User talk:Lynbarn/archive/002
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Lynbarn. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
L&B reference on Barnstaple article
I've changed the name back to "Lynton & Barnstaple Railway". Thanks for pointing that out! --Marknew 16:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Barum
Hey Lynbarn, That was what the article needed - a section on Barum. Maybe Barnstaple should get more information on the origin of the name. I think originally it was somthing like Beardestaple? Anyway thanks for adding about Barum - it was incorrect for a while. Jack 10:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, it looks great. No matter what I did, it just kept making it look worse. :) User:Zoe|(talk) 16:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
l & B
shouldnt the revival schemes section be caleed something different like the l& B today or the modern l&b because it is about rebuilding the railway and the modern company, not just about the different revival schemes which failed.
Feel free to change it if you like, Doubledgedsword, although I don't think it needs to change - the current activities are part of a scheme to revive the line - it is just that this one seems to be getting somewhere! (see Killington Lane in the latest "Steam Railway" Mag!) Lynbarn 20:38, 25 February 2006 (UTC)