User talk:Miracle dream/Archive 2

Latest comment: 7 years ago by The Pittsburgher in topic Philippines Campaign

Your recent edits edit

  Please be sure fully sign your posts, it is important to know when edits/comments are made along with who made them. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 12:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Journey to the West edit

At this point, I won't push my angle any further, because I feel it's not worth it and that you probably have a good reason for including those links. So, good luck with everything there. DARTHBOTTO talkcont 02:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Oh, you never offended me- I just have had a different perspective on things. The consensus has seemed to be leaning towards their inclusion, so it's all good! ;) DARTHBOTTO talkcont 03:23, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Military history coordinator election edit

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014 edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 29 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Nations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open! edit

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open! edit

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year Miracle dream! edit

Allies of World War II edit

The reason I changed your edit was because the UK were involved from 1939 whereas the USA entered the war 1941. Regards Denisarona (talk) 15:02, 17 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Article on PartinG edit

Hi so I've created an article on Won "PartinG" Lee-sak, although of it was copied from licensed material from Liquipedia. Let me know what you think and what other articles you'd like created.--Prisencolinensinainciusol (talk) 00:10, 26 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Military history coordinator election edit

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Japanese casualties in China 1937-41 edit

See the top line-the header of 大東亜戦争に於ける地域別兵員数及び戦没者概数 Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1964. 大東亜戦争に於ける地域別兵員数及び戦没者概数

厚生省援護局 昭和39年3月 本表数字には、朝鮮人、台湾人、軍属、支那事変戦没者/陸軍181000人 海軍7700人を含む。

Per Google translate-The Ministry of Health and Welfare Relief stations in March 1964 this table numbers, including Koreans, Taiwanese, civilian employees, the China incident war dead / Army 181 000 people navy 7700 people. This should provide a clarification for you--Woogie10w (talk) 09:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open! edit

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 4 May edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Japanese deaths in Manchuria edit

Thanks for the message, and I agree with you. According to the Japanese Army estimates (as cited in Alvin D. Coox, "Nomonhan: Japan against Russia"), IJA deaths during the 1945 conflict with the USSR numbered 21,389, which is the figure currently present in the infobox for that event. While I am unsure as to the official start date for the Japanese casualty count recorded in the Ministry of Health and Welfare figure of 46,700, subtracting the 21,000+ dead from 1945 plus another 10,000 or so from the 1938-1939 border conflict with the Soviets still leaves about 15,000 to 16,000 deaths that could be attributable to Chinese military action or other causes.

I suspect your concern stems from the '~27,000 missing, captured, or deserted' figure appearing below the total for IJA killed in action. This originated not with me, but from another user who subtracted the Japanese total remaining in Manchuria at the close of hostilities (665,500) from the count made prior to the invasion (714,000) minus the KIA. While I cannot exclude the possibility that the confused nature of that campaign might have lead to Japanese losses being somewhat higher than reported, I'm also wary of that user's methodology because he assumes consistency of accounting between the two (distinct) sources. While I have up to this point refrained from changing or deleting it altogether, I would not consider it a valid number for use in serious discussion of the matter and wouldn't care at all if you altered to removed it.

Sincerely, The Pittsburgher (talk) 16:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

China Battles edit

I apologize for the exceedingly lengthy period prior to this response. I have been very busy and forgot you messaged me.

I would consider the casualty tabulations, especially those produced from the Japanese Monographs (postwar military compilations from officers of the former IJA) to be more or less accurate. Based on the descriptions of those battles to have casualty totals in the tens of thousands would suggest entire divisions being destroyed; we know this was not the case. In the West as well as among the KMT these battles were (naturally) played up into great victories, and while they demonstrated the determination and resilience of the Chinese people were hardly hammer-blows against the Japanese Army.

This is not to say Japanese losses were light; prior to 1941 total deaths in the China theater were close to 190,000, ultimately there were nearly 460,000. However, such a total is easily reachable when the daily grind of battle is taken into account (dividing the final Japanese death toll by the number of days of the China war would suggest just over 150 deaths per day across the whole front) and when one remembers that much greater battles (such as Wuhan and Ichi-Go) also took place as well as non-combat losses from disease, et cetera.

Compared to KMT military bookkeeping the Japanese were far more organized and in a better position to keep track of things like battle casualties. That is why I consider them to be a reliable source while I find some 'official' Chinese statistics questionable.

Sincerely, The Pittsburgher (talk) 15:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Military history WikiProject coordinator election edit

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Miracle dream, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Chris Troutman (talk) 02:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry edit

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of chemistry into Chemistry. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Philippines Campaign edit

I'll see what I can do about improving the sourcing on the articles you mentioned. Though, even in the Japanese wiki the references are sometimes either vague (such as simply saying "Senshi Sosho" without a page number or volume) or absent entirely. You should see some updates in the near future.

Sincerely, The Pittsburgher (talk) 22:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply