User talk:Koavf/Archive030
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Koavf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I prefer if you respond on my talk page; I will respond on yours. Please let me know if you want otherwise.
By the way, I'm not an admin—once a month, I get a request for admin help. See WP:AN.
Flag of Western Sahara
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Flag of Western Sahara". Thank you. -- Nightw 07:55, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:History of steamboats in Louisville, Kentucky
Category:History of steamboats in Louisville, Kentucky, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:18, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Userbox nominations at TfD
I see you've nominated another handful of userboxes ({{User html5}}, {{User haskell-0}}, {{User cobol-0}} for instance) at TfD. As you should know by now, userboxes go to MfD regardless of what namespace they're in. Nominating them in the wrong place just causes more work for closing administrators as they inevitably have to be re-listed at the right place. If you're using a script to nominate unused templates en masse (which seems likely), please be sure to check the output each time in future. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 08:55, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Template:UnitedStates-stub listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:UnitedStates-stub. Since you had some involvement with the Template:UnitedStates-stub redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Kumioko (talk) 17:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Koavf, can you check, please, is it enough now?KremBrule (talk) 10:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
You have new messages at User talk: Thumperward
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
~Alison C. (Crazytales) 19:37, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello, my name is Kali and I am part of Wadewitz' L376 class! I hope I'm doing this right! 134.68.45.179 (talk) 20:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks a lot, Justin. I'm really happy. Thanks again for your help on it. :-) Moisejp (talk) 05:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Move back
With all due respect to your in-good faith move of All That is Heavy, the legal, official name of the company has a lowercase "is" (irritating as that may be to the grammatically prudent). So if you could move it back, that'd be marvelous. Thank ya, MusicLover650 (talk) 23:46, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Good selection on the WP templates
I just wanted to tell you that was a good selection of templates you selected. I disagreed with 2 and added 2 more to the list but you must have been reading my mind cause I was thinking about submitting some of those myself. --Kumioko (talk) 00:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Surpassed templates
I see the "American" templates that you have been nominating for deletion have simply been surpassed (merged if you will) - A G6. Technical deletion would apply to most of them. Could just add {{db-g6|rationale=Surpassed Parameters of this template have been integrated into Template:WikiProject United States}}. This may make things faster for you.Moxy (talk) 04:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In C'mon (Low album), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Composition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In In the Name of My Father – The Zepset – Live from Electric Ladyland, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Medley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hey, just wanted to let you know, you got messages two days in a row due to a bug in DPL bot. It's only supposed to message a particular user a maximum of once every five days; I've shut down the bot for now and won't restart it until it's fixed. --JaGatalk 14:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Flag-map
Hello, I wrote to you asking. You have created SVG flag-map of Morocco, I like the SVG flag map. But the problem is that I do not know SVG graphics. That's why I asked you, could you create SVG flag-map of Greater Morocco and Flag-map of Lesotho (last flag)? Дмитрий-5-Аверин (talk) 14:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Rawabi
Hi, what about including the article Rawabi in the Wiki Project Palestine? I am not a member and don't know if I can put the tag. -- Pevos (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- Fine, tnx -- Pevos (talk) 18:05, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Kai Lu (author)
Hi, I'm still new to writing Wikipedia articles (I've only written one) so I don't know where exactly to type my comments. My first article (about the author Kai Lu) was nominated for deletion and I am requesting that the nomination be removed. My article has been cleaned up per removal of any text that may be construed as opinion. I want the article to stand because the author Kai Lu is well-known and respected in the West Hollywood, CA (and elsewhere) LGBT community not only for literary work but also for contributions to community organizations. I'm in the process of gathering additional empirical evidence to enhance this article (and others which I will write about notable LGBT people, which will be my own, personal project :-) and am requesting that it be allowed to stand, as this person is living and thus the page will be dynamic - Mina Starsforminerva (talk) 22:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Jstor article
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
--Ratzer (talk) 09:01, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Koavf, you wrote I should remind you. Greetings,--Ratzer (talk) 22:20, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Category:Songs produced by Sufjan Stevens
No doubt you would have picked the CfD nomination at WPAlbums or WPSongs where I also notified, but just for completeness, I am posting here too. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 12:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have made a further comment at Songs produced by Sufjan Stevens. You may wish to respond. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Campus ambassador for spring
Justin, no need to reapply; simply let Chanitra know you'd like to continue (since she's our Indiana rep). Unless you didn't do so well, I don't think you'll be denied. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) 18:52, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Flag of Western Sahara RfC
Hi Justin, this is just to let you know that the RfC is up at Talk:Flag of Western Sahara#Request for comment: Article content. I thought you would probably want to copy your comment over from User:Mr. Stradivarius/Flag of Western Sahara RfC, but I'll leave this for you to do as the RfC text has changed slightly since you made it. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 14:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi again. I saw that you copied your comment over. You will probably want to change the wording of it too, as moving Flag of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic to Flag of Western Sahara has since become one of the options (option 2). It's up to you, though, of course. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 16:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Children's Museum update
It's time again to share the latest news on the Children's Museum of Indianapolis Wikipedia project! In the last few months we have been busy with our third image donation, which was made up of 150 images that were professionally photographed specifically for this upload. We are asking for volunteers to categorize these images and distribute them into Wikipedia articles. Your help is appreciated! Check them out here.
We have also donated our first video and a second GLAM-Wiki Infographic to Commons. In September we were thrilled to welcome Jimmy Wales to the museum. Following our successful Edit-a-Thon and Translate-a-Thon in August, translations have continued with the help of the established QRpedia community, (particularly Russian translations thanks to Lvova!) We have begun to analyze our implementation of QRpedia codes and completed an extensive case study. In November we presented at the Museum Computer Network conference about how museums can effectively collaborate with Wikipedia. You can see more details on the Prezi.
In more general news, in addition to serving as the Children's Museum's Wikipedian-in-Residence, it was recently announced that I will be taking on the role of US Cultural Partnerships Coordinator for the Wikimedia Foundation. In this role I will be working to streamline the process of connecting interested US GLAMs with the Wikipedia community. If you have any questions or suggestions, feel free to let me know. Be sure to sign up for This Month in GLAM to keep up with the latest GLAM-Wiki news from around the world (subscribe).
We have a listing of High Need and Moderate Need requests on the Ways to Help section on the project page. I encourage you to lend a hand if you're able. While the Children's Museum partnership continues to truck along, we still are in desperate need of volunteers to help disperse our images and update and maintain content. Thank you for your time and help. Happy holidays! LoriLee (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Speedy deletion declined: As Forever: A Manifesto Of Fractured Imagination And Wreckless Living
Hello Koavf. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of As Forever: A Manifesto Of Fractured Imagination And Wreckless Living, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Though the letter of A9 is followed, Robert Pollard is a notable musician, and with that, I don't think this is what A9 is meant for. you could consider AfD instead. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Collaboration for WL.
Hey there Koavf. I saw the note you made on the WikiLeaks article about wanting to make the article in to GA status. I have been following much of what WL has been doing via the media etc and am quite interested about it. In summary, I would be happy to help. Write back if you are still interested in pursuing this. Cheers!Calaka (talk) 03:37, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Season's tidings!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:26, 25 December 2011 (UTC).
Merry Christmas!
