User talk:LoriLee/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Using Wikipedia

Today I made my first contribution to Wikipedia by updating information on the Czarevich (Fabergé egg) article. I also figured out how to include an Infobox. Ironically, I've figured out the Infobox before I've figured out References.. I need to work on that. I would like to eventually see all of the Romanov Faberge Egg articles have the same format and InfoBox. Once I complete the intial work for my Collections Care & Management class on our Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia Saves Public Art! project, I will probably begin streamlining the layouts of the Romanov Faberge Egg collection. 10-16-09 HstryQT (talk)

Communications

Hi Lori, nice to see you wading in! --Jenny User:Jgmikulay

Hi, Lori. I really appreciate that your analysis also included some trial and error with a topic you're interested. Clearly, learning to use Wikipedia is best done by just getting in there and doing it. I think you've really done a good job on this assignment and have covered the pertinent topics.

One of the things that I've been thinking more and more about is how we describe and link things in Wikipedia (you don't have to take this on, but I thought you might be interested). For example, Sculpture can be art, fine art, or an art object. But what is it?

There is also a history of sculpture, and of course a history of art and art history. ??

There is an article about the sculpture of the United States and an article about outdoor sculpture in New York City and there's a List of sculptures in Central Park.

There is an Outline of sculpture on Wikipedia. Of course Public art can also be outdoor sculpture.

Very messy, huh?

--Richard McCoy (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey Lori! Thanks for all the nice comments! Sure you can copy that part on the Cultural trail! The documentation part I just added in for the mean time. I like the idea but we might not need it if someone creates a wikipedia article on the whole collection. So I guess we'll see what develops! Thanks for creating that really cool Navigation Template! Have a great Thanksgiving! Cgshc09 (talk) 05:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC)Cgshc09

Talkback

Hello, LoriLee. You have new messages at Nancy's talk page.
Message added 15:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nancy ^talk 15:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

User:HstryQT/SculptureTemplate

I've taken the liberty of making some changes to to the template. More may follow! Best, Nancy ^talk 09:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

That's absolutely fine. I want to make sure the template conforms to any style guidelines I may have missed. We appreciate your help. HstryQT (talk) 15:36, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Nav boxes

Nav boxes should go right at the bottom of the page below the references, see also, external links etc. See WP:FOOTERS for the order that the appendices and footers should be in, Best, Nancy ^talk

Hi Nancy, I'm so sorry, I just realized that and was about to start fixing them. I was just going to ask you to confirm the correct order (which is now on the Sculpture Template). From top to bottom is it See Also, References, External Links, and then Nav Boxes ? *The helpful link you provided shows this is indeed the correct order. Thank you!* I'm going to begin going through each of the pages in our collection and updating the formatting. I'm sorry I started doing it wrong a second ago. I promise I'm trying to help, not make things worse!

Also, I thought I saw on someone's page an edit that made our headings simply say Description and Information rather than Sculpture Description and Sculpture Information . Which would be more appropriate? And I can update that too.

Likewise, I was going to make the headings sentence case rather than all upper case, per your suggestion (if you hadn't already changed it).

I also just learned how to indent on talk pages, so that will help too. Sorry about that. It's slow going but coming along. Thank you again for your time and help. HstryQT (talk) 16:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry about being slow - there is a lot to take in and you're doing just fine, believe me, you're a model newbie. To answer your questions:

1. Yes, that is the correct order for section headings
2. We try to avoid superfluous words in section headings (and a lot of other places too) - because the whole article is about the sculpture the word "Sculpture" is not needed in the headers, so yes, trimming them down to "Description" and "Information" would be good.

Kind regards, Nancy ^talk 16:33, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you Nancy! HstryQT (talk) 16:49, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Great edit summaries[1] - I'll have to stop calling you a newbie soon! Nancy ^talk 17:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Kchattin has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks Katie. The phrase, "Wanna cookie?" has never been more applicable. I needed a cookie desperately :). HstryQT (talk) 19:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

If you give a mouse a cookie, they'll ask you for a glass of milk... and get addicted to Wikipedia! Thanks again for your leadership on this project!Kpetrole (talk) 22:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Kpetrole

Orphaned non-free image File:MegaGemDetail.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MegaGemDetail.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 05:34, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Anna Karenina

I saw your message on the talk page. It would be great if the article could be improved to at least GA status. There doesnt seem to be anyone with any "ownership" of this particular article, so you might have it mostly to yourself! Its strange how wiki works, sometimes fairly obsure seeming topics are under heavy guard against changes, while much more important seeming ones are left open and mostly unworked on. I have the article on my watchlist and might pop over to make suggestions or minor contributions every now and then. Welcome to Wikipedia! FeydHuxtable (talk) 14:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes I was surprised that such a well known topic would have a need for me. Most of my areas of expertise are pretty much locked down. Thank you very much for the encouragement! I appreciate the help! HstryQT (talk) 14:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

thanks for tracking me down

and alerting me to the Wikipedia Saves Public Art project. I glanced over your user page and noticed a lot of things - - such as, well. my daughter is getting her Ph. D. in History at Purdue . . . and other things. I expect that we shall cross paths again, particularly after I can produce the project name in blue. . Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Try this: Wikipedia Saves Public Art Now is it blue? Jgmikulay (talk) 15:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Jgmikulay. Ask and ye shall receive, I guess. Carptrash (talk) 01:00, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Broken Walrus II

A tag has been placed on Broken Walrus II requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 18:33, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar for User:HstryQT

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for making the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia Saves Public Art page so informative, easy to navigate, and inclusive! Jgmikulay (talk) 23:48, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LoriLee. You have new messages at Nancy's talk page.
Message added 10:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nancy ^talk 10:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletion nomination of Template:Subst:WSPA

blanked page

Hi HstryQT, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding Template:Subst:WSPA. You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text {{db-author}}. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the {{db-author}} tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=FrescoBot}} somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot (msg) 00:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there HstryQT, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:HstryQT/NewArticle. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:42, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

WP:GLAM/SI

Hello, LoriLee. You have new messages at Sadads's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4