Kelly Marie 0812
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Kelly Marie 0812 has not edited Wikipedia since June 3, 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| Please leave a . |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Help needed edit
Hey Kelly. Long time no talk. I've just taken on a huge article and I can't do it all alone. I know you're specifically editing GH articles, but if possible, could you help me find sources for: The Bold and the Beautiful secondary characters? GH is near perfect compared to B&B articles, which are the worst atm. I'd really appreciate a little help for this article (just find sources for the actor playing the role or something). Thanks :), Arre 11:58, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- Of course! :) Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 14:38, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thankyou so much for your additions to the article:) means a lot. Arre 04:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- No problem! :) Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 04:20, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thankyou so much for your additions to the article:) means a lot. Arre 04:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Lucky Spencer expansion. edit
I absolutely love what you've done with the article; I had been meaning to do that, but I just never got around to it.--Nk3play2 my buzz 17:32, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks!! I still have a couple sections to add but I'm glad it's coming together :) Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:35, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - February 2013 edit
| ||||
| ||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Good Article Nominations Request For Comment edit
 At this time, Proposal 1, 3, and 5 have received full (or close to) support. If you have questions of anything general (not related to one specif proposal), please leave a message under the General discussion thread. Please note that Proposal 2 has been withdrawn and no further comments are needed. Also, please disregard Proposal 9 as it was never an actual proposal. |
New discussion edit
Hi Kelly! I've started a new discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas#Listing of former married names for female characters. I'd really appreciate your opinion! Regards, Creativity97 01:21, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Info-boxes edit
I know all General Hospital characters use Box2, however, the only thing about them that's annoying is the image field. It doesn't let you re-size the image file without having the "220px" etc... It looks very bulky and huge. I think this should be fixed. Arre 05:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- I don't mind the size either way. I just think the box that was discussed and adjusted at length should be used. As for the image I actually like the bigger version but won't oppose if everyone else wants to make it a little smaller. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 05:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:46, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 4 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of General Hospital characters (2000s), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingpin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:46, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Tequan Richmond edit
Hi there. :) I'm here hoping you would be able to support me in moving Tequan up to his contract position in the GH cast list. Another user won't let me move him up due to lack of a source and I tried to argue that SOD and the other typical sources don't always report the cast changes but he's been on contract since November in the credits and his Facebook and Twitter list him as a 'regular' on GH. Would you be willing to comment in the topic and back me up? I'd really appreciate it. --Alexisfan07 (talk) 08:04, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry I think there should be a source to make that change. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 06:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Help with Dante and Lulu?! edit
I really love what you did with the Lucky and Elizabeth article, and I've been working on an article for the Dante and Lulu pairing for in a sanbox. I was wondering if you'd be interested in helping me expand the article? It would really be a big help!--Nk3play2 my buzz 01:47, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Sure - anything specific you want me to do? Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 03:20, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well I actually like the way you discussed the development of the storyline in the history section instead of making it separate like we do in character articles. Also, you seem to have access to old articles, and since Dante and Lulu articles would be more recent, I figured they'd be easier to get a hold of, but I haven't had such luck, maybe you will.--Nk3play2 my buzz 14:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Okay - want me to edit in your sandbox? Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 15:44, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well I actually like the way you discussed the development of the storyline in the history section instead of making it separate like we do in character articles. Also, you seem to have access to old articles, and since Dante and Lulu articles would be more recent, I figured they'd be easier to get a hold of, but I haven't had such luck, maybe you will.--Nk3play2 my buzz 14:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Better source request for File:Rachel Ames as Audrey.png edit
Thanks for uploading File:Rachel Ames as Audrey.png. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback edit
Message added 17:55, 13 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:18, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Help test new SuggestBot design edit
We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:42, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Franco's picture??? edit
Before we get into an editing war, my issue with the picture you used for the Franco (General Hospital) article is the quality of the photo and the fact that his hand kind of hides his face. Are you consciously trying to find a picture that makes the character look a little unstable? If so, how about one of these?
http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/francogh1.jpg
http://cdn.blogs.sheknows.com/celebrityphotos.sheknows.com//2010/07/james-franco-gh.jpg
Cropped version: http://tvdeeva.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Franco-3.jpg
http://timeentertainment.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/95617149.jpg?w=480&h=320&crop=1
http://media.onsugar.com/files/2010/06/26/3/192/1922283/7228a15d2a9af8dd_Franco-GH.jpg
--Nk3play2 my buzz 19:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think the photo is that blurry when viewed in the infobox. The photos of him in a tux seem like any other picture of James Franco, same with the photo of him and the monkey once you crop it to what would be shown in an infobox. What I like about the photo I uploaded is that he's doing the wave that is a signature of the character, and looks "creepy" for lack of a better word, without going so far as the last photo you linked. I added a commons photo of Franco to casting which shows his face clearly. I can try to make a clearer still of the waving photo. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 19:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hm; I don't seem to remember him doing that "signature" wave that often, maybe I'm having memory lapse. But, I'll leave it alone, though I'd prefer a clearer picture.--Nk3play2 my buzz 19:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- I feel like he did it a lot the first couple times he was on, maybe by the end it wasn't as memorable. I'll make another screenshot and see if its clearer.Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 20:01, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hm; I don't seem to remember him doing that "signature" wave that often, maybe I'm having memory lapse. But, I'll leave it alone, though I'd prefer a clearer picture.--Nk3play2 my buzz 19:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Expanding the A. J. Quartermaine article???!!! edit
I was wondering if you could help expand that A. J. Quartermaine article similar to how you expanded the Lucky Spencer article.--Nk3play2 my buzz 23:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know as much about A.J. but I can help out a little. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 16:50, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, edit
Hello Kelly Marie 0812, I am SoapFan12, I don't want to sound like a stalker but I've seen a lot of you're contributions/edits and you are an amazing and fantastic editor. That's why I want a favour from you. I nominated the Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actress in a Drama Series for a featured list, however I received a lot of negative comments about the article. So, I was wondering if you could help me expand it. I would very much appreciated. Thank you for your comprehension. SoapFan12
- My initial reaction is that the imdb references definitely need to be replaced. I'll try to look for some. It'd be nice to have a good Emmy list article that the others could be cleaned up and mirrored after. I'm not super familiar with list formatting rules though. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 16:53, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- It's fine. Thank you so much for willing to help me. SoapFan12 18:15, 5 May 2013 (UTC)SoapFan12
- Thank you soo much!!!! The article looks amazing. You are a fantastic editor, in my opinion one of the best. Also, I was wondering if I could use the same references that you have use for the other categories? I want to clean up the other categories. Lastly, I need a last favour from you only if you wish. Can you help me expand the other categories lead? I'm not use to doing leads. It will be great help. Don't I will do the rest like the pictures and refrences. You've been help me, I very appreciated. Thank you again. 10:32, 6 May 2013 (UTC)SoapFan12SoapFan12
- As long as each reference also says the actor/actress you're using it for, not all of them said every winner/nominee. The leads take more research I'm not sure how many I'll be able to look at. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 11:46, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- Kelly Marie, It's fine. You could work on the leads when you're ready or when you want to. Like I said only if you wish. But it would be a great help. SoapFan12 18:35, 6 May 2013 (UTC)SoapFan12
- As long as each reference also says the actor/actress you're using it for, not all of them said every winner/nominee. The leads take more research I'm not sure how many I'll be able to look at. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 11:46, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you soo much!!!! The article looks amazing. You are a fantastic editor, in my opinion one of the best. Also, I was wondering if I could use the same references that you have use for the other categories? I want to clean up the other categories. Lastly, I need a last favour from you only if you wish. Can you help me expand the other categories lead? I'm not use to doing leads. It will be great help. Don't I will do the rest like the pictures and refrences. You've been help me, I very appreciated. Thank you again. 10:32, 6 May 2013 (UTC)SoapFan12SoapFan12
- It's fine. Thank you so much for willing to help me. SoapFan12 18:15, 5 May 2013 (UTC)SoapFan12
Nationality - Opinion edit
Hello Kelly Marie 0812, How are you? I was wondering if you are still working on the Emmys articles? Also, I've seen featured list articles to continue improving Outstanding Younger Actress and I saw that they add the nationality of the winners and nominees. Therefore, Should I add the nationality? SoapFan12 19:12, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yes I'll probably work on them some more. Which lists have nationality? My initial reaction is that it doesn't seem relevant to Emmy awards. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 17:40, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- The lists uses nationality are mostly Grammy Awards articles, also there is Academy Award for Best Actor however it is not a featured list. I know it doesn't seem relevant to Emmy awards however if we add it, won't the articles seem professional? Just suggestion but I have to agree with you, plus I'm adding more work for myself (LOL). Furthermore, I know that you mostly edit GH articles therefore do you watch it? I would love for us to share our opinions about the show sometimes. SoapFan12 05:56, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think they should be left off. The talk page of Academy Award for Best Actor has a long heated discussion about them being included, and reading MOS:FLAG it seems they are only appropriate when the subject is specifically representing their country, which for an Emmy Award I don't feel they are. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 15:44, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. Also I've been looking everywhere for reliable sources/references for the Emmys articles however I can't find some. Do you know where I can? Furthermore, I work on the awards and nominations of Kristen Alderson page. I would love to hear a feedback from you. SoapFan12 16:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think they should be left off. The talk page of Academy Award for Best Actor has a long heated discussion about them being included, and reading MOS:FLAG it seems they are only appropriate when the subject is specifically representing their country, which for an Emmy Award I don't feel they are. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 15:44, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- The lists uses nationality are mostly Grammy Awards articles, also there is Academy Award for Best Actor however it is not a featured list. I know it doesn't seem relevant to Emmy awards however if we add it, won't the articles seem professional? Just suggestion but I have to agree with you, plus I'm adding more work for myself (LOL). Furthermore, I know that you mostly edit GH articles therefore do you watch it? I would love for us to share our opinions about the show sometimes. SoapFan12 05:56, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
New discussion edit
Hi there, Kelly! I've begun a discussion here about titles for soap opera supercouple articles. Your opinion would be gladly appreciated! If you get the chance, could you contribute to the discussion? Thank you! Regards, Creativity97 21:57, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've made a suggestion to close the discussion. If you get the chance, could you comment? Thanks! Creativity97 01:34, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 14 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Hansen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Look edit
That is how he is listed in the credits, we just can't have TBA as a character, when RH returned to OLTL in 2011, he was listed as Man with Scar, well why can't RH be listed as The Man on this cast list, seriously? P.J. (talk) 22:12, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't see an issue with having TBA until a name is revealed, unless a reliable source publishes one. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 23:44, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
They pulled this when RH joined OLTL two years ago, except we can be certain he's not playing Todd Manning, but maybe Robert Frank, what do you think, I basically don't care about the TBA, I just thought it would look better with The Man in the character slot, but if you want it TBA than fine by me. But who do you think RH is playing? P.J. (talk) 02:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For your contributions in all U.S. soap pages including, you're hard work in developing the Emmy Awards articles. You're work is seen and really appreciated. SoapFan12 11:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC) |
How are you? Emmy Awards articles edit
Hey there, how are you? I haven't notice you on Wikipedia often. I hope everything is okay. So, I got another review for the Outstanding Younger Actress, with a long list of fixes. I fix all of them with the exceptions of two. Can you fix these two and the other ones that need to be fix for me? You will see what you can fix on for it's Featured list candidate page. Furthermore, I wonder if you are still on board on working on the Emmy Awards article? Don't forget it's only optional, I know you are really focusing on GH articles. I have messaged Arre 9, if she's on board on working altogether on getting at least 2 Emmy Award articles to become a featured list. I am currently waiting for her to respond. I hope you are willing. I am deeply sorry if I sound annoying. Have a nice weekend! SoapFan12 02:08, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- Never mind about fixing it. I already fixed it. SoapFan12 10:59, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions edit
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions edit
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Quick Question edit
Hello, sorry to other you but I would like o ask you a quick question. Does Courtney Matthews need her own Wikipedia page? She was only on for about 4 years and she wasn't an important character. There are some other characters who were on longer and more important and don't even have their own page. I think it would be more appropriate if her page was moved of to the General Hospital 2000's characters page. What do you think? Thank you for your time. Historylover18 ( talk) 21:23, 15 June 2013 (EST)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions edit
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions edit
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions edit
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kelly, how are you? I just wanted to say that your work on this article has really blown me away. I think with a few minor adjustments, it could become a good article! If you're interested in taking the article to the next step, I'd be happy to help you out. Again, WOW, great work! Regards, Creativity97 22:19, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
WP Soap Operas in the Signpost edit
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Soap Operas for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 12:55, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of T. J. Ashford for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article T. J. Ashford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. J. Ashford until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bigpoliticsfan (talk) 20:56, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Genie Francis as Laura Spencer.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Genie Francis as Laura Spencer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:32, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Meg Bentley's parents? edit
I noticed that you added the information about Meg Bentley's maiden name and parents. I did not see a source listed. I'd like to know where you got the information from and if you can link source.--Nk3play2 my buzz 03:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Herbst and Jackson 1998.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Herbst and Jackson 1998.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Vaughan as Lucky Cop.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Vaughan as Lucky Cop.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Jackson as Lucky Affair.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Jackson as Lucky Affair.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Young as Lucky rebel.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Young as Lucky rebel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:James Franco as Franco.png edit
Thanks for uploading File:James Franco as Franco.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Orphaned non-free image File:Kin Shriner as Scott Baldwin.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Kin Shriner as Scott Baldwin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kin Shriner as Scott Baldwin.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Kin Shriner as Scott Baldwin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kin Shriner as Scott Baldwin.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Kin Shriner as Scott Baldwin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. livelikemusic talk! 15:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Merge discussion notice edit
An article or articles that you have been involved in editing, r.e.: Soap Opera Digest Awards / Soapy Awards, has been proposed for a merge. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going >>>here<<<, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. -- HistoricalAccountings (talk) 14:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Spencer family return 1993.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Spencer family return 1993.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)