Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 April 8

April 8 edit

Template:Resurrection appearances edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 April 18. Primefac (talk) 02:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Black the Ripper edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary and serves no purpose – navbox only has one article, so there is nothing else to navigate to. And as the subject has recently died, this is unlikely to expand much in the future. Both the album named and the discography linked to have no reliable sources whatsoever. Richard3120 (talk) 15:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Update: creator is busy creating other articles to try and keep this template. None of them have any good sources at all, or any demonstration of notability. Richard3120 (talk) 18:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Only released one album. How much more could be added to this navbox? WP:NENAN. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like he's going to create articles for all the EPs as well. None of them are remotely notable individually. Richard3120 (talk) 00:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Allhallowtide edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 April 18. Primefac (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Christian hierarchy notes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after substitution. Primefac (talk) 02:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid the contents of this template better be moved into the proper location in the article realm? PPEMES (talk) 11:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NZR locomotive list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 April 18. Primefac (talk) 02:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikify edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 April 18. Primefac (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Navy F.C. squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Royal Thai Navy F.C. squad. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Navy F.C. squad with Template:Royal Thai Navy F.C. squad.
technical request: initially was opened as article merge UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 14:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anri Okita edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Performer by performance navigation template only used by the main subject's article. No useful navigation since the subject is not even mentioned in most of the blue-link articles. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).