Happy new year! | |
We wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year! Pass a Method talk 20:39, 25 December 2011 (UTC) |
Please note that I have converted your PROD of the above article to an AfD, due a prior PROD of the article. (I had originally proposed the article's deletion shortly after it was created, which was disputed by the original author.) Singularity42 (talk) 04:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Nice to see
the Category talk:Manfred Mann EPs suddenly appear, since several of those articles and covers came from my record collection. Life is good. Einar akaCarptrash (talk) 00:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, they could use some help for sure. A quick look at the histories show that I started 6 out of the 7 articles, so I am not sure that I have much more to add. I will look around one more time. Carptrash (talk) 00:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
New Year's greetings
Happy new year, and I hope to begin that long-promised collaboration with you sometime soon! WesleyDodds (talk) 09:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- You mentioned New Adventures in Hi-Fi as a potential collaboration, but might, say, Lifes Rich Pageant or Green be of interest to you instead? WesleyDodds (talk) 11:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'll leave it up to you to pick between the two. I will say that LRP has the distinct advantage of having a thinner amount of sources available that discuss it, making it easier to be comprehensive about it (for example, as far as I know it's only ever charted in two countries, and has sales certified only in the US, all due to the band's cult status at the time and IRS' less-than-stellar overseas distribution). But it really comes down to which is more interesting for you. WesleyDodds (talk) 01:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- You do have a point regarding the Green background. I was mainly thinking in terms of which album I like more, and thus which would keep me better engaged. In light of your argument, Green would be more interesting to work on. Before we start, shall we plan out a course of action between the two of us? About the only thing I ask at this stage is that since there doesn't appear to be an established citation style currently for the page, that we utilize the straightforward no-ref-template style I prefer to use, since I find it far easier to work with and manipulate. WesleyDodds (talk) 03:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- I have the Buckley book and the R.E.M. Companion on-hand. I also have the '96 version of It Crawled from the South, but as that has a more fannish bent and a number of outright errors I try to use it as little as possible. I'm going to review my sources and you probably want to do the same. Which books do you have? WesleyDodds (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Black and Buckley look like what we should rely on the most. How about we work progressively from Recording production to release using Buckley/Black as our main sources, then go back when we are finished and add what is imperative from the remaining sources? So we don't bump into each other, I think I might start on the "music" section, as I tend to have a knack for those. Also, I like that Buckley has chart placings and sales certs in the back, so I think I'll just pop in the cites he provides, and then you add anything that might be missing. I'd recommend covering sales figures and certifications solely in the prose without a table as there are so few, but if you feel strongly about including the table I won't object in this instance. Also, it'd probably be sensible to copy stuff I cited in the Green paragraph in R.E.M., since that gives us the basics about the album which we won't have to dig for. WesleyDodds (talk) 06:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- I have the Buckley book and the R.E.M. Companion on-hand. I also have the '96 version of It Crawled from the South, but as that has a more fannish bent and a number of outright errors I try to use it as little as possible. I'm going to review my sources and you probably want to do the same. Which books do you have? WesleyDodds (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- You do have a point regarding the Green background. I was mainly thinking in terms of which album I like more, and thus which would keep me better engaged. In light of your argument, Green would be more interesting to work on. Before we start, shall we plan out a course of action between the two of us? About the only thing I ask at this stage is that since there doesn't appear to be an established citation style currently for the page, that we utilize the straightforward no-ref-template style I prefer to use, since I find it far easier to work with and manipulate. WesleyDodds (talk) 03:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'll leave it up to you to pick between the two. I will say that LRP has the distinct advantage of having a thinner amount of sources available that discuss it, making it easier to be comprehensive about it (for example, as far as I know it's only ever charted in two countries, and has sales certified only in the US, all due to the band's cult status at the time and IRS' less-than-stellar overseas distribution). But it really comes down to which is more interesting for you. WesleyDodds (talk) 01:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
