User talk:Magical Golden Whip/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hi Magical Golden Whip! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

3RR Violation

Hello, it seems you have violated Wikipedia:3RR by reverting Nickelodeon 6 times in a row now, despite the above warning. Please go ahead and dispute any article content on the talk pages. Thanks! Anybar (talk) 00:10, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

3RR Violation

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:3RR, which you have violated multiple times at Nickelodeon. Multiple editors have reverted you, and if you do not stop edit warring, you may be reported to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Jpcase (talk) 23:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Please also familiarize yourself with the "Talk page vandalism" section of WP:VANDTYPES. It is unacceptable for you to remove my comments from a talk page or to copy and paste entire comments of mine onto other talk pages without my permission. I see that you are a relatively new editor on Wikipedia, and so I am assuming good faith that you are not familiar with all of the policies. But if you do not self-revert your recent edits, you will be reported to an administrator. This is your final warning. --Jpcase (talk) 00:12, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@Jpcase: Okay, I probably shouldn't of reverted so many times, however it was with two different users. Also you are the one who told me that the issue shouldn't of been talked about on the Dan Schneider page, so I moved it accordingly as I have seen others do this too. It would of been best if you talked ikt though like I was instead of reverting it as I was looking at you to get the disccusion started. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 00:17, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

That you were reverting two different people made it even more unacceptable. And yes, the objections you were raising do belong at Talk:Nickelodeon instead of at Talk:Dan Schneider, but that does not mean it's okay to simply blank out an existing conversation at Talk:Dan Schneider - especially not without first asking if others are okay with you doing so. You're welcome to open a new conversation at Talk:Nickelodeon, but I would ask you not to copy/paste my comments from one talk page into another. --Jpcase (talk) 00:44, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@Jpcase: I figured it wouldn't be an issue as I have seen users move messages from there talk page to the article talk page when the issue fit better there anyway. I didn't see the issue if they did that I couldn't move a disccusion over to another talk page. I just moved everything that was talk about today and nothing else then reworded my intro. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 00:50, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

I can't speak to the actions of other editors, but I would assume that when others have done this sort of thing, they've reached agreement on it first, instead of just unilaterally moving content without prior notification. My main concern is that you moved half of a conversation from one talk page to another - meaning that potentially important context from the unmoved half of the conversation was not included in the move. Creating a new conversation at a new talk page is usually going to be the simpler option and makes it easier for other editors to join in. --Jpcase (talk) 00:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Danger Force into Draft:List of Danger Force characters. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Nick and Cartoon Network lists

Please do not remove content and subsequently create redirects without prior talk page consensus, and if there is consensus, cite a link to the discussion proving it. Your edits may constitute as vandalism without an adequate edit summary, and if you keep this kind of behavior up, you may be blocked from editing for edit warring (which based on your talk page, seems like you may have a history of edit warring). InvadingInvader (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

@InvadingInvader:, I noticed they were split from here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoon_Network_Studios#Filmography and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickelodeon_Animation_Studio#Filmography, Split proposals were made but no one was responding and the pages seemed to be improperly split. Since no discussion were taking place, I reverted the edits. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 20:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

I'd recommend you read Wikipedia:Be Bold, specifically this:

Fix it yourself instead of just talking about it.

If there are issues with the split, fix it yourself or ask the person who split the article in the first place. Plus, 12 days is too long to wait for a response; if every proposal was just stagnated and not followed through because of no response, we would not be where we are today. InvadingInvader (talk) 20:45, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

@InvadingInvader: question, I created List of Danger Force characters and it imminently got reverted back to a redirect. I don't want to get into an edit war, but doesn't the same thing apply. There was no discussion when the list of Henry Danger characters page when it was created. I did ask about putting the info on the Henry Danger character page and no one responded so I went ahead and just made the page for the Danger Force characters. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 21:30, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

This seems potentially controversial…I would recommend that you RFC first. InvadingInvader (talk) 22:11, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Regarding Sears.

You added That Sears has 35 locations left. That is not true, as they have closed many locations since then. It is now at 23. Also, the source you added is outdated, as it is from September 2021. Much newer sources mention more store closings, with one even saying there is now 18 left. 73.100.80.112 (talk) 01:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

If the source is out dated, provide a updated source and replace it the a current one. We have to go by what the source currently says.

But more stores have closed since September 2021. The number of current stores is not 35. It is well below that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.100.80.112 (talk) 10:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Regardless a new WP:RS, is still needed. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 18:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Magical Golden Whip. Thank you for creating The Goldbergs (season 10). User:Pyrrho the Skipper, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the contribution to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pyrrho the Skipper}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 19:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Abbott Elementary season 2

Hi, just wanted to drop you a quick explanation. If you take a look at this link cited in the episode table, and navigate to the "relationships" tab at the top it (currently) gives episode titles and air dates up to January 18, 2023, but it is periodically updates. This one, also cited in the episode table, lists the writers up to episode 2.09 and is also updated periodically. Thanks, TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Okay Thanks, didn't see it before.Magical Golden Whip (talk) 16:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

About List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon and Template:Disney Princess and other similar articles.

For List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon, it does not matter if they were first-run broadcasts or not, it simply matters that they had aired on the network.

For Template:Disney Princess, there is local consensus that a character only counts as a Disney Princess if they have a character subpage on [1], regardless of commentary on other sources. If you want to change this, start a discussion.

For most of the other template edits, you never really provided an explanation to your reverts, can you provide one here? (Oinkers42) (talk) 19:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

For the Nickelodeon Programing it is what aired on the network first. Second run shows shouldn't be listed. We don't list all of the Nick at Night shows that aired onm ABC or others. Only Nick original shows should be listed. As for the princess, there are sources that support the addition. Other users have reverted your other edits on the issue. I suggest you take it to the talk page then. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 22:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

For List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon, there are tons of programs listed that did not air on the network first, namely almost the entire acquired section. The reason Nike at Nite shows are not listed is because they have their own list, as seen here. For Template:Disney Princess, it does not matter what other sources say, as previously decided local consensus has stated that the character has to be mentioned on the website. This has been in effect since at least 2009, and those edits typically get reverted as vandalism. You also did not mention your reverts on pages such as Count Duckula and Template:Former Nickelodeon original series. (Oinkers42) (talk) 23:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Hey @Magical Golden Whip: It has been over 48 hours since your last response. I will give you another 24 hours to respond. If you do not, I will presume you are fine with my original edits and I will reinstate the ones that were not already reinstated by other editors. (Oinkers42) (talk) 20:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Wow, you're seriously still going with this? You didn't even tell me I have a time limit to reply. I also don't have to reply. My answer still stands that Only Nick original shows should be listed. If these shows keep getting added they will be reverted and you will be warned accordingly. You are welcome to to it to the main talk page. WP:BRD applies Your bold split was reverted, and at that point, it was time to discuss instead of reverting. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 20:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Directormikecaron.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Directormikecaron.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:24, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

@Whpq: Not going to contest the deletion, as am not sure who actually owns it or how it is considered free use if it's coming directly from his website and used on several of his profiles. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 04:33, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

non-free content can be used only if it meets all of the non-free content criteria. In this case, the subject is a living person and does not meet WP:NFCC#1 on replaceability. For living people, even if a freely licensed image of the person does not currently exist, one could be created. From the guidelines, "Non-free content should not be used when a freely licensed file that serves the same purpose can reasonably be expected to be uploaded, as is the case for almost all portraits of living people." -- Whpq (talk) 03:28, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Characters of Henry Danger and Danger Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

List of Victorious episodes

Just curious – what's the reasoning for this reversion? It seems like converting these refs to archive links is the right call. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

It looked like they were chaning the links, must of missed that they were archive links. Will revert. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 23:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Place for proposed article mergers

In case you didn't check the talk page: There's a dedicated page for proposed article mergers. If you want to merge the PBS Kids list, go there and follow the outlined directions to make a formal merge proposal. 100.7.44.80 (talk) 18:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

On reverting my edits

I hate to be mad over a revision while giving me no reason over your revision but here I am. Please understand that my edits were made in good faith and was in fact sourced (the main page did mentioned that Rainbow S.p.A. WAS in fact been brought out by Paramount Global and the news mentioning on it was from a legitimate and accpetable news source; don't know if you can read Italian or have the page translated). Also Viacom renamed to Paramount so it was reflected to those changes. 20chances (talk) 02:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

To me this isn't a reliable source as it also falls into the area where only certain users can read it. A better source would be needed. Although they merged companies it was still Viacom at the time, so is acceptable.

I still double checked, it is a source that is considered reliable, and yes, even though it is in a foreign language, it can still count. Obviously, this is from a magazine. (EDIT: The article also mentioned another source, but it's in Italian, like I said, even though this is in a foreign language, it is acceptable which I'll link here; it's under a pay-wall but it has a right to be sourced after all). I know I won't mind searching for more, but even this is just acceptable and I disagree on your statement on it. As for the second part, even if it's under a new company, Paramount still owns pre-merger Viacom Assets (as well as copyrights), despite being under the old company name (ViacomCBS and its predecessor, Viacom). 20chances (talk) 02:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Sources that have paywalls attached aren't good as well as it limits who can see the information, while they may be acceptable, the sources should be accessible to everyone. I know other users frown upon this as well. Viacom is indeed fine to still be used. My stance stays the same. If you want to get another user and bring it up on the talk page that is fine. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 03:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

You can just use the Resource Exchange as well for help on pay-walled sources (it's not discouraged to use paywalled articles), but I rather just put it in, even though the headline from the source mentions the buyout and the first sentence does mention it. I am still dismayed at your revision and I will always defend mine. 20chances (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

@Magical Golden Whip: Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Wikipedia policy prohibits you from rejecting sources as reliable simply because they are paywalled. Wikipedia policy also prohibits you from rejecting sources as reliable just because they are not in English. If you dispute the reliability of a source for reasons besides its accessibility, then you should request review at the reliable sources noticeboard. — Greentryst ^T_C 13:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

@Greentryst: Thanks, I just left it alone after the fact as it seemed other editors thought it was okay. In the edit, there was no back and fourth editing as it was just one revert. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 20:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

List of Raven's Home episodes

Hi @Magical Golden Whip. I just accepted an edit by an IP user on List of Raven's Home episodes and noticed that you have been actively reverting edits on that article in recent weeks, some of which were done without appropriate summaries. Please remember to follow WP:CONSENSUS rather than WP:POINT in regard to content. While it is important to remove edits that appear intentionally disruptive, it is equally important to assume WP:GOODFAITH in potential contributions even by unregistered users. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Ppt91 (talk) 21:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

@Ppt91. Thanks I didn't see that they were included before. Most of my edits there were to try and fix a table, so I didn't include a summary in so of the edits. As for the little edit war that happened, was correcting a revert by another user to include an award that was totally fine too be there, but another user disagreed. I tried to get the situation resolved here [2], but it didn't fo anywhere. More details are explained here. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 21:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Nickelodeon logo revision

I’m an art director on the brand team at Nickelodeon. The new splat logo is illegible on a white background. Kutluj (talk) 01:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Following up on this. Brand guidelines dictate that the logo does not live on a white background. Kutluj (talk) 16:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring

Stop edit warring on List of programs broadcast by PBS Kids EvergreenFir (talk) 18:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

:@EvergreenFir.I looked on the main Space Rangers page, and it is listed there as it aired on PBS Kids. I did add an edit warring page to his page. Thanks. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 18:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

From what I can find, only the Space Racers series was associated with PBS Kids, the web series that inspired the show however was not. There seems to have been some confusion here. Jamesandedward7 (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Triton Class to Wish Edit on Disney Cruise lin

Hello can you please read my source I did add instead of just reverting the revision! I added the sources in my second attempt and then you just removed it! This is just rude by not checking them! https://disneyparks.disney.go.com/blog/2023/03/disney-cruise-line-and-singapore-tourism-board-to-bring-magical-cruise-vacations-to-southeast-asia/ StuartDA (talk) 15:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Not broken?

My dude it literally shows ' instead of what part it is, you're seriously overreaching your boundaries here. GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 01:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Also, WP:NOTBROKEN provided nothing in regard to the edit in question, you're just power tripping here. If you undo it again I will send an administration report for unreasonable edit warring.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

I didn't see that it was an error, thought it was a format situation that didn't need to be fixed. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 02:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

This all could have been avoided had you simply reviewed your edit and undid only the final addition edit. Please take a note from this lesson, thank you.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Interesting Soup

You stumbled onto a whole sock closet with that one. Good job! S0091 (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Victorious

Sorry for speculating. The same edit I made a link to M Magazine. I found something. Would this source work? https://www.nickiswift.com/180826/the-real-reason-nickelodeon-canceled-victorious/ Cwater1 (talk) 17:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

2023 Writer's strike

This is the source for David Zaslav's speech facing protests. Sorry for not providing a source earlier. https://www.bu.edu/articles/2023/writers-strike-protest-david-zaslav-bu-commencement/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitslain12 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

The Loud House/The Casagrades

Hey there, sorry for removing Harold and Howard names on the list but can we add Maria, Arturo, Rosa, Hector, Carlos, Frida, Carlota, CJ, Carlino and Carlitos on the list because they are main characters in The Casagrades and are recurring characters in season 2-4 in TLH while they're guest characters in season 6 also there's a upcoming 7th season of TLH and another movie for the live action series and one for TC so the page would need to be expanded a bit

I tried adding The Casagrades on there earlier but it was hard for me so I just gave up and edited the Boy Meets World page Noah4000 (talk) 21:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

the Boy Meets World page

why did you undo my edits on that page? Noah4000 (talk) 21:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Only Boy Meets World content goes on that page. If you think other wise take it to the talk page. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 23:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

ohhhh ok I understand Noah4000 (talk) 23:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

a character table

Could I add a character table on the Fairly Oddparents page like the ones on the BMW and TLH pages? or no? Noah4000 (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Hereditary Page

hi there! can i ask why the edits i made were undone on the hereditary film page? are there specific things i could change or did you find the whole edit unnecessary? thanks! NominalFarce (talk) 20:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

The surrarry that was there and straight to the point and fell withing the polices. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 20:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Bella and the Bulldogs

Hey there. Is there anything wrong with my edit on Bella and the Bulldogs? Martinc1994 (talk) 20:51, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Nathan Kress

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nathan Kress, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Patrick Star Show

You are reverting my edits on the Patrick Star Show. The episodes are not combined like the first three. In reruns, they are combined. 2600:1700:2120:DF90:D11E:514D:F06C:A2CB (talk) 21:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

That Girl Lay Lay

Hi, thank you for you contributions. I note your vote today at this RM. I'm a bit puzzled, however: The nomination seeks to move the Alaya High article to That Girl Lay Lay. Your comment seems to support that idea, yet your vote is "Oppose". Is that correct? 162 etc. (talk) 21:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Declined G6 requests

I've declined a bunch of speedy deletion requests like this one. These are not technical deletions and so G6 does not apply. If you believe these redirects should be deleted, you need to nominate them at RFD. -- Whpq (talk) 21:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

AFD for redirect after opening a RFD?

Hi, I closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Characters of the Henry Danger franchise as WP:AFD is not intended for redirects. Further more, you had opened Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 4#Characters of the Henry Danger franchise just 8 minutes before, which is the correct venue. I'm not sure why you did that but as a general rule, a topic should only be discussed in one location per WP:FORUMSHOP. Thanks! Skynxnex (talk) 01:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

I've closed, for the same reason, the other AFDs you made for redirects. Skynxnex (talk) 01:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Magical_Golden_Whip,

Don't start AFD deletion discussions for Redirects. They belong at WP:RFD. Before you start an AFD, think once, twice, maybe three times on whether you have a proper deletion proposal and whether starting a discussion would be productive. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

October 13, 2023

Hello, I am Winter. I have noticed that you reverted my edit on Schneider's Bakery. I would like to tell you that your revertion was not constructive and I have reverted the edit. Thank you for understanding. WiinterU (talk) 18:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give List of Barney & Friends episodes and videos a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Kenan & Kel

Hello. I've noticed you've reverted all of my edits on the episode summaries of "Kenan & Kel". I don't understand why, as I was simply adding important context that was missing from each episode description. I also don't understand how my summaries are considered "too in-depth" when other episode summaries of other television shows across Wikipedia are extremely detailed. I spent a large period of time contributing info to a show I'd like to think I am very knowledgeable about, and I am very disappointed that it was all for nothing. SLSmith96 (talk) 08:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Yes, alot of the stuff you are adding is unnecessary expansions or getting to wrody, You wrote both of them get pregnant where it was fine stating there were pregnant. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm Sorry

Sorry for trying to expand the page for Jay Jay the Jet Plane. I just wanted to expand it even more by mentioning its merchandising. Blake2003 (talk) 20:40, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Alexa Nikolas

Hi Magical Golden Whip,

I’m a bit confused why you leep deleting my revisions to Alexa Nikolas’s page. The warning on the page calls specifically for additional sources to fight libel, which I’ve provided, and made extensive comments on the talk page. Please let me know why you are reverting the page. Happy to discuss on the talk page here or over there.

many thanks,

Klaus KlausUlrich134 (talk) 02:55, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

It was already reverted by Amaury here [3]. I reverted mainly still due to this users reason, Mass changes without consensus. I suggest reaching out to this user. I have not followed this issues, but don't think there is an issue adding it, but, I am just following Amaury's edit since they have been here longer then me. Seeing that this user hasn't even responded to the talk page, it maybe okay to add it back in. If you do I will just leave it at this point. I also didn't see it was a few days, as it wasn't reverted by her again. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 04:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your response! This all makes sense. I’ve tried to contact @Amaury several times but haven’t received any response. I’ll try again to add the revisions.

many thanks,

K KlausUlrich134 (talk) 03:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunate actions

Your recent edit reversal on Criticism of the Walt Disney Company is very unfortunate, as is your claim I am engaging in vandalism (which is wrong). I hope to discuss it with you, civilly, at Talk:Criticism of the Walt Disney Company#Edit reversal. Thanks. Please do not post about this on my talk page, only on the talk page I have just linked. Thanks. Historyday01 (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

I warned you accordingly how I seen fit, if you continue I will have no probably warning you on your talk page as that is where warnings are given. The last warning should have said disruptive editing, but forgot to select.Magical Golden Whip (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Sigh. I still disagree with the warnings. In any case, I hope that you respond on Talk:Criticism of the Walt Disney Company#Edit reversal. I will refrain from editing the Criticism of the Walt Disney Company article, apart from mentioning a recent proposed split, until some consensus is gathered on Talk:Criticism of the Walt Disney Company.Historyday01 (talk) 23:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Reverts

Jumping into an active edit war and reverting without an edit summary, as you did here and here isn't helpful.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Okay Sorry, I was just reverting back to his original edit, but probably should have mentioned something in the summary. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 00:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Reverting solely because others are is an easy way to get caught up in something you're best to avoid. Just a thought.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Bunk'd

May I create a table for the main cast and characters since season 7 is the final season also Matteo, Finn, Ava and Gwen are returning for season 7 as a guest character. Noah2004 (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit to Danger Force

The show Danger Force ended yesterday. Nolowook (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Please provide a source that is not a promo and is directly Nickelodeon stating it. . You have also ignored all hidden notes. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 19:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Noah Munck

Please stop with the unwarranted undoing of my revisions to the articles. Your claims that my edits are "disruptive" are incorrect. My sources are within the Wikipedia guidelines:

"Never use self-published sources—including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and social network posts—as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the article." - Everything I have used was indeed published by the subject.

"Primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them." - They are being used with care as they are the only possible sources to use, no secondary source exists for my edits or else of course I would use those instead.

"A primary source may be used on Wikipedia only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. For example, an article about a musician may cite discographies and track listings published by the record label, and an article about a novel may cite passages to describe the plot, but any interpretation needs a secondary source." - All of my edits fall under this statement.

Not only that, but user Dan arndt already added a warning message on primary/unreliable sources, which is more than enough without undoing all of the important up-to-date information I have fixed. I am going to revert it back to the version before you first undid it all - but I will change any YouTube/Spotify links to Soundcloud links, as the Soundcloud page is verified.

Please do not revert the page entirely again. It is unnecessary. Use the Talk page on the article, or make adjustments instead. Thank you. Brutallust (talk) 03:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

The information you have been adding other names isn't supported by scores and the sources you are using can't be used.. You need to take it to the talk page. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 04:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Thomas and Friends articles

Why are you accusing me to disruptive editing and vandalising articles? Some of the reasons I'm making edits to these Thomas and Friends articles are to fix editing errors made by other users, to remove american spelling of certain words, to remove incorrect information and to improve the layout of the articles, yet you say I'm the one making disruptive edits? What the hell is wrong with you? People like you make me not want to bother improving the state of these articles on this site. You have no good reason to revert my revisions, so please stop reverting them. 2A00:23C5:1B03:5301:2804:35AB:1A12:F4BA (talk) 08:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

JD Vance

Hello! Your revision is incorrect about JD Vance being selected as the VP nominee. Three people were in the running, the other two have been informed they did not get selected. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/live-blog/trump-assassination-attempt-live-updates-republican-convention-rcna161238/rcrd46167?canonicalCard=true 2600:6C44:23F0:7570:61AB:2C1D:6141:2972 (talk) 18:53, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

That is speculation, wait until it is official announced. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 18:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Sambenyoseph

If they make another WP:DE, I would recommend going to WP:AIAV for continued disruption and zero communication. If that doesn't work, WP:ANI would be the next place to try. Amaury • 08:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

2024 United States presidential election

My edit on "2024 United States presidential election" has nothing to do with web archive. The same cite templates are appearing twice in the article. I deleted the later one. They have the exact same fields, but in different order. So archive-date and archive-url appear in both instances of all of them. Nngnna (talk) 13:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)