User talk:Megapen/Archive

Hi Megapen, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of Contents

• Department directory

Need help?

• Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
• Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

• Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
• The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

• Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Good luck, and have fun. --Roleplayer (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

{{Medical-book-stub}}

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 04:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Best Doctors in New York

A tag has been placed on Best Doctors in New York requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 17:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Barack Obama

Hi, this article is on probation. You should read the relevant information and participate to the discussions on the talk page before engaging in any potentially controversial editing. Note that the Ayers thing is heavily discussed there. Cheers, Cenarium ^Talk 15:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Barack Obama appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:24, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Actually, your edit is not well sourced at all. It is full of errors (most obviously the spelling of Rezko and Ayers), it violates the neutral point of view, it represents undue weight and it is also in the wrong article (see Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008). It also fails to take into account months of talk page discussion on Obama's associations with both individuals, including the most recent consensus debate. Please self-revert immediately. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

(copied from my talk page) - Certainly. The most recent consensus debate is here, but you can actually go back into almost every page of the talk page archive since April and see exhaustive discussion. Please note that it even has its own article: Obama–Ayers controversy -- Scjessey (talk) 22:04, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Article probation notice

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, that an article to which you have recently contributed, Barack Obama, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Barack Obama/Article probation. Please accept this as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that you have violated the probation terms. Thank you. - --Loonymonkey (talk) 21:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Barack Obama, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 21:42, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Your edit is the most ridiculously biased edit trying to pass of as neutral that I have seen in my year and a half on the project. It violates WP:NPOV, WP:CONSENSUS, WP:TERRORIST, WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE. I could cite Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh as sources, but I could only cite them so far as to say, "BOR and RL say x", not "x" and then cite them. Your edit goes against months of talk page discussion, makes outlandish claims that could constitute libel, and is terribly sourced. If you continue to go against consensus and violate NPOV and BLP, you can and will be blocked. And don't remove recent warnings on your talk page; that only counts against you. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 21:55, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

I agree with them Megapen, how dare you make an unauthorized edit to their article. Who do you think you are! CENSEI (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi, um...

You have missed my message. It's called Alright.... You did not reply and I put you on hold until you got back. Now, may I have an answer. If you don't want to be in the wikistory, I have a replacement. Thanks.--Editor510 ^{drop us a line, mate} 19:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi, um...

You have missed my message. It's called Alright.... You did not reply and I put you on hold until you got back. Now, may I have an answer. If you don't want to be in the wikistory, I have a replacement. Thanks.--Editor510 ^{drop us a line, mate} 19:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Please please PLEASE can I just get an answer on my talkpage! I have been waiting patiently for ages! PLEASE SAY SOMETHING. THE WHOLE THING WAS NOT JUST ABOUT THE DAMNED BARNSTAR!--Editor510 ^{drop us a line, mate} 19:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello, hello, hello. Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me. Is there anyone home? Come on, now. I hear you're feeling...down. Well I can ease your pain, get you on your feet again. Relax. I need some information, first. Just the basic facts. Can you show me where it hurts?--Editor510 ^{drop us a line, mate} 19:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD - seems like someone has neglected to inform you of this

Hi - even though I have nothing to do with the following at all, it seems that a notification of the an AfD in which you were the original editor has not been provided to you.... (or of course you may have opted out of receiving such messages)?

AfD nomination of The Kingdom of Apiya

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Kingdom of Apiya, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kingdom of Apiya. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --VS ^talk 01:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)