There's about five pages in the Buckley book that dealt with the album specifically; there's a few more about the Green tour. The main thrust for the Music section looks like it's going to be: Stipe told the band to write fewer "R.E.M.-type songs", experimentation present, first appearance of Buck on mandolin, originally envisioned as half-electric and half-acoustic, album considered somewhat haphazard--even by Scott Litt. Buckley also points out three primary stylistic types the songs from the record can be filed under. So all that is what I'm going to build the section around--let me know if you find anything else regarding the music you think is worth incorporating. WesleyDodds (talk) 06:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll start on a Music section. I'll make the header first so I can work on it in case you want to edit another section around the same time and we won't mess up each other's edits. WesleyDodds (talk) 06:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Just to mention it now (we can figure it out later), you know I'm not a fan of "Release history" sections that rely on big non-inline cited tables to merely present formats and catalog numbers. Would you consider first covering the release details in prose sticking to what is commented on by our main third-party sources (the books, mainly), and then deciding to spin it off into its own section again if there is enough material after that is finished to warrant it? Mind you, we can address this topic way further down the line, after we take care of other sections first; I don't intend to touch the Release History section it until we agree on what to do. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Question: do you want me to start rewriting the Background and Recording section and you follow my lead, or shall we just each edit as we please and work it out as we go along? Just wondering as I'm almost ready from move on from the Music section for now. WesleyDodds (talk) 06:51, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, just want to make sure we're on the same page! I must say, this collaboration is working out pretty well so far. If only we didn't butt heads so much before! WesleyDodds (talk) 07:21, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- I naturally need to add info about Stipe's lyrics for the album, but the core of the Music section is about complete. What do you think so far? WesleyDodds (talk) 08:04, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I don't have a copy of Reveal with me at the moment, so I can only view it on Google Books. Naturally, some of the pages are unavailable. I'm starting on the recording details, but it looks like what I can't see (on pages 140-148) discusses the demos leading up to the proper sessions. Can you add material that looks worthwhile from those pages to the article? It doesn't need to be tip-top shape; get the basic points down and I'll polish them and pair down as necessary. I wouldn't be too precious about trying to stick to the uncited prose currently in the article--you're better off writing new prose from scratch. WesleyDodds (talk) 12:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Removal of Chicken Rhythms from the 'Debut albums' category
Hi. I see you removed Chicken Rhythms from the 'Debut albums' category. Was there any particular reason for this? I see there are still in excess of 8,700 albums in this category, and can see no mention on the talk page of it being demised. Thanks. Julianhall (talk) 12:09, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response. I didn't know it was a sub-category. Julianhall (talk) 14:44, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Page and Plant No Quarter Re-release.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Page and Plant No Quarter Re-release.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Debut albums
Hello. I see that it is a new development that instead of Category:Debut albums, there are new offshot categories of [[:Category:[year] debut albums]]. You have been adding the year to debut albums categories on a lot of pages, and thank you for doing that. I picked up on this activity because many of the pages on my watchlist are affected. One aspect of this change that has not been taken care of as much, however, is the leaving behind of theCategory: Debut albums</nowiki>. I've taken away, from my watchlist, many of the debut album categorizations that are now not needed on the articles, in favor of the newly instilled categories with greater specificity. If the debut album category could be removed alongside the specifying of the year articles, that would be nice. Thank you and cheers. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 07:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, so the redundant cat removal is pending. I see what's happening now. When I gave you that message, I hadn't received the memo that you were already doing it; my fault. Thank you. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 07:56, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- I came to ask about the same thing. Having read these comments, and your replies on User talk:Backtable I'm still confused as to what is supposed to be happening:-
- On Paris (Paris album) you changed "1976 albums" to "1976 debut albums" and left "debut albums"
On Brinsley Schwarz (album) you changed "1970 albums" to "1970 debut albums" and removed "debut albums" with an edit summary of "redundant cat".
- On Paris (Paris album) you changed "1976 albums" to "1976 debut albums" and left "debut albums"
- Is this difference an oversight? Or do different policies prevail on these two pages?
Nowhere on the page [[Category:Debut albums]], or its discussion page, does it say the category is redundant. Where does it say that it is? and how is an editor supposed to know to stop using a category, if it doesn't say so on the category page?
Arjayay (talk) 09:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)- I'm afraid I'm no clearer after your response; to repeat my fundamental questions:-
Where does it say the category is redundant?
How is an editor supposed to know to stop using a category, if it doesn't say so on the category page?
Arjayay (talk) 16:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)- Thanks for the clarification - Arjayay (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I'm no clearer after your response; to repeat my fundamental questions:-
- I came to ask about the same thing. Having read these comments, and your replies on User talk:Backtable I'm still confused as to what is supposed to be happening:-
Victory Gardens
Why are the CD liner notes not a valid reference for the track information on a CD?GullyWalker (talk) 13:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- I go along with your argument that liner notes should not need to be referenced if they are the only source and there is no unexpected information, other than the standard track names, times, etc. My primary purpose in including them is to prevent the article from being marked as unsourced. I think that banners such as the unsourced banner add to the impression that a Wikipedia article is incomplete or needs work, and add to an impression of unreliability when in fact the article really is substantially complete.GullyWalker (talk) 17:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I took your name in vain in this discussion. You may want to drop in and explain what you originally did which eventually resulted in the creation of this category. Mangoe (talk) 14:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Tony Gonzalez
Noticed that about a month ago you added him to the Category Vegan sportspeople. He's not a vegan. In his book The All-Pro Diet: Lose Fat, Build Muscle he expressed frustration with people calling him a vegan. He eats meat, mainly chicken fish and no more than 18 ounces of red meat. I read his book and did his diet, he's not a vegan.--Rockchalk717 (talk) 05:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello Koavf, a message Iv'e received from User:The Rambling Man about few George Orwell bibliography issues.
– HonorTheKing (talk) 08:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
I've received a note with some concerns over unreferenced sections in this list, due for main page next week. I was wondering if you'd have a look at it and maybe chat it over with User:Giants2008, User:GamerPro64 and User:WFCforLife. It does look like the list was promoted with several unreferenced sections, which is a mild concern right now. We need to resolve this as soon as possible. Cheers.
— The Rambling Man (talk) 08:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Rule of thumb
Hi Koavf, as a rule of thumb here, I would expect to see at least one reference for each section. There are no general refs (only external links) so what is referencing those sections without in-line citations? The Rambling Man (talk) 13:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, it may seem silly but that's often what people expect. Perhaps check with User:GamerPro64 to see what he is objecting to. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- Would you be kind enough to indicate if you intend to do anything about the unreferenced sections? Your recent edits appear to indicate that you aren't going to modify the page. Unfortunately, due to concerns from multiple editors, I will need to remove it from the TFL queue soon. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hello, just a courtesy note to let you know that due to the concerns of at least two editors regarding the referencing on the George Orwell bibliography, and your reluctance to work with them to fix their issues, I'll be replacing it in the TFL queue later today. Sorry that it's come to this but we can't afford to undermine the TFL work so far when at least two members of the FLC community are nervous about the quality standards of the list. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I'll happily re-schedule it, but I would really appreciate it if you and Giants and GamerPro64 could work together to ensure when I do, the same (or for that matter, any other) issues don't crop up. All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 08:02, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hello, just a courtesy note to let you know that due to the concerns of at least two editors regarding the referencing on the George Orwell bibliography, and your reluctance to work with them to fix their issues, I'll be replacing it in the TFL queue later today. Sorry that it's come to this but we can't afford to undermine the TFL work so far when at least two members of the FLC community are nervous about the quality standards of the list. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Would you be kind enough to indicate if you intend to do anything about the unreferenced sections? Your recent edits appear to indicate that you aren't going to modify the page. Unfortunately, due to concerns from multiple editors, I will need to remove it from the TFL queue soon. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
U2 province
I see you have added a province to U2, I have found the template you mentioned [1]. The problem with this is it doesnt take into account the fact that Irish provinces are not like Canadian ones or American states. I can see where the confusion would arise. Irish provinces are not that important any more and are very seldom used in common address or place discription. A more common example would be Irish addresses use counties a lot more than the USA or Canada. I have left examples on the U2 talkpage of other Irish artists and bands to show you. I hope this clears it up for you.Murry1975 (talk) 23:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gus dies.png
Thanks for uploading File:Gus dies.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Texline High School
Hi! Since Texline ISD only has one school, shouldn't Texline High School and Texline ISD be in the same article? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 22:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry... I may have meant to contact someone else... WhisperToMe (talk) 22:57, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
More information needed about File:New Multitudes.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:New Multitudes.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.
Please click here and do the following:
- Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
- Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.
If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.
Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Samael, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Angel of death and Seventh heaven (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Category: Sony Music Entertainment albums
Hi Koavf. I realized you have been using AWB for various label related categories. The aforementioned category should NOT contain any album articles directly, but rather it should rightfully contain subcategories to Sony Music labels, which in turn contain their respective albums. I hope you can see how this is much more proper. Also a general 'sony music albums' category for album articles would be forever terminally incomplete due to the tens of thousands of prospective albums from around the world and throughout the century that could be placed in there, defeating the purpose of categorizing in the first place. Imperatore (talk) 19:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ok I realize that my 'hundred of thousands' argument doesn't hold relevance to wikipedia categories on it's own, but what I was trying to infer is that a couple dozen albums thrown into the category is very random in a universe of potentially hundreds of notable articles, each of which can and should belong to other respective subcategories of the said category. Indeed, about 40 something articles have made it into the category, which is just total randomness. As for deciding to message you, it was on the basis of this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=In_the_Name_of_My_Father_%E2%80%93_The_Zepset_%E2%80%93_Live_from_Electric_Ladyland&action=historysubmit&diff=385110314&oldid=385110286, an article from which I recall having removed this category, as it belongs to Epic Records, for example. My mistake, by the way, you didn't use AWB, but HotCat. Basically 'Sony Music Entertainment' is the parent company and it operates through various labels, label groups, divisions, subsidiaries, national offices, etc., all of which operate and release content under their own names. Therefore there will almost never be an ambiguity that will result in an article solely belonging in 'Sony Music Entertainment albums'. Rather this category should group together all the record label album categories of the parent, Sony Music Entertainment, as subcategories. My apologies if my articulation isn't that clear; I'm not too familiar as to speak with precision regarding wikipedia categorization, but I can expand on the basics of Sony Music Entertainment company structure if you want me to further justify my reasoning. Imperatore (talk) 07:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Any further thoughts? I may look into using HotCat soon, in which case I will address the above issue. Thanks. Imperatore (talk) 23:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
George Orwell bibliography
Hi Justin,
Great work on the George Orwell bibliography. I think we've come to a simpler solution to the sourcing issues. Your thoughts would be appreciated here.
CfD Discussion
A CfD which you have been previously involved in has been proposed again at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_January_12#Category:National_Public_Radio. You are invited to participate in the current discussion. Frank | talk 01:27, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Simpsons project
Please do not that templates and project pages as part of the Simpsons wikiproject. This project only tags articles. Regards, Theleftorium (talk) 18:59, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- How do you de-active parameters? Theleftorium (talk) 19:06, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Canadian music project
Koavf, a friendly request? When you add banners to article/category talk pages using {{Canada}}, please be aware that there are currently 36 other projects that use this main banner. If I'm not mistaken, most of your edits (or at least the ones I've seen) are music related? I'm not asking you to be an expert on the template, just add the |music=yes parameter when adding the template. Thanks for your edits. I guess you're one of the few users that understands that the banner is key to article alerts and the wolterbot cleanup list. I've added the music project to Talk:Jack Richardson Producer of the Year Award. If you need anything from me, let me know. Thanks. Argolin (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- I tend to see your userid alot! I'm glad I am not alone in knowing the importance of the talk page project banner. I started tagging the Canadian music project early 2011 (I think?). I took a break from wiki but I'm back at it. I tend to stay within the Canada categories so it's more/less easy for me: Canada banner + Bio (musician) banner, + whatever genre of music. I'd have to say, don't worry too much about the prov/terr projects. I only add them to musicians/bands/music festivals (never albums/songs). In fact, if you like, rate/assess the article leaving those blank for the Canada project: as long as you use music=yes, I'll see the article. I tend to always fix the Canada banner anyway. Since talking with you, I've found that the Canada people have added St. John's and there may be an error in the documentation of the template. Thanks a lot!(lol) Later... Argolin (talk) 08:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Removing cats
Hi. I'm afraid I don't understand some of your edits I came across just now. If someone is born in, say, France, of Jewish heritage, and then moves to the US and becomes a US citizen, then both the categories "French Jews" and "American Jews" are appropriate. one because of their birthplace, and the other because of their citizenship -- so I don't understand why you're removing "American Jews" from articles as part of a "diffusion". Could you please explain to me the rationale behind the removal? Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
File:EU-49.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EU-49.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :Jay8g Hi!- I am... -What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 14:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Yo put a split tag on The Beach Boys solo discography and said you were going to split this article in a deletion debate. Are you going to? if not, can I remove the tag? Op47 (talk) 20:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
I am sorry, I was reading more into the talk pages than was there. Since you have a clear idea of what is wanted then it would be best if you did it. At the moment, I am trying to clear up the backlog of split tags. I will do the obvious remove cases and easy ones first. If you haven't had time when I come to the harder ones then I will have a go. I do not think I can say fairer than that Op47 (talk) 15:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello
Hi there, this is Kida5887 from Adrianne Wadewitz's Young Adult Lit course. I am new to the editing world of Wikipedia, but I am certainly no stranger to using it. I've always wondered what it takes to edit, and never realized it is so easy. I will let you know if I have any trouble. A question: What made you start editing Wikipedia? Also, I must mention that you have a righteous beard. That is all. Kida5887 (talk) 17:38, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Introduction
Hello, I am in Adrianne Wadewitz's Literature for Adolescents class, so I am introducing myself. This is my first experience editing Wikipedia and I hope to continue editing after the class is over, so I hope to learn as much as I can throughout this course. Thanks for being there to help. Crazykaystar (talk) 20:51, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Intro
Hey, this brief introduction is for my Adolescent class. My name is Mike and I am somewhat new to using Wikipedia... Hope I did it right! Thanks dmbfan85Dmbfan85 (talk) 15:15, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia 2 Assignment
Just introducing myself for the Literature for Adolescents class! HaddaBeMe (talk) 20:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia Assignment 2
Hi! I'm part of Adrianne Wadewitz's Literature for Adolescents class and I was told to introduce myself on here. My name is Allie and I'm completely new to the editing part of Wikipedia, but I'm not all new at editing in general. I sure hope I did this right. Dreams-in-Shadows (talk) 03:28, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
WikiAssi2
Hello! My name is Kali and I'm in Adrianne Wadewitz' L376 class. I'm introducing myself to you as part of an assignment. Thanks for helping our tutoring sessions--I'll be coming to you and Ms.Burk for help, I'm sure. LoversSpat (talk) 20:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Wiki Assignment 2
Hey Justin! My name's Ryan and it looks like you're one of our class ambassidors. You have an awesome user page. I love the Kurt Vonnegut quote! JustBreve (talk) 00:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Honourable mention?
Hello,
After conferring with someone else about the etiquette of these things, I think it would be polite to let you know that I've referred to you in while responding toan incident report and also in the previous conversation that led to it. I didn't refer to you by name, but I did refer to your actions a couple of times. It's of course entirely up to you whether you want to express an opinion on any of the goings on. Orfeocookie (talk) 23:59, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, perhaps should have been clearer. I was dealing with someone who basically shut down discussion on the grounds that I was new. I then realised that last year, you had raised the same point that I had - you put a banner on the article suggesting it was very long and consideration should be given to breaking it up into smaller articles. He deleted it just 5 minutes later. So essentially your involvement consists of me having used you as an example to show that I'm not just making crazy trouble off the top of my head, but trying to raise a concern that other, more experienced editors have shared. That was all. Orfeocookie (talk) 01:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- Entirely up to you, but I suggest your very first move is to explain the new tag you added or else it will be a red rag to a bull and I will be blamed for it! Best place to do that is probably the discussion taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orfeocookie (talk • contribs) 02:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
I did some minor editing on Ghost on the Canvas.
It would be nice to have the article at GA status in time for this month's awards. I would guess that talented WP editors would love to work on this article and on Glen Campbell, out of appreciation for GC. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 14:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, the template is nominated for deletion, because it is just in two articles right? But please don't delete the template. Because I'll put the template over 10 to 15 before the end of this February. please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZZ47 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Srry, I can't understand this userfying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZZ47 (talk • contribs) 12:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Love at the Bottom of the Sea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Folk-pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Counting Crows - Underwater Sunshine (Or What We Did On Our Summer Vacation).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Counting Crows - Underwater Sunshine (Or What We Did On Our Summer Vacation).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Template rename
Hi. Can you help. You seem to know templates (see below). Do you know how to propose a template rename in this case to something consistent with visible title of the Template?
