M Waleed
March 2024 edit
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Outline of Pakistani military history, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 14:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- As far as I know Pakistan had some 700 troops in Kuwait according to the article Pakistani armed forces deployment Waleed Ukranian (talk) 15:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Liberation of Kuwait campaign. Skitash (talk) 14:11, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm User4edits. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Draft:Pakistani naval deployment in the red sea seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikipedia is not a PR agency. We do not put paragraphs of quotes verbatim in bold. Nor are we a newspaper. Thank you User4edits (talk) 19:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to KHAD, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- No problem, I just created a new article for the terror campaign of KHAD in Pakistan as it was notable enough Waleed Ukranian (talk) 09:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Operation Cyclone into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. – Isochrone (talk) 20:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- In future I'll provide for sure Waleed Ukranian (talk) 03:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Cite web url edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Cite web url, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 14:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks I'm a bit new so I didn't understand Waleed Ukranian (talk) 14:56, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay so now I'm creating independent deployments during red sea crisis encompassing Pakistani Indian Israeli Chinese Saudi and Egyptian so that might address the issue Waleed Ukranian (talk) 18:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Waleed Ukranian!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! User4edits (talk) 17:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
|
Welcome! edit
Hi Waleed Ukranian! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! User4edits (talk) 18:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for guidance Waleed Ukranian (talk) 02:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Draft:Independent deployments in red sea crisis edit
Hello Waleed Ukranian! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Independent deployments in red sea crisis, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from Various news articles, see history, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Independent deployments in red sea crisis and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en wikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Independent deployments in red sea crisis, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Independent deployments in red sea crisis. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Independent deployments in red sea crisis with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Independent deployments in red sea crisis saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Hut 8.5 17:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Pakistan-Afghanistan skirmishes has been accepted edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 17:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Ways to improve Raids inside Soviet Union during Soviet Afghan War edit
Hello, Waleed Ukranian,
Thank you for creating Raids inside Soviet Union during Soviet Afghan War.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for creating this page but I saw few issue are interrupted in this page you recently created "Please add categories in article and please link this article to another releated topic".
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Thank you for your recent articles on KHAD and Soviet-DRA air skirmishes against PAF edit
It has been suggested that the name of this article “Pakistan Soviet air confrontations during the Soviet Afghan war” should be changed to provide more clarity. Additionally, please ensure that you refrain from adding articles in the “See also” section that do not correlate to the topic of the article. Happy editing! AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 14:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please additionally remember to ensure that your articles follow this – Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I just named this article hurriedly but I can't think of a better name the top off my head would you help bro? Waleed Ukranian (talk) 15:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hmmm… maybe “Soviet-Pakistani aerial engagements during the Soviet-Afghan war”? AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 19:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I just named this article hurriedly but I can't think of a better name the top off my head would you help bro? Waleed Ukranian (talk) 15:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 1949 Mughalgai raid edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 1949 Mughalgai raid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.afghanstudiescenter.org/timeline-history-of-pak-afghan-relations-a-pakistani-perspective-1947-1979/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Leoneix (talk) 04:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Contested, you can visit the article again, all copyright violations are removed and more sources are provided Waleed Ukranian (talk) 06:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia edit
In 1950 Afghan invasion of Balochistan you seem to have copied text from the Wikipedia article Afghanistan–Pakistan border skirmishes. You have done so without giving proper attribution which violates the licensing terms of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0. Please consider mentioning it in the edit summary. For more information see WP:PATT. Happy editing! Leoneix (talk) 16:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of 1950 Afghan invasion of Balochistan for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1950 Afghan invasion of Balochistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of 2024 Afghanistan–Pakistan skirmishes for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Afghanistan–Pakistan skirmishes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Noorullah (talk) 23:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Couldn't understand why? Waleed Ukranian (talk) 09:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, you can see the rationale for deletion given by the nominator at this page -- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Afghanistan–Pakistan skirmishes. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 10:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Userpage fix edit
I'm not sure how your userpage looks on your device, but on my monitor, the beginning of your "Articles created" section is squished beside your userboxes. To fix this, I suggest that you put {{break}} at the end of your "USERBOX" section to force a line break before the beginning of the "Articles created" section. - ZLEA T\C 20:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Seems normal to me but thanks I'll implement it immediately Waleed Ukranian (talk) 03:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hmmm, it seems to have made it slightly less squished, but it did not fix the problem entirely. You could try sorting your userboxes in a table like I do. If you want, I can sort your userboxes in a table in my sandbox and you can copy the code into your userpage. - ZLEA T\C 04:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Okay thanks I'll copy and paste Waleed Ukranian (talk) 06:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done. On my monitor, your userbox section appears to be six userboxes wide, which I used as a base for the template. If you wish to change the width of the table, let me know. - ZLEA T\C 14:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes indeed I want it to be fixed, would be thankful if you did it for me Waleed Ukranian (talk) 13:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done. On my monitor, your userbox section appears to be six userboxes wide, which I used as a base for the template. If you wish to change the width of the table, let me know. - ZLEA T\C 14:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Okay thanks I'll copy and paste Waleed Ukranian (talk) 06:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hmmm, it seems to have made it slightly less squished, but it did not fix the problem entirely. You could try sorting your userboxes in a table like I do. If you want, I can sort your userboxes in a table in my sandbox and you can copy the code into your userpage. - ZLEA T\C 04:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 8 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MQM insurrection (1994-present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Altaf Hussain. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Writing in MQM insurrection (1994-present) edit
Hi @M Waleed, I read the above article roughly, and it has no context for someone who is not from the Indian subcontinent. Wikipedia is read by people across globe, cultures, and levels of understanding/awareness. You can edit the article to make it easier for others too. Best, Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 07:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done just as you listed, have some context and improved the lead too M Waleed (talk) 09:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for promptness. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024 edit
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 10:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Undefined references edit
Hello,
I was reviewing some of your new articles, when I came to MQM insurrection (1994-present) and found three undefined references (numbering #34, #38, #44 at this point in time). I was unable to determine what the correct reference was to fix it so I am posting on your talk to let you know it needs fixing.
Nice article, I also reviewed and marked a couple of your other articles. // Timothy :: talk 19:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2024 Iran–Israel conflict edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Iran–Israel conflict, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Pakistan Soviet air confrontations during the Soviet Afghan war (April 19) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pakistan Soviet air confrontations during the Soviet Afghan war and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Attacks on U.S. bases in Iraq, Jordan, and Syria during the Israel–Hamas war, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- kay bot bro <span style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffa500; color: #ffffff;">Waleed</span> (talk) 15:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think your signature is broken. Be sure that "Treat the above as wiki markup" is checked under your signature in your preferences, otherwise your signature will be the markup itself. - ZLEA T\C 15:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- like how, can you send me the text so I can copy paste <span style="color:#6B8E23">Waleed</span> (talk) 15:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's not something to copy/paste, it's a check box labeled "Treat the above as wiki markup" under the signature text field. WP:SIG#Treat as wiki markup provides further explanation. - ZLEA T\C 15:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- @ZLEA <span style="color:#6B8E23">Waleed</span> (talk) 15:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- <span style="color:#6B8E23">Waleed</span> (talk)like this <span style="color:#6B8E23">Waleed</span> (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Does the code in your signature text field look like:
- 1. <span style="color:#6B8E23">Waleed</span> or
- 2. [[User:M Waleed|<span style="color:#6B8E23">Waleed</span>]]
- ZLEA T\C 15:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Like 1 <span style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #6633ff;> color: #ffffff;" M Waleed</span> (talk) 15:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Give one second, that didn't work like I thought. - ZLEA T\C 15:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- I tried but somehow it ain't working <span style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #6633ff;> color: #ffffff;" M Waleed</span> (talk) 15:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- <span style="color:#6B8E23">Waleed</span> (talk)like this <span style="color:#6B8E23">Waleed</span> (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- like how, can you send me the text so I can copy paste <span style="color:#6B8E23">Waleed</span> (talk) 15:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think your signature is broken. Be sure that "Treat the above as wiki markup" is checked under your signature in your preferences, otherwise your signature will be the markup itself. - ZLEA T\C 15:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started edit
Hi M Waleed. Thank you for your work on First Balochistan conflict. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024 edit
Your recent editing history at Yom Kippur War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 14:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Instagram edit
I need to discuss something with you give me your instagram 110.144.165.117 (talk) 15:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
1986 Miram Shah incident moved to draftspace edit
Thanks for your contributions to 1986 Miram Shah incident. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. // Timothy :: talk 17:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- @TimothyBlue I've added like 7 more sources and corrected some grammatical errors and then moved it back. Waleed (talk) 23:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics: Arab–Israeli conflict edit
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Please also read the talk header section of pages in this topic area for possible additional information and editing restrictions. It does not appear that this notice has been posted to your talk page. If it has already been left already by another editor, please let me know. If you have questions, please request help at the Teahouse. // Timothy :: talk 17:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics: India, Pakistan, Afghanistan edit
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Please also read the talk header section of pages in this topic area for possible additional information and editing restrictions. It does not appear that this notice has been posted to your talk page. If it has already been left already by another editor, please let me know. If you have questions, please request help at the Teahouse. // Timothy :: talk 17:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
1986 Miran Shah incident moved to draftspace edit
Thanks for your contributions to 1986 Miran Shah incident. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and As TimothyBlue (talk · contribs) mentioned, the page isn't ready yet. In the future, please refrain from moving it back to the main namespace without consulting others first.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 14:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'll improve it in draft space before moving it back Waleed (talk) 15:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Saqib, brother as advised by you, I'm consulting you before moving it back, I've added 3 additional book sources and two archived news articles at that time (they're reliable Washington Post and New York Times) so should I move it back Waleed (talk) 05:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'll prefer @TimothyBlue: take the lead here since they were the first ones to raise concerns. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 09:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well brother, he doesn't reply too often, his home page itself shows he ain't active too often Waleed (talk) 09:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Saqib, see my previous reply Waleed (talk) 11:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'll prefer @TimothyBlue: take the lead here since they were the first ones to raise concerns. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 09:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Pakistan Invitation edit
Hello! You look like someone who might be interested in joining WikiProject Pakistan, and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you help us :-) Wikibear47 (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan. There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much — or little — you like:
- You can give your input on issues at the project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics.
- You can add the project's to do list to your watchlist and help out with what interests you.
- You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.
- Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan-related article on Wikipedia.
- Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
- Add your name in the members' list at WikiProject Pakistan members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: {{User WikiProject Pakistan}}
- You may also like to add your name to List of Pakistani Wikipedians by number of edits. To opt-in, add your name here.