LivelyRatification

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tongio, Victoria has been accepted

Tongio, Victoria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello LivelyRatification, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, D🎅ggy54321 (ho-ho-ho) 14:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

D🎅ggy54321 ^(ho-ho-ho) 14:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! I really appreciate the message. --LivelyRatification (talk) 20:40, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

My pleasure! D🎅ggy54321 ^(ho-ho-ho) 20:50, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Tasmania polling graphs

Thanks for doing these, although I still see the trend line looping around.

I notice that the 2018 dates have day, month and year, but after 2019 they are year and month only. If I remove all the days from 2018 the lines snap to the y-axis, so it should work to add dates to the post-2018 dates (see below). I just added 01 as the day, but ideally you could put the day of the polling or the release date.

Hope that helps. --Canley (talk) 05:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!. They're just marked as "February 2020", for example, so I'll just add 01 to them. --LivelyRatification (talk) 05:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Powerscourt railway station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Powerscourt railway station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

What exactly needs to be done? Is the lack of references an issue here, or is it a lack of information? I presumed such an article would be, at least initially, fine, as pages like Heyfield railway station are similarly undetailed, and articles like Maffra railway station don't have any references. If I add references verifying the statements made, would that make it suitable? --LivelyRatification (talk) 02:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Just realised you probably won't see this so I'll give you a ping @Discospinster: I've also added a couple of sources to the draft. --LivelyRatification (talk) 03:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lana Del Rey - Text Book.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lana Del Rey - Text Book.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lana Del Rey - Wildflower Wildfire.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lana Del Rey - Wildflower Wildfire.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Liz Phair Soberish page

Howdy! I appreciate you cleaning up the charts section on this page - I couldn't work out the best way to add the link to the UK Album Sales chart where Soberish is # 50. Can you help me out? https://www.officialcharts.com/charts/albums-sales-chart/

No problem at all! Template:Album chart is normally what's used here, as it automatically generates a link to the album chart. There doesn't seem to be an option for the sales chart, so I've added that in manually, and given the chart is just for sales, I've made a separate table for just sales charts. --LivelyRatification (talk) 08:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

We don't use separate chart tables for sales charts. They're all charts, so editors put them all in the same one. "UK Albums Sales" tells readers the chart only measures sales and not other forms of music consumption like streaming anyway. Ss112 03:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

My mistake! Thanks for informing me. --LivelyRatification (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lorde - Solar Power Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lorde - Solar Power Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Powerscourt siding has been accepted

Powerscourt siding, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Autopatroller

Hi there, if you're not aware, since you've created about 28 articles, you should consider applying for autopatroller status on WP:PERM. This way, someone doesn't have to review your article, and it'll be automatically reviewed (similar to how edits are patrolled on envoy). 06:49, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Oh, thanks for letting me know. Might do that! --LivelyRatification (talk) 07:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Stoned at the Nail Salon

Hello! Your submission of Stoned at the Nail Salon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pamzeis (talk) 03:58, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stoned at the Nail Salon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marlon Williams. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Family First Party (2021)

On 7 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Family First Party (2021), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the newly founded Family First Party has access to the former Family First Party's database of 6,000 supporters, according to The Australian? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Family First Party (2021). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Family First Party (2021)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Stoned at the Nail Salon

On 10 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stoned at the Nail Salon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Stoned at the Nail Salon" was written by Lorde and Jack Antonoff, and features backing vocals from four other artists? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stoned at the Nail Salon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stoned at the Nail Salon), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ali Cupper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reason Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Template:Callista Clark

Hi. Just for future reference, please don't make navigational templates when the artist only has two articles to link to (their main article does not count). Please see WP:NENAN and refer to the informal "rule of five": unless the artist has five other articles to link to (not including their record label or other "related articles"), they probably do not need one and if you create one, it may be nominated for deletion at WP:TfD. Thanks. Ss112 04:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! Will keep this in mind for the future. --LivelyRatification (talk) 04:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Kuinini Manumua

On 18 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kuinini Manumua, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kuinini Manumua is the first woman to represent Tonga in weightlifting at the Olympic Games? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kuinini Manumua. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kuinini Manumua), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (Talk) 00:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mood Ring (Lorde song) has been accepted

Mood Ring (Lorde song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stoned at the Nail Salon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stoned at the Nail Salon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:22, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stoned at the Nail Salon

The article Stoned at the Nail Salon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stoned at the Nail Salon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Oxytocin (song)

On 16 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oxytocin (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Oxytocin" was recorded expressly to "be insane live"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oxytocin (song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Oxytocin (song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Little thing about your profile

Hi! Since I was bored, I looked up on your profile, and I guess that you should also add that DYK of "Oxytocin" happened to your profile, since you created that page. ^-^ infsai (talkie? UwU) 22:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Cleo Smith police image.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cleo Smith police image.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Masem (t) 01:50, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleo Smith police image.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cleo Smith police image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Lorde

Hi there, I have seen that you have reverted the change without any explanation. Do you care to provide the reason when a person heritage is from Serbia, why would their name be Croatian? Pixius talk 19:13, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

@Pixius: Hi! Thanks for the message. To my knowledge, Lorde's heritage is not primarily Serbian. As said on the page, her mother was a Croatian immigrant, and she holds Croatian dual citizenship. From what I can see to your edits to Sonja Yelich, there is a source that suggests that she had relatives who were Serbian, which is certainly possible. However, I don't think this overrides Lorde self-identifying herself as Croatian and the aforementioned citizenship. Are these Serbian connections worth noting? Potentially they are, I haven't read into it that much. I don't think it's worth replacing a Croatian translation of her family name with a Serbian one, though. --LivelyRatification (talk) 19:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Demeanor (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Demeanor (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Demeanor (song)

The article Demeanor (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Demeanor (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 14:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Demeanor (song)

The article Demeanor (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Demeanor (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Rex Patrick Team

Hi. I've reverted your contribution regarding news of Rex Patrick considering contesting for Lower House. I've done this on grounds that Wikipedia is not for reporting speculation, and Sky News/Murdoch-owned media outlets have a penchant for reporting headlines with partial POV which affects neutrality and even brings the factuality of the headline into question. Let's wait for backup sources (Antony Green included), and preferably Patrick himself to make a press statement about it himself. -- Tytrox (talk) 00:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

@Tytrox: Thanks for the message! I certainly agree with your concerns about the Murdoch press, and while it is speculation, I thought the presence of multiple sources (albeit, under the same corporation) reporting on the same thing with a few weeks' separation may have made it worth inclusion. However, you are right in that nothing beyond the headline in the Advertiser source says that Patrick is considering running (even Patrick just says "I would never say no", and also adds that "at this point in time, I’m just going to keep running for the Senate"), and the Sky News source essentially just amounts to speculation from a commentator. So, yes, thank you for doing that - it is probably worth waiting in this situation. --LivelyRatification (talk) 00:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Cowboy like Me for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cowboy like Me is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cowboy like Me until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ippantekina (talk) 03:06, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of We Were Happy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article We Were Happy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Were Happy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ippantekina (talk) 03:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Callista Clark

Template:Callista Clark has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:47, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Tonight (Doja Cat song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tonight (Doja Cat song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonight (Doja Cat song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

>> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 13:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)