March 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Talk:2020 Delhi riots, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The article summarizes what independent reliable sources say about the event. If those sources are not being accurately summarized, please detail the specific errors. If you don't like what the sources say, you will need to take that up with the sources. Do not suggest in your posts that people are guilty of crimes unless they have been convicted in a court of law, the court of public opinion does not count. 331dot (talk) 18:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Important Notice

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

March 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 03:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 331dot (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I've removed your access to this page due to your vulgar and uncivil postings which are inappropriate for any public forum. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I wasn't unfair to you. I told you how you could proceed, you instead chose to be disruptive and later vulgar, instead of collaborating with others. If you want to wage nationalistic and religious battles, Wikipedia is not the place for you. 331dot (talk) 09:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply