Speedy deletion of "Pakistanian"

edit
 

Pakistanian, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 00:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Cyborg (comics)  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:56, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Pakistanian

edit

Since the article has been deleted, no one except administrators can see what it said. My reply to your message will be based on my memory, not on the article, but I think my memory is good and the following logically must describe what why the deletion was made. My recollection is that the article you wrote portrayed "Pakistanian" as a fact, not a joke or mistake inadvertently (or not) created in comics. Adding to the problem, it was inserted into at least one other article as a fact. If you had written it along the lines of the newspaper article and cited that article, reviewing administrators might have allowed it to stay, whether or not I had tagged it - which I probably would not have done. That being said, this topic probably would fit better in an article about DC Comics, or the particular volume if there is one, as a separate section. Please realize that at least one administrator reviewed this and deleted it, I only pointed it out. Donner60 (talk) 03:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —Kusma (t·c) 06:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marioguy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am here to build an encyclopedia. Marioguy (talk) 20:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Repeatedly making dumb references to a comic book mistake is not part of the encyclopedia we're trying to build. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. I will remove your ability to edit this talk page if you do this again. Kusma (t·c) 09:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 —Kusma (t·c) 09:00, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply