By the way, a couple things still need to be addressed before I can promote County Route 149 (Sullivan County, New York) to GA. See the GA review of that article for more information. Dough4872 (talk) 17:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Mitchazenia. You have new messages at Highwaydude2007's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

There's an unresolved query from Juliancolton. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Replied on my talk. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for First Presbyterian Church of Marcellus edit

  On June 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article First Presbyterian Church of Marcellus, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 14:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Chauncey Thomas edit

I assume the book you're referring to is Bridges over the Delaware River? If so, I'm afraid I can't help. No obituary or death notice appeared in any of the papers whose archive I can access for this time period. In my opinion, there's no particular problem with referencing the book, but if you desperately want another cite for the material your best bet is to find a local newspaper that was publishing in the period. You'll have a heck of a time finding anything that way, though; if you're not in the area I don't recommend attempting it. Cool3 (talk) 04:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXII edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 21:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

Wiki-Conference New York Update: 3 weeks to go edit

For those of you who signed up early, Wiki-Conference New York has been confirmed for the weekend of July 25-26 at New York University, and we have Jimmy Wales signed on as a keynote speaker.

There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session. Register for the Wiki-Conference here. And sign up here for on-wiki notification. All are invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 7 - July 2009
edit

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Note edit

Two articles relating to roads have been locked due to edit-warring. Please remember that rule applies to all users regardless of their status. Risker (talk) 04:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #27 edit

The 27th issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Trolling" in RFAs edit

Hi. I'm posting here to request that you refrain from such edits as this. It is the consensus among more and more Wikipedians that applying such labels, even in cases where they are accurate, tends to increase the heat, add fuel to fires, and distract from the project of encyclopedia-building, or in this case, approving an admin candidate. Regarding "oppose" votes in RFAs, please consider what is written at WP:TYFYV. If you want to discuss this, I'm certainly willing to do that. Just let me know. Thanks. -GTBacchus(talk) 17:05, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply