User talk:Krayon95/Archive 1

April 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Dingal, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 19:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your edit to Dingal has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isardas has been accepted

Isardas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:48, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Bhāts

Hello, Krayon95. I will begin by thanking you for posting sourced comments on Talk:Bhāts. I just request a time of one day from you. Tomorrow, I will specially dedicate a few hours in the evening or night to go through - in detail - the sources provided by you and probably a few others. Yes, it does appears that a little bit of change may be required in the article. Just one day! Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 04:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

I will work on this in just a few hours. Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 13:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

I have posted comments at Talk:Bhāts. But please can I request that you wait for one more day before replying at Talk:Bhāts? Actually, I will provide modern scholarly sources who says that the Charas not only worked as poets/eulogists but also as genealogists. However, it appears that only the eulogist Charans were part of the elite squad. It will all get too complicated if I try to explain it all here. Kindly wait for one more day and when I would have provided a much broader picture at Talk:Bhāts with scholarly sources, then things would be discussed more smoothly. Please be a dear and give me another 12–18 hours. Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

There's a lot to write. I can write books responding to what you have said here and at talk page of Bhats. Personally, I am much familiar with communities of Rajasthan and Gujarat. Charans never did function as genealogists. One mistake repeated again and again doesn't make it true. I will write more when I have time. Krayon95 (talk) 17:09, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello. It appears that you couldn't wait for another 12–18 hours. But it's OK Seems you are really passionate about the subject. No problem! I will reply to you within the next few hours. Anyways, I am very thankful to you for the discussion. Certainly, when we would be done, there would be multiple changes in the article and it would be improved. Please keep the participation on and please bear with my slow replies. And, please wait for my reply before posting your next comments at the Talk:Bhāts. I won't take too much time. Bear hugs, Мастер Шторм (talk) 02:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Krayon95. I have replied to you at Talk:Bhāts. Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 12:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Priyadarshan Singh Lakhawat moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Priyadarshan Singh Lakhawat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 07:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Priyadarshan Singh Lakhawat has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Priyadarshan Singh Lakhawat. Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 07:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyadarshan Singh Lakhawat (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Priyadarshan Singh Lakhawat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Priyadarshan Singh Lakhawat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 22:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

hi, i don't understand how its promotional. from my view, its just bare data in the article. now I tried to rewrite it so it doesn't seem like a "resume" as perviously complained. if you could point out the lines or words I need to change, i can try again.

about the awards: the first two are given by Govt of India itself, they are considered prestigious in hospitality sector. you can see this: the awards are conferred directly by the Union Minister

thank you. Krayon95 (talk) 23:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Community sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RegentsPark (comment) 00:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Charan

Hi. A quick note to remind you that Raj era sources are considered not reliable for Indian social group articles. I see you've just added one on Charan. Best. --RegentsPark (comment) 13:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, RegentsPark. Have replaced it. Thanks.Krayon95 (talk) 14:58, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

RegentsPark has already informed you about the discretionary sanctions. You have been pushing your POV to promote the caste which is known to one and all, since you have yourself pinged admins & senior editors for the same. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked as per our policies. If you have concerns, you can discuss on the article talk page. Ekdalian (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Ekdalian RegentsPark. I really am waiting for a proper discussion on the subject, but no one's willing to start or if you could just point out which term you have issues with or are concerned about. And I have tried to keep the content unbiased.

Now, in the previous edit in the introduction: 'Charans have been buffalo herders, pastoralists, bards...'. Here, I had already included the term 'pastoralists'. Then, adding the phrase "Charans have been buffalo herders" becomes redundant, which is why I reverted. Furthermore, the source used for Charans as 'buffalo herders' only refer to the Saurashtra region, particularly Gir, Barda, and Alech areas around Junagadh. You yourself can comprehend if you had read the book or some portions of it that the author's subject location is the Kathiawar region of Gujarat. Above stated Source: Transaction and Hierarchy Elements for a Theory of Caste By Harald Tambs-Lyche ·2017 (https://books.google.com/books?id=AOsrDwAAQBAJ)

Not only that, pastoralist Charans were not limited to buffaloes either, but cows, camels, and horses were also part of their lifestyle. This is another reason, the term 'pastoralist' better suffices and it is prominently included in the introduction. And honestly, it did seem like a POV pushing on your part.

Again Ekdalian, I would request you to please discuss these issues and not just remove content because, in my view, I am trying my best present unbiased content. ps: you wrote in edit summary:"clearly here to promote Charan caste". I am not here for that. Thanks.Krayon95 (talk) 13:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Ekdalian. Again, I would start by saying that it would be better if we have a proper discussion. Now after the above comments, you have changed the introduction to " Historically, Charans have been pastoralists, bards, poets and even jagirdars and warriors; they also specialised in diverse occupations like literateurs, agriculturalists and traders."

along with edit summary: "Removed the specific profession as requested by Krayon95 on their talk page"

First, I did not ask or "requested" you to do that.

It is Charans being poets & historians that they are most prominently known as, secondary to being a fighting group(soldiers or warriors) or their feudal heritage. So, I am requesting you now to please reinstate the earlier introduction: "Historically, Charans were poets & literateurs, as well as warriors and jagirdars. They specialised in diverse occupations as historians, literateurs, soldiers, pastoralists, agriculturalists, traders, and merchants."

It is a better description in every way. The 'pastoralists' part you seem very fond of is an integral part of Charan identity, but if you must know, it is the least numerous Charan sub-group, which hardly number more than a thousand persons who live around the Gir mountains/forests of Gujarat. So, please revert to my last edit version. And for the n-th time, please discuss such issues. Thanks. Krayon95 (talk) 14:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey, all edits here must be supported by reliable & verififiable sources. According to the sources, historically (in the past), the Charans have been buffalo herders/pastoralists, bards, poets and even jagirdars & warriors; that's the reason I have mentioned the same. It's not about your opinion about the numbers associated with these professions, but all about what reliable sources say. Your version of the lead amounts to WP:UNDUE. None of the sources (except one, which clearly indicates "bards") mention them as historians. Ekdalian (talk) 14:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey Ekdalian. Your version placing pastoralists prominently in the first part also lead to same the WP:UNDUE. Charans are most prominently known as poets, do you have any doubt over this statement? Have you read any of the multiple sources already existing on this page? Did you scroll down to the section which says that a whole genre of literature is called "Charan literature"?

Let's remove the term 'historians' for a while(will provide more sources later). The first part about poets, literatures, warriors, jagirdars is for what they were known for and their status. The second part lists their prominent occupations: soldiers, pastoralists, agriculturalists, traders, and merchants.

"Historically, Charans were poets & literateurs, as well as warriors and jagirdars. They specialised in diverse occupations as literateurs, soldiers, pastoralists, agriculturalists, traders, and merchants."

Now, it shouldn't have any problem.Krayon95 (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

What's the problem with 'pastoralists' when multiple sources mention about the same? One source says, "Charans are affiliated, by their past history as buffalo herders, to the pastoralist estate. Some Charans, indeed, still herd buffaloes", while another says "In the past some Charans were agriculturalists, engaged in farming lands which were divided equally between male descendants of the lineage. Others were cowherds and caravan escorts...." Ekdalian (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey, Ekdalian. What do you mean multiple sources mention the same? I can provide a lot more sources for each of the terms? This is why the earlier wording is better. As Charans were involved in a diverse set of occupations, it is natural that some will be prominent and others comparatively less so.Krayon95 (talk) 15:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Ekdalian. I have added an additional source with citation as it would help better explain & reworded the introduction part to:

"Historically, Charans have been poets & literateurs, as well as warriors and jagirdars. They specialised in diverse occupations as literateurs, soldiers, pastoralists, agriculturalists, traders, and merchants."

Again stressing that the two sentences be kept separate: "poets & literateurs, as well as warriors and jagirdars" in the first part

and the expanded set of occupations in the next part: "literateurs, soldiers, pastoralists, agriculturalists, traders, and merchants." Krayon95 (talk) 16:39, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Ekdalian. Please reply to the above comments. As I have explained before with reasons, the preferred introduction is like this:

"Historically, Charans were poets & literateurs, as well as warriors and jagirdars. They specialised in diverse occupations as literateurs, soldiers, pastoralists, agriculturalists, traders, and merchants."

Your latest edit is this:

"Historically, Charans have been engaged in diverse occupations like bards, poets, literateurs, pastoralists, agriculturalists and also jagirdars and warriors and some even as traders."

Again, the most prominent occupations which Charans are known for are Poets(court poets+historians+literateurs) & warriors(as soldiers in Rajput & Mughal armies + many appellations like poet-warriors/warrior-poets/bardic-warriors). This is why in the preferred sentence structure, poets(+literateurs) & warriors are first mentioned. Then in the 2nd part expanded set of occupations which include soldiers, agriculturalists, pastoralists, traders, merchants are mentioned.

I believe this should be the sentence structure. The additional source I provided which states:

"Although, in a way, poetic composition and recitation was for them a “pastime” subordinate to the primary income producing occupations of military service, agriculture, and horse and cattle trading"

Through this citation, I wanted to provide you with an example that even though a significant portion of Charans were poets, a significant section also worked as soldiers(military service), agriculture, and traders(horse+cattle trade + commodity trade).

This I believed would support the order & sentence structure in which occupations are mentioned.

Now, I do not know what was supposed to be my POV that wasn't supported by this new source? Please enlighten me. Thanks for continuing the discussion.Krayon95 (talk) 19:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Indic Script

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Thakur Kesari Singh Barhath, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you for correcting this. Krayon95 (talk) 11:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Welcome . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I was just trying to reinstate the images i accidently deleted. forgot about indic script names. Krayon95 (talk) 17:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Subhash Charan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Subhash Charan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Subhash Charan (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Subhash Charan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Subhash Charan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:37, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Subhash Charan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Subhash Charan. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hemu Gadhavi

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as High quality-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Miketurna (talk) 14:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

@Miketurna ??? please explain. Krayon95 (talk) 14:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

A one day old editor who seems to have an unusual line in vandalism, I think 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:35, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

yes. very strange thing to do. Krayon95 (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

It was a Sockpuppet who seems to do stuff like that. Wikipedia introduces us all to the most unusual people. They are blocked now. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Aam Aadmi Party, Gujarat, but you didn't provide a reliable source that mentioned the stuff it was cited for - see Talk:Aam Aadmi Party, Gujarat#Isudan Gadhvi. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a relevant citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:37, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

thanks. have added it back with a proper citation. Krayon95 (talk) 06:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Administrative.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:47, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyadarshan Singh Lakhawat (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Priyadarshan Singh Lakhawat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Priyadarshan Singh Lakhawat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 03:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Krayon95! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 03:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Natrayat Charans moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Natrayat Charans, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

User:Timtrent Hey, this is not a large social group, so there are not much studies on it. This is a distinct caste is cleared by sources. It should be enough. You can find similar articles for smaller castes. Krayon95 (talk) 21:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Jagadu

Your recent edits to Jagadu has been reverted by me. It seems that 15th century Jagadu from Chittor is a different person from 13th century Jagadu from Kutch. Chittor Jagadu was Maheshwari Jain while Kutch Jagadu was Shrimali Jain. Please create separate article for him. Bhagwati Shri Karniji Maharaj: A Biography may not qualify as WP:HISTRS. Please checkout guideleines. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Ratnu

It's never standard or acceptable process at all. I suppose you might have gotten away with it in the past because it wasn't noticed that you did that -- but when AFC reviewers look at Category:Pending AfC submissions, we must never, ever, ever see any page in there that is already in articlespace but still has an AFC submission template on it.

If you don't want to have to wait for AFC review, you might want to consider using your own user sandbox space instead of draftspace -- draftspace is meant for new users who need guidance and direction in how to create new articles, not experienced users who generally have some idea of what they're doing. You should have a "sandbox" link right after the link to your user talk page in the top menu, so try that out -- but if you really insist on using draftspace, then the number one absolutely inviolable rule of draftspace is that I must never under any circumstances see any pages that are already in mainspace but still sitting in Category:Pending AfC submissions because they still have AFC templates on them. Bearcat (talk) 01:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Okay. I did not know that. Thank you. Should I move the draft to mainspace now? Krayon95 (talk) 02:21, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Charan, you may be blocked from editing. Please initiate talk page discussion before adding such contentious content; edit warring may lead to block, topic ban, etc. especially since you have been trying to promote the caste/community for a pretty long time here. Ekdalian (talk) 17:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Plz add Juglani Baloch — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.126.86.87 (talk) 02:25, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Chetavani ra Chungatya moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chetavani ra Chungatya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Isudan Gadhvi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isudan Gadhvi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isudan Gadhvi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheWikiholic (talk) 07:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Hy

Plz mujhse contact kare meri Gmail nikhilkavia04@gmail.com Nikxkav44 (talk) 17:29, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Natrayat Charans

Hello, Krayon95. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Natrayat Charans, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alhaji Barhath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trader.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Isudan Gadhvi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isudan Gadhvi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isudan Gadhvi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 08:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Natrayat Charans

Hello, Krayon95. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Natrayat Charans".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Subhash Charan

Hello, Krayon95. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Subhash Charan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swami Swarupadas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disciple.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Ambadan Rohadiya moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ambadan Rohadiya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gazal world (talk) 14:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Subhash Charan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Subhash Charan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhash Charan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 06:05, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Charans

Hi, you are very keen on documenting Charans. Unfortunately, despite now having around 2500 edits, you seem not to have learned much about how to do it. I seem still to be fixing problems that you have created, most recently at List of Charans. I think perhaps you should read my edit summaries there. - Sitush (talk) 17:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Perhaps also read WP:OVERCITE and please, where possible, prefer reliable English-language sources to anything in Hindi etc. And use page numbers: it is an absolute nightmare having to clean up after you. - Sitush (talk) 17:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

@Sitush. Hi, I was going to add page numbers, just takes some time to check sources again. Btw, the sources do identify them as members of the community. I will add with proper citation. Thank you. Krayon95 (talk) 17:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

If they are living, they must self-identify in the source. And despite what you may think, Gadhvi is not Charan - even some of the sources you cite call them "sister castes", which doesn't mean the terms are interchangeable. - Sitush (talk) 18:00, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

"If they are living, they must self-identify in the source."—Agree.

"And despite what you may think, Gadhvi is not Charan"—It is one of the titles, used interchangeably with the caste name. You can check the Gadhavi article.

I understand that surname can't be used as identification of caste. Thanks. Krayon95 (talk) 18:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC)