User talk:LadyofShalott/Archive 28
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | → | Archive 35 |
Again
- Is a range block needed? Still attacks coming Irondome (talk) 05:46, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Possibly, but I don't know the first thing about range blocking. :/ TPS's? (See my recent deletions or Irondome's recent rollbacking for why.) LadyofShalott 05:54, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
No idea either. I feel so bloody inadequate sometimes when these outrages occur. Maybe a semi protect on MS's page? I dunno. Depressing Irondome (talk) 05:58, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- I was doing that at the same time you were leaving that message. LadyofShalott 06:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Sure
Yes, agree. Hafspajen (talk) 19:19, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! I wanted to make sure there wasn't something obvious that I was missing. LadyofShalott 19:30, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
I presume you saw this - he is some kind of basket -player. http://www.kopingbasket.se/nyheter/?actionParam=read&article=1313 this video -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gwa-XTvz2O8 Not overly notable?. Hafspajen (talk) 00:56, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ludwig Lemmer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bergheim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
request
Hi LadyofShalott, would it be possible for you to move this deleted article to my userspace so I can work on updating? The tournament starts later this month. Thank you! Hmlarson (talk) 20:21, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Done User:Hmlarson/2014 Torneio Internacional de Brasília de Futebol Feminino although it won't help you much - there's pretty much nothing there. LadyofShalott 20:33, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks so much - you are so quick! Much appreciated. Hmlarson (talk) 20:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Cannulated cow for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cannulated cow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cannulated cow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
You mentioned
Look on today's German Main page in the section Schon gewusst? (DYK): de:Wikipedia:Hauptseite/Archiv/18. Dezember 2014, pictured, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Very nice - thanks for letting me know! LadyofShalott 14:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Zombie (fictional)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Zombie (fictional). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Best wishes for a happy holiday season
Happy Holiday Cheer | ||
Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user an Awesome Holiday and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings! Joys!Hafspajen (talk) 01:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Hafspajen! Happy holidays to you as well!! LadyofShalott 21:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Can I wish the two of you a merry Christmas, or does it have to be a random person? Merry Christmas! Drmies (talk) 15:49, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Belated Christmas greetings to you, Drmies, and happy new year!
Seasonal Greets!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!! | |
Hello LadyofShalott, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
A Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year LadyofShalott :) Best Wishes! TheGeneralUser (talk) 00:12, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho
Dougweller (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec14c}} to your friends' talk pages.
Dougweller (talk) 19:52, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Happy holidays to you, Dougweller! LadyofShalott 00:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
TheGeneralUser (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- A belated Merry Christmas to you, TheGeneralUser, and happy new year! LadyofShalott 00:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy New Year LadyofShalott!
LadyofShalott,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Hafspajen (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- Happy New Year, Hafspagen!! LadyofShalott 14:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Have a bacon-filled new year!
As a member of WikiProject Bacon, I'm wishing you a very happy New Year's Eve and a great 2015! May your new year be filled with positive experiences, great wiki contributions, and of course, well-smoked thin-cut bacon. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Haha, thanks and the same to you, SuperHamster! LadyofShalott 17:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
UUCA
Are you still involved with the Unitarian work group? I noticed Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington was recently listed on the National Register. If I can find the NRHP nomination form, do you want to work on it together at some point? APK whisper in my ear 05:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Sure, let's do it! I'll start a sandbox. LadyofShalott 21:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- User:LadyofShalott/Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington, AgnosticPreachersKid LadyofShalott 21:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oops. Someone created an article about the church yesterday, so I can't keep the revision history. Oh well, it's done for the most part if you want to look over it for grammatical errors, odd wording, etc. I'm prone to do that. :-) APK whisper in my ear 11:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- User:LadyofShalott/Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington, AgnosticPreachersKid LadyofShalott 21:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Alright, User:AgnosticPreachersKid and Lady--who wants to hear my Unitarian joke? It's much less offensive to Unitarians than my CoC joke is to CoCers. Drmies (talk) 15:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Lay it on us. *has tomato ready* APK whisper in my ear 17:11, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Do you think this article looks ok to be nominated for GA? I don't know if not having a photo of the current building will affect the nomination. I emailed someone at the church and requested a pic. That was a few days ago and no reply so far. APK whisper in my ear 20:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
IdeaLab proposal
There is a proposal at the IdeaLab that may interest you. Lightbreather (talk) 20:56, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Gender Studies infoboxes Reply
I'm currently going through WP:WikiProject Gender Studies articles and labeling any that don't have an infobox. It may be that one could be created under Category:LGBT templates as I don't see any infoboxes in that category. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 01:11, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Flyer22: As above. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 04:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Further discussion is at User talk:The Vintage Feminist#Infobox request on Parthenogenesis. LadyofShalott 15:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Test Kaffeeklatsch area for women-only
Since WikiProject Women as proposed at the IdeaLab may take some time to realize, and based on a discussion on the proposal's talk page, I have started a test Kaffeeklatsch area for women only (cisgender or transgender, lesbian or straight).
It is a place where women can go and be sure they'll be able to participate in discussions without being dominated by men's advice, criticism, and explanations. If interested, your participation would be most welcome. Lightbreather (talk) 23:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'll check it out, thanks! LadyofShalott 16:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:War on Terror
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:War on Terror. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
scowiki
As I've seen you've been active there in the past, I'm active there (and have temporary adminship), and we'd be glad to have you back! :) --AmaryllisGardener talk 17:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, AmaryllisGardener! Maybe I'll do just that. It would be good to work there again. LadyofShalott 17:53, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
and speaking of grammar
which you do on your user page, what do you think about this from Frank's "official" web page?
- "Fleming is an artistic genius who’s love of nature.........."
- "Fleming is an artistic genius who’s love of nature.........."
it also says "his voice is authentic southern", so, is this an example of "authentic southern writing"? Or is it just me? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:06, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, ouch that hurts. No, that's not Southern; it's just wrong. LadyofShalott 21:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
UUCA, part deux
I don't think you saw my previous question because your page was archived after I commented. Do you think this looks ok to be nominated for GA? I'm worried since there isn't a photo of the current building. I e-mailed church staff and contacted two people on Flickr with photos of the building, but no response from any of them. APK whisper in my ear 10:47, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'd say go for it. The only other thing you might want to try first is to ask at WikiProject Virginia if someone can snag a photo for you. LadyofShalott 15:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- I tried that a few weeks ago. No luck so far. APK whisper in my ear 16:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Well shoot. Just try for the GA anyway then. LadyofShalott 21:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- I tried that a few weeks ago. No luck so far. APK whisper in my ear 16:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Funny redirect
Reading rainbow dude. --kelapstick(bainuu) 12:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Talk page stalker here. And one without a sense of humour this afternoon, it seems. Now at WP:RfD. --Dweller (talk) 13:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Was going to do that anyway Dweller, I just know the Lady is a Reading Rainbow aficionado :) I have another to go up there shortly.--kelapstick(bainuu) 13:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- :-) --Dweller (talk) 13:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Haha, thanks for the amusement! LadyofShalott 18:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nothing of the kind was done so far to WP:Great Dismal Swamp ;) - Do you know its maroons?--Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Haha, thanks for the amusement! LadyofShalott 18:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- :-) --Dweller (talk) 13:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Was going to do that anyway Dweller, I just know the Lady is a Reading Rainbow aficionado :) I have another to go up there shortly.--kelapstick(bainuu) 13:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- I see Reading Rainbow and think of the song. I thought the kickstarter campaign was going to create new shows? Darn. Bgwhite (talk) 19:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Georgia ArtAndFeminism Editathon, March 7
Not sure if you're already aware of this, if you like we can put you in touch with the event organizers there: Wikipedia:Meetup/Athens, Georgia/ArtAndFeminism 2015.--Pharos (talk) 05:37, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Pharos! LadyofShalott 16:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Awesome you can be a part of this! If you'd like me to put you in touch by email with the event organizers, you can contact me at Special:Email/Pharos.--Pharos (talk) 17:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
You have a barnstar!
The Chicken shit Barnstar | |
For improving Wikipedia by creating an article on an unusual but historically notable term. Your efforts have spawned the "stone soup" effect with your fellow editors, encouraging a cooperative environment. This epitomizes the true purpose of Wikipedia. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC) |
- LOL, thank you very much, Dennis! I appreciate both the star and the laugh! LadyofShalott 20:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- I was going to do the same, but didn't have the... creativity to come up with the wording. Excellent image selection Dennis. --kelapstick(bainuu) 20:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- The irony was simply too delicious to pass up, and while humourous, the intent was quite serious. I really appreciate you boldly improving the encyclopedia this way. It may sound silly, but I think having small articles on these terms is very important. It is the kind of odd ball term that someone might look up on Google, and now will find with sources and everything. A little more expanding with Mastcell's ideas and it will be a great little article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- And now it turns out that your little rescue of a minor redirect has spawned TWO articles. One of them at DYK. Amazing how quickly the chicken manure piles up. --MelanieN (talk) 19:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- I love it! Who knew a little stubbifying would result in so much. Collaboration is good! LadyofShalott 16:04, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- And now it turns out that your little rescue of a minor redirect has spawned TWO articles. One of them at DYK. Amazing how quickly the chicken manure piles up. --MelanieN (talk) 19:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- The irony was simply too delicious to pass up, and while humourous, the intent was quite serious. I really appreciate you boldly improving the encyclopedia this way. It may sound silly, but I think having small articles on these terms is very important. It is the kind of odd ball term that someone might look up on Google, and now will find with sources and everything. A little more expanding with Mastcell's ideas and it will be a great little article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- I was going to do the same, but didn't have the... creativity to come up with the wording. Excellent image selection Dennis. --kelapstick(bainuu) 20:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Presentation proposal for Wikimania 2015
How to pick up more women... | |
Hello to the members of WikiProject Women writers! Victuallers and I have developed a proposal for a talk to be presented at Wikimania 2015. It's titled, How to pick up more women -- as in more women editors and more women's biographies. The proposal review process has begun and there's no guarantee that this proposal will be accepted. That's where you come in. Please review our proposal and give us feedback. Ultimately, we hope you add your name to the signup at the bottom of the proposal which signifies you're interested in the talk (it does not signify you'll be attending the event). Thank you! Rosiestep (talk) 21:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC) |
DYK for Chicken manure
On 23 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chicken manure, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that of all manures, chicken manure has the highest nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium content? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chicken manure. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
decoration
Wiki-room
Hope you don't mind it arrived a bit late. Some Wiki-Luxury, a feminine room with everything to wish for for a real Lady. Hafspajen (talk) 10:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC).
- They are beautiful! LadyofShalott 17:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Edit-a-thon
Looks like it was a success, truthfully, I had my doubts. I thought a worldwide intentional increase of new users simultaneously would have been a complete gong show, I was pleasantly surprised to see it went off rather smoothly. Unfortunately I didn't get to attend my local one as I was out of town, maybe next time. --kelapstick(bainuu) 11:20, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Well hello there
recalling a "ping me anytime" comment a while back, I thought I'd post here. I was away for a good part of 2014 (other than fixing typo things as an IP), and want to get back into the flow of things. So anyway - I was going through one of my things and ran across this, so over the past month or so I've been plugging away at it a little at a time. It had been up for GA I think 3 times, but that's not where I'm headed. (I don't often venture into that stuff - although I did a few GA, DYK, FA kinda things back in the day). Geesh - why do I have such a hard time just saying what I want. I was wondering if you would have a look at Bonny Hicks and give me any feedback on what I've done and what you think might help me be a better editor. (I didn't remove the ce tags) Thank Lady. Cheers and best. — Ched : ? 15:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- I will check it out, Ched! LadyofShalott 16:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol. Legobot (talk) 00:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians whose talkpages are decorated by Hafspajen
Hallo LadyofShalot. I've changed the category of our friend to Category:Wikipedians whose talkpages are decorated by Hafspajen, to be used at the userpage, instead of the talkpage. The tags at the talkpages tend to get archived... Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for letting me know. LadyofShalott 16:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Notice
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. APK whisper in my ear 16:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oh noes! I can't edit the Wikipedia no more. Whoa is me! LadyofShalott 16:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for the PayPal payment of $100. Your block has been lifted. Happy editing! APK whisper in my ear 16:32, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Help Please
Hi, you have been useful many times before.
Yesterday I created a page on "Sir James Barr"... now relabelled as "James Barr (physician)" which is not a problem
however my references were tagged as "linkrot" by Masum Ibn Musa...not that I could see the problem but I have re-referenced as a hard copy equivalent.
But I cannot get rid of his linkrot tag as a Notification !? it keeps showing as if it is unread. Any advice/ fix??
Thanks --Stephencdickson (talk) 11:23, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sounds like you need to click on the notification itself. Click the little red number where it shows up. If you have indeed done that, then maybe try clearing your cache - maybe your computer just isn't reloading a clean copy of the page. LadyofShalott 16:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Clicking the red number is what I normally do... which normally then does not reappear... it is not computer/laptop linked as it is the same problem from my work computer or at home... I am bamboozled, have not seen this before... thank you for your adjustment to the article--Stephencdickson (talk) 18:37, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Strange, Stephen, I don't have any other ideas then. Maybe a techie tps does? Mandarax, Ironholds, anyone? LadyofShalott 16:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hmn; @Stephencdickson: is there a "mark as read" button? Ironholds (talk) 16:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- I've seen reports that clicking on Preferences clears it. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 16:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hmn; @Stephencdickson: is there a "mark as read" button? Ironholds (talk) 16:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The problem has gone... it lasted a few days--Stephencdickson (talk) 18:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
About the current definition of Geoethics
Dear LayofShalott, I have included a comment here with regards to the changes that you made about the definition of Geoethics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Geoethics I hope my explanation is considered and accepted. Please, I apologize for my unexperience editing wikipedia. Any assistance from you is welcome. Thank you! Jesús Martínez-Frías, President, IAGETH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.130.249.49 (talk) 20:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Oldest people
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oldest people. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject Intertranswiki
Hi. In 2009 you joined up for the wikiproject Wikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki. The project has since ceased activity but is currently being given a kick start due to its importance and the coordination needed to translate content from other wikipedias. If you're still active and are still interested please visit the bottom of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Intertranswiki and add a {{tick}} by your name within the next week so the project can do a recount and update. Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dittewal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujrat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Request
Hello, I would like to request that the deleted article for Jessica Humble be moved to my userspace so I can review. Thank you, Hmlarson (talk) 17:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- Done Hmlarson, see User:Hmlarson/Jessica Humble. LadyofShalott 16:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- @LadyofShalott: Thank you - much appreciated. Hmlarson (talk) 16:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Request for deleted content
Please could you post the old source information (or what there was of it) of File:Thucydides_Manuscript_Tenth_Century.jpg to my talk page? It's needed to support commons:File:Kappa-variant.png's source info. Thanks, User:GKFXtalk 10:42, 20 May 2015 (UTC).
- Is what you are looking for this website GKFX? That seems to be all there was for source information. --kelapstick(bainuu) 16:41, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks very much, that was what I was looking for. User:GKFXtalk 08:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for handling it, K! LadyofShalott 16:31, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks very much, that was what I was looking for. User:GKFXtalk 08:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Infobox basketball biography
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox basketball biography. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library needs you!
Did you know that Wikipedia has its own library? The Wikipedia Library is seeking volunteers from those in galleries, libraries, archives and museums.
- Become an account coordinator to distribute research accounts to editors
- Get involved in some of our special projects:
- Expand our Resources page with free resources for editors in all subject areas
- Help develop a template for citing archival collections
- Write guides to accessing and using library resources
Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on American Gods
I see you removed the section on Plot Holes. Just wondering if it's common practice in Wikipedia book articles to exclude that sort of content? If so, my apologies for the original edit and thank you for removing it. — Apgold (talk • contribs) 18:54, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Apgold, well, I can't say I've seen such a section before, but that doesn't mean there shouldn't be one. We commonly let plot sections go unreferenced, with the tacit understanding that the work is itself the reference. You could make the case that your section was merely an extension of that. I considered that, but deleted on the grounds that I thought you had strayed into WP:original research territory - that it was too much your original thought. A couple suggestions - seek other opinions of WP editors (I'm not certain enough of my position, and others may well have no problem with the section you added) and/or strengthen your section by citing secondary sources. So and so commented on this plot hole. Blah blah blah Then it would be much harder for anyone to dispute the section. LadyofShalott 02:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi LadyofShalott - thank you for the feedback. It is very helpful. You raise an interesting question on whether such a section should be included. Unfortunately I don't have a good evidence-based answer. When I first discovered the plot holes, I searched for others who might have commented on such holes, but couldn't find anything online. I did discover one person in my personal (offline) network who had read the book, and she commented that when she first read the book she didn't notice the holes, but after seeing what I had published on Wikipedia (before you removed it), she verified that the plot holes were indeed true holes. So, in this sense, while I couldn't find any online secondary sources, I do have at least one "external" validation. However, I can see your point of view regarding original research. In a sense, my logic was used to find plot holes in the novel. On the other hand, one might argue that the novel itself is the reference for which the plot holes are self-evident. For example, the section on Characters (e.g. Shadow, Laura, etc.) contains no secondary sources - rather the writer(s) of that section simply summarized from the novel. Likewise, my section on Plot Holes simply pointed out holes that are in the novel, independent of any opinion or research being required to document. I have very little experience editing pages on Wikipedia (mostly just minor edits of a grammatical nature), so I'm not sure how best to proceed. Is there a way to invite other folks to comment on this matter? Once again, I really appreciate your clarification and help. Apgold (talk) 02:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Apgold, I see someone else has removed the section, calling it trivia. At this point, yes, it would be best to seek additional discussion on all of this. You can do that by starting a section at Talk:American Gods. LadyofShalott 16:25, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi LadyofShalott - thank you for the feedback. It is very helpful. You raise an interesting question on whether such a section should be included. Unfortunately I don't have a good evidence-based answer. When I first discovered the plot holes, I searched for others who might have commented on such holes, but couldn't find anything online. I did discover one person in my personal (offline) network who had read the book, and she commented that when she first read the book she didn't notice the holes, but after seeing what I had published on Wikipedia (before you removed it), she verified that the plot holes were indeed true holes. So, in this sense, while I couldn't find any online secondary sources, I do have at least one "external" validation. However, I can see your point of view regarding original research. In a sense, my logic was used to find plot holes in the novel. On the other hand, one might argue that the novel itself is the reference for which the plot holes are self-evident. For example, the section on Characters (e.g. Shadow, Laura, etc.) contains no secondary sources - rather the writer(s) of that section simply summarized from the novel. Likewise, my section on Plot Holes simply pointed out holes that are in the novel, independent of any opinion or research being required to document. I have very little experience editing pages on Wikipedia (mostly just minor edits of a grammatical nature), so I'm not sure how best to proceed. Is there a way to invite other folks to comment on this matter? Once again, I really appreciate your clarification and help. Apgold (talk) 02:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Ooops
I am obviously editing whilst tired and distracted.
I was trying to create Thomas Burns (Scottish miniister) but have mis-titled it as Thomas Brown (Scottish minister)
I am not sure how to change titles... can you assist.
thank you --Stephencdickson (talk) 21:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Request
Hi LadyofShalott. When you have a chance, would it be possible for you to copy the deleted Christy Ohiaeriaku to my userspace? Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Double confirmations
Hi, Lady. It's been a while!
If you've done any rollbacks on a mobile device lately, you've probably noticed that you've had to do a double confirmation. That's because recently, a few years after I wrote my little script, the Powers That Be decided that it would be a Good Thing to provide that functionality for everybody. So a gadget was added and turned on by default. (It can be turned off in Preferences under Gadgets.) The gadget is a little fancier than my simple script, telling you who and how many edits you'll be rolling back. So I'd recommend that you remove importScript('User:Mandarax/ConfirmMobileRollback.js');
from User:LadyofShalott/monobook.js.
Kelapstick, this also applies to you. I think we three were the only insightful people using my script. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 21:56, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Mandarax, I have removed it. In reality I hadn't noticed, as I don't access my main account on mobile devices (I found it was too easy to mistakenly block/delete), and my sock account doesn't have rollback (I never had it until I became an admin, so I don't really miss it). I guess that someone figured your efforts were worth copying, and mimicry is the most sincere form of flattery. --kelapstick(bainuu) 22:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- I'm curious.... Are blocking and deleting one-click functions, or do they require confirmation? Of course, no matter how many clicks (touches) are required, strange things can happen with mobiles, such as when I accidentally fell asleep with one and mysteriously ended up with a new Facebook friend. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 23:28, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- They don't require confirmation as in "are you sure", but it does take you to a screen where you make your selections, and click block/delete/protect (depending on what you are doing). The easy block script is truly easy and could quickly go awry from a mobile (the new twinkle module operates in the same manner as garden variety warning does, so wouldn't be as much of a risk of accidental blocking). As you say, things can go pear-shaped in a hurry on a mobile, so I find it is best not to take the risk. --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:37, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info! MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 23:43, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- They don't require confirmation as in "are you sure", but it does take you to a screen where you make your selections, and click block/delete/protect (depending on what you are doing). The easy block script is truly easy and could quickly go awry from a mobile (the new twinkle module operates in the same manner as garden variety warning does, so wouldn't be as much of a risk of accidental blocking). As you say, things can go pear-shaped in a hurry on a mobile, so I find it is best not to take the risk. --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:37, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- I'm curious.... Are blocking and deleting one-click functions, or do they require confirmation? Of course, no matter how many clicks (touches) are required, strange things can happen with mobiles, such as when I accidentally fell asleep with one and mysteriously ended up with a new Facebook friend. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 23:28, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
- Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
- Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
- Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
- Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
- Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
- Research coordinators: run reference services
Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Guess what it's meowing? Happy birthday!
Drmies (talk) 15:48, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, Drmies!! LadyofShalott 16:35, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Finally (CeCe Peniston song)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Finally (CeCe Peniston song). Legobot (talk) 00:04, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
- What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
- When? June 2015
- How can you help?
- 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
- 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
- 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
list of guitarists with signature guitars
I'm on the fence about that list which I noted you have prod'ed. It wasn't clear to me that you understood what a signature model was though from the rationale you gave, perhaps just badly worded, but... It isn't a guitar that someone owns, basically it is about a manufacturer who decides to honour a particular artist, who would tend to be very well known, (or clever marketing ploy if you prefer) by working with them to produce a model to their exact specifications for approval by them (though I suspect in many cases not necessarily for playing by them). Once the model is approved it is then sold to others using that artists signature either as a strictly small limited edition custom made line, or as a more general issue model. The notability of each signature model could be objectively measured by the amount of independent reviews. Very famous examples would be models which copy Brian May's red guitar, or Carlos Santana's PRS model. There is quite likely to be a fair amount of detail written in the music press to discuss independently all the details of each design - ie what makes the Eric Clapton signature approved Stratocaster different from the standard Fender model, similarly the Johnny Marr Fender Jaguar. --ℕ ℱ 18:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- OK, that was not clear before. Someone else has deprodded and clarified some. Thanks, LadyofShalott 16:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Help Sought
Hi, I have always found your help very useful and constructive. Sadly this is not true of all members. I wonder if you can advise/help on the Wikimedia side. I appear to have just been blocked due to an unfounded claim of copyright breach on multiple uploads. Especially annoying are those where I travelled a great distance to get the image such as those previously illustrating the article Louise Giblin (sculptor). The images here have been deleted despite my explaining on each image that all photos were taken in the presence of the sculptor and with her express consent for their use on Wikimedia. The deletions also seem to misunderstand the UK rights to access publically owned art, which are quite different than USA (where collections are usually owned by a trust rather than legally the public themselves). In UK any publically owned artwork may even be called up from storage and imaged on demand (as long as the image causes no harm to the exhibit).
Can you offer any advice regarding restoring the lost images and my status as a Wikimedia user?? --Stephencdickson (talk) 16:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well, this is really out of my knowledge reach. It sounds like you are going to have to establish that what you say are the relevant laws, are such. (I'm not accusing you of being wrong; I just don't know.) I'm going to ping a few folks that I think might know more about it than I (and since I know essentially nothing about UK copyright and right of panorama laws, that won't hard). Mandarax, Ironholds, Drmies, (and any TPS...), can any of you help Stephencdickson? LadyofShalott 16:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- First, Stephencdickson, you are not now, nor have you ever been blocked on Commons. If you appear to be blocked, you may be caught up in an IP range block, in which case you should see the Commons IP block exemption page.I don't know much about image copyrights and such. Maybe Materialscientist, who's knowledgeable and is an admin on Commons, can be of assistance. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 02:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Category talk:Out of copyright in 2013
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:Out of copyright in 2013. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Precious again
People that don't fit into any categories
Thank you, Lady who knows some Scots and enjoys singing, for random observations and thoughts based on wisdom such as "Never doubt The MANdARAX", for quality articles such as Mildred Lewis Rutherford, Camak House and "people that don't fit into any categories", for improving a Lady of early learning, for missing and Memoriam, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (10 April 2010)!
A year ago, you were the 960th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- And thank you, again, Gerda Arendt! I hope you know how precious you are. LadyofShalott 16:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Someone, and I mean you, should really read this book and improve the article. I think this is where I first learned about vibrators. Let's see if Google Books confirms. Drmies (talk) 17:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Drmies, Is "red thread" a literary term? LadyofShalott 23:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- If it's not, it should be. What do you think? Or are you just completely in looooooooove with those cotton bats, or whatever those fuzzy critters were? Drmies (talk) 23:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Cotton-ball bat. Adorable. Drmies (talk) 23:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Heh, let me do some digging. Yes, they are adorable! LadyofShalott 23:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I admit, I was guessing. (BTW, one of my mom's friends just died of cancer--though technically he died of assisted suicide, I suppose. If I get as much as he did, I got 22 more years.) And you probably guessed correctly that "long" is the Dutch word for "lung"... Drmies (talk) 23:11, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- I never said how sorry I am about your friend. LadyofShalott 13:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Eliot Higgins
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eliot Higgins. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
User:Trust Is All You Need - +3RR
Could you look at User:Trust Is All You Need, please? He or she has already broken the 3RR rule. I'd like if that could be controlled. Thanks! Urgup-tur (talk) 23:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, Both of us have broken the 3RR... If you look at the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union it is clear that Urgup-tur is breaching WP:CONSENSUS by forcing upon controversial change on the article without being willing to discuss it with the community. In any case, I've breached the 3RR rule and I'm sorry, but its impossible not to when users like these are trying to force disruptive changes upon the encyclopaedia (and in practice opposing any form of discussions).. Sorry, but get him to discuss, and this will all come to an end. A block of both of us would not be unreasonable, but would not solve anything at this point, would it? ... and per WP rules, if an edit war breaks out the original version, before the edit war took place, should be reinistated (the one I have been reverting back too). --TIAYN (talk) 23:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- And if you block me, I hope you can take it into account that I'm currently nominating Central Committee elected by the 16th Congress of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) for FL status. --TIAYN (talk) 00:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- By the time I saw your messages, Floquenbeam had dealt with the issue. LadyofShalott 19:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Help out a librarian
Dear Lady, Velaga Venkatappaiah was apparently a librarian and his grandson (that's what he said during a deletion discussion on Commons) has written the article, but I can't seem to make much sense of the article to figure out what's what. There's a lot of stuff in the article that I find a bit much, especially since Madras Public Libraries Act (pushed by S. R. Ranganathan) and the gold-standard for the library system in India was enacted way before anything mentioned in this article. Could you please take a look and see if it's something to be improved or a matter for AfD? cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 19:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'll check it out. LadyofShalott 13:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- SpacemanSpiff, I am concerned with the pdf ebooks, but I can't read the relevant information. Are those pdfs legal, or are they illegally reproduced copyright infringements? LadyofShalott 16:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'd be very wary. The ed had a huge set of copyvios on Commons and doesn't seem to understand that part of policy or even just non-Wikipedia procedure. In this particular case as he's claiming to be an heir or something I'm not sure how to deal with it, but if that weren't the case I'd have just removed it all. The main issue I had was all these library classification rules and stuff like that as well as the Library Association activity -- not sure that contributes to notability or worth coverage. Thanks for looking at it though, I couldn't really figure out any part of it. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 03:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm not yet convinced one way or another. I'm still working on deciphering it before taking further action. It is gradual. I think I will take out the pdf links unless/until it can be shown they are acceptable. LadyofShalott 19:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- And Jac(#s) had already done so. Good. LadyofShalott 19:35, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- I've removed a little bit of stuff, so it might make it easier to figure things out now. I had to remove the google drive links again. —SpacemanSpiff 17:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- And Jac(#s) had already done so. Good. LadyofShalott 19:35, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm not yet convinced one way or another. I'm still working on deciphering it before taking further action. It is gradual. I think I will take out the pdf links unless/until it can be shown they are acceptable. LadyofShalott 19:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'd be very wary. The ed had a huge set of copyvios on Commons and doesn't seem to understand that part of policy or even just non-Wikipedia procedure. In this particular case as he's claiming to be an heir or something I'm not sure how to deal with it, but if that weren't the case I'd have just removed it all. The main issue I had was all these library classification rules and stuff like that as well as the Library Association activity -- not sure that contributes to notability or worth coverage. Thanks for looking at it though, I couldn't really figure out any part of it. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 03:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- SpacemanSpiff, I am concerned with the pdf ebooks, but I can't read the relevant information. Are those pdfs legal, or are they illegally reproduced copyright infringements? LadyofShalott 16:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Re: Your article Velaga Venkatappaiah
Thanks for your message, but I'm a bit puzzled. The linked article that I started was most definitely in English - it would be a Biblical miracle were it in any other language, since beyond some schoolboy French and a few words of Welsh. I know no other. The article was started in response to an enquiry on the Humanities Reference Desk by one of the subject's relatives. Alansplodge (talk) 09:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- Alanslodge, see a couple of sections above (Help out a librarian), I'd alerted the Lady to the article as it had morphed into something incomprehensible. There was some Telugu added by the subject's grandson, but I think the notification automatically goes to the creator. cheers.—SpacemanSpiff 17:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, and I did add to the translation request the fact that most of the article was in English. I don't know if that made it to the notification you were sent. LadyofShalott 17:06, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Velaga Venkatappaiah
You are invited to join the discussion at Velaga Venkatappaiah. Participate in AfD Discussion Thanks. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 15:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Velaga Venkatappaiah
You are invited to join the discussion at Velaga Venkatappaiah. Participate in AfD Discussion Thanks. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 15:36, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
request
Hi LadyofShalott, Can you please copy deleted Monique Iannella article to my userspace for review + improvement? Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 05:54, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Political correctness
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political correctness. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Fa La La (album)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fa La La (album). Legobot (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Séralini affair
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Séralini affair. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Best wishes for the holidays...
Season's Greetings !!!! | ||
Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year!! Hafspajen (talk) 09:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC) |
Wikiclaus' cheer !
Wikiclaus greetings | ||
|
Invitation to a virtual editathon on Women in Music
Women in Music | |
---|---|
|
|
--Ipigott (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- On that note, Lady, apparently we're doing an edit race related to African women. Can you maybe do your cat magic on Vera Songwe? Thanks! Drmies (talk) 17:06, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- They sold your hospital! Maybe you can help this article a little. Ty Cobb Healthcare System. Drmies (talk) 17:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- We probably need a write-up on St. Mary's Health Care... but, not by me. LadyofShalott 23:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Malheur incident
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Malheur incident. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Afrocandy
Hello, the page Afrocandy does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. She's not notable in anyway whatsoever, have a look for yourself. I put a speedy deletion tag and it was removed by the user Oshwah many times and now he's saying something very strange that a person doesn't have to be proven notable to be on Wikipedia, please see his comments on my talk page. I'm bringing this to the attention of an admin because this page needs to be deleted. The sources quoted are blogs and she has made no impact on the Nigerian music industry, has won no awards and is not known even in Nigeria. Do your own research please and see for yourself, all she has are small mentions. Please advise. Thanks PaulAshford (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, PaulAshford, Well, speedy deletion would have to be based on no claim of notability. I have not looked in depth yet, but I think the references listed could be enough to at least constitute such a claim. That does not mean she is notable enough for the article to stay, just that it would be ineligible for speedy deletion on those grounds. My suggestion is that if you still think that she does not satisfy WP:N, that you nominate the article for deletion through AfD. LadyofShalott 21:39, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Having read through the entire article now, I can say it is definitely not eligible for speedy deletion on the basis of no claim of notability (criterion A7). It says she is a founder and CEO of a company, and that she has had a major film role. Either one of those alone would invalidate such a speedy deletion. LadyofShalott 21:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Are you blind???
Pardon me but I didn't remove anyone else's comments just mine you nitwit.--Doug511 (talk) 16:54, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- I saw removal of at least two replies to you from two other people. LadyofShalott 16:57, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- So what. I started that thread to begin with. And yes I can count. No wonder wikipedia is such a freakin joke--Doug511 (talk) 17:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Female seminaries
I still feel that "History of education" is far too general a category for this page. Can we find or create a more specialized place to put it, like say a new cat for "History of women's education"?--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 20:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, Bellerophon5685. Well, with your comments in mind, I started looking at the History of Education category. It has as a subcat, Gender and education, which is the parent of Women and education... making it a great grand-cat of Category:Female seminaries in the US. So, I just removed it altogether. LadyofShalott 22:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Athletics at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Women's 1500 metres
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Athletics at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Women's 1500 metres. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Shhh! Invitation to Women in Espionage
| |
---|---|
Women in Espionage worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Noctuam Society
I saw you had a comment about the possible notability of this group on the AfD discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noctuam Society. Reviewing the comments from one of the SPA's, am I reading too much into this, or are they admittedly creating multiple accounts to prove a point? I try to assume good faith every chance I get, but this is looking like either being pointy, or someone is trying to troll. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:08, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- No, I do not believe you are reading too much into it. That is exactly what that person said. If they actually follow through on it, all their accounts will be blocked for sockpuppetry. LadyofShalott 19:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- THey kind of did, seeing as they admitted that the other accounts were there to prove a point. Thanks, wanted to make sure I wasn't reading too much into that. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Photography
| |
---|---|
Women in Photography
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 12:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Women artists of Middle East / North Africa... a WiR & Guggenheim collaboration
| |
---|---|
Women artists of Middle East / North Africa
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
--violetnese 15:56, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Would you like to say something to me that makes sense? LadyofShalott 20:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
FYI to any interested, see: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 May 5#Category:Falsettos. LadyofShalott 20:56, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Erroneous redirection
Hi. I reverted this edit, which appears to have been in error. FYI. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Paul 012, OK, I can accept that, but then they need better disambiguation than just an accent mark. (I'm wondering if that is truly a distinction at all. Should they both be spelled with that accept mark?) LadyofShalott 14:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thai is a tonal language; completely different words may differ only by tone. The subjects of the articles don't appear to be discussed much in the English-language media, so I'm not sure what other disambiguation would be appropriate. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:14, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- It might be useful to put the time periods for each? I'll leave this alone now. LadyofShalott 15:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thai is a tonal language; completely different words may differ only by tone. The subjects of the articles don't appear to be discussed much in the English-language media, so I'm not sure what other disambiguation would be appropriate. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:14, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Thre's a category on that userpage which caught my eye; I wonder if it's really necessary, or useful? Cheers. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 10:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hmmm... Straight Wikipedians? Probably not, but I'm not going to go after people for self identification on their userpages. If there were evidence that he is using that to bully others in some way, that would be a different matter. LadyofShalott 19:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Spotlight on women entertainers!
| |
---|---|
Women in Entertainment worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 02:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Parameter changed
You may have noticed that two of your userpages are presently in Category:Fix. This is because that category is used temporarily to track deprecated usage of a certain parameter.
On User:LadyofShalott please replace the 2 instances of "icon_nr" by "sortkey", and your pages will disappear from that tracking category and template usage will be optimized. Debresser (talk) 11:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Pride 2016
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
- Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
- Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
- Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)
Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.
This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Celebrating Pride @ Women in Red
| |
---|---|
LGBTQ worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
Delivered by Rosiestep (talk) 04:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage. (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Welcome to the Hall of Fame!
| |
---|---|
Women in Halls of Fame worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Please comment on Talk:Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)