Marco Chemello (BEIC)

Ways to improve Onofrio Puglisi

Hi, I'm Rasimmons. Marco Chemello (BEIC), thanks for creating Onofrio Puglisi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The page only contains one source, and while it establishes that Puglisi was a mathematician, it does not establish that he is of any importance.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. Simmons ^Talk 16:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ottavio Scarlattini

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ottavio Scarlattini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 01:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Apollinare Offredi

Hi, I'm NearEMPTiness. Marco Chemello (BEIC), thanks for creating Apollinare Offredi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. this is a good start. However, the article is still so short that it does not contain enough information. Could you please expand it a bit, based on refrences?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:56, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Creating new pages without sources

Hello! just curious about someting. Since you are a Wikipedian in residence, you muct know that articles need sources. Why are you creating pages without sources? I have seen several of them in the new pages feed. Here's an example: Lazzaro Mongiardini. It would be nice if you did research and included sources when publishing the page, as it saves others the work of tagging it "unreferenced", "refimprove" etc, or even looking for the sources! Happy editing.....HappyValleyEditor (talk) 00:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC) ‎

Ways to improve Vincent Leotaud

Hi, I'm Rasimmons. Marco Chemello (BEIC), thanks for creating Vincent Leotaud!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article seemingly relies on mainly period sources, all by the same period author. I feel like it could use some more contemporary sources by more varied authors, if possible.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. Simmons ^Talk 14:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Paolo Monti

I've informed here.--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:19, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Antoine Didier

I cannot agree with you that he was born in 1696. he was awarded doctorate in 1691 and was Professor in 1697. Please read http://www.biusante.parisdescartes.fr/sfhm/hsm/HSMx2011x045x001/HSMx2011x045x001x0045.pdf Plucas58 (talk) 13:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Also there is no evidence he was an abbot Plucas58 (talk) 13:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Marco Chemello (BEIC). Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Numerology image

Could you add something to the Numerology article - either the article itself or the caption - to explain the significance of the image you just added? It's not clear to the casual reader why it's there. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 16:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

@DavidWBrooks: Some details and reference added, thak you. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 17:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matteo Mainardi

The article Matteo Mainardi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable economist. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:ANYBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —usernamekiran(talk) 22:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Johann Lantz

The article Johann Lantz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Domenico Cocoli

The article Domenico Cocoli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Giacomo Micalori

The article Giacomo Micalori has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pietro Catena

The article Pietro Catena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Francesco Cigalini

The article Francesco Cigalini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clermont (mathematician)

The article Clermont (mathematician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nicolao Colletti

The article Nicolao Colletti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:44, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jean-François du Soleil

The article Jean-François du Soleil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic. Not everyone who writes a book is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:44, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pietro De Martino

The article Pietro De Martino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic. Not everyone who writes a book is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:45, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charles de Eendero

The article Charles de Eendero has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable author.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Otto Effertz

The article Otto Effertz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable author.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Johan Jacob Ferguson

The article Johan Jacob Ferguson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Flegomene

The article Flegomene has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Giovanni Battista Gallizioli

The article Giovanni Battista Gallizioli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Guglielmo Gargiolli

The article Guglielmo Gargiolli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Domenico Griminelli

The article Domenico Griminelli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:48, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Domenico Griminelli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Domenico Griminelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domenico Griminelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:59, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Pageviews

Vedo un notevole incremento di visite su qualche pagina a caso. A fine mese sarà bene verificare se è un avvenimento diffuso e se sí magari cercare di capire come mai. --Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 16:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Marco Chemello (BEIC). Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Unblocking request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marco Chemello (BEIC) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 54.36.30.212. Block no. is #8190691. In this moment I'm travelling on a hi-speed train, using the wi-fi. Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 08:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That IP is blocked as a webhost. You will need to wait until you are off the train in order to edit. 331dot (talk) 12:28, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Marco Chemello (BEIC). Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Antonio Pace

Hello, Marco Chemello (BEIC). It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Antonio Pace".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Unanswered question

Dear Marco Chemello,

I sent you a question with the following diff on Sept. 25, about an image that you added on that date to the main page. I did not get any answers about it, and I had almost forgotten about it. But another user now thanked me for my question, and that reminded me again of it. Could you please look at the question again and answer it on that talk page? I would appreciate it. Thank you, warshy ^(¥¥) 22:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear @Warshy: sorry but I didnt'received the notification (sometimes it happens). The info about Acosta is in the BEIC digital catalogue (you can access the matadata page clicking on the BEIC link on the BEIC banner on the image page, then click on "Show MetaData for"). You see he's identified not only by name but also by approx. birth/death. If you find any error, please let me know and I'll forward it to the BEIC librarians. Thank you again. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 08:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear Marco Chemello. Thank you very much for the metadata information on the original manuscript you give below. This appears to be a collection of original legal/jurdical manuscripts from the 16th century and beginning of 17th century. This is the relevant information about all the original manuscripts contained in the collection:

• Miscellanea iuridica -- ff. 304-308: Henricus Simonis, Repetitio ad C. 3.28 -- ff. 367-500: Pedro Barbosa, Repetitio ad D. 36.1 -- ff. 500-522: Henricus Simonis, Repetitio ad C. 2.3.6 -- ff. 522-550: Uriel Acosta, Repetitio ad D. 41.2 -- ff. 550-554: Roderigo Lopez, Repetitio ad D. 41.2.23 -- ff. 554-590: Antonius Vazius, Repetitio ad D. 12.1

So apparently the relevant pages concerning Uriel Acosta would be on folios 550-554 of the collection. From Uriel Acosta's biography we know that he studied canonical law at the University of Coimbra between 1600 and 1608. So these 4 pages/folios would appear to be some legal/juridical work concerning canonical law that Uriel da Costa wrote when he was a student of law at the University of Coimbra. As far as I know these 4 pages/folios written in Latin manuscript are original documents from the period and from the University of Coimbra that were never before studied or published in a modern scholarly format. As a student of the subject and of the history of the period I would very much appreciate it if you could locate those 4 pages/folios in the collection and send me a digital reproduction of them? But even of that is not possible, I believe that all this historical information would be important for you and for the catalogue librarians to have and to know. Thank you very much! warshy ^(¥¥) 16:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear @Warshy: this should be the complete manuscript (that's all we have), I hope it will help your research (if it does, please let us know!). --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 19:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear Marco Chemello: Wow! I can see the collection of manuscripts now, and it is a real treasure for the student of 16th and 17th original Latin manuscripts. Even though I am trying to improve my early modern Latin reading skills, I cannot yet call myself exactly that, i.e. "a student of 16th and 17th century Latin manuscripts." But I will try to look into the Uriel Acosta pages carefully over the next years, as time allows. Whenever I come up with anything tangible from it I will do let you know about it, and I will also acknowledge it. I promise. Thank you very much for all your research efforts! Regards, warshy ^(¥¥) 20:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ottavio Scarlattini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ottavio Scarlattini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ottavio Scarlattini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FeralOink (talk) 08:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)