March 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Moshe Reuven Azman have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

hello, I'm a person who is knows Rabbi Asman, and knows the more accurate information Kyiv Jew (talk) 20:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I don't know who you are or what's up with this power struggle between two Jews claiming to be the chief rabbi of Ukraine, but mainstream sources say it's Azman, so stop changing that (if there are two chief rabbis, you can add that). In wikipedia we go only by what reliable sources say: https://www.timesofisrael.com/ukraine-chief-rabbi-says-spy-devices-found-at-kiev-synagogue/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aarika Epps (talkcontribs) 17:38, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm not changing anything about him being the rabbi of Ukraine, I'm adding information about him, like his comments on January 6, etc Kyiv Jew (talk) 17:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Moshe Reuven Azman. Thank you. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 13:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

the information that I'm adding (January 6) is fully referenced. pleas provide the information that says Oderwise before changing it. Kyiv Jew (talk) 13:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
You are removing sourced content that says he's the Chief Rabbi of Ukraine Source. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 13:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello Kyiv Jew! Your additions to Public menorah have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:57, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm 1AmNobody24. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Moshe Reuven Azman, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! 1AmNobody24 (talk) 23:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

hello 1AmNobody24. I saw it in the Hebrew, Russian and Ukranian version of Moshe Reuven Azman page (with no citation), so I thought its important to have it, even without citation.
Thank you, Kyiv Jew Kyiv Jew (talk) 07:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Different Wikipedias have different policys. On the English Wikipedia WP:Verifiability, WP:Reliable sources and WP:BLPRS (part of WP:BLP) apply in this case.
WP:Verifiability says: Even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it.
WP:Reliable sources and WP:BLPRS say: contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion.
1AmNobody24 (talk) 09:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your feedback Kyiv Jew (talk) 20:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I rolled back one of your edits edit

Re [1], please read WP:NPOV. Wikipedia does not have opinions. If you cannot edit neutrally on this topic, it may be better to find another that suits you better. --Dweller (talk) Old fashioned is the new thing! 15:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Moshe Reuven Azman. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kyiv Jew (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello. please check that the information that I wrote vas written by me! not by anybody else.

Thank you, Kyiv jew

Decline reason:

What is the relationship between you and User:Zach own? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kyiv Jew (talk) 16:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

June 2023 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Moshe Reuven Azman, you may be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 19:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

this is NOT my opinion, Ukraine has separation of religion and state as you can see hear! [1] so please do not change anything that you just dont like! Kyiv Jew (talk) 02:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ Ukraine 2014 FINAL.pdf (strasbourgconsortium.org)