July 2010

edit

Hi. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies of neutral point of view and verifiability before making further changes such as those you've made to John Birch Society. Thank you. --jpgordon::==( o ) 04:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Erotic humiliation, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 01:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Facial (sex act). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Mutinus (talk) 01:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Oral sex. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Mutinus (talk) 02:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. me_and 18:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Supreme Court of the United States, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

You made the changes twice, even though I reverted you the first time, but you apparently didn't read the edit summary I provided in the reversion. You should also use edit summaries when you make changes to articles, as you have been previously advised.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:30, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010

edit

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Keynesian economics. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. LK (talk) 08:33, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Keene Pumpkin Festival, did not appear to be constructive. While you removed the edits, in the future please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NECRATSpeak to me 07:15, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Maine has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles; use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Diannaa (Talk) 06:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. –BMRR (talk) 22:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2011

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. causa sui (talk) 16:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

October 2012

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Lara Logan, you may be blocked from editing. – Wdchk (talk) 02:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Reply