LucasPooMan
June 2023
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note in particular Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking, which gives guidance on when and when not to link. Celia Homeford (talk) 12:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Noted. LucasPooMan (talk) 13:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Kerrebrock
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Chris Kerrebrock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 16:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
June 2023
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)- Hi! I don't understand why I have been blocked from editing as I have only been doing to stuff bennefical wikpedia and helping improving it for the better aparntly I'v been blocked for ''not being here to build an enclopedia''' when all what I have been doing is good so I really need someone to explain to me why I can no longer edit anything. LucasPooMan (talk) 18:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- None of your edits has been "beneficial". You have repeatedly violated WP:OLINK. You were warned about it on this page, and you acknowledged the warning but continued to violate it. Other changes to articles were not an improvement. Your wording changes made the articles worse. You created an article about a person who, by any stretch of the imagination, does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline. As a new user, you didn't bother to go through the WP:AFC process. Instead, you created a poorly written article out of whole cloth. Your English skills are subpar. You are not sufficiently capable to edit Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- The article was about a guy who died trapped in a Crevasses in the 1980's which I was gonna further link it to it and was linking already existing article and not out of ''whole cloth'' maybe in your opinion my changes of wording maybe worse in eyes by me linking things help other users get a better grasp of key information I only tried to do my best, Therese also no need to be so harsh and aggressive about this situation I am new to editing and I only want edit Wikipedia for the better. So please give me the benefit of the doubt and let me learn from my ''mistakes'' and let me understand better instead of just taking away all my privileges like there's no tomorrow. LucasPooMan (talk) 18:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- None of your edits has been "beneficial". You have repeatedly violated WP:OLINK. You were warned about it on this page, and you acknowledged the warning but continued to violate it. Other changes to articles were not an improvement. Your wording changes made the articles worse. You created an article about a person who, by any stretch of the imagination, does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline. As a new user, you didn't bother to go through the WP:AFC process. Instead, you created a poorly written article out of whole cloth. Your English skills are subpar. You are not sufficiently capable to edit Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)