User talk:Kepler-1229b/Archive 3

Why did you edit my edits? I connected two existing pages, Mt Nephin as a filming location in the movie Wild Mountain Thyme. I respecfully request you revert your correction, or provide an indication, ANY indication, as to why that is in violation of any policies within Wikipedia. thanks, I guess. Shihad x (talk) 23:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I have reported this false flag as follows;

Username Shihad x (talk · contribs) (filter log) Page you were editing Wild Mountain Thyme (film) (filter log) Description I created a link between the geographical wiki page for Mt Nephin, to the movie media page for Wild Mountain Thyme (film). User:Kepler-1229b, an astrometric contributor, with a large history of editing pages, totally unrelated to his area of expertise, 25 edits alone on 5 Feb, indiscriminately, reverted it. Looking at the pages that he has edited/reverted, he is clearly trolling Wikipedia. My only intent was to connect pages that already existed within the encyclopedia. To have them reverted by a "troll", is in total contrast to the intent of the encyclopedia Date and time 23:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Comments

I am not a troll, simply another editor who reverts vandalism. If my revert on your edit was wrong, I apologize for my mistakes. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 00:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

You OVERLY report what you consider to be "vandalism", as if you have nothing better to do than "troll" edit pages on wikipedia, and falsly think you are contributing to the platform. you are NOT. with over 50 edits, today alone, I can only surmise, that you have nothing better to do, than troll wikipedia, and due to your undeserved issue of "editor", you falsly post reversions/edits/deletes. Again, I ask, what Term of Service violation did i commit, in tying two existing wiki pages together, ie, the geographical page for Nephin to the media page for Wild Mountain Thyme (film). That connection could in NO way be misconstrued as "malicious", or "detrimental" to Wikipedia? ERGO, restore my edits please, OR, explain, in no uncertain terms, how you, as, in my words alone are a Troll editor, my edits could possibly be construed as "Vandalism"

I make some constructive edits too. I will try to restore your edits. Also I am not a troll. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 01:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

By all means, please DO restore my edits, but more importantly, please give me SOME indication, as to how and why, you could have POSSIBLY seen them as "Vindaloos"? Your unfiltered view has GREAT impact on how people contribute to the encyclopedia, and it is counterproductive, to have such a malicious editor, indiscriminately deleting/reverting honest user input. Revert your previous edit of my post, advise as to why it was vindaloos, or let me know, that repeated edits will NOT be reverted/deleted. My protest to the WikipediaEdit filter/False positive page remains Shihad x (talk) 01:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Review of your user page, makes it clear that you are trying to pad your "Novice Editor" status up to "Apprentice Editor" status. Hint, it is not, and should not, be, the number of edits you make, regardless of there significance. Advice, remove your edit bot, and concentrate on making real and substantive edits. Shihad x (talk) 01:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Original Barnstar
		message I would like to thank you for your consistent contributions on exoplanets. Cheers!

yeah, not congratulating you on ANYTHING

I am going to do my all, to ensure that, a "novice" editor, never becomes an "apprentice" editor. To push me off this path, all you have to do is describe how a post that links two existing pages, was vandalous, just advise me, senor "Novice Editor", how I failed wikipedia? How could it be possible that you "commennted/reverted/deleted over 50 posts" in a single day, if you are NOT just trolling updates to wikipedia pages to pad your resume,, to advance your editor status from "novice" (which even that is a a TOTAL stretch) to Apprentice? Shihad x (talk) 01:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I am not trying to become an Apprentice Editor, nor am I a troll. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 01:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Also, I am not a bot operator, nor am I a bot. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

explain please, How and Why, my edit got reverted? Thats all I ask, what mechanics resulted in the reversion? if it wasn't a Bot, then it was consciosly done, by you. Please explain Why that would occur. I'll gladly drop it, I see that you have reverted it, but i still want to know Why it was ever reverted in the first place. Advise and explain, or the protest remains. I'm just trying to get smarter. Shihad x (talk) 02:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I may have mistakenly reverted a constructive edit. If so, I apologize for my mistakes, if any. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Why are you refusing to explain How and Why the edit occurred? i get that you apologized, and I thank you for that, but until I get the "How did this occur, Why did this occur" I can't accept the apology. again, thanks for reverting the revision, but I still want to know how and why it occurred, without that,, I cant make more meaningful edits to Wikipedia, and I don't want to have to deal with this again. Answer the question! How did the reversion occur, Why did the revision occur? Shihad x (talk) 02:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

The revision occurred because I was reverting vandalism and I may have mistakenly reverted a few edits which were not vandalism. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Oh, shame shame shame. I shared a google earth location of the "Mulroney" farm, and you deleted it. Sorry, Google earth is open source, and so is my posting of that location. restore it, or continue to receive my wrath

What are you talking about? 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

look, my original post included a Google Earth link to the location in the movie of the "Mulroney" farm, your repost, ie, undo of my revision, omits it. PUT IT BACK!

What post? 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

In my original post to Wild Mountain Thyme, I had a link to the existing Wiki page for Mt Nephin, and a google earth link, listed as "here" to the Mulroney farm page. You deleted the original edit, for as yet reasons unknown, and when you attempted to "restore" your "mistake", you neglected to include the Google Earth page link to the Mulroney Farm. I want it restored, or a Really good reason why it shouldn't be. All open source, all relevant to the pages.

Okay then. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

"Ok then" isn't good enough, restore the original page as I updated it, that hasn't happened yet

I am about to do that. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 03:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 03:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Great, and Thanks, I see the reversion, but i still INSIST, how and why, did the original revision take place. Failure to provide an explanation of the how and why, will continue my protest of your account

Please see above. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 03:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I've looked "Above", and can only see that you "detected" Vandalism, and then reverted your revision when you determined it WASN'T Vandalism. So, I guess you need me to be more specific. What alerted you to my "supposed" issue of Vandalism, and why would you act on it BEFORE you researched it? Why did you incorrectly assume it was Vandalism, whereby upon further reflection, determine it WASNT vandalism. When you assume an act is "Vandalous", without researching, you put honest users in the position, as is this, of having to defend, for HOURS, the honesty of there reporting and posting. Take this from this exchange, If you want to be an "amateur reviewer", then at least give the appropriate time and resource to that endeavor. From my point of view, you haven't done that, YET.Shihad x (talk) 03:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Thankyou for the LAST WORD, as your actions were indefensible. Shihad x (talk) 04:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Shihad, WP:DROPTHESTICK. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 04:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll WP:DROPTHESTICK, when you DROP the pretense of being a responsible editor of wikipages.Shihad x (talk) 05:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Uw-useless1

Why did you create Template:Uw-useless1 exactly? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 18:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

For a reason. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 19:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

As the template seems to be a self-reference, I have removed it. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The template is not a self-reference. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 15:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)