Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruth Blair (February 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 03:36, 12 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Loicdacreature! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 03:36, 12 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ava Addams

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ava Addams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Addams (5th nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ava Addams

edit

 Template:Ava Addams has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:A Higher Call: An Incredible True Story of Combat and Chivalry In the War Torn Skies of World War II. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 03:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Keisha (adult actress)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Keisha (adult actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keisha (actress). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of 21 Air

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 21 Air requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21 Air. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Anri Okita

edit

 Template:Anri Okita has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of awards and nominations received by Keisha for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of awards and nominations received by Keisha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Keisha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Williamsport Christian School moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Williamsport Christian School, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Please see the school article guidelines which describes how the content of school articles should be organized, with the aim of providing general guidance to editors. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Steven (Editor) (talk) 01:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Keisha

edit

 Template:Keisha has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. • Gene93k (talk) 05:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 20:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Hitomi Tanaka has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hitomi Tanaka. Thanks! • Gene93k (talk) 21:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Markus Dupree for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Markus Dupree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markus Dupree until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. • Gene93k (talk) 04:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sophie Dee (May 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 01:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
 

The article 1994 Williamsport, Pennsylvania double homicide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable unsolved murder. Sources are local-only, which fails WP:N's requirement for attention from the world at large.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 06:51, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kelly Madison, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Director and Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Sangdeboeuf. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Riley Reid, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dates of birth are often regarded as private information and should be widely published in reliable sources before we add them to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 12:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sophie Dee (May 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
• Gene93k (talk) 05:48, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Riley Reid, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:24, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of awards and nominations received by Riley Reid for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of awards and nominations received by Riley Reid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Riley Reid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 12:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Loicdacreature. You have new messages at Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Riley Reid.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Riley Reid

edit

 Template:Riley Reid has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Instructor With Bursting Tits moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Instructor With Bursting Tits, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Matt Jones (mountain biker) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Jones (mountain biker) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Jones (mountain biker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 06:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Denise Milani

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Denise Milani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise Milani (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 10:31, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Moriah Mills

edit
 

The article Moriah Mills has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 15:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Moriah Mills for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moriah Mills is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moriah Mills until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 21:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Williamsport Christian School

edit
 

Hello, Loicdacreature. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Williamsport Christian School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Francesca Le

edit
 

Hello, Loicdacreature. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Francesca Le".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Tessa Fowler

edit
 

Hello, Loicdacreature. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tessa Fowler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:10, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lisa Ann

edit

 Template:Lisa Ann has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Trivialist (talk) 00:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mark Wood (actor)

edit
 

Hello, Loicdacreature. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mark Wood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Amanda Cerny

edit
 

Hello, Loicdacreature. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amanda Cerny".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:07, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Pornhub Awards

edit
 

Hello, Loicdacreature. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pornhub Awards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:06, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kink (documentary) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kink (documentary) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kink (documentary) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 10:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Hitomi Tanaka

edit
 

Hello, Loicdacreature. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hitomi Tanaka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of awards and nominations received by Angela White for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of awards and nominations received by Angela White is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Angela White until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sangdeboeuf (talk) 07:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of awards and nominations received by Lisa Ann for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of awards and nominations received by Lisa Ann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Rocco Siffredi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

This is a group AfD, hence the different title for the AfD page. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of awards and nominations received by Asa Akira for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of awards and nominations received by Asa Akira, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Rocco Siffredi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Ruth Blair

edit
 

Hello, Loicdacreature. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ruth Blair".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

"List of awards and nominations received by Riley Reid" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of awards and nominations received by Riley Reid. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 2#List of awards and nominations received by Riley Reid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 12:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Instructor With Bursting Tits

edit
 

Hello, Loicdacreature. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Instructor With Bursting Tits".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Eva Notty

edit

  Hello, Loicdacreature. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eva Notty, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Natasha Nice

edit

  Hello, Loicdacreature. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Natasha Nice, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Sophie Dee

edit

  Hello, Loicdacreature. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sophie Dee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Eva Notty

edit
 

Hello, Loicdacreature. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eva Notty".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Angela White

edit

 Template:Angela White has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2 Broke Girls: A XXX Parody for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2 Broke Girls: A XXX Parody is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2 Broke Girls: A XXX Parody until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SVTCobra 22:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Asa Akira

edit

 Template:Asa Akira has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply