September 2023

edit
LP44LP (talk) 01:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Bbb23 LP44LP (talk) 01:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
LP44LP (talk) 12:55, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LP44LP (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My block is incorrect because I have no link to any of the other people mentioned. If reviewed, you will find that all my edits to date have been positive, factual and properly cited and I have not had any conflict with anybody. My intention was to carry on raising accuracy standards on wikipedia by identifying promotion and non-factual claims and countering them with solid verifiable citations. I have been prevented from doing so despite only making positive contributions. If unblocked, I intend to avoid all conflict and focus on improving wikipedia as a whole. Thank you LP44LP (talk) 14:46, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:46, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LP44LP (talk) 14:46, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Jb09012 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jb09012. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
--Blablubbs (talk) 15:38, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply