Mastershaown

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alauddin Ahmed (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mastershaown/sandbox/Alauddin Ahmed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Mastershaown/sandbox/Alauddin Ahmed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 15:14, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Mastershaown! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 15:14, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nursarahkader

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nursarahkader requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Frood 03:45, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Frood 03:50, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Frood 03:52, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. Frood 04:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Notability

Hi Mastershaown and welcome to Wikipedia. While Wikipedia is the Encyclopedia anyone can edit, we do have a few policies and regulations you might not have known about. For example, every page on Wikipedia must pass our WP:Notability criteria. The page you have created not only doesn't pass these criteria but seems to be about yourself. It is strongly advised you do not create articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors. This is because it affects the neutrality of the article. Another very important aspect of Wikipedia is communication. I am of the belief that Communication is required to have a collaborative and positive experience here. You were advised above to stop removing deletion templates from pages you have created yourself. You were blocked because you repeatedly ignored these warnings and continued with disruptive editing. If you still want to be involved in Wikipedia, you may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can also visit the ever friendly Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:28, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

What is wrong?

It’s real information Mastershaown (talk) 05:10, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

That's not the point. The article doesn't pass our criteria. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 14:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nursarahkader

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Nursarahkader requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Railfan23 (talk) 14:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nursarahkader

Hello Mastershaown,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nursarahkader for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

William2001^(talk) 15:45, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. Railfan23 (talk) 15:47, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mastershaown/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Mastershaown/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Railfan23 (talk) 15:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Actual information Mastershaown (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

All articles on Wikipedia, especially articles about living people, must have reliable sources that allow the reader to verify what is in them. They must be written from a neutral point of view, whereas your article was clearly designed to promote the subject. Your article met none of these basic requirements. You persistently disrupted Wikipedia's processes and recreated the article over and over without addressing any of the concerns that multiple editors raised with you. This is why you are now blocked from editing. Railfan23 (talk) 16:10, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Promotion only account and WP:CIR

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)