- cf. 00:19, 5 February 2012 (diff | hist) Template:Kehuna and Kohanim (Undid revision 474530084 by Koavf (talk)y not?)
- In ictu oculi (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks very much! I'll try and work that out. If I get into difficulty I'll ask you. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar for you
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
I am awarding you this barnstar for your excellent contributions in our beloved Wikipedia. Faizanalivarya (talk) 14:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC) |
Moby
Hello Koavf, I've just removed Moby from the "American Christians" category (third time I think); there's a discussion on his talk page. (Chorleypie (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC))
- Thanks for the reply, but I wasn't thinking about the lack of a source. The problem is we have sources where Moby says he's a Christian and others where he says he isn't. It's ambiguous so I think we need to leave him out of this category. (Chorleypie (talk) 23:04, 13 February 2012 (UTC))
John Dies at the End (film)
Hi, there! Could you please clarify why you removed these five categories from John Dies at the End (film)? Also, HotCat has a multi-change mode – it's the (++) link just after the word 'Categories' – that you can use when adding, removing or changing more than one category. Thanks, -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- I see, now. I was wondering primarily about Category:American black comedy films and I hadn't realized that it was a parent to Category:American comedy horror films. Thanks for explaining! Best, -- Black Falcon (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Underwater Sunshine (Or What We Did On Our Summer Vacation), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Amie, Ooh La La and Dawes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar
Pleasure is mine to award you Branstar Justin, you really deserve it, well I would also appreciated by someone as well. --Faizanalivarya (talk) 14:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Article titles involving Haydn and Mozart
Hello Koafv, article titles like "Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Joseph Haydn" are extremely awkward and make Wikipedia look bad. Would you kindly put in a few minutes to undo these changes? Thanks very much. Opus33 (talk) 18:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Dates
Hi. Please don't change the format of the date pages as you have done at November 18 without first discussing the change to consensus at WT:DAYS. The date articles all have a consistent format and any change should be discussed. Making a random change to one article creates a lot of work for other editors in reverting the change. If you have any questions, please ask. Swayback Maru Mufka's alternate account (talk) 20:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Okay I honestly don't know how I created work for anyone else, but the problem is that your revert (and the one following) broke a bunch of interwiki links. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- The extra work didn't come from that particular revert, it came when you had changed the format a while back. Since there were intervening edits, the fix had to be done manually. My mistake for breaking the interwikis. My text editor did that. Thanks. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 10:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Rating template
There are replies to your request at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Suggested edit to template and creation of tracking category about {{Rating}}. Please clarify there what is required, as the template already displays fractional halves. — Richardguk (talk) 15:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice
Thank you for the advice which you left on my talk page. As you suggested, I have now left my comments on the talk page of Otto Rank. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 22:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
When you said that the category was "barren", were you thinking of the fact that it had only been viewed 63 times in the past 30 days, and that the talk of the category had only been viewed four times in the past 30 days? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 22:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Invitation to events: bot, template, and Gadget makers wanted
I thought you might want to know about some upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, extending functionality with JavaScript, the future of ResourceLoader and Gadgets, the new Lua templating system, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.
Check out the Chennai event in March, the Berlin hackathon in June, the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC, or any other of our events.
Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page at mediawiki.org. Sumanah (talk) 14:44, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Category:Service award templates
I created that discussion today in TIL. Currently, it's 3 on the TIL page. Go tell everybody in the discussion you're the 2nd most BA MFer on Wikipedia :)
comments at Bahá'í Faith in Morocco
and the talk page - care to comment? Smkolins (talk) 22:10, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- btw I was doing research and came across this - is this ... um... legal? [2] Smkolins (talk) 00:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Categories of Du Bois
Hi. Re categories for W. E. B. Du Bois ... you removed Category:African American writers, but that seems legitimate. Am I missing something? --Noleander (talk) 04:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, that kind of makes sense. I've added the cat Category:African American novelists since he did publish five novels, and that is a bit more specific than "writer" or "philosopher". Thanks for helping out with the article. It is my first FA article. --Noleander (talk) 04:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Koavf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |