User talk:Krj373/Pg10

Do Not Post Here this is an archived page

Please post any & all messages on my main page located

Here

This is the Talk page for both Krj373 & Krj373-NR. If you wish to leave a message for either user please post it here.

Talk Pages

Current Page

• User_talk:Krj373

Oldest ➠ youngest

• PG1
• PG2
• PG3
• PG4
• PG5
• PG6
• PG7
• PG8
• PG9
• PG10

Purge link

This is a link for the page you are currently on. There is no reason to click it unless something looks out of date. An example would be if I did some archiving and the list of pervious pages is not yet updated on the current page.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Krj373. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Roman Catholic vs Catholic

I think that the term Catholic Church is preferred at Wikipedia. You can see how the rest of the articles are named. I don't consider it a big issue though, just for the sake of uniformity. Also, I dislike the redirects. :) --Governor Sheng (talk) 18:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

I personally have a issue with changing the Popes pages as not all Catholic Churches consider the pope the pope. They will argue that he is the bishop of Rome and that's all. The interweaving of the churches are interesting. However it is my opinion that this case they links should be specific. Especially do to the differences in associations depending on the time period. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 18:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

That is true. However, I'm more inclined to go by the common name. Though the Eastern Orthodox churches (and by this I include Oriental Orthodox churches) consider themselves to be catholic i. e. universal, so does the Catholic Church consider itself to be orthodox i. e. truthful in doctrine. Nevertheless, it is common to denote the Church of the West (or Western/Roman Patriarchate, per the Eastern Orthodox terminology) as the Catholic Church, while the churches of the East are referred to as Orthodox churches (as opposed to schismatic, which was a common term of Catholic theologians for the Eastern churches). Even many pages that previously did use the term Roman Catholic, now use the term Catholic Church. For example: Modernism in the Catholic Church, Homosexuality and the Catholic Church, Mariology of the Catholic Church, and even the Catholic Church article itself. --Governor Sheng (talk) 19:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. Its not a hill I want to die on. You have thought it though and can justify it. I just seen that you were changing a quite a few articles and wondered why. You have answered the question. Thanks Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 19:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Select Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: https://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_9Lb8b8PTksSjGlv&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 17:01, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Krj373. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)