Larenmclane, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Larenmclane! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hydrotennessic acid

edit

Hello, Larenmclane. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Hydrotennessic acid, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article on Hydrotennessic acid was deleted a couple of months ago. I see you have started a new talk page for it - that has been deleted also. If you feel the article should be written - then I would suggest you start a discussion as a new thread on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry and see if anyone agrees with you. Vsmith (talk) 01:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

References needed

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:41, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:53, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  See also WP:NOR. Homemade Cl is most likely not pure, and impurities do change color. Materialscientist (talk) 23:51, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sodium Xenate has been accepted

edit
 
Sodium Xenate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hi, although I accepted this page, I then found out there is no such substance. Easychem looks to be an unreliable source, and the other paper only talks about solutions. But it does refer to a paper that is about monosodium xenate, so I have renamed and repurposed the article. Perxenates can also be called xenate(VIII) as a confusing issue. Also calling it highly toxic appears to be wrong. I found a reference that says its moderately toxic.Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:24, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply