Welcome! edit

Hello, Kumar Rishi Ranjan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 21:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Kumar Rishi Ranjan, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Kumar Rishi Ranjan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kudumi Mahato. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

Peaceray (talk) 21:05, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kudumi Mahato. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. I have requested that you explain your edits on the talk page as WP:BRD suggests. You are also failing to leave any edit summaries. Peaceray (talk) 21:18, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:41, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kurmali language. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Sumanuil (talk) 22:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Kudmali edit

In the name of Wikipedia people use this platform as tool to spread fake, unauthentic information without knowing it's impact in the particular situation. Kumar Rishi Ranjan (talk) 22:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Citations talk, original research walks ... Peaceray (talk) 05:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Kudmali is a Aboriginal language speak by the Aboriginal community Kudmi. H. H Risley|G. A Garrison| contrast the Language and community. Because of multiple partition of Bengal| the geographical area divided in Bengal, orrisa, Bihar, Jharkhand and chattisgarh. The face of industrialization in india force to migrate Assam tea garden. Kumar Rishi Ranjan (talk) 05:49, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please present your citations for your attestations on the article talk page. Please read & digest Help:Referencing for beginners, Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia:Verifiability, & Wikipedia:Reliable sources.
You may also wish to look at Wikipedia:Original research to learn why you are currently getting no traction. Peaceray (talk) 06:08, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate your suggestion but i would like to know what is the name of First book who introduced Kudmali! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumar Rishi Ranjan (talkcontribs) 05:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I am unsure what you mean by that, but if you are looking for books on Kudmali, I would suggest starting with "Results for 'su:Kudmali' [WorldCat.org]". WorldCat.. You might be able to find these books in a library near you. Peaceray (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
I would also take a look at "search results for Kudmali (About 24 results)". Google Scholar. Peaceray (talk) 18:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Citation for Kudmali language as follow [[1]][[From the journal Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics

https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2021-2028]]. The Kudmali language represent the kudmi community and available data in wiki shows only in Five blocks of Panchparganiya.How it is possible a community have more then four Mother tounge?

Kudmali/Kuṛmali it the correct alphabet combination to write a sound कुड़मालि.

Whole reagion known as Bengal before 1905AD But after that Bengal divided in West and East bangal.second partition of West Bengal in 1912 ,formation of Bihar.Third odisa in 1938 and Fourth in 2000 Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh.The problem is you are promoting only five pargana in 24 parganas.In united Bengal the number of total parganas was 24.

Kudmi community is the major population of India.Kudmi share belt of more then five states as follow- Jharkhand ,Bengal,odisa ,Chhattisgarh,Assam,and one foreign country Bengladesh and you are trying to Isolate Kudmali in Particular Panchpargani area! Because of your misleading a community facing Racial Problems in the country. One thing keep in your mind KURMI And KUṚMI/KUDMI are belong to different Racial groups. I am clear with my knowledge,if you have any doubt please mail in my Inbox. (User talk:Kumar Rishi Ranjan talk)

These discussion should take place on the Talk:Kudumi Mahato & Talk:Kurmali language pages where editors who are more knowledgeable about the topics can comment. I, myself, am one who seeks to see that articles embody English Wikipedia's verification & no original research policies.
I would advise that you read up on the talk page guidelines if you wish to converse effectively on talk pages. Peaceray (talk) 23:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I want to clear your doubt about Kudmali. Kumar Rishi Ranjan (talk) 02:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Again, it would be best to discuss that at Talk:Kurmali language. Verfication from reliable sources is the best way to clear doubt. Peaceray (talk) 03:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Share your reliable source name because your reliable source important than Lingustic survey of India, Authentic lingustic personality, Kudmali speakers! Kumar Rishi Ranjan (talk) 03:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If the Linguistic Survey of India & "How one language became four: the impact of different contact-scenarios between “Sadani” and the tribal languages of Jharkhand" are your sources, then you should be citing them in your discussions at Talk:Kurmali language & edits that you make to Kurmali language.
You can find instructions at Wikipedia:Citing sources.
For instance, to cite the Linguistic survey of India on its Kurmäli content, you might use this wikitext
  • {{cite book |last=Grierson |first=George Abraham |author-link=George Abraham Grierson |chapter=Kurmäli; of Manbhum |chapter-url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/coo.31924071945434?urlappend=%3Bseq=183%3Bownerid=13510798903074483-189 |volume=V. V, Part II |title=Linguistic survey of India |publisher=Office of the Superintendent of government printing, India |year=1903 |oclc=880762704 |url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/coo.31924071945434 |pages=151–158}}
which would produce:
Similarly:
  • {{cite journal |last=Paudyal |first=Netra P. |last2=Peterson |first2=John |title=How one language became four: the impact of different contact-scenarios between “Sadani” and the tribal languages of Jharkhand |journal=Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics |publisher=Walter de Gruyter GmbH |volume=7 |issue=2 |date=2020-09-01 |issn=2196-0771 |doi=10.1515/jsall-2021-2028 |pages=275–306}}
would produce:
  • Paudyal, Netra P.; Peterson, John (2020-09-01). "How one language became four: the impact of different contact-scenarios between "Sadani" and the tribal languages of Jharkhand". Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics. 7 (2). Walter de Gruyter GmbH: 275–306. doi:10.1515/jsall-2021-2028. ISSN 2196-0771.
To this end, you might find https://citer.toolforge.org & Wikipedia:Citation templates useful. Peaceray (talk) 04:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If any doubt clear here, i could not want any war in edit history. Kumar Rishi Ranjan (talk) 04:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have no desire for an edit war either. I just ask that editors adhere to the verification & reliable sources policies. Peaceray (talk) 05